<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Big Hollywood &#187; jump shark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/tag/jump-shark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:31:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>‘The Event’ Review: Sets Record &#8212; First Series to Jump the Shark in First Episode</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/stkarnick/2010/09/22/the-event-review-sets-record-first-series-to-jump-the-shark-in-first-episode/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/stkarnick/2010/09/22/the-event-review-sets-record-first-series-to-jump-the-shark-in-first-episode/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>S.T. Karnick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Episode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jump shark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pilot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[premiere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the event]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=397173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NBC’s The Event has probably been one of the most widely anticipated new series of the current season. The network ran countless promotional spots intended to entice viewers to wonder precisely what the title occurrence might be, and what it might mean.
Of course, big hype means big expectations, and it’s an open question whether the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NBC’s <em>The Event</em> has probably been one of the most widely anticipated new series of the current season. The network ran countless promotional spots intended to entice viewers to wonder precisely what the title occurrence might be, and what it might mean.</p>
<p>Of course, big hype means big expectations, and it’s an open question whether the show can live up to them. The ratings last night were good but not as high as NBC might have hoped, with the show finishing third in its time slot.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-397185 aligncenter" title="NUP_139534_0178" src="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2010/09/alg_event.jpg" alt="NUP_139534_0178" width="485" height="323" /></p>
<p><a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/09/21/tv-ratings-monday-dancing-castle-two-and-a-half-men-up-lone-star-no-star-the-event-hawaii-five-0/64332" target="_blank">According to TV by the Numbers</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>It was NBC’s best non-olympic performance in the time slot since February 2, 2009 and it rose from a 3.5 rating with adults 18-49 in the first half hour to a 3.9 in the second half hour.</p></blockquote>
<p>But, OK, you may be wondering, should I watch it? Will it be worth my time?</p>
<p>Short answer: probably not, at least if the pilot episode is any indication.</p>
<p>One distinctive element of <em>The Event</em> is the show’s narrative structure: the story jumps back and forth in time and from one place to another. I didn’t find that to be a problem, but others might not find that aspect of <em>The Event</em> particularly enjoyable.</p>
<p>The other evident thing about the pilot episode is the lack of a clear central character. Just as the story jumps about in time and place, it also jumps from one central character to another. That is a more important concern, I think.<span id="more-397173"></span></p>
<p>Everything seems intended to make the viewer wonder what the event of the show’s title will be.<strong> [Note: plenty of plot spoilers ahead.]</strong> Early on, a man named Simon, whom we are to figure is a police or security officer of some sort,  says, “He’s going to tell them about The Event,” regarding a man on a jetliner who appears at the time to be a potential terrorist. One presumes that he is referring to the actual event, and not the show itself, though given all the promo spots NBC has run for it in recent weeks, one would be excused for thinking otherwise. As the plane is rushing along the runway preparatory to takeoff, Simon races his SUV alongside in an effort to get it to stop, but he fails. Realism wins this round.</p>
<p>Soon thereafter we find that the President of the United States plans to close down a government detainment facility, even though all of his national security advisors counsel against it. We are then thrust thirteen months into the past, when the President finds out that the CIA has been running a secret facility of some sort in a remote area of Alaska. Presumably, this is the one the President was planning to close down earlier—er, later, um, . . . in the earlier scene set later in the fictional timeline.</p>
<p>The Prez and his advisers then all hash out some arguments over whether terrorism justifies governments’ abrogation of people’s rights. And as appears to be required in this sort of show, one of his advisers makes a portentous statement that proves he’s on the Dark Side: “We sacrifice the rights of the few for the safety of the many all the time.”</p>
