<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Big Hollywood &#187; MSNBC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/tag/msnbc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:31:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Sarah Silverman Goes Full Garofalo</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/10/31/silverman-goes-the-full-garofalo/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/10/31/silverman-goes-the-full-garofalo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 17:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hollywoodland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Maddow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Silverman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=533580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look out, Janeane Garofalo, someone&#8217;s gunning for your crown as the goofiest liberal celebrity.
Comedian Sarah Silverman didn&#8217;t start out as a politically charged stand-up. But lately she seems eager to shift her shtick from the pretty girl who talks dirty to the comedian eager to carry water for the erroneous Left.

&#8212;&#8211;
Silverman recently appeared on MSNBC&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look out, Janeane Garofalo, someone&#8217;s gunning for your crown as the goofiest liberal celebrity.</p>
<p>Comedian Sarah Silverman didn&#8217;t start out as a politically charged stand-up. But lately she seems eager to shift her shtick from the pretty girl who talks dirty to the comedian eager to carry water for the erroneous Left.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><object width="480" height="270"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/fsNM373ikik?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="270" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/fsNM373ikik?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0"></embed></object></p>
<p style="text-align: center">&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Silverman recently appeared on MSNBC&#8217;s &#8216;The Rachel Maddow Show&#8217; to promote &#8216;Live from [N-Word]head,&#8217; a comedy show meant to mock Texas Gov. Rick Perry for his scandalous ranch connection. Too bad nobody told Silverman the<a href="http://bigjournalism.com/aakbar/2011/10/03/ali-a-akbar-rick-perry-is-not-a-racist/" target="_blank"> charge has already been debunked</a> and is simply part of the mainstream media&#8217;s attempt to discredit yet another Republican.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s<a href="http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/29/sarah-silverman-on-dismissive-rick-perry-coverage-i-miss-the-jew-run-banks-and-media/" target="_blank"> Silverman pontificating</a> on the importance of keeping the racist meme alive:</p>
<p><span id="more-533580"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>“I think that any time racism shows itself in a tangible way, it’s not just a gas in the air, it’s important to take the opportunity to point at it,” Silverman said. “You know? I think it’s dangerous when it just kind of goes away and, you know, here’s a guy who is a governor and running for president and it has not injured him in any way really.”</p></blockquote>
<p>But the real culprit for letting the faux racist charge die is &#8230; wait for it &#8230; the media, according to Silverman.</p>
<blockquote><p>“I partially blame the media actually,” Silverman said. “I mean, Rachel, I am not – I have no religion, but am I crazy – I miss – I kind of miss – I miss the Jew-run banks and media. I think that wouldn’t have been let go so fast.”</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;ve been served, Garofalo.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/10/31/silverman-goes-the-full-garofalo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>91</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hollywood One-Percenter Russell Simmons: &#8216;I Don&#8217;t Pay Taxes&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/10/20/hollywood-one-percenter-russell-simmons-i-dont-pay-taxes/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/10/20/hollywood-one-percenter-russell-simmons-i-dont-pay-taxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Nolte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA['Occupy Wall Street']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[millionaire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell Simmons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=529168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obviously feeling the sting from those of us who have pointed out that there&#8217;s a very simple way to fulfill your own burning desire to pay more in taxes, gazillionaire Russell Simmons tried to explain his way out of that with this nonsense:
The conservatives always say to me, would I, why don’t I just write a check [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously feeling the sting from those of us who have pointed out that there&#8217;s <a href="http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/gift/gift.htm">a very simple way </a>to fulfill your own burning desire to pay more in taxes, gazillionaire Russell Simmons tried to explain his way out of that with this nonsense:</p>
