Hear me out.

So many invested so much into Their One and now he’s not only a complete failure as a president, but he’s also on the fastrack to becoming a national joke. Supporters like Lil Wayne have nothing positive to defend him with and so they’re shattered, broken, hurt, desperate… 

This isn’t a cry of racism, it’s a cry for help from those disillusioned by the fact that the oceans did not rise.

And yet, even Lil Wayne has to admit Obama deserves criticism for his failed economy.

“You learn from what the right-wing is doing and you take something from it,” Wayne tells VIBE. “I feel like as a people the most that we can do is better ourselves and learn. Then look at yourself and ask ‘Am I the person they’re talking about or am I not?’ You have to make the most of who you are because the Republicans are never going to like us.”

Wayne added that the right-wings’ at times blatant disrespect of the oval office has more to do with Obama’s racial make-up than his policies. He admits that while he understands the criticism over the President’s handling of the economy, he says some of the talk has gone beyond politics.  “I don’t think I have to say that for everybody to know that,” Wayne says. 

The Left will never stop calling us racist, but they are running out of one thing…

…excuses.

—–

Classy response from the former Godfather’s Pizza CEO and GOP presidential candidate.

Bottom line, Janeane Garofalo doesn’t believe a Black man can or should think different from her, and if he does, he’s either corrupt (taking a pay off) or crazy (suffering Stockholm Syndrome); and that kind of thinking makes Garofalo the one with serious racial issues.

Of course, both she and Keith Olbermann have gotten away with this because our corrupt MSM is too busy screaming racist at those on the Right who use such sinister phrases as “basketball,” “food stamps,” and “dark clouds.”

None of this should be surprising, though. After all, this is the same MSM currently freaking out over Michele Bachmann and Rick Perry’s faith after spending all of 2008 assuring us that The Man Who Would Be President’s attendance for 20 years in a racist church run by his mentor — a racist, anti-American demagogue — didn’t matter.

—–

Was questioning George W. Bush’s intelligence racist — a phony narrative Letterman himself relentlessly pushed?

Was digging into Bush’s National Guard records three-years into his presidency racist and off-limits?

Letterman knows Trump is no racist, he’s just trying to chill the billionaire into silence and at the same time send a ‘dog-whistle’ to his showbiz pals to follow suit. They all watched Obama’s poll numbers drop as Trump went after their precious one, and now they’re hurling around the word “racist” just as readily as McCarthy hurled “communist” in order to shut Trump up and shut him down. 

This is nothing more than a variation of the showbiz blacklist of the 1950s; the creation of a phony charge in order to intimidate into silence and marginalize a political opponent.   

Just as there are Birthers, there are now Racers — people obsessed with race and using the race card as a political weapon.

2012 is already getting ugly and we’re not even halfway through 2011.

I will admit, when it was first announced, I looked forward to the show, because it was promoted as an offbeat comedy featuring Jane Lynch, who’s normally hilarious, but it’s nothing of the sort.  This is a soap opera of the worst kind– it’s the ultimate wet dream for the kind of people who actually believe that gays should be more outraged at high school bullies than Shariah-ordered executions.  It’s nothing but blatant wish fulfillment for TV executives who are at the top of the world but can’t get over some hangup from high school. Your glee club wasn’t that great and didn’t get any funding in school?  Aww, poor baby, let’s make a show where everyone in the glee club would be a final contestant on American Idol! You got picked on in high school?  That’s okay, you can write a show where the homophobic bully is secretly gay!  Don’t like Christians opposing gay marriage? No worries; we’ll just create a stupid, belligerent, superstitious, overweight, violent black character to mock them:

—–

And, even worse, it’s a musical.  Not a musical in the sense that characters express themselves through songs– it’s a musical where the characters extraneously break into glammed-up, severely auto-tuned covers of hit pop songs.  It’s all about leeching off the success of those who create in the music world…

… and some in that world have begun to publicly denounce it.