<p>After that bombshell, we find ourselves on a cruise ship in which a young man is thrust into an oft-used type of nightmare plot in suspense stories: his girlfriend disappears, the cruise ship cabin in which they were staying is now occupied by another couple, and no records of either him or his fiancé are to be found. (This has been done well many times, and done poorly many, many more. This one is not bad, but it’s frustratingly unoriginal.) From earlier scenes, we know that this poor chap is going to end up on a jetliner trying to talk his girlfriend’s father out of crashing the plane into the President’s vacation compound in a bizarre assassination attempt. Now that’s what I call a lousy day.</p>
<p>It’s all a build-up to this spectacular attempt on the President’s life. This must be The Event.</p>
<p>So, you may wonder, how does that go? Pretty tense, right? Well, yes and no. Given that the President and his family are nearly complete ciphers to the viewer, it’s difficult to get worked up about the potential assassination, except insofar as one is devoted to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Donne" target="_blank">John Donne</a>‘s attitude that <a href="http://www.luminarium.org/sevenlit/donne/meditation17.php" target="_blank">“any man’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind.”</a> The problem here is that the President and First Lady aren’t given enough distinctive character traits—any, really—to enable us to see them as fully human. They’re just placeholders.</p>
<p>Anyway, the assassination attempt is averted—by a literal miracle: the jetliner disappears into some sort of hole in the space-time continuum—along with any interest I had in the story until this point.</p>
<p>If the producers of <em>The Event</em> managed to prove anything, it’s that it’s possible for a TV series to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jumping_the_shark" target="_blank">jump the shark</a> in its very first episode.</p>
<p>Anyway, back to the story. “They saved us,” a woman tells the President, referring to the miracle disappearance of the jetliner. Naturally, he asks her whom she means, and just as naturally the episode ends before she says anything useful.</p>
<p>If all this sounds a bit confusing, it really isn’t. Despite the jumping around in time and space, the story is reasonably coherent and in fact rather simple. And that seems to me to be a problem with the pilot episode of <em>The Event</em>: it’s too much of a rehash of suspense clichés without any particularly interesting characters or settings, plus a spectacular supernatural event as in <em>Lost</em> and last year’s <em>FlashForward.</em> If the viewer does not identify strongly with the characters, the emotional effect of any dangers they face is greatly diminished. That’s something one should learn on the first day of Suspense 101.</p>
<p>The problem with <em>The Event</em> is the failure to convey a real sense of danger with which the audience can actually identify. The characters are so vague and the situations so bizarre and overblown that it makes the viewer a passive bystander rather than feeling like an active participant.</p>
<p>The people who made the show undoubtedly had their hearts in the right place. We should all be against assassinations and the incarceration of innocent people. But without compelling characters and situations to drive the story along, no event, however spectacular, can really keep our interest. And unless the upcoming episodes quickly rectify those faults, <em>The Event</em> appears likely to be a short-term thing.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/stkarnick/2010/09/22/the-event-review-sets-record-first-series-to-jump-the-shark-in-first-episode/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>91</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8 Reasons &#8216;24&#8242; Has Jumped the Shark</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bshapiro/2009/02/06/8-reasons-24-has-jumped-the-shark/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bshapiro/2009/02/06/8-reasons-24-has-jumped-the-shark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 14:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Shapiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[24]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janeane garofalo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jump shark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kiefer sutherland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=42866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I used to count myself among the biggest fans of 24.  A friend recommended 24 during Season 2, and I went back and rented Season 1.  It was addictive, fast-paced, genuinely adrenaline-pumping.  The first half of Season 2 was almost as good.  Season 3 was similarly excellent, and while Season 4 dropped off in quality [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to count myself among the biggest fans of <em>24</em>.  A friend recommended <em>24 </em>during Season 2, and I went back and rented Season 1.  It was addictive, fast-paced, genuinely adrenaline-pumping.  The first half of Season 2 was almost as good.  Season 3 was similarly excellent, and while Season 4 dropped off in quality a bit, it still kept the blood moving.  The much-derided Season 5 was more than half decent, despite its Nixonian tinge.  Season 6, of course, was a full scale disaster. </p>