<blockquote><p>The conservatives always say to me, would I, why don’t I just write a check for more taxes.  &#8230; Well, no, I won’t give my money to war machine and to other things, but if it will help the education and the health care for people who are locked out, of course I want to pay more taxes.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, so that&#8217;s the hold up. He only wants to pay more taxes if those taxes are directed towards what he believes in. Unfortunately, that is not how taxes work and you can bet Simmons know this. But he lacks the moral courage to speak the truth and say he doesn&#8217;t want to pay more taxes.  Furthermore, a gift to the Treasury doesn&#8217;t fund anything. It helps to pay down the national debt. So Simmons doesn&#8217;t even have his facts straight.</p>
<p>Hit PLAY and hold your nose. The hypocrisy is strong with this one:</p>
<p><center><iframe title="MRC TV video player" width="480" height="270" src="http://www.mrctv.org/embed/106721" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;</center></p>
<p>What a weaselly, pathetic excuse.</p>
<p>And naturally this raging hypocrite wouldn&#8217;t dream of giving the rest of us the choice of where our taxes go to, because I can assure you that all of mine would be directed towards the &#8220;war machine&#8221; and not a penny would go towards a drug of dependency known as welfare. </p>
<p><span id="more-529168"></span></p>
<p>More here from our friends <a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2011/10/20/multimillionaire-ows-supporter-russell-i-want-pay-more-taxes-simmons-">at Newsbusters</a>.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/10/20/hollywood-one-percenter-russell-simmons-i-dont-pay-taxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jon Stewart Hammers Ed Schultz&#8217;s Race-Baiting Deceptive Edit</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/08/18/jon-stewart-hammers-ed-schultzs-race-baiting-deceptive-edit/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/08/18/jon-stewart-hammers-ed-schultzs-race-baiting-deceptive-edit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hollywoodland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BreitbartTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Schultz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jon stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry O'Connor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=506220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
&#8212;&#8211;
This NBC News deceptive edit had just started to take off in the left-wing mainstream media when Breitbart.TV&#8217;s Editor-in-Chief Larry O&#8217;Connor revealed the full context of the quote and stopped the smear in its tracks.
By the way, jobless claims are up this week to 408,000, and a concerned President Obama has just interrupted his vacation to release [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe title="MRC TV video player" width="640" height="360" src="http://www.mrctv.org/embed/104732" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>This NBC News deceptive edit had just started to take off in the left-wing mainstream media when Breitbart.TV&#8217;s Editor-in-Chief Larry O&#8217;Connor <a href="http://www.breitbart.tv/outrage-nbc-news-ed-schultz-uses-deceptive-edit-to-paint-rick-perry-as-racist/">revealed the full context of the quote</a> and stopped the smear in its tracks.</p>
<p>By the way, jobless claims are up this week to 408,000, and a concerned President Obama has just interrupted his vacation to release this statement from Martha&#8217;s Vineyard&#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-506220"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2011/08/photo_1313005133565-1-0.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-506224 aligncenter" title="photo_1313005133565-1-0" src="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2011/08/photo_1313005133565-1-0.jpg" alt="" width="512" height="343" /></a></p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/08/18/jon-stewart-hammers-ed-schultzs-race-baiting-deceptive-edit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coulter Rules &#8216;Real Time&#8217;; Why Doesn&#8217;t She Have Her Own Show?</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/amarlow/2011/07/11/coulter-rules-real-time-why-doesnt-she-have-her-own-show/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/amarlow/2011/07/11/coulter-rules-real-time-why-doesnt-she-have-her-own-show/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Marlow</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[" "The Daily Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ann coulter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Maher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chaz Bono]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Hayes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=491876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone who caught &#8220;Real Time&#8221; this past weekend got to enjoy some great television.  