Boobs: Now We Know Why ‘Avatar’ Is So Stupid
by Tim SlagleSince I reviewed “Avatar” a couple months ago, James Cameron has gone on the defensive with the film’s multitudinous critics. The Right thinks the film is anti-business, anti-military, anti-human, anti-Western, and anti-American. One charge he actually LIKES is John Nolte’s remark that it is a “Death Wish” for leftists. Cameron claims, “Nature gets to fight back. It’s ‘Death Wish’ for environmentalists. When did nature ever get to fight back in a movie?” (Perhaps James missed “Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs.”) Meanwhile, Cameron seems to have ignored right-wing critics like myself who claim the film is stupid.

That’s what I want to see Cameron address. I could care less whether the film is a slam against corporations, makes America the villain, or if it treats the military as a bunch of hate-mongering thugs, None of this is new to Hollywood. They’ve been making movies like that for at least the past fifty years.
I think if he really had to defend the intelligence of the film he wouldn’t be able to do it. Cameron is ignoring critics who found the film as dumb as a Supermodel, because it is also the one charge that might sink his Oscar hopes. Academy members wouldn’t vote for a stupid picture, and unfortunately many aren’t smart enough to know that it was.
They’re used to being called a bunch of anti-corporate, new-agey, anti military, enviro-hippie liberals. (In fact they’re quite proud of it.) One thing that Hollywood hates is being accused of stupidity. Deep down, actors know they aren’t hired for their intelligence — it’s why they have writers.
Many actors are college dropouts. Hollywood cherishes youth, and college years are when youth is in full bloom. Those who haven’t found success by the time they’re 18, won’t squander the prime of their careers on something useless like higher learning. The ones who do finish college tend to major in Theatre, earning degrees that require little substantial knowledge. Some liberal actors, like Martin Sheen flunked out as early as high school.
This insecurity draws them to people like Al Gore and Barack Obama; a notion that their support of these purportedly brilliant men indicates a level of higher understanding. They almost think they can gain intelligence by osmosis, that by being in the company of genius some might rub off.
I wonder myself about Cameron’s intelligence. You would think he’d have to be fairly smart. Usually science fiction nerds and special effects geeks come from that percentile that spend their school years having lunch at the lonely table, alongside advanced math students and the chess club. So you would assume that his intellect is above and beyond this movie.
But then I saw a clue why the movie is so stupid. And it’s as plain as the nose on your face. Or more correctly: as plain as the breasts on Na’Vi women. In an interview with James Lipton, Cameron admitted it.
Back in December of 2009, in a Playboy article, the director acknowledged there was no biological need for the breasts. So why did he do it, asked Lipton? He replied “”Because this is a movie for human people.” Rather than make the aliens repulsive (as they were in “District 9”) he wanted to make them appealing. So he acknowledged that he put breasts on the Na’vi women for no other reason than to gain sympathy from humans. In other words, he knowingly pandered to the lowest common denominator.

He also bragged about how he programmed the computers so that Princess Neytiri’s feather necklace would always cover her nipples, to assure a PG-13 rating. It also made the film a two and three quarters hour strip tease for adolescent boys; who spent the entire film hoping for an errant breeze; a pair of aces from a stacked deck; a chance to glimpse the mysteries of life in three dimensional, seven-story IMAX glory. No wonder there were suicides after the movie was over.
It’s really kind of funny if you think about it. Because without breasts, Jake Sully might have never fallen for Princess Neytiri, and without his Western American wisdom, the Na’vi would have surely fallen under the iron boot of the RDA Corporation.
Perhaps the Spirit Mother gave the Na’vi people breasts, because she KNEW, that someday the people would need to attract a lustful human of European descent to fight the duel over the homelands. Of course the Spirit Mother isn’t as wise as you might imagine either; she needed Jake Sully to tell her that she should rally the beasts of the jungle against evil corporations.
But from the audience level, if there weren’t breasts and six-pack abs to lust after, everyone might have CHEERED when a tree full of them was incinerated, and the Unobtanium was obtained; in Alanis Morissette style irony.
Which indicates to me that Cameron is by far more intelligent than the movie. Not only did he know he needed to anthropomorphize his blue creatures, he knows that he really shouldn’t talk about it too much. If this film walks away with Best Picture, it will probably be the biggest anti-intellectual coup since “An Inconvenient Truth” passed as an entertaining documentary, when it was neither.
