Taking a Stand Against SAG Extortion
by Frank DeMartiniToday I had the pleasure of doing something I have wanted to do for the past twenty years: I walked out of a SAG (Screen Actors Guild) arbitration.
For those you who are unaware of the method in which disputes are resolved between the entertainment unions and producers, I need to give you a little primer before I tell you what happened today. Keep in mind that whenever a producer needs to hire any actor who is a member of SAG, they must agree to abide by all of the rules of the SAG Minimum Basic Agreement (“MBA”). The MBA appears on its face to be fair. It is not, however, as it is not enforced equally against both sides. The enforcement procedure is heavily biased against independent producers.
The method of enforcement is a grievance procedure in which a group of union-leaning arbitrators decide the facts and issue judgments. In fact, other than one or two of the approved arbitrators, the entire group is liberals and rarely find in favor of producers. There is an article on the internet about a certain SAG Arbitration in which the writer states that:
There is a basic assumption in SAG arbitrations that the producer is always wrong and only wants to cheat the actors out of their rightful compensation
I personally have been involved in a SAG Arbitration in which Arbitrator Sol Rosenthal ruled that an interoffice memo at a certain talent agency had more legal effect than an executed agreement with the actor, even though the executed agreement stated clearly that outside evidence could not be considered when interpreting the agreement. For those of you that have gone through law school, this is something you learn in First Year Contracts. Did Arbitrator Rosenthal care? Nope. He ruled that the actor had a two-week guarantee of employment even though the written agreement he signed had no guarantee at all. (more…)







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?