Much like the boss (and much unlike your average buttoned-up conservative), Ann Coulter thrives in a political environment where there&#8217;s an emphasis on entertainment, humor, and thinking on your feet.  If you&#8217;ve read her books or seen enough of her speeches [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who caught &#8220;Real Time&#8221; this past weekend got to enjoy some great television.  Much like <a href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/author/abreitbart/">the boss</a> (and much unlike your average buttoned-up conservative), Ann Coulter thrives in a political environment where there&#8217;s an emphasis on entertainment, humor, and thinking on your feet.  If you&#8217;ve read her books or seen enough of her speeches and media appearances, you know she&#8217;s easily funnier than you average Hollywood or New York &#8220;comedian.&#8221;</p>
<p>Credit where it&#8217;s due, as usual, to Maher and co. for having her on.  &#8220;Real Time&#8221; continues to be the only liberal-leaning late-night current events/comedy show eager to engage articulate conservative commentators.</p>
<p>Here are some highlights, starting with Coulter telling MSNBC&#8217;s Chris Hayes that his mother, who has a government job, &#8220;is a drain on society&#8221;:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><iframe title="MRC TV video player" width="480" height="270" src="http://www.mrctv.org/embed/103503" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>Next is a long chunk of the round-table discussion where Maher and Coulter&#8217;s sardonic repartee takes center-stage.  This is an act they could take on the road <em>(UPDATE: Apparently they have)</em>:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><iframe src="http://videos.mediaite.com/embed/player/?layout=&#038;playlist_cid=&#038;media_type=video&#038;content=5SKSTY2L5BLHVWBD&#038;read_more=1&#038;widget_type_cid=svp" width="420" height="421" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" scrolling="no" allowtransparency="true"></iframe></p>
<p><span id="more-491876"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">And finally, Coulter smacks down Maher saying she only talks to rubes when she&#8217;s on his show:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><iframe title="MRC TV video player" width="480" height="270" src="http://www.mrctv.org/embed/103500" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Very witty, as usual.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">According to Wikipedia, Jon Stewart currently <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_The_Daily_Show_writers">has about 15 writers</a> working for him to produce the 22-minute &#8220;Daily Show&#8221; four nights per week.  Watching these clips makes you wonder what Ann Coulter could do with her own show and a team of conservative comedy writers.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">She&#8217;s written eight(!!!) best-sellers; there is an audience already built in.  And if you think Coulter is too controversial or too much of a rabble-rouser to carry her own show, Bill Maher himself <a href="http://nation.foxnews.com/gop/2011/07/09/maher-compares-republican-policy-casey-anthony-jury">likened GOP thinking to the Casey Anthony jury</a> <em>that very show</em>.  How&#8217;s that for rabble-rousing?</p>
<p>The fact that an Ann Coulter show has never been tried is all you need to know about liberal-bias in Hollywood.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/amarlow/2011/07/11/coulter-rules-real-time-why-doesnt-she-have-her-own-show/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>219</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breitbart to Appear in Sorkin&#8217;s HBO Pilot; MSNBC Nixes Matthews’s Cameo</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/07/07/breitbart-to-appear-in-sorkin-hbo-pilot-msnbc-nixes-matthewss-cameo/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/07/07/breitbart-to-appear-in-sorkin-hbo-pilot-msnbc-nixes-matthewss-cameo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hollywoodland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aaron sorkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Breitbart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hbo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeff daniels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[More As This Story Develops"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Magazine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=491288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE: After Chris Matthews backed out, the creators of the show decided they would take this scene in a different direction that doesn&#8217;t feature known pundits.  Sorkin and his team expressed interest in having Breitbart on in a future episode, should the show go to series.
