Bill Maher is that monkey.

See, Bill Maher’s a smart guy. None of us can deny that. A nuisance at worst, a more than worthy adversary at best, Bill Maher is the kind of