Moore vs. Miller: Differences on Occupy Wall Street Foreshadowed in Their Breakthrough Graphic Novels
by Ron CapshawWhen comic book scholars chart the moment the medium shed its one-dimensional sensibilities and veered toward adulthood, they cite Alan Moore and Frank Miller as the duo that made it possible.
A recent dust up between the two shows that making comics more adult was all they had in common. In response to Miller’s recent characterization of the Occupy Wall Street movement as “nothing but a pack of louts, thieves, and rapists, an unruly mob, fed by Woodstock-era nostalgia and putrid false righteousness,” Moore countered that the protesters represented a “completely justified howl of moral outrage” and have behaved “in a very intelligent, nonviolent way, which is probably another reason why Frank Miller would be less than pleased with it.”
Not content with attacking Miller the citizen, Moore went on to attack his works as well. Surveying Miller’s twenty-plus years of output, Moore stated that these comic efforts showcased, “a rather unpleasant sensibility apparent in Frank Miller’s work for quite a long time.”
The comic fan community has been shocked that these two giants are disagreeing, but they shouldn’t be.







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?