—–

NSFW … obviously.

—–

Classy response from the former Godfather’s Pizza CEO and GOP presidential candidate.

Bottom line, Janeane Garofalo doesn’t believe a Black man can or should think different from her, and if he does, he’s either corrupt (taking a pay off) or crazy (suffering Stockholm Syndrome); and that kind of thinking makes Garofalo the one with serious racial issues.

Of course, both she and Keith Olbermann have gotten away with this because our corrupt MSM is too busy screaming racist at those on the Right who use such sinister phrases as “basketball,” “food stamps,” and “dark clouds.”

None of this should be surprising, though. After all, this is the same MSM currently freaking out over Michele Bachmann and Rick Perry’s faith after spending all of 2008 assuring us that The Man Who Would Be President’s attendance for 20 years in a racist church run by his mentor — a racist, anti-American demagogue — didn’t matter.

Here she is trying to accuse black conservatives of Stockholm Syndrome, again:

—–

Okay, here she really is. Anyway…

Janeane Garofalo wouldn’t know Stockholm Syndrome if it were the applicator she uses for her wheat grass enemas.

Stockholm Syndrome would be better applied to a group of people who still vote for the party that: 

• Fought to keep slavery legal.
• Founded the KKK.
• Imposed Jim Crow laws.
• Created the Jim Crow Minstrel to boot  (Thomas D. Rice – D)
• Imposed the Dred Scott Decision.
• Revoked special field order 15, or “40 Acres and a Mule.
• Revoked federal positions for blacks.
• Pro segregation in schools and military.

All these things Democrats were for and Republicans  against.

And no, there was no party switch, that is, unless you’re talking about black voters. Blacks started voting Democratic long before the supposed “party switch,” before the supposed Southern Strategy. The black community was disenfranchised by Democrats, and then established as a voting stock for the Democratic party as early as FDR’s first term, as he brought in the entitlement society.

Furthermore, the Dixiecrats went back to the Democrat party, as they said: “We would vote for a yellow dog before voting Republican.”   

It would take too much time to list all the Dixiecrats who went back to the Democrat party, but liberals always showcase that cherry-picked exception known as Strom Thurman. Thurman should have remained a Democrat. He would have been forgiven for being a bigot, like lifelong Democrat and former KKK Grand Wizard, Senator Robert Byrd.

But Janeane Garofalo says we Black republicans have Stockholm Syndrome. And where is this proof that Herman Cain is being paid off? Where is the proof that any of us conservatives of color are being paid off?

Is Janeane Garofalo so full of herself that she thinks it takes large amounts of money for us to think different than she does? I got news for ya! We take great pleasure in knowing we think different than Janeane Garofalo! It didn’t take money, either. We did it because it’s the rigjt thing to do, because people like Janeane Garofalo have the same sour attitude of a slave owner whose ego was bruised because one of the slaves was able to outsmart ‘em and escape.

Janeane is bitter because more and more blacks are seeing past and through her.

Black people, if you vote Democrat that’s your choice, but please consider where the real bigotry comes from. We don’t call you what Democrats call us: Uncle Toms, sell outs, house ni**as, boot lickers, oreos, twinkies, bananas, coconuts … the list goes on.

These are racist terms used by the Left. That’s where the real bigotry is.

Please re-evaluate the notion of who does and doesn’t have Stockholm Syndrome.

 Case in point: The Miserable Janeane Garofalo:

Garofalo also said successful businessman Herman Cain is either being paid to run or is suffering from Stockholm syndrome because he is a “person of color” running as a Republican in the party’s presidential primary.

“[He's] in this presidential race because he deflects the racism that is inherent in the Republican party, the conservative movement, the Tea Party certainly. [In] the last 30 years the Republican party has been moving more and more to the right, but also race-baiting more. Gay-baiting more. Religion-baiting more,” Garofalo said.

“But, Herman Cain, I feel like, is being paid by somebody to be involved and to run for president so that you go like ‘I love that, that can’t be racist. He’s a black guy, a black guy asking for Obama being impeached.’ Or ‘it’s a black guy whose anti-Muslim. It’s a black guy who is a Tea Party guy.’”

Garofalo also had some conspiracy theories as to who may be putting Cain up to this.

“And I feel like wouldn’t that suit the purposes of whomever astroturfs these things. Whether that be the Koch brothers or Grover Norquist or any anything. It could even be Karl Rove. ‘Let’s get Herman Cain involved so it deflects the obvious racism of our Republican party,’” Garofalo said.

“Would that be separate from his delusions of grandeur or are they just taking advantage of him?” host Keith Olbermann asked.

Ms. Garofalo disagreed but had another reason for why she thinks Cain is in the race which includes diagnosing him with Stockholm syndrome.