***
There has been some speculation over the last 24 hours [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>UPDATE: After Chris Matthews backed out, the creators of the show decided they would take this scene in a different direction that doesn&#8217;t feature known pundits.  Sorkin and his team expressed interest in having Breitbart on in a future episode, should the show go to series.</em></p>
<p>***</p>
<p>There has been some speculation over the last 24 hours that Andrew Breitbart will be making an appearance as himself in Aaron Sorkin&#8217;s upcoming HBO project &#8220;More As This Story Develops<em>,&#8221; </em>and that is indeed the case.  &#8220;More,&#8221; which will star Jeff Daniels, is a dramatic pilot based on the world of cable news.  Originally, Breitbart was to be in a debate scene opposite MSNBC anchor Chris Matthew, but MSNBC has squelched Matthew&#8217;s participation.  <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2011/07/aaron_sorkin_chris_matthews_mo.html"><em>New York Magazine</em> reports</a> (emphasis mine):</p>
<p><a href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2011/07/sorkin.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-491292" title="sorkin" src="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2011/07/sorkin.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="300" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Vulture hears that plans for Matthews to shoot a roundtable debate scene in <em>Develops</em> alongside conservative muckracker/ Weiner-eater Andrew Breitbart have  had to be scrapped because, according to a production insider,  Matthews&#8217;s bosses at MSNBC nixed the idea.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not like MSNBC has a blanket no-scripted-programming  order for their anchors: Matthews played an MSNBC reporter two years ago  in the Russell Crowe pic <em>State of Play</em>. And a guest spot on Sorkin&#8217;s show would likely be good for publicity; assuming it goes to series, <em>Develops </em>will  likely boast an audience filled with the sort of left-leaning smarties  targeted by the news-and-opinion network. So what was the problem? Our  spy speculates that even though Sorkin&#8217;s ideology meshes with MSNBC&#8217;s,  the network&#8217;s brass may have taken issue with the way <em>More</em> portrays the world of cable news and its corporate culture.[...]  (<strong>UPDATE</strong>: Our source has further elaborated to  us that <strong>MSNBC also didn&#8217;t like the fact that parts of the show seemed to  be skewering left-leaning media</strong>.)</p></blockquote>
<p><em>NY Mag</em> describes the lead character, an anchor to be played by Daniels, as &#8220;a passionate, liberal Keith Olbermann–esque character.&#8221;<span id="more-491288"></span></p>
<p>Sorkin won an Academy Award for <em>the Social Network</em> last year.</p>
<p>More as this story develops&#8230;.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/07/07/breitbart-to-appear-in-sorkin-hbo-pilot-msnbc-nixes-matthewss-cameo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MSNBC&#8217;s Chuck Todd Previews Palin Film: ‘Supporters Are Going to Love It’</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/06/10/msnbcs-chuck-todd-previews-palin-film-supporters-are-going-to-love-it/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/06/10/msnbcs-chuck-todd-previews-palin-film-supporters-are-going-to-love-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hollywoodland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Todd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Bannon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Undefeated]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=482776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe title="MRC TV video player" width="640" height="360" src="http://www.mrctv.org/embed/102637" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/06/10/msnbcs-chuck-todd-previews-palin-film-supporters-are-going-to-love-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New Blacklist: Rachel Maddow Declares &#8216;Witchhunt&#8217; Against Huckabee Animators</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/05/13/the-new-blacklist-rachel-maddow-declares-witchhunt-against-huckabee-animators/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/05/13/the-new-blacklist-rachel-maddow-declares-witchhunt-against-huckabee-animators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 17:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Nolte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsbusters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Maddow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=475264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
&#8212;&#8211;
Rachel Maddow&#8217;s closing remarks in this segment are nothing short of obscene:
&#8220;We asked [Huckabee's production company] today who had done the animation on these DVDs.  They would not tell us.  If you know who brought this amazing animated sauce to life, please get in touch with us.  We would like to know.&#8221;
Maddow might couch her unholy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="371" height="315" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GftBZnLlysw?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="371" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GftBZnLlysw?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Rachel Maddow&#8217;s <a href="http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2011/05/13/maddow-enlists-viewers-out-animator-huckabee-history-series">closing remarks</a> in this segment are nothing short of obscene:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We asked [Huckabee's production company] today who had done the animation on these DVDs.  They would not tell us.  If you know who brought this amazing animated sauce to life, please get in touch with us.  We would like to know.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Maddow might couch her unholy request in that chirpy, kindergarten teacher voice, but the venom is 100% pure.  The hypocrisy, however, is 150%.</p>
<p>Read the quote again closely. Maddow already knows the name of the production company, but right after decrying the Hollywood blacklist of the 1950s, she demands the production company &#8212; wait for it, wait for it &#8212; <strong>name names</strong>. And because they refuse to name names, Maddow then weaponizes her own audience to witchunt up those names on her behalf.</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p><span id="more-475264"></span></p>