When the band Kings of Leon quietly rejected a request to license their music to the show, Murphy shot back by telling the band “F— you,” calling them “self-centered a–holes,” then accusing them of the unforgivable sin of neglecting him “arts education.”  Slash of Guns ‘n’ Roses rightly dissed the show as an insult to musicals, and Murphy tactfully declared, “people who make those comments, their careers are over; they’re uneducated and quite stupid.”  That’s odd, because the rather popular and prolific Damon Albarn of Blur and Gorillaz didn’t have nice things to say about Glee, either.  Nor does Dave Grohl of the Foo Fighters:  ”f— that guy for thinking anybody and everybody should want to do Glee.”

I’m glad that a Glee backlash is building in the music community; Murphy is little more than a bully with simultaneous messiah and victim complexes.  A normal, well-adjusted adult would recognize that not 100% of the music community is going to want to hear its work turned into pitch-corrected teenybopper jams and accept the fact that not 100% of his licensing requests will be accepted.  However, Murphy interprets these as insults, not only against him but against his mission, as if a vapid primetime soap opera is crucial to “arts education” in America (“Allow me to butcher your songs… it’s for the children!”).

And his need to publicly embarrass anyone that gets in his way is disturbing.  Kings of Leon frontman Caleb Followill responded to Murphy’s outburst, “This was never meant as a slap in the face to ‘Glee’ or to music education or to fans of the show. We’re not sure where the anger is coming from.”  Drummer Nathan Followill was a bit less generous, but the point stands that Murphy publicly singled out and insulted the band just for denying his requests.

It’s a trend we’ve seen on the show, as well.  Since the start of the second season, the show has included plenty of sucker punches against conservatives:  a pregnant cheerleader’s one-dimensionally evil dad is a Glenn Beck fan; Sarah Palin is mocked as stupid; Ann Coulter is listed as a negative influence on young women akin to Lindsay Lohan; now the crazy Tea Partying birther homeschooler.  And Murphy’s insistence on mocking the groups he’s set up as his existential enemies has also manifested itself as a vile, cruel racial caricature.

I will admit that I watched Season 2, Episode 7 because of the buzz Gwyneth Paltrow’s guest spot was generating.  There were plenty of eyeroll and facepalm moments, but around three-quarters of the way through, I was just simply stunned at what I saw.  In a hackneyed flashback to explain some current character flaw (I’ll take Screenwriting Cliches for 2000, Alex), Paltrow’s character details how she was attacked by a black teenage girl (described by the narrator as “like an attractive Biggie Smalls”) who is so offended by the concept of learning algorithms (because “I’m a Christian,” she says) that she punches Paltrow (see video above).

Murphy and the writer of this episode, Ian Brennan, have no leg to stand on if they ever claim that they or Glee are about promoting tolerance or diversity.  They are all about politically correct, one-dimensional stereotypes; groups they like are pure good, groups they dislike are pure evil.  And they have some explaining to do.  I see why they’d want to mock Christians:  Prop 8, those who purport to be believers like the Westboro Baptists– yeah, yeah.  But why inject race into it?  And why would such rich white men do it with such a hateful stereotype against black women?

It’s because they’re thin-skinned, bigoted bullies.  They demand everyone submit to whatever they want; if they don’t, there is retaliation– public shaming through stereotypes, insults, and vitriol unbecoming of anyone, much less a media figure claiming to promote education and inclusion.

It’s sad because Mel Gibson clearly has some issues. Racism is probably one of the least of his problems. His taste in women and failure to understand the limitations of public life appear to be even more dramatic than his resentment of women, homosexuals, and minorities. He’s an immensely entertaining actor and a truly gifted director. Whenever true talent is stifled by human limitations, the entertainment consuming public loses.

What is truly tragic, not just for Mel, but for all of us, is that the mere utterance of a single word has become the death knell for entire careers. By merely speaking the word n***er (see, I can’t even type it), either in anger or jest, one can find themselves ostracized from society.

