“Write what you know” is the first and most basic advice every aspiring creative writer tries to take to heart. Like all writing advice, this is easier said than done, and few novelists make that formula work more successfully and naturally than Bob Hamer, author of last year’s Enemies Among Us and the new Targets Down.

Undercover FBI agent Matt Hogan, the fictional protagonist of both thrillers, bears a striking resemblance to his creator, who spent 26 years as a street agent for the FBI, usually undercover. Hamer, also a Marine Corps vet, relates that remarkable quarter-century backstory in his engrossing, sometimes shocking first book, The Last Undercover: The True Story of an FBI Agent’s Dangerous Dance with Evil.

In his capacity as an undercover agent, he walked convincingly in the flames with drug dealers, pedophiles, gangs, international arms dealers, and killers. Hamer brings this gritty experience to bear on every page of his novels, lending them a degree of detailed authenticity that’s unusual in the thriller genre. No less a thriller authority than Vince Flynn confirms this, having said of Hamer that he “delivers realism only an undercover FBI agent can bring.”

No-nonsense man’s man Matt Hogan is one of the most genuine heroes you’ll find in the genre. He’s no superhuman Bourne or Bond, but a refreshingly real-life hero of the kind that actually fills the ranks of American law enforcement – standup patriots who put their lives on the line to take down the bad guys, but whose work consists more of paperwork drudgery than flashy gunplay or the bedding of bombshells.

Hogan gets his share of action too, but Hamer’s action scenes are also grounded in reality and not cartoonish - as are his plots. In Enemies Among Us, Hogan goes undercover to investigate a charity suspected of funding Islamic terrorists (that’s right, Islamic terrorists, not Homeland Security’s usual suspects: disgruntled veterans and violent, racist Tea Partiers). In Targets Down, Hogan gets down-and-dirty in the real-world swamp of Russian organized crime, neo-Nazis, sex trafficking, and a jihadist with a plan to make 9/11 seem “like a mere footnote in our history books.” Not a rogue CIA program or evil capitalist is to be found between the covers of either book.

Bob Hamer

His page-turners are smoothly and naturally written, and laced with plenty of humor. They’re peopled with characters, not caricatures. Unheard of in contemporary fiction, some of these characters are actually religious and attend church, and are not portrayed mockingly for it. And (surprisingly, for an author who would kick my butt for suggesting that he’s in touch with his feminine side) even Hamer’s female characters are well-drawn, not simply sexy window dressing – like Hogan’s wife Caitlin, a grade-school teacher who keeps him grounded with her quiet strength and Christian faith.

Hamer’s real-life undercover experience was useful preparation for more than just his novels, as he moved on from the FBI to deal with even sleazier and more ruthless, reprehensible characters. That’s right – he went to work in Hollywood. He has consulted on shows including Law & Order: SVU, Sleeper Cell, The Inside, and Angela’s Eyes. He has written episodes for The Inside and Sue Thomas: F.B.Eye.

Most importantly, somewhere along the line, Hamer managed to hook up with one of the minority of standup, decent guys in this cutthroat town – the proudly conservative actor/director/producer Jack Scalia, whom you may remember from a 30-year career in television and film, not to mention stints in pro sports and modeling. Scalia’s chin alone has more commanding masculine presence than today’s wispy leading metrosexuals like Johnny Depp or Orlando Bloom. Scalia, who describes Targets Down as “pedal to the metal, red-lining in every gear,” has optioned the book for a feature film.

Jack Scalia

(Full disclosure: I’m honored to say that Bob Hamer and Jack Scalia are both friends of mine. Does that cast doubts upon my objectivity? Will some dismiss this article as a puff piece? Frankly I don’t care, because I’m much more afraid of either Bob or Jack spearing me with steely, disapproving glares than I am of the slings and arrows of accusations of favoritism.)

Not a day goes by on Big Hollywood that we conservatives don’t lament the leftist dominance of pop culture, and wish that there were more good-quality books and films that reflect our values instead of Hollywood’s usual nihilistic, elitist fare. Well, here’s a chance to get behind a couple of our own and support their work. Check out all of Bob Hamer’s books including the new thriller Targets Down, and hit the theaters when Jack Scalia brings the latter to the big screen. 