So a black American who disagrees with Barack Obama is suffering from some sort of syndrome because he can’t actually believe those things – can’t actually have a mind of his own – can’t actually not be a Leftist. No…

He’s SICK!

Meet the new “Uncle Tom” … Stockholm Syndrome.

Meet the new Democrat, same as the old Southern Democrat: Racists who expect their blacks to stay in line.

This isn’t a dogwhistle of racism, it’s a bugle.

“Explain that one to me now, you have an African American gentlemen married to a white woman who is in cahoots with a group that has a lot of racists in it. Is that Scotkhom Syndrome on his part or what’s going on?”

Olbermann says:

“You can be 100% white and not be racist … you don’t have to be integrated.”

Because he went from an all-white network to an all-white show, he was quick to slip his backside from that sling.

Garofalo:

“If it was a white Democrat, you couldn’t get so many Tea Party people so upset whatever it is they’re upset about – showing up armed to town hall meetings,” she said. “By the way, if a black person showed up armed at a town hall meeting where a white politician was speaking, it would be on lockdown martial law and we’d never hear the end of it.”

No, it was the media who went into lockdown mode when an armed, law-abiding conservative black American showed up to a rally exercising his Second Amendment rights — in fact they went beyond lockdown and tried to erase his existence by omitting his race.

Read the full post here.

It’s no secret that television commercials, sitcoms, children’s shows and mainstream news are all renowned for promoting left-leaning bias. Woven into the tapestry of primetime Hollywood offerings are messages insinuating that the liberal choice is always the better, more intelligent option.  

Television is saturated with liberals who attempt to influence public opinion with subliminal methods as subtle as smiling approvingly when interviewing a liberal and scowling when discussing a conservative. 

The hit show Glee presents homosexuality as a viable option for confused prom “queens” vying for the dual prize of acceptance and a rhinestone crown. Private Practice’s Dr. Addison Montgomery heroically performed a partial-birth abortion and even Doctor House’s main squeeze Lisa Edelstein, complete with a hanger for a prop, promoted legalized abortion in a “We Won’t Go Back” ad.  

While most liberal bias is blatant, some can be more insidious, because inherent to all liberalism, regardless of genre or venue, is an unrelenting crusade to portray conservatives as idiotic dolts. 

Arrogant, self-impressed celebrities like the vulgar Bill Maher, who fancies himself the smartest person in the world, and horn-rimmed actress/comedian Janeane Garofalo, who also sees herself as an intellectual giant, are so convinced of their own brain power that both have forged full-fledged television careers disrespecting the intelligence and religious persuasion of political adversaries. 

Ask a politically uninformed person on the street if Sarah Palin is smart, and thanks to 30 Rock star/ comedian Tina Fey’s career-boosting misrepresentation of Sarah’s “I can see Russia” comment, a resounding “No!” is usually accompanied by a sarcastic giggle. 

In fact, Tina Fey single-handedly enhanced Saturday Night Live’s ratings by mockingly imitating Sarah Palin’s folksy style and portraying her as an intellectually challenged bubble brain.  Fey prides herself on depicting Sarah as a dim-witted fool.  Tina’s efforts proved so successful that while many people recognize that Palin’s warmth and genuine nature is not a reflection of her intellect, Tina’s merciless efforts convinced far too many people to associate the name ‘Palin’ with idiocy. 

Thanks to Hollywood, in the mind of the public, former president George W. Bush has also been reduced to a bumbling ignoramus. Rush Limbaugh, regardless of weight loss and rehab, continues to be depicted as a fat drug addict. The liberal media is even attempting to portray accomplished Minnesota Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann as a confused, wild-eyed ditz.  

On the other hand, when either Bill or Hillary Clinton is mentioned, the overriding liberal media consensus tends to imply: Both are brilliant. As for Michelle Obama, she is not only smart and savvy, she’s a lithe fashion icon with great biceps, while Barack is an outstanding orator with superior intellect who, despite submitting minimal written proof, is perceived by most as a genius – all thanks to the liberal media’s incessant cheerleading. 

In the Broadway play “You’re Welcome America,” left coast native and former Saturday Night Live star Will Ferrell got big laughs at the expense of George W. Bush. Yet Brilliant One Barack in the year 2011 dated his signature in the guest book in Westminster Abbey “2008” a slip-up that went unnoticed on the Hollywood Mock-o-Meter. 

Does anyone remember Dan Quayle misspelling potato as “potatoe?” If it had been a prominent conservative that had confused the date, the error would have inspired the dum-dum drumbeat to pound away in primetime for months.  