Simple laws of supply and demand teach us that the less of something there is in the world, the more valuable it becomes. The same can be said for words. By making something taboo, we give it power. If we really want to rid the world of hurtful and demeaning buzz words, we should use them excessively, but in a different context. We should all adopt the use of the word enjoyed by rappers for decades. If calling somebody a n***er was a signal of trust and affection, future generations would scoff at the true etymology of the term.

More disturbing is the fact that everyday, in politics, entertainment, and media many very well established and influential people utter statements far more racist and dangerous than anything that Mel Gibson can spew. The “soft bigotry of low expectations” is far more evil and insidious. This dangerous, active racism is an epidemic on the political and social left.

Mel Gibson may have capped off his often brilliant career with an insult fest to his ex-girlfriend, but people like Bill Maher, Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann, Dan Rather, Donny Deutsch, Joy Behar , Janeane Garofalo, and Harry Reid continue to enjoy regular paychecks and TV face time despite their blatantly offensive racist comments.

After his comments would we expect to see Braveheart on CNN debating racial issues? Of course not. He will be the subject of numerous spots on racism, not a commentator. Yet, Chris Matthews still has a show, still talks about race almost nightly and has received zero retribution for stating that Obama’s State of the Union speech was so great that he forgot the man was black!

Janeane Garofalo dismisses Tea Party criticism of the president by claiming that it is 100% based on race. By merely looking at Obama as a “black man,” she is completely ignoring his many achievements. How insulting is it to ignore his years of work? To completely brush over his numerous failures, misdirections, and overall cluelessness is beyond cruel. It takes hard work and conviction to be that lame. Making it about race undermines the man’s actions and character.

Is Mel Gibson a racist? Maybe. Probably. If he is, it’s most certainly a trait he picked up working in the leftist bee’s nest of Hollywood. Our industry is one that speaks of “urban demographics,” frets about casting “diversity” and works overtime trying to understand the mindset of blacks, women, gays, and latinos. Rarely do they stop to think that maybe, just maybe, all those “special” groups are simply human beings. Human beings who enjoy good stories with strong, relatable messages.

Here’s a true story. I showed my latest film to an industry friend of mine. While he immensely enjoyed the film, he made the comment that the lead cast was “WASPY” and “lily white.” This struck me as odd because the lead actress is of Mexican decent. She was actually born in Mexico City and speaks Spanish fluently. He dismissed this, saying she didn’t “look or act Latino.”

Who’s the racist now? Mr. “Self-righteous, looking out for the minorities” or me, Mr. “I just cast the best actress for the part”?

People are people. Period. The second you start carving it up, questioning or dictating how people act or think based on superficial things like gender, color and who you get your freak on with, you are a bigot. Plain and simple. And no, Bill Maher, I don’t really care what your intentions are. It doesn’t matter.

The slave owners of the Confederacy felt the exact same way about black folks that Hollywood intellectuals and liberal legislators do. Blacks are different, have their own way of thinking, their own culture, and their own unique limitations. Confederate slave owners forced them to work in cotton fields, judging them inferior and unable to exist equally in white society. Hollywood intellectuals struggle to understand how “blacks think,” reinforcing cultural negatives and stereotypes in their pursuit to make a dollar. Washington legislators crank out laws and programs aimed to segregate our society, socially and economically. They are desperate to secure power by demonizing their opposition. An opposition, by the way, that stands for individual liberty regardless of skin color, gender, or sexual preferences.

A wise man once dreamed of a world where people were judged by the “content of the character and not the color of their skin.” If he were alive today, he would be naturally offended by Mel Gibson’s n***er rape insults. But, he would be equally offended by Bill Maher wishing our president would act like a “real” black man and flash a 9mm.

Modern Klansmen don’t have to run around in bed sheets. They get their own talk shows.

—–

Excellent piece of video courtesy of our friends at NewsBusters. More there.

As you already know, over the weekend, Bill Maher said:

“I thought when we elected a black president, we were going to get a black president. You know, this [BP oil spill] is where I want a real black president. I want him in a meeting with the BP CEOs, you know, where he lifts up his shirt so you can see the gun in his pants. That’s — (in black man voice) ‘we’ve got a motherfu**ing problem here?’ Shoot somebody in the foot.”

