<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Big Hollywood &#187; drug references</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/tag/drug-references/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:31:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Movies With No Sex, Foul Language and Nudity Win At Box Office</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/drbaehr/2009/03/28/filth-depravity-don%e2%80%99t-sell/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/drbaehr/2009/03/28/filth-depravity-don%e2%80%99t-sell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted Baehr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alcohol abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[box office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug references]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MovieGuide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexcual content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=90578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once again, Movieguide® Magazine&#8217;s Annual Report to the Entertainment Industry shows that moviegoers prefer movies with no explicit sex, nudity and foul language. This was especially clear in 2008. Movies with no foul language, sex and nudity averaged significantly more money at the theatrical box office in America and Canada than movies with some or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, Movieguide® Magazine&#8217;s Annual Report to the Entertainment Industry shows that moviegoers prefer movies with no explicit sex, nudity and foul language. This was especially clear in 2008. Movies with no foul language, sex and nudity averaged significantly more money at the theatrical box office in America and Canada than movies with some or a lot of such vulgarity, sex or nudity.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2009/03/movieratings2.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-90958 aligncenter" src="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2009/03/movieratings2-300x214.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="214" /></a></p>
<p>Movieguide®&#8217;s analysis of the top movies released in 2008 also showed that moviegoers rejected movies with extreme forms of substance abuse. Movieguide® also measured miscellaneous amounts of immorality, such as lying, stealing, blackmail, extortion, greed, envy, jealousy. Movies with no miscellaneous immorality made nearly six times more money than movies with extensive or extreme amounts of miscellaneous immorality.<span id="more-90578"></span></p>
<p>We have found similar results in practically all of our previous studies.</p>
<p>Movieguide® has been analyzing the content of movies and comparing box office numbers since 1991. The annual studies since 1996 have been particularly comprehensive.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">Movies with no foul language compared to average box office in 2008:</span></strong> </p>
<ul>
<li>No obscenities/profanities averaged: $55,568,733</li>
<li>0-25 obscenities/profanities: $32,145,527</li>
<li>More than 25: $22,934,908</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">Movies with no sexual content compared to average box office in 2008:</span></strong></p>
<ul>
<li>No sexual content averaged: $42,953,235</li>
<li>Implied adultery, promiscuity, sexual perversion or sexual immorality: $33,290,253</li>
<li>Depicted adultery, promiscuity, sexual perversion, or sexual immorality: $19,390,655</li>
<li>Graphic adultery, promiscuity, sexual perversion, or sexual immorality: $14,878,503</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">Movies with no nudity compared to average box office in 2008 movies:</span></strong> </p>
<ul>
<li>No nudity: $36,274,503</li>
<li>Some sexual nudity: $29,132,665</li>
<li>Extensive sexual nudity: $19,874,327</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">Movies with no alcohol abuse compared to average box office in 2008 movies:</span></strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Some drunkenness: $32,809,224</li>
<li>Extreme abuse: $14,014,314</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">Movies with no drug references compared to average box office in 2008 movies:</span></strong></p>
<ul>
<li>No drug references: $48,819,627</li>
<li>Some drug references: $18,880,203</li>
<li>Very strong drug references: $11,621,557</li>
</ul>
<p>For more information, visit <a href="http://www.movieguide.org/"><span style="text-decoration: underline">www.movieguide.org</span></a> or call 1-800-577-6684.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/drbaehr/2009/03/28/filth-depravity-don%e2%80%99t-sell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