<p>For the same reason there was a blacklist in the 1950s. No one did anything illegal or improper here, Maddow simply disagrees with the politics of the art and in the hopes of toxifying and/or putting a stop to it has apparently decided to make a MSNBC show trial out of dunking the creators in water to see if they can acquit themselves by drowning.</p>
<p>Our friends at NewsBusters sum <a href="http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2011/05/13/maddow-enlists-viewers-out-animator-huckabee-history-series">this up well</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<div>
<p>In notoriously liberal Hollywood, being outed as Mike Huckabee&#8217;s animator could have bad career consequences.  Ironic, no, that Maddow was enlisting her viewers in such an outing just seconds after decrying the way people exposed during the McCarthy hearings &#8220;never worked again.&#8221;</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>A reader also helped NewsBusters bust the MSNBC Rhode Scholar on her revisionist history:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;[H]er history is BUNK. McCarthy had nothing to do with the Hollywood hearings.  That was HUAC. Maddow went on and on about McCarthy calling Hollywood actors to testify.  Great hearings, but McCarthy had nothing whatsoever to do with them.  He was interested in commies working for the government.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Mark my words, this is all intentional. Governor Huckabee is using the power of art to reach children and no one understands that power better than the Left. And they want this turf all to themselves. Maddow is intentionally sending a message to the artistic community that if you step off the Liberal Plantation <strong>I will Alinsky you</strong> &#8212; I will personalize this, target you, and make you infamous to any number of future employers. </p>
<p>And in response our corrupt MSM goes, doo-de-do-de-do-doo-do-do&#8230;  Because they agree with Maddow and her vicious tactics.</p>
<p>NewsBusters has <a href="http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2011/05/13/maddow-enlists-viewers-out-animator-huckabee-history-series">more</a>.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/05/13/the-new-blacklist-rachel-maddow-declares-witchhunt-against-huckabee-animators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>92</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Atlas Shrugged&#8217; Producers: The Ad MSNBC, CNBC &amp; CNN Refuse to Air</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/04/29/atlas-shrugged-producers-the-ad-msnbc-cnbc-cnn-refuses-to-air/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/04/29/atlas-shrugged-producers-the-ad-msnbc-cnbc-cnn-refuses-to-air/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 20:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Nolte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["Atlas Shrugged"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kaslow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trailer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=470972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you remember, in my exclusive story yesterday regarding the future of the &#8220;Atlas Shrugged&#8221; trilogy, we learned the following:
The most interesting development, however, is that in their effort to expand television advertising, MSNBC, CNN and CNBC “have all rejected a 15-second ad for ‘editorial’ reasons [with] no further explanation provided.”
“This unforeseen censorship effectively puts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you remember, in my exclusive story yesterday regarding the future of the &#8220;Atlas Shrugged&#8221; trilogy, we learned <a href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/04/28/exclusive-atlas-shrugged-producers-intend-to-complete-trilogy-cnn-msnbc-reject-their-ads/">the following</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The most interesting development, however, is that in their effort to expand television advertising, MSNBC, CNN and CNBC “have all rejected a 15-second ad for ‘editorial’ reasons [with] no further explanation provided.”</p>
<p>“This unforeseen censorship effectively puts the brakes on our follow-up marketing efforts where we were trying to reach millions of people unaware of the movie being in theaters now,” Kaslow wrote. “We are continuing with the theatrical release because we have great word of mouth and awareness for the movie increases daily.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Just a few minutes ago, the producers were good enough to send along a YouTube of the rejected ad with this note: &#8220;Here’s the ad.  It’s very simple and certainly in no way offensive[.]&#8221;  </p>
<p>See for yourself:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="390" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/LlsKYTW43jw?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/LlsKYTW43jw?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span id="more-470972"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Not saying there isn&#8217;t one, but I would be curious to know what the cable nets &#8220;editorial&#8221; problem is here.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/04/29/atlas-shrugged-producers-the-ad-msnbc-cnbc-cnn-refuses-to-air/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>102</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hollywood Propaganda Time: Spike Lee and MSNBC Sittin&#8217; In a Tree&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/04/25/hollywood-propaganda-time-spike-lee-and-msnbc-sittin-in-a-tree/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/04/25/hollywood-propaganda-time-spike-lee-and-msnbc-sittin-in-a-tree/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Nolte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lean Forward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spike Lee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=469624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You watch a few of these new &#8220;Lean Forward&#8221; ads and the approach becomes obvious, director Spike Lee and MSNBC are hoping to fool people into thinking  they&#8217;re all about &#8221;The People,&#8221; &#8220;The  Kids,&#8221; and &#8220;The America.&#8221; An extreme left-wing message stewed in Hollywood magic for that home-grown, down-home, God-Bless-America flavor.