Now despite all the PC stuff, the left-wing still proves to be the ones doing the majority of the stereotyping. And I’m pretty sure they had a medic on stand-by  in case Maher’s guts ruptured from him using more testosterone than he ever has in his life to try to pull off his best “black” impression.

This is what black people are to Bill Maher. This is what we’re supposed to be; gun-toting thugs. And if we’re not, then we’re just docile Uncle Toms who wanna be white.

Truth is, there is no behavior that could satisfy Bill Maher because he’s a racist, and a very confused individual. He’s pro-gun-control, yet he wants the president to brandish a weapon at the table with BP. But when it comes to dealing with our enemies; the ones who get a special thrill up their leg when they cut off the heads of Jews, well no — those are the ones we should just have talks with.

I don’t pay much mind to Bill Maher; a bitter cynic whose veins pump with spoiled milk, and just another patronizing racist. I’ve seen his show before. I know what it is. I’ve come to the conclusion that I don’t dig it, therefore I don’t watch it. However, I’m aware of the comments he makes because the more outrageous ones end up getting forwarded to me.

So I watch this dude who has this strange resemblance to Otto from Star Trek DS9, and just like all liberal elites he feels as though he’s some kind of authority on what black people are supposed to be. It reminds me of when clean-cut white frat boys would come up to me whispering, “Hey, brah. Do you know where we can score some kind?” And I’d be like, “Why the hell are you asking me? You’re the ones doing it. Go fask some some other clean-cut white frat boys like yourselves.”

Guess those liberal colleges they learn from aren’t doing much to instill that kind of deductive reasoning.

Anyway, Maher just makes my job easier when it comes to pointing out who the real racists are. The hard part is getting people to see the painfully obvious. It’s like trying to point out something as obvious as figuring out how to pour pee out of a boot with directions on the sole of it. (Thanks, Pryor)

Admittedly I do generalize when it comes to liberals, but I used to be one, so there’s my license. ; ) On the other hand, Bill Maher has never been black. I’m sure according to Bill Maher I’ve never been black either.

In the end, though, I still respect Bill Maher’s freedom to say what he does, and I’m certainly free to disagree.

Well, I guess that beats honest debate.

But what a lot of work! Which leads me to believe this guy is a nobody, in between jobs, desperately seeking approval (and possibly, some tongue) from Keith Olbermann. The dope even started a web page, a Facebook page, and more than likely holds secret meetings in a tree house in his parent’s backyard.

The secret knock is based on a Rage Against the Machine song!

It’s funny because it’s the Tea Party movement. But I suppose it wouldn’t be so funny if it were the woman’s movement, a civil rights movement, a gay parade. Then that would be evil, intolerable, wrong. But because these are average Americans pissed off about big government, they’re open game.

But here’s what I love: The guy’s goal is to act racist and homophobic, in order to create…proof of racism and homophobia! Which means, he’s pretty much proved that none of it exists in the tea parties, if he has to go to the trouble of importing the stuff.

And, he’s also invented a new way for racists to get away with being racist: just say you’re an undercover liberal!

But the fact is, progressive types have been branding the Tea Partiers as extremists since day one. Now, for lack of examples- they must create behavior they cannot substantiate.

So I’m going to do the same. I’m going to infiltrate the infiltrators! And then act like them! Which means I’ll have to stop bathing.

And if you disagree with me, you’re a racist homophobe who wears mink.

Tonight we’ve got the comic legend Greg Proops, the delightful Juliet Huddy, and fun Alison Rosen, and the dude from the Dos Equis commercial (the most interesting man in the world!)

There’s only one problem with all of the following examples: there is no evidence that any of those events have occurred.

Ever.