<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2009/02/ddddddp.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-43814" src="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2009/02/ddddddp-300x194.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="194" /></a><br />
Ben Shapiro and Kiefer Sutherland</p>
<p>But I was hopeful that Season 7 would provide redemption.  Tony Almeida was back.  Sure, it was Joey Tribiani-esque soap opera reappearance, but Tony was Tony and I was happy to see him, even if they wheeled him in Bernie-style.  Jack Bauer was back to his old ways, making impossible shots with a handgun while shouting brilliantisms like &#8220;Dammit!&#8221; and &#8220;We&#8217;re running out of time!&#8221;  The Palmer family was gone, once and for all.  So was the Bauer family, from James Cromwell&#8217;s insipid dad to Elisha Cuthbert&#8217;s horrifyingly dull daughter.  Jon Voight would pop in.  It was a recipe for a good time. <span id="more-42866"></span></p>
<p>Well, not so much.  I&#8217;m not going to pass judgment on the entire season just yet &#8211; I owe Jack and Tony that much.  But I can say with complete certainty that so far this season, <em>24 </em>isn&#8217;t just jumping the shark, it&#8217;s leaping the shark with a rocket-powered pogo stick.  I offer the following compendium of complaints in an effort to steer the show in a better direction in future seasons: </p>
<p><strong>1.  President Allison Taylor</strong>.  It was difficult to take a step down from Wayne Palmer, but somehow President Taylor manages to do it.  Repeating over and over that you won&#8217;t negotiate with terrorists &#8211; and retaining advisors who keep telling you to do it &#8211; is boring.  No, boring isn&#8217;t right.  Drool-cup, soporific, double dose valium boring.  Honestly, I found David Palmer boring as well.  He never made a single tough decision in all his time as president.  The best president on <em>24 </em>was Keeler, and he was knocked off after a few episodes to make way for President Nixon-Lookalike.  Can we have a president who isn&#8217;t either Nixon (Logan &#8212; pure evil) or Obama (Palmer &#8211; pure purity) or Hillary (Taylor &#8212; pure gumption)?  How about a Clinton type (pure STDs)?  Or a Bush type (sometimes makes mistakes, but does the right thing)?  Or even a Carter type (surrender first)? </p>
<p><strong>2.  Sangala</strong>.  No one has ever heard of this country, but Taylor&#8217;s spending all this time deciding whether to invade it.  Can we start talking about real countries, please?  Call this one Sudan, and at least you can get a good debate going.  Or how about Iran, or Syria?  There&#8217;s no apparent reason for this invasion of Sangala.  It&#8217;s like Yugoslavia &#8211; which liberals think was the most moral war of all time, since it accomplished nothing that could remotely be said to redound to America&#8217;s benefit &#8211; except that it&#8217;s got a lot of cute African kids.  It is, therefore, boring.  As long as we&#8217;re invading random made-up countries, why don&#8217;t the writers just have Taylor embrace a full-scale invasion of Neverland to depose that dastardly Hook fellow?  </p>
<p><strong>3.  </strong> <strong>First Gentleman Taylor</strong>.  Allison Taylor is a whiny good-for-nothing, who so far this season has done nothing except ream out her advisors.  And she&#8217;s the better half.  Her husband is a pusillanimous little weasel of a fellow who goes around bullying his son&#8217;s ex-girlfriend and stupidly relying on the most transparent villain ever, Secret Service Agent GQ.  The nice thing for First Gentleman Taylor is that Agent GQ is even dumber than Taylor is.  Instead of just killing the ex-girlfriend and then shooting Taylor in the head at close range, he decides that the best way to fake a suicide is to hang Taylor from a lofty balcony.  Naturally, he leaves himself wide open to First Gentleman Taylor, who suddenly becomes Ray Lewis and tackles Agent GQ over the balcony, killing him.  This is about as convincing a set-up as Rosie O&#8217;Donnell playing a woman in <em>A League of Their Own</em>. </p>
<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2009/02/garofalo-in-red-top.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-42902 aligncenter" src="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2009/02/garofalo-in-red-top-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a></p>