But if you look closely, what we&#8217;re being told is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You watch<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40112039"> a few of these</a> new &#8220;Lean Forward&#8221; ads and the approach becomes obvious, director Spike Lee and MSNBC are hoping to fool people into thinking  they&#8217;re all about &#8221;The People,&#8221; &#8220;The  Kids,&#8221; and &#8220;The America.&#8221; An extreme left-wing message stewed in Hollywood magic for that home-grown, down-home, God-Bless-America flavor.</p>
<p>But if you look closely, what we&#8217;re being told is that it&#8217;s patriotic to take away people&#8217;s liberties with ObamaCare, truly American to spend our children and grandchildren into oblivion, and wholesome to punish prosperity.</p>
<p>In a nutshell: Government-enforced equality over individual liberty is baseball, hot dogs, mom, and apple pie!</p>
<p>This is all about 2012, folks. All about couching Obama&#8217;s extremist message and failed policies into something the independents he lost in 2010 can tolerate.  Everyone together now: Thanks Hollywood! </p>
<p>But this isn&#8217;t 2008 and we are on to you this time.  </p>
<p><center><object id="msnbc841c8e" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="420" height="245" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="FlashVars" value="launch=42705352&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="src" value="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" /><param name="name" value="msnbc841c8e" /><param name="flashvars" value="launch=42705352&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed id="msnbc841c8e" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="420" height="245" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" allowscriptaccess="always" flashvars="launch=42705352&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent" name="msnbc841c8e"></embed></object></div>
<p style="text-align: center; margin-top: 5px; width: 420px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; background: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%; color: #999; font-size: 11px;">Visit msnbc.com for <a style="border-bottom: #999 1px dotted; height: 13px; color: #5799db !important; font-weight: normal !important; text-decoration: none !important;" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com">breaking news</a>, <a style="border-bottom: #999 1px dotted; height: 13px; color: #5799db !important; font-weight: normal !important; text-decoration: none !important;" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032507">world news</a>, and <a style="border-bottom: #999 1px dotted; height: 13px; color: #5799db !important; font-weight: normal !important; text-decoration: none !important;" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032072">news about the economy</a></center></p>
<p><span id="more-469624"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowldc/spike-lee-directs-new-msnbc-ads_b37184"><strong>Fishbowl DC</strong></a><strong>:</strong></p>
<p>MSNBC debuted new “Lean Forward” ads today featuring the network’s four primetime hosts: <strong>Chris Matthews</strong>, <strong>Lawrence O’Donnell</strong>, <strong>Rachel Maddow</strong> and <strong>Ed Schultz</strong>.</p>
<p>But there’s something different about the ads this time around. They’re directed by <strong>Spike Lee</strong>, and Oscar-nominated <strong>Matthew Libatique</strong>, who worked on “Black Swan,” served as the director of photography.</p>
<p>According to a press release, the ads were “all shot completely unscripted” and will appear on television, msnbc.com, and in movie theaters across the country this summer. Separate print ads will run in “major publications.”</p>
<p><strong>Full piece<a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowldc/spike-lee-directs-new-msnbc-ads_b37184"> here</a>. </strong></p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/04/25/hollywood-propaganda-time-spike-lee-and-msnbc-sittin-in-a-tree/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Only the LSM* Could Spin Into a Negative Andrew Breitbart&#8217;s Desire to See Sarah Palin Command Pop Culture</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/03/25/only-the-msm-could-spin-into-a-negative-andrew-breitbarts-desire-to-see-sarah-palin-command-pop-culture/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/03/25/only-the-msm-could-spin-into-a-negative-andrew-breitbarts-desire-to-see-sarah-palin-command-pop-culture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Nolte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Breitbart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breitbart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood Interrupted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediaite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarah palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talking Points Memo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=459744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though notorious for my lousy memory, anyone who&#8217;s ever shared this experience will understand why I&#8217;ll never forget my first phone call with Andrew Breitbart. It&#8217;s hard to believe almost three years have passed so quickly, but I do remember the conversation like it was yesterday. At the time I was trying to squeak out a living at a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though notorious for my lousy memory, anyone who&#8217;s ever shared this experience will understand why I&#8217;ll never forget my first phone call with Andrew Breitbart. It&#8217;s hard to believe almost three years have passed so quickly, but I do remember the conversation like it was yesterday. At the time I was trying to squeak out a living at a website of my own that was pretty much devoted to my vision-less complaining about the terrible effect left-wing politics was having on my beloved motion picture industry. On a good day, I maybe got 5,000 hits but things were so financially dire that something had to give &#8212; and by &#8220;something had to give,&#8221; I mean, &#8220;I was a month away from going back to bill collecting.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then the email came: <em>Please </em>c<em>all me. *phone number* &#8211;</em><em>Andrew Breitbart. </em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em><a href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2011/03/Palin-Breitbart.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-459908" title="Palin-Breitbart" src="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2011/03/Palin-Breitbart.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="361" /></a></em></p>
<p>I knew of Andrew and had only met him very briefly once before but that day we talked for over two hours and if I were smarter, anything close to charismatic, and capable of being a visionary, it would&#8217;ve been like talking to myself. By that time I had already been trying to sound the alarm about what was happening in Hollywood for nearly three years. Certainly there were people who appreciated it, but 5,000 hits a day does not a movement make. But here was this guy on the other end of the phone speaking about it with more passion and insight than I had ever heard before: This is about America. This is about a blacklist. This is about a diversity of opinion at the pop culture table. This is about my kids. This is about truth, justice, and the American way. Out of anyone else&#8217;s mouth this would&#8217;ve sounded corny as hell, but from Andrew it sounded like The Ramones had entered the building.</p>
<p>So there was that, and then there was the vision. A media empire of BIG sites. Over ten of them: Big Government, Big Journalism, Big Peace, Big Education, Big Israel, and my personal favorite, Big Soros. But it would have to start with Big Hollywood, he said, because nothing was more important than the culture. If you couldn&#8217;t win a seat at the table of pop culture, the others won&#8217;t matter. Everything is downstream from Hollywood &#8212; and not just politics. Hollywood shapes our children, our country, and most importantly, it shapes how the world sees our country. Unless we gain a foothold on that beach, the rest of the invasion will fail.</p>
<p><span id="more-459744"></span></p>
<p>When I hung up the phone the only doubt I had about his judgment was that he was considering me for the job. Not to be falsely modest, but who was I? Well, as it turned out I was uniquely qualified. I love movies, I know about them, I ran a blog, I can write some, I enjoyed some experience in the industry, I&#8217;m right-of-center, politically, and I had never been<em> convicted</em> of a felony. In my life I have failed way more than I have ever succeeded, but somewhere along the way I did manage to build an unexceptional resume that, as luck would have it, also happened to check all the boxes necessary for a shot at running Big Hollywood. But still, think about it: if you&#8217;re going to build a media empire, if you want to make a splash and plant a flag in the big bad media world, wouldn&#8217;t it be better to open with a star player like Peter Schweizer, Dana Loesch, Mike Walsh or Mike Flynn as opposed to some guy plunking away at an obscure blog no one&#8217;s ever heard of? I