Firstly, let’s examine the claim that Glenn Beck called James Cameron the Antichrist. To hear the story in mainstream media, Glenn Beck came face-to-face with Mr. Cameron and proceeded to accuse him of being the anti-Christ. The rock-solid source for this one was none other than the blue-man-group fetishist himself. If James Cameron says it, it HAS to be true!

It should be noted that later, in the same interview, James Cameron did go on to use this “incident” as justification to call Glenn Beck a “f*cking a*shole.” He in no way believes that this hurts his credibility as a reliable source. As it turns out, James Cameron was mixing two completely separate stories: One in which he met Beck personally, another in which Glenn Beck made a joke about the awful, repetitive Celine Dion track (from Cameron’s film “Titanic”) as being “evil” and used the word “anti-Christ” to abstractly and comically target the man responsible for its reaching the airwaves. It would seem quite the far cry from Cameron’s original tall tale.

Note: I would like to publicly apologize on behalf of french-Canadians for “My Heart Will Go On.” There is no darker time in our history books, and we pray that time will heal any wounds we’ve inflicted on our fellow man.

Then we have the “racist teabaggers” where, again, the only proof that we have is from Mr. Congressman Clyburn’s very own mouth. He claims to have been called the N-word, and “faggot” by protesters with “deliberately lispy” screams, one of whom proceeded to spit on him. How one would “deliberately lisp” a word void of the letter “S” remains to be seen, but rest assure that all conservatives are homophobic racists (and possibly rapists).

Not only were no charges filed, nobody was arrested (spitting as a means of harm is legally classified as “assault”), but there are no pictures or videos of the events mentioned. Keep in mind, that you are not dealing with an isolated sucker-punch (where if you blink it could be missed), but a several-hour long protest where both sides of the aisle were armed with video cameras and consistently taking pictures (not to mention any local and/or national news cameras) to document the unraveling. You are talking about one of the most heated, crowded and nationally covered events in modern history, yet the closest thing to a legitimate source for the left’s claims is … The Huffington Post picture gallery of signs with slogans such as “Kill the Bill,” “Save Babies” or “I Didn’t Vote for Socialism.”

There you have it, the leftists clear-cut proof for racially aggravated assault.

See liberals don’t understand the concept of the “burden of proof.” When James Cameron accuses Glenn Beck of calling him the Antichrist, the burden rests squarely on his shoulders to prove it. The problem lil’ Jimmy has here is that there is none. There is however, documented proof of him calling Beck a “f*cking a*shole.” The same applies to Sean Penn. Some critics very well may have verbally assaulted him with a veritable medley of profanities, but we have no evidence of it. We do however, have the obvious recorded proof of Sean Penn claiming that he wished they would all “die screaming of rectal cancer.”

We have no proof of the Tea Partiers being violent. As a matter of fact, all Tea Parties combined don’t even come close to the number of felonies committed at the singular “Woodstock ‘99.” Rape, drugs and looting (all staples of the leftist-protesting experience) are virtually non-existent at conservative gatherings. Also, in my brief attendance at college, never once have I witnessed a single liberal speaker require the services of a bodyguard. On the flip side; Every conservative speaker was forced to travel with a security entourage that would put Diddy to shame (provided that they were even allowed to speak in the first place). Noticing a pattern here?

Conservatives are such docile activists in comparison to their liberal counterparts that leftists at the Huffington Post have in fact, now accused them of “using coded language” to incite racism and violence.

No lexicon was provided.

At the end of the day, when one looks at the facts, it’s easy to see that liberals and Hollywood elitists are simply the scum of the earth. They call people names, regularly commit acts of violence against both each other and outsiders, all the while demeaning anyone burdened with the task of expressing a dissenting point of view. The only straw at which they can grasp is that of, “They did it first!”

Even if there were a shred of proof to back up their claims, it would still be pathetic (albeit not as much). Of course, there isn’t. There never is. It is becoming increasingly apparent that in Hollywood however, proof is not needed to justify vulgar hatred aimed against anyone different from red-carpet coke-buddies.

Which reminds me Mr. Penn, lay off the Colombian gold.