<p><strong>4.  Janeane Garofalo</strong>.  You knew I had to go here.  I don&#8217;t mind Garofalo as an actress.  I don&#8217;t even mind her idiotic attempts at political commentary &#8211; it&#8217;s actually rather amusing.  To paraphrase Shaw, Garofalo&#8217;s preaching is like a dog walking on its hind legs; it is not done well, but you are surprised to find it done at all.  What I do mind is her character, who is a Chloe-lite annoying bundle of neurosis.  One Chloe per show is enough.  And her bitchy slap-fight with Greasy-Looking Computer Guy Having an Affair With Blonde Computer Lady ain&#8217;t Edgar vs. Chloe.  Make her the mole, and we can sleep happily tonight.  Make her a likeable employee who takes one for the team (RIP Edgar) and we&#8217;ll be bored.  Let her survive, and we&#8217;ll be weeping. </p>
<p><strong>5.  Tony Almeida</strong>.  Sorry, Tony.  I&#8217;m glad Tony&#8217;s alive.  I really am.  But they should give him something to do so that we can sense that he&#8217;s alive.  He hasn&#8217;t gone off on anybody yet, which is ridiculous &#8211; after spending several years going after the American government for getting his wife killed, he&#8217;s certainly taking this whole &#8220;save the government&#8221; thing pretty well.  I have hope that this will change, and that we will see Psycho Killer Tony some time in the future.  If the little kickboxing match he had with Jack in the first couple of episodes was the extent of his comeback, they should have left him wandering around in <em>24 </em>purgatory. </p>
<p><strong>6</strong>.  <strong>The Techniques</strong>.  Stop setting up perimeters.  Just stop it.  They don&#8217;t work.  Stop trying to track calls.  It never works.  You have a better shot at asking the villain politely where he is.  Stop preventing Jack from beating up suspects.  That always works, and you keep intervening.  Dammit, we&#8217;re running out of patience! </p>
<p><strong>7.  The Writers</strong>.  Okay, seriously guys, it&#8217;s time to trash your storyboard and come up with a new one.  I can summarize your pattern every season.  It&#8217;s the most predictable pattern on TV, outside of <em>House</em> (seizure, House bitches, makes a snide sexual reference, theory, failure, House bitches, makes an atheist reference, theory, failure, Cuddy and House fight, correct theory, House has snarky sign off).  Here&#8217;s the underlying pattern to every season of <em>24</em>: (1) Second-Tier Villain (STV) threatens attack.  He is secretly working for someone else, the shadowy First-Tier Villain (FTV).  Usually, the STV is of minority persuasion, and the FTV is a white corporate/political mastermind.  (2) Jack prevents the attack, recognizes there is a mole in law enforcement.  (3) STV threatens president&#8217;s family, President hesitates.  (4) Jack tracks down STV, kills him, tries to find mole, fails, but finds a clue leading him to the &#8220;shocking&#8221; identity of FTV.  (5) FTV activates &#8220;Plan B.&#8221;  (6) Somebody we like dies (see George Mason, Edgar, Curtis).  (7) Jack gets pissed, tracks down FTV, kills him, but does something bad in the process to tick somebody off, or leaves the Biggest Mastermind intact, who still wants to kill Jack in revenge.  (8) Jack runs away and/or is depressed.  Come on, now.  Variety is the spice of entertainment.  You have to stop writing the scripts as though you&#8217;re filling in a mad lib. </p>
<p><strong>8</strong>.  <strong>The Villains</strong>.  Dubaku is right out of central casting, the kind of guy who kills kids for breakfast and then blows up planes for dessert.  How about a villain with a complex motivation and/or personality rather than some evil dude who stands around and scowls?  The best TV and movie villains either (a) are brilliant and/or have a sense of humor (Gene Hackman&#8217;s Lex Luthor, Alan Rickman&#8217;s Hans Gruber, <em>Lost</em>&#8217;s Ben Linus) or (b) have a motivation that is backed by an interestingly evil philosophy or a serious mental defect, or both (Heath Ledger&#8217;s Joker, Emperor Palpatine, Peter Lorre&#8217;s Hans Beckert, Angela Lansbury&#8217;s Mrs. Iselin).  <em>24</em>&#8217;s villains have typically been stock terrorists of all colors, and/or greedy scumsuckers of the upper crust.  That&#8217;s fine, but there&#8217;s a way to make that compelling.  <em>24 </em>hasn&#8217;t done it. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m interested to hear what other people believe is going wrong with <em>24</em>.  Has it just played out its string?  </p>
<p>I still hold out hope.  If Jack can come back from the dead not once, but twice, there&#8217;s no reason the writers can&#8217;t resurrect the show.  But they&#8217;d better hurry.  We&#8217;re running out of time.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bshapiro/2009/02/06/8-reasons-24-has-jumped-the-shark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>89</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

