–

Obviously, the Left opposes The HAPPY Act. Anything that takes money from an out-of-control central government and gives it back to the people who actually earned it is anathema to them — but there’s been some polite opposition from our side, as well.

What you might call “killing the good in pursuit of the perfect” reasoning:

This will only complicate an already complicated tax code…

…which is why God invented TurboTax.

People will abuse the law…

…and 99% of the laws on the books could be disqualified with that line of reasoning.

Any tax law — any tax law —  that keeps tax-dollar-crack out of the hands of DC Democrats and in the hands of the people who earned it is a good thing. 

Robert nails it best in the video, though, when he suggests people debate and discuss the Happy Act on the merits. The link above sends you to a copy of the actual bill. Many of the concerns people have voiced are already addressed in the bill. 

“What a pro-active way to be able to help the economy and change the culture in this country around animals,” Robert Davi, a veteran actor (“The Goonies,” “Die Hard,” “License to Kill”) who was a main force behind the bill’s introduction, told ABCNews.com in a telephone interview. 

“This money goes back into the economy, and it encourages people to understand the social responsibilities we have toward animals,” Davi said. …

***

A bill making the rounds on Capitol Hill marries two feel-good propositions — tax cuts and pet ownership — to generate a novel idea: A tax break of up to $3,500 per person for pet care expenses.

The measure is a legislative long shot. But it’s been championed by a veteran Hollywood tough guy and by a conservative Michigan congressman [Rep. Thaddeus McCotter, R-Mich], and has drawn the enthusiastic support of animal rights groups eager to promote pet ownership during economic down times. …

***

The tax break would apply to more exotic pets as well, so long as they’re being owned within the bounds of the law. Any “legally owned, domesticated, live animal” would qualify, under the terms of the bill.

According to the ASPCA, a cat costs about $670 a year on average to take care of, while dogs are about $200 a year more expensive. The tax break would be capped at $3,500 per person, regardless of how many animals a taxpayer owned.

Davi, the owner of four dogs and a cat, said the concept of using the tax code to promote pet ownership occurred to him a few months ago, in thinking about the stimulus package passed by Democrats in Congress — a package, he said, that he opposed.

Davi’s cousin runs a prominent California animal rescue foundation, D.E.L.T.A. Rescue, and is always looking for ideas that would get more pets adopted, he said. Why not let people deduct expenses like pet food and veterinarian bills from their taxes, like child care expenses or mortgage interest can help reduce your tax burden?

Read the full article here.

Also see Robert Davi’s Big Hollywood articles:

Leo Grillo Defines What Makes America Great

Humanity and Pets Partnered Through the Years (HAPPY) Act

Several months ago I wrote a piece for the Washington Times entitled “Pets Are Family Too.”  I am pleased to say the bill has been placed before Congress—It is called the HAPPY Act.  I ask for your enthusiastic support of this amendment to the tax code—let’s create a national dialogue on this.

Please go to www.petexemption.com for more information and to show your support.

Thank You,
Robert Davi

Humanity and Pets Partnered Through the Years (HAPPY) Act –