Do Politics Drive Hollywood’s Slow Response to Heartland Disasters?
by Susan SwiftA savvy man once said: “The biggest factor in attracting aid is not the amount of human suffering caused by an event, but the amount of media coverage it receives.”
Celebrities traditionally love to depict themselves as humanitarians, often rushing to seize headlines in relief efforts following natural disasters. But are Hollywood celebrities politically selective when publicizing human tragedy?
The problem is that celebrity showcasing of natural disasters, such as concerts for domestic relief, can be politically touchy: They imply governmental inaction or mishandling, hence the “need” for private fundraising, and second, they highlight tragedy and suffering by Americans in our country. Together these are political buzzkill for an administration in full reelection mode desperate to keep a happy face on the state of the union.
Does Hollywood tend to publicly spotlight American suffering when Republicans control the White House? Recall FarmAid during the Reagan Administration? Willie Nelson and John Mellencamp rallied to “help” the suffering of farmers facing foreclosures under a backdrop of relentless media presentation of their suffering. Yet during the Obama Administration, more homeowners have suffered foreclosure and repossession than anytime in history. Yet no sweet music there. No nationally publicized Hollywood relief to emphasize the suffering plight of Americans under Obama.
During Bush 43’s Administration, “A Concert for Hurricane Relief” was thrown together with, well, whirlwind speed and nationally broadcast on NBC, MSNBC and CNBC, showcasing artists including Harry Connick Jr., Wynton Marsalis and Tim McGraw. Matt Lauer of the “Today” show acted as host of the telethon. ”Shelter From the Storm” was another big Hollywood fundraiser featuring a Bush-bashing Kanye West. Such star-studded Katrina fundraising is still ongoing.







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?