Maybe Cameron should win the Best Actor.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
156 Comments
Boobs – Tim are you certain you haven't been hanging out with the Hollywood Chat Pack…LOL! Otherwise, a great article!
This has been my stance the whole time! This was a visually stunning stupid-fest. It was a silly movie with a lame story. I could care less about any "message" it sends. It's just a dumb movie wrapped in dazzling special effects.
the Cameron issue is a gift that just seems to keep on giving…
Propelled largely by his own clueless, facile statements. Typically, nasty sort that he is anyway, he becomes his own worst enemy by engaging his critics, supplying them with ample fodder.
Grist for the mill, as it were.
The fact that 'Avatar', despite it's groundbreaking, and often stunning- imagery, is a massive event wrapped in a mediocre film package. No one will remember the sophomoric politics in time; just the fact that it's 'the blue alien movie in 3-D'.
More sophisticated viewers will remember it as 'Dances With Aliens'. The politics in that, FAR superior film, are lost as well. So, Cameron can dish this nonsense, keeping him in the public eye (which he craves, of course) yet exposing him for the shallow thinker he really is…
Bravo, Mr. Slagle! You have discovered the Rosetta Stone of modern American cinema and deciphered its hidden code — a nice rack and pair of plump, succulent breasts.
At first I thought the aliens in District 9 were a little creepy to be allowing to live here, but then they kinda grew on ya. By the end of the movie, they could have been my neighbors.
I thought the the blue chick was hot with a set of boobs fit for a ten-foot tall alien, but when you realize why they are there, the movie loses it shine.
I liked the movie for a movie. Not the best there was, but interesting.
But, by the ends of both films, I thought the Na'vi needed nuking.
More proof cameron is a pig then.
This was posted on BH already but…
PART 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJarz7BYnHA
PART 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLzKwTcGO_0
Look specifically at the beginning of part 2…"Would the audience sympathize with the Na'vi if they weren't, you know, perfect jackoff material?" Sexualizing the creatures takes the easy way in gaining the audiences sympathy.
For kooks to be so green and environmentally friendly, they tend to always forget the oh-so "natural" process of natural selection. Only the strongest survive!! And hell, this was even a Darwin theory!!!
Hey, if I remember correctly not all blue girl beings have boobs, Smurfett didn't and she was very popular for a while. Maybe Cameron didn't see the Smurfs…..ya right. I thought that Avator was just the Smurfs on steriods.
Smurfette with a rack job….please.
Prouix he has seen my drawings in the chat room
Hear Hear, Prue!!
Gee, and I thought the movie was all about chasing tail(s). I stand corrected.
I thought it was just like Titanic. One hour into the movie and I was so bored I wanted to kill myself.
Avatar's like a combination of AMERICAN BEAUTY & MUNICH: It validates the anti-American fantasies (AMERICAN BEAUTY) of the Hollywood Establishment and when you point that out to them with point-by-point, looks like a duck, quacks like a duck examples from the film (MUNICH), they deny it.
This is yet another example why I don't think this film will have the staying power of other recent sci-fi/fantasy epics like the Matrix, Spider-Man, LOTR, etc and will fall down the memory hole like Peter Jackson's King Kong: a visually stimulating film that is otherwise ponderous and difficult to sit through. This will only be exaggerated when it's released on video. And unlike the others, even King Kong, I have a hard time remembering one scene that stood out and to me that's death for any film that wants to be considered 'great'.
Check out the "How it should have ended" treatment of Avatar on youtube. It directly shows perhaps the single greatest flaw of the movie. Are the Na'vi ever told why the humans want to cut down their precious trees? I especially enjoyed the "post credits" scene.
"Oh f#@% it, once we're clear let's just nuke them"
I can think of at least one more movie where nature fought back, but it was so bad that I'm embarrassed I even know about it, much less admit to have seen it. Anyone remember "The Happening?"
For some impossible boob coverage, I would recommend the bedroom scene between George Peppard and Ursula Andress in The Blue Max.
I detest movies that play the tease role with nudity. By making it so the breasts were always covered it cements in my mind how FAKE this movie is. For some one who claims to have a back bone and big balls, Cameron pulled a George Lucas and banished the boobs. Lucas if you recall made Carrie Fisher as Leia tape her breasts down since there are no boobs in space according to him.
"When did nature ever get to fight back in a movie?”
The Day After Tomorrow
Wondering if people would think I was too geeky to point out that Cameron had the planetary physics of life on a moon orbiting a gas giant all wrong? The only time there would be night would be when the gas giant was between the moon and the system's primary. Then it would be night for a LOOOOOOONG time. Unless there is a large secondary star Class A star in the system, and then all bets would be off about the night an day cycle.