‘Race hustlers’ are commonly known as shakedown artists and/or smear merchants who expertly deploy the “R-word”, and it has somehow garnered them credibility to preach the gospel of social justice — and reap the ill-gotten gains of equality-of-outcome Statism — to the intellectual wreckage left below them. 

Tragically, such rhetorical abuse damages the appropriate use of the term – and leaves actual victims of “traditional” racism with a neutered descriptor that is quickly beginning to make the accuser sound like a whining name-caller. The sad irony is that abusers harm the very people they claim to be defending, most often for selfish political and financial profit. 

Of course, follow the money… 

Thomas Sowell:

Being a race hustler is a very lucrative business for people like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. But such people can extort money and power from white business and political leaders precisely because it is easier to pay off a relative handful of noise makers than to be bothered fighting them. But tens of millions of blacks cannot duplicate what a small band of extortionists do. 

Chasing a will o’ the wisp like reparations cannot produce what blacks most want — respect, including the self-respect that comes ultimately from one’s own achievements. This is something that whites could not give blacks if they wanted to. 

That fading race-business model is likely depressing its intolerant participants’ financial outlook. 

Time-out to play Spot the ‘Racists!’ (*NSFW*): 

A true classic, no? 

Moral-crusaders on self-congratulatory, highly profitable missions exploit and perpetuate the ‘soft bigotry of low expectations’. They are now desperate to keep their minority mascots in political servitude to one political party’s destructive ideology, i.e., dependence. 

Ironically, Candidate Obama’s denunciation and public divorce from his long-time racist pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, played a pivotal role in accelerating the loss of race-hustler credibility in the current American zeitgeist; this cultural good fortune – secured for now by new/alternative media success — is likely to continue its progressive course into the foreseeable future. 

Addressing his former pastor’s failures and “mistake” in his famous March, 2008 campaign ‘Race Speech,’ President Obama characterized our nation’s “racial divisions” as being in a “stalemate.” He asserted a firm conviction “rooted in [his] faith in God and [his] faith in the American people – that working together we can move beyond some of our old racial wounds.”   

Later, elected president, Mr. Obama acknowledged his careless rush to judgment – which some deemed as reflexive reverse racism — that the Cambridge, MA Police “acted stupidly.” The president manned up and provided leadership at a healing “Beer Summit.” Ben Franklin, no stranger to beer, would’ve likely approved this gesture. 

Rhetorically speaking, thank God that from now on when thought-terminating clichés such as “racist!,” “sexist!,” “bigot!,” “xenophobe!,” “homophobe!,” “hypocrite!,” “chicken-hawk!,” “Uncle Tom!,” “white supremacist!” etc. are hastily concocted (Max Blumenthal call your office), Americans are no longer intimidated by these divisive, intellectually-stifling smears. 

Fearless rhetorical engagement in the modern cultural/political arena of ideas is a good and necessary component of our vigorous and successful Republic. 

With principled firmness, a solid rejoinder to race-hustler-ridiculousness: “What hard evidence do you have other than clumsy guilt-by-association character assassination, and/or sins-of-the-father attacks and innuendo?” 

Too often Modern Liberal arguments amount to nothing more than self-anointed moral rulings that certain people don’t at all have standing on various issues, especially race. These rulings are never ideologically neutral but, rather, are the notorious political weaponry of Saul Alinsky. 

Once exclusively reserved for very effective use against unarmed conservatives, Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” is now self-defeating his radical ideological progeny. Now those are ‘chickens come home to roost’ that can benefit America! 

Ridicule is, according to Alinsky, man’s most potent weapon. 

Highly effective also is Andrew Breitbart’s approach of keeping the pressure on by freezing the target and making them live up to their own book of rules:

It’s time to hit back at these people — that these people keep calling you a racist… Instead of slinking into the corner and crying or saying ‘I don’t like that,’ you walk straight towards them and confront them; and they’re bullies, they’re just bullies and bullies crumble when you hit them back. 

Unity is overrated… Saddle up. Let’s Roll!