His latest novel “Extreme Measures” was released last fall but once again Flynn may end up just a little too real. I won’t give away the plot but Mitch Rapp finds himself in front of a Congressional committee explaining why he needed to employ “extreme measures” to protect this nation. Sound familiar? Attorney General Eric Holder named a federal prosecutor this week to examine the abuse of prisoners during interrogations by the CIA. I wonder if Mitch will be called as a witness. 

The administration has minimized the War on Terror calling it a “contingency operation” to prevent “man-made disasters.”  I guess I shouldn’t be too surprised it would choose to re-investigate a subject the President has publicly said he prefers not to explore and one that has already been reviewed by federal prosecutors. Even after Holder’s announcement, White House aides declared the President “wants to look forward, not backward” at the previous administration’s policies. Forgive me if I am skeptical. 

How can this latest action be anything but a political move to placate the left in Congress, the ACLU, and Amnesty International? 

In “The Last Undercover” I detail many of the cases in which I was the FBI undercover agent. All were federal cases and resulted in hundreds of convictions. I am well aware of Justice Department guidelines requiring a reasonable certainty of conviction before bringing an indictment…none of this TV crap when the prosecutor indicts on weak evidence hoping to get the bad guy to cooperate during a commercial break. 

So how does my experience impact my opinion of the administration’s decision?  First, John Helgerson, the former CIA inspector general, who wrote the report in 2004 which was released Monday said, “I think it would be very difficult to mount a successful prosecution in any of these cases.” Then there is the matter of the law. The Statue of Limitations for most federal crimes is five years. A criminal act requires mens rea, a “criminal intent” and prosecutions require evidence. Most of the cases in the 2004 report were among the many investigated by Alexandria, Virginia federal prosecutors in which no charges were brought against anyone in the CIA. Government attorneys who reviewed these incidents cited a lack of evidence, witnesses, and even victims. 

The report released on Monday cites as “abusive”… threatening the man charged with plotting the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, a Navy destroyer in which seventeen sailors were killed and thirty-nine injured. The “threat” was to bring in his mother thereby possibly inferring his female relatives might be sexually abused. At no time did the CIA interrogator bring in a female relative let alone physically abuse the man or his family. And if you think that was abusive how about staging mock executions in the room next door or worse yet blowing cigar and cigarette smoke into prisoners’ faces (doesn’t the President still smoke?). Various media outlets have referred to these tactics as “severe” even “brutal.” I must be missing something. 

In February, 2007 David Passaro, a CIA contractor, was convicted of assaulting Abdul Wali, an Afghan suspected of rocket attacks on military bases. Wali died in custody. The federal prosecutors did their jobs. John Helgerson said none of the remaining cases compared in severity to the Passaro matter. 

In response to Holder’s announcement this week, the CIA released internal reports calling the interrogation program “a crucial pillar of U.S. counter-terrorism efforts” and saying it “dramatically expanded our universe of knowledge on al-Qaeda’s plots.” 

Granted both are Republicans but former Vice President Cheney said the CIA efforts kept the nation safer and Rep. Peter King, the top Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee, called Holder’s decision “disgraceful.” 

Dennis Blair, the current director of national intelligence, said the interrogation techniques provided “high value information…a deeper understanding of the al-Qaeda organization that was attacking this country.” He admitted, “…the information gained from these techniques was valuable in some instances…” 

Michael Hayden, the former Director of the CIA said, “The use of these techniques against these terrorists made us safer. It really did work.” 

Even John Brennan, the President’s recently hand-picked selection to lead the administration’s interrogation policies, said in a 2007 interview regarding the Bush administration interrogation techniques, “Would the U.S. be handicapped if the CIA was not, in fact, able to carry out these types of detention and debriefing activities? I would say, yes.” 

I have no problem with the administration determining what techniques will be used while it is in the White House, but this decision looks like a pure political move to appease the left-wing of the party.  At the same time it has to have a chilling effect on those who are tasked with keeping us safe, fearing anything they do, even if sanctioned by the current administration might subject them to criminal liability down the road. Although most of my career was spent working criminal cases, I did interact with the CIA on several occasions. Those case officers with whom I dealt were intelligent, hardworking, and patriotic. As former Vice President Cheney said they “deserve our thanks.”   

Mitch Rapp, thanks. If you do exist and need me, give me a call. Let me know what you want done. I’ve got your six. We owe you a lot!