The truth is, Hollywood or otherwise, liberals everywhere perceive themselves as intellectually superior beings.  Those who align with the left do so because in their haughty, deluded minds, liberalism is defined as a cerebral ascent they believe conservatives are incapable of making.  Couple that sentiment with Hollywood’s narcissistic arrogance and the combo makes for television whose goal is to find every opportunity to “enlighten” the uninformed masses by depicting conservatives as liberals perceive them to be – dolts worthy of being laughed at and dismissed.

—–

I admit it, this post is nothing more than shameless comment bait. I’ve never even heard of this guy. At first I thought he might be Elvis Costello’s unloved son or the Southwest regional secretary of the Harold Lloyd fan club. To be honest with you, I don’t even understand the title of this post. I stole it from TV. What I’m thinking, though, is that this is some new form of Air America, liberal radio online in front of a stark white wall because that always looks good. Anyway, on with the nonsense:

I think [Andrew Breitbart] wanted to be, you know, like one of those Hollywood Lefties. And I think what must’ve happened is that he got rejected by them and that’s why everything he builds, like he built like this Big Hollywood site to mock Hollywood. You know, like, who gives a shit about it? I mean, who gives a crap about Hollywood enough to set up that whole thing. But I think it’s all for him very, very personal, and I think he feels rejected by these people and this is his way of saying, ‘Like, if you’re not going to let me into the club that I think is cool, then I’m going to start my own club saying how much you guys are not cool!’

Another example of how Leftists cannot fathom the fact that some of us honestly and sincerely hold them in contempt and have no desire to be liked by them. It is impossible for these people to process that someone somewhere will never even consider tipping the bouncer so he’ll lift the velvet rope and allow them entry into Club Narcissism. 

Part of me legitimately admires people incapable of self-awareness. Like ignorance (which I do know something about), it has to be liberating to be incapable of seeing yourself the way others do — which in this case explains a whole lot more than those glasses.

Update: Sam’s not really wearing a sweater vest, is he?

She did so initially by accusing Sarah Palin of being “a traitor to this country.” This ridiculous statement caught my attention not because it had any foundation in facts, but because it was being made by Barr: a woman who made headlines in 1990 for mocking America by grabbing her crotch and spitting while singing the National Anthem for a baseball game between the San Diego Padres and the Cincinnati Reds.

Barr next accused Palin of being “a dupe” and an opportunist who’s capitalizing on the “anti-intellectualism” of Americans. And while there’s something inherently laughable about Barr speaking derisively of “anti-intellectualism,” it’s somewhat offensive that she doesn’t guard against throwing the word “dupe” around so recklessly. After all, she is the dupe who once donned a Nazi uniform and wore it in pictures that showed her taking “burnt Jew cookies” out of an oven.

Yet as stupid as all these things were, perhaps Barr’s most stupid statement was her assertion that Dick Cheney has never “[earned] one damn thing. [The] guy’s never worked an honest day in his life.” Where has she been for the last 10 years? A period of time in which Cheney was relentlessly criticized for his ties to Big Oil, via his past working relationship with Halliburton. To this day, Cheney continues to be vilified for his work with that company.

Thus while Barr tried to paint Cheney as elitist and out of touch, the truth is Halliburton has been a convenient political noose that real elites tighten around Cheney’s neck every chance they get. By “real elites” I mean people who’ve never had to work a day in their lives because they either married wealthy women or were born into families with enormous wealth: people like Senator John Kerry or the late Ted Kennedy. (Such elites have been so successful at tying Cheney to Big Oil that even the all knowing, all seeing Robert Redford was fooled into blaming him for the April 2010 Gulf Oil Spill.)

That Cheney was (and is) one of the most hardworking, decent human beings to ever hold the office of Vice President is lost on Roseanne because she is swallowed up in a world of self-loathing and bitterness, much akin to Cher and Janeane Garofalo. And for this same reason, she can only look on Palin with contempt and spew vitriol toward her because the former Governor dares to be comfortable in her own skin.

Barr is so hate-filled and so non-intellectually stimulating that I may even owe Garofalo an apology for mentioning her in this post (and that’s saying a lot).

Set in the obscure French countryside, an aspiring chef, Remy, follows the televised culinary advice of his idol, Auguste Gusteau. Remy dreams of following him, but there’s just one problem: he’s a rat and rats don’t belong in the kitchen. Fate offers Remy an opportunity Separated from his family during a farmer’s raid, Remy falls into the sewage, traveling thousands of miles, until, at last he finds himself underneath Gusteau’s very Parisian restaurant!

 The choice of locale is deliberate, of course. Paris, long the home of big government and bien-pensant, is also the home of gourmands, haute cuisine, and critique, so Remy’s passion might yet find outlet. Alas, in France, the hopes of the entrepreneur are subordinated to the plans of others. The word for the French economic system, “dirigiste,” means to direct and the French love nothing more than to direct their citizenry, and that, of course, includes who is and who is not among the crème de la crème par excellence. While his keen sense of smell saves the family from rat poisoned garbage, but Remy knows it still stinks to be a rat who loves food amongst those who couldn’t care less. He is his family’s bête noire. Quelle horreur!