'So you meet up with a hot piece of tail out in the bush and forget what side you're on?'
After being taunted like this Jake tries to punch his superior officer.
Apparently because the man was 100% correct.
This isn't an environmental hit-piece, its about a paraplegic being pussy-whipped by an alien.
Oscar material.
"… a two and three quarters hour strip tease for adolescent boys; who spent the entire film hoping for an errant breeze …"
When they should have spent 30 seconds with their iPhones Googling "Boobs, pictures of"
The fact that he actually said something that unbelievaby stupid proves that some time after tERMINATOR 2, this guy pulled a Geroge Lucas and allowed ego to smother his sanity. For the sake of the man who made my all-time favorite movie, ALIENS, I'll pretend that man calling himself James cameron is some sort of evil impostor.
When did nature ever get to fight back in a movie?
This being a gathering place for those in the industry, which means writers also, some one can help me figure this out.
I've been reading that quote for some time, but something always bugged me about it. Took a while of thinking. If I remember back to high school English aren't there three types of fiction, man vs. man, man vs. himself, and man vs. nature?
So wouldn't that mean theoretically wouldn't 1/3 of all fiction movies ever made be nature fighting back?
The insecurities among the less educated of the actor class being drawn to the likes of Al Gore and Barack Obama
is interesting considering the lack of information on Obamas grades at the various schools he attended and Al Gore
who flunked a few programs. Needless to say Harvard is proud of these two grads which tells me that these actors
are no smarter for following these two while Harvard appears to be dumber for even acknowledging they are proud of the two attending the college. Considering the havoc that rained on the business communities i.e Enron, Lehman Brothers etc. a good share of the management of these companies were proud graduates of Harvard Business School. Actors should try and pick better role models tho it may go against their initial left wing bias and Harvard should at least stress the sorely missed , at least by the above two grads, traditional ethics in all their schools of instruction. Forgive me if this kinda wandered off subject.
Ughh, you had to bring that piece of trash up?! I am still wishing I had that time back so I could spend it more wisely. I could have had a root canal or I could have organized my closet alphabetically by color…you know something productive.
See! There is an evolutionary purpose for Na'vi breasts. In fact, they saved the entire species. Darwin and Cameron are both vindicated.
It's not "now" that we know about Avatar. We always knew it. It's godless, Christophobic trash made by hellywood.
I have not seen it – I will never see it. It has negative redeeming values.
Would Jesus watch this movie? That's all we need to ask.
A movie made by perverts for perverts to enrich the pockets of perverts.
Until we dispose of hellywood, this Nation will continue to slide downhill into hell. Hellywood comprises Satan's little helpers, doing their parts to destroy America. It does not work for me. I love Jesus. The NAZI hellywooders hate Jesus and all those who believe in biblical values. I pray they wind up quickly in hell.
Don't forget Jaws 3-D (I know, really bad movie).
Princess Neytiri's boobs are probably fake anyway. She's from Hollywood you know.
An impressive individual achievement, but nothing compared to the Tahiti scenes in the Brando/Trevor Howard version of "Munity on the Bounty." That was a massive cover-up.
Pretty petty piece.
I felt that way about Dances With Wolves. I loved the scenery but they could have told the story in half the time. The same with Out of Africa. We walked out of that one. I can find better things to do than watch some "actor" gaze off into the great beyond!
Hollywood people can't even spell orbital mechanics let alone have any comprehension of what it means.
1) Great points (!) If the Na'vi aren't anthropomorphized, viewers wouldn't 'understand' that it is representitive of Themselves whom are at risk from men of evil corps and corps of evil men. (I guess whatever global 'government' which allowed this expedition for energy is blameless in a 'plausible deniability' kind of way.)
2) Without the intervention of humans of the liberal persuassion, the Na'vi are dead meat; the tree is reduced to toothpick-sized trophies and sold on eBay and billions of people on Earth don't shiver to death in a cold, dark world without Unobtainium. Another not-so-subtle message for the clod-class that those loving liberals with their big, bright ideas are our (Na'vi-substitutes) only protection from evil corpRATism.
2) I still have not seen this dreck and probably won't until its on fifth-run on AMC someday in the 20's
Even better, as Al Bundy let us know, are the three breasted martian women. The one on her back is for when you are slow dancing.
