‘Reds’ at 30: Not as Partisan as We Remember?
by Ron CapshawJust by virtue of when it was released, “Reds” (1981) has been praised as courageous filmmaking in the age of Reagan. But thirty years later, what exactly was being praised then and now?
In the bonus features of the commemorative DVD release, Warren Beatty says that he made this film to combat America’s “inordinate fear of communism.” But the majority of screen time dealing with politics involves those who don’t buy into it. Eugene O’Neil, played cynically by Jack Nicholson, calls Bolshevism the “latest theocracy.” Maureen Stapleton’s Emma Goldman early on recoils from the Soviet regime’s abuse of civil liberties. Reed himself attacks the Bolsheviks for censoring his copy and looks on in horror as the Soviet Army marches by.
Beatty must have realized impassioned support of Leninism wouldn’t have played well with ’80s audiences. Hence he drastically edits Reed’s political speech down to one word: in answer to a Democrat’s question about what World War I is about, he says “profits.” When asked by Louise Bryant what Reed’s views on politics are, Beatty avoids the all-night speech by fast-forwarding to morning, where Reed attempts to embrace Bryant. (more…)







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?