Gusteau was too much of a bon vivant, for as soon as Remy arrives in Paris, he finds that Gusteau is dead. Fortunately, his legacy – and spectre – lives on as Remy’s conscience and, in times of desperation becomes his only companion. He exhorts Remy to be better than his nature, to be more than a rat and a thief: “A chef makes, while a thief takes.” In a moment of despair, Gusteau tells Remy, “If you focus on what you left behind. You will never be able to see what lies ahead.”

Linguini, is the long lost son of Gusteau, but, he, alas, does not know it. Nor should he, for he lacks all of his father’s talents in the kitchen. Linguini, like the rats, is relegated to garbage collection, a fitting symbol for how his boss, Skinner, appraises his talents and his worth. He tells Linguini “welcome to hell,” and hell is it, having lost all Gusteau’s joie de vivre. Colette, the romantic interest, tells Linguini that their job isn’t to be creative, but to follow Gusteau’s recipes à la lettre.

Linguini seems destined to haul out the garbage, but a chance encounter with Remy, who Linguini catches cooking leads to a reversal of fortune. Linguini recognizes Remy for as a “little chef.” Underneath his chef’s hat and with a tug on his hair, Remy controls Linguini like a marionette. Together they take Paris by storm, winning the praise of Paris’s most critical critique, Anton Ego and thwarting Skinner designs to save Gusteau’s reputation from marketing a line of microwaveable meals.

On top of it, the writing is easily the cleverest of the Pixar films. For French speakers, the names are more than a bit of fun. Remy is likely short for Rembrandt, while Auguste Gusteau means “august taste.” Linguini is the noodle of a boy who becomes great as Skinner seeks to cut down the great Gusteau’s restaurant.

Anton Ego’s name needs no explanation, nor does his appearance. Pixar designed him to look like a vulture, which is precisely what many critics have become. Left with nothing but their own ego to satisfy, some critics never recognize that which is truly great, as we see when Ego tells Linguini that he wants his “heart roasted on a spit.” But, as with all great masterpieces, Remy’s great chef d’oeuvre turns even the staunchest critic to a supporter because true excellence needs no marketing.  

For conservatives, there’s much to like. We learn that while “not everyone can be an artist, an artist can come from anywhere” and “Anyone can [cook but], that doesn’t mean that anyone should.” The greats can rise to the top, but that doesn’t mean everyone is great.

 Ratatouille is so good it allows us to even overlook Janeane Garofalo, whose politics would sound more believable, if not sensible, were she always to speak with that affected French accent. It just seems far too natural for her.

My favorite scene is when Remy decides he wants a better life.

Django: [showing the exterminator shop to Remy with the dead rats in the window] Take a good long look, Remy. This is what happens when a rat gets a little too uncomfortable around humans. The world we live in belongs to the enemy, we must live carefully. We look out for our own kind, Remy. When all is said and done, we’re all we’ve got.
Remy: [Django starts to walk away] No.
Django: What?
Remy: No. Dad I don’t believe it. You’re telling me that the future is – can only be more of *this*?
Django: This is the way things are. You can’t change nature.
Remy: Change is nature, Dad. The part that we can influence. And it starts when we decide.
Django: [Remy turns to leave] Where are you going?
Remy: With luck, forward.

Conservatives know well that they can’t change their innate nature, but they sure can change their station. It is conservatives, then, who are the real believers in progress. Onwards and upwards, and with hope and prayer, all the way.

Naturally, under the mistaken assumption that things are as they’ve always been, Leftist Hollywood’s jumped on this racism bandwagon. But things are no longer what they once were, and God bless ‘em, the American people are finally refusing to be racially blackmailed, most especially when it’s a willfully ignorant, unbelievably cruel, joyless celebrity doing the blackmailing:

—–

For decades now, we’ve watched lying, sanctimonious, superior, left-wing celebrities step into the political arena to sling their toxic nonsense without ever having to face an opponent. We’ve also watched lying, sanctimonious, superior, left-wing race baiters win the day with an equally toxic divisiveness and the hollow promise of ”just give in on this one and we’ll stop calling you racist.”

Well, no more. We know who we are, we know who the real racists are, we know this president and congress are both stunningly incompetent, and we can’t wait to vote. 

So out of ideas is the other side — which is perfectly represented by MSNBC and Garofalo — that the Dallas Tea Party was able to effectively ridicule and expose their breathtaking hypocrisy and intellectual bankruptcy using only their own words.

Racial blackmail doesn’t work anymore. The left is losing the last play in their playbook and in the immortal words of the boss: “You can go to hell.”