I haven't seen Watchmen yet either, but that big blue naked guy on seven-story IMAX must be the most frightening thing ever.
Maybe we should get those two together…
The otaku fanbois would have a field day…and we could release it as a TRUE BLUE movie…
Where was Cameron during the 1970's? There were tons of movies about nature fighting back against evil man. More recently, there was the execrable "The Happening" from M. Night Shamalamadingdong.
"Would Jesus watch this movie? That's all we need to ask."
I think he would. Actually I think if Jesus were alive today he'd probably watch a lot of movies, to understand the people better.
I think he'd actually like this movie. Of Cameron's movies he might like Terminator 2 more so. It has themes that he'd relate to more.
Avatar is a Gamer movie…
The "intelligience deficit" of the move does not bother the chess club because it reminds them of their last DnD episode where there character got to seduce a TreeElf and save the Elven Village from the rampaging orcs cntrolled by the Overlod. The movie hits every one of these. It could have been the plot of an adventure module and not even a well written one. Tree elves live very primitively, they are taller than humans with pointed ears and usually animal like faces. They commune mystically with all the animals who udnerstand and respect them and serve them, they worship a forist spirit and have close relationships with living sentient trees.
Plus hot blue chicks…… This Mr. Slagle is why it appeals to science nerds……… and why the movie is stupid….
The writer of this article is an idiot. I'm a conservative, but I recognize true, jealous stupidity when I read it. If you had half James' ambition, vision and commitment, you'd be ten times the man you are.
[...] See the full article from “Big Hollywood (blog)” [...]
The second rule of Troll Club is always say you are a conservative……..
The third rule of Troll Club is call the critic of the stupidest move made since Santa wants a Bimbo an idiot and link to your movie site in hopes the Cameron clown will give you money…
And the third rule of Troll Club is never talk about Troll Club.
Actually, the fourth one, "Jaws: The Revenge" was much, much worse. Annoying characters, wasted actors, stupid directing and writing, The infamous thing about this movie now is that Michael Caine was making this film when he won the Oscar for "Hannah and Her Sisters." He missed the ceremony because he was thousands of miles away in the Caribbean shooting this dreck.
Wait a minute, I'm behind on this. The Na'vi don't nurse their young? Then how do the babies eat? Do the moms chew up worms and feed them into the babies mouths or something? Do they feed them with their magic dreadlocks? Seriously, I don't get it.
True. The 70s were classic: The Bees, The Swarm, The Giant Spider Invasion, Kingdom of the Spiders, Frogs, Empire of the Ants, Night of the Lepus, and many others.
Day of the Triffids!!
It's a science FICTION movie. ;-D
I'l be so f#¢*!^& happy when this idiotic movie is no longer a topic of conversation.
You don't make over a billion dollars worldwide by just appealing to the nerds. A lot of "regular" people liked it as well. Sneer all you like, Cameron made a movie that piqued enough interest to be a massive global success that isn't going to be equalled any time soon.
Yeah, it's heavy on the fiction and VERY light on the Science.
Not necessarily. Man vs nature could simply mean they're stuck in the wilderness. Nature isn't fighting "back" in that case, just being itself. We're part of the food chain, after all.
….or a LIFELONG conservative. Who parrots the progressive narrative for some mysterious reason.
And every one of those movies, despite their chessiness and stupidity is infinitely better than AVATAR
There's no way to justify it, Ed. It's one of the most tired cliches in film, along with the eeeevil corporation, mystical Indians, and everything else that compromised this movie's so-called "plot"
Yes, especially since they did not cover him up like the chick in Avatar. He was full frontal and in your face.
You don't remember the hour-long t-rex fight scene?!
Or the GIANT KILLER BUGS?!?!?!
I'm embarrassed to admit I saw "The Happening" as well.
"You eyein' my lemon drink?"
I wish I had my time and money back on that one. The plot holes were so numerous, it was like watching drip-irrigation onscreen.
Saw that stinker on cable…and I want my two hours back. This was awful, boring, and made no sense at all.
Well, most of those '70's movies were taken from decent novels…
You're not meant to. Only liberals are smart enough to figure out the no-boobs-in-space theory.
The rest of us conservatives are meant to sit back and just watch the movie. Don't think about plot-holes or anything.
Here. Want some Kool-Aid?