wouldn&#8217;t have gone that way, but&#8230;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s how important the culture is to Andrew. Business-wise there was absolutely no upside in using as the foundation for a dream a completely unknown name on the masthead of a site that covers a niche topic. Thankfully, though, that decision wasn&#8217;t up to me. </p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2011/03/untitled3.bmp"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-459920" title="untitled" src="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2011/03/untitled3.bmp" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>Furthermore, popular culture has been Andrew&#8217;s passion going all the way back to 2004 when he teamed up with Mark Ebner to write &#8220;<a href="Insanity Chic in Babylon -- The Case Against Celebrity [Hardcover]">Hollywood Interrupted: Insanity Chic in Babylon &#8212; The Case Against Celebrity</a>,&#8221; which means that this was the priority of his life even before it was mine &#8212; and I&#8217;m older than he is.</p>
<p>And so this is how JournOlism works: Starting with our left-wing friends<a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/andrew-breitbart-to-gq-the-presidency-is-beneath-sarah-palin/"> at Mediaite</a>, looping back up through the equally leftist <a href="http://bigjournalism.com/lstranahan/2011/03/23/talking-points-memo-gives-crash-course-in-bad-journalism/">Talking Points Memo</a> and <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/51811.html">Politico</a> before finally <a href="http://www.breitbart.tv/msnbcs-matthews-gives-nonsensical-snoopy-analogy-when-analyzing-breitbarts-comments-comparing-palin-to-oprah/">landing at MSNBC</a>, the idea is to do anything and everything in an attempt to humiliate, demean, and diminish Sarah Palin &#8212; and that includes the spinning of a compliment made by one of her biggest fans and chief defenders into a criticism.</p>
<p>Not everyone can be President of these here United States, but more than one person can. How many people on our side, though, have what the legendary movie moguls once called <em>oomph?</em> The former Governor of Alaska has star power to burn, savvy to spare, is as tough as a hickory knot, and yet while were told again and again by The Sophisticated Class that she&#8217;s dumb as a post, somehow she also happens to be right about almost everything. But because his primary passion is the culture, Andrew sees Palin as a transcendent figure &#8212; someone, yes, bigger than the presidency &#8212; a &#8220;Red State&#8221; Oprah. He said so on the record<a href="http://leestranahan.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/TPM_Video.jpg"> back in November</a>, and in my personal conversations with him, he has said so since I&#8217;ve started working for him. </p>
<p>Anyone who knows me or who has followed me <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/jjmnolte">on Twitter </a>knows that all Sarah Palin has to do is point to the broken glass she wants me to crawl over. I&#8217;ve never seen anyone put through such a cruel, mean-spirited, public meat grinder where their family, womb, faith, gender, dialect, looks and culture are all fair game for the worst kinds of smears. And because she has survived this unprecedented evil with such grace and dignity &#8211; Sarah Palin is my hero. And of course I want her to be president. But when Andrew says that he sees her as the Oprah of the right; once again, he&#8217;s seeing the bigger picture &#8212; the pop culture landscape that shapes and defines our politics in ways not enough people on our side understand (you better believe the Left gets it).</p>
<p>There &#8217;s only one Sarah Palin and she would make for one outstanding president, and like Andrew I will vote <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/AndrewBreitbart/status/50711850047901696">for her in a heartbeat </a>and fight for her every step of the way. But it&#8217;s just a fact that the price of a President Sarah Palin is a hole in the crucial pop culture war that only she can fill. And only a wicked, journOlisting MSM would attempt to spin into a negative a man publicly declaring that he would like to see this one person lead the charge in a battle that has defined his life more than any other.</p>
<p>*LSM = <a href="http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/03/24/sarah-palin-responds-to-maher-media-bias/">Lamestream Media</a>.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/03/25/only-the-msm-could-spin-into-a-negative-andrew-breitbarts-desire-to-see-sarah-palin-command-pop-culture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