Exactly. Nature was the problem in Earthquake, but I don't think you would say nature was fighting back…
You've just insulted boobs everywhere…
Precisely. I don't care that it's anti-military; I'm not offended that people dare to make movies that I disagree with. There are scores of wonderful films with a liberal slant. The problem with Avatar is that it's big and dumb, with a reliance on special effects over story that could potentially cause all big films to regress to 1950's style simplicity.
I finally saw Avatar.l I found it to be a perfectly awful mess of a movie. It stole ideas from The Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter and Monday Night Football. It was painfully long and boring. Cameron is so full of himself, he gets in the way of his art. My head still hurts.
I couldn't care less whether the film is a slam against corporations.
Sorry should have narrowed it down to a particular idiot political class. Some boobs
not only nourish the body and the soul but are darn good to look at. Sorry Boobs everywhere.
"When did nature ever get to fight back in a movie?”
He obviously didn't see The "not very much" Happening.
I couldn't relate to or sympathize with the Na'vi even *with* the boobs. For some mysterious reason, I didn't seem to have this problem with the aliens of District 9. Though that might have something to do with the latter being truly believable and sympathetic rather than moving CG porn.
There isn't really any right wing backlash against Avatar. It made 750 million here, and 2.5 billion worldwide, obviously conservatives are watching it in droves. I think that what little controversy a few people seem to stir was encouraged by the studio to drive up ticket sales. You are part of a marketing strategy Mr. Slagle.
Actually, smurfs on estrogen. Well, okay, maybe a few steroids too. I didn't see the movie and won't see the movie, so I guess based on the pictures I've seen here.
Squirm (the only movie that ever moved my late brother-in-law Jerry to turn off the TV). The Thing if I remember right. King Kong (though he didn't win.)
Maybe when they have kids in the sequel the boobs will be bigger in the hybrid generation. Can't hardly wait.
.
in the defense of the smurfs, keep in mind she was the only woman in the village. Not like she had much competition. But its funny you should mention this – http://www.iamlost.com/features/smurfs/commies.sh...
apparently communist naturally lean towards the color blue…heyo!
Well, it's the tease, you know.
{ dont know,
Saw the movie twice
After the first time and knowing the "goods" weren't showen
I was still craning my neck around trying to see behind the feathers
The movie was really stoopid!!!!, If I had time I would go see it a couple more times, and when the DVD comes out I will buy it and I will put it in the pile of movies that I enjoy watching every once in a while (right next to TOMBSTONE) Did I mention That I really LIKE stoopid movies, most of the stuff out of Hollywood is really stoopid, I never take anything out of Hollywood seriously. it is all make believe and fun to watch, I think they refer to it as ENTERTAINMENT…..It deserves an OSCAR because it was fun to watch.., TITTIES notwithstanding ;D
Sorry, couldn't help it. I was so upset at the money and time I wasted that for weeks I told everyone I knew how bad this movie was. This can easily be the worst movie I have ever seen or at least be in the top three, but right now I can't think of any other ones that were this bad. Watching paint dry would have probably been a better use of my time.
The writer of this comment is an idiot. I'm a conservative, but I recognize true, jealous stupidity when I read it. If you had half Tim's ambition, vision and commitment, you'd be ten times the man you are.
There, I fixed your mistakes.
I really hope your logic doesn't catch on, or we might have to endure a future in which Transformers 5: The Legend of Megatron's Gold becomes an Oscar contender.
You spelled stupid wrong…
Big Hollywood will have nothing to post!
Am I the only one who remembers "Day of the Triffids?"
Me too! I think Roland Emmerich might be my favorite – just saw 2012, and it was hilarious! Loved it almost as much as "The Patriot". The politically correct term for awful movies that are fun to watch is "differently good".
Charlie Brown…
Excellent post, you could almost quote this…
The first rule of Troll Club is always say you are a conservative………….
Yeah but not in 3D IMAX!
That was superb, all versions which goes to show what you can do with a good story and not much money.
Married several times, each marriage ending in divorce due to adultery….
Yes. Cameron's a pig.
I found that people have no idea what a good movie is and can only be wowed by special effects. This movie's story was dull, lame and done many times before. I like special effects movies but I could not wait for the final credits. The big ending battle scene was cheap, unoriginal, and badly acted, why should this win anything is beyond me.
Rupert Murdoch appreciates our patronage.
well, I thought the movie was great
Don't have time for part 2, but part 1 was hilarious. Thanks.
Heh. I called it http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/tslagle/2010/01...
I enjoyed that movie, but I wish I could *FORGET* about the bugs. Major nightmare material there…
You must be logged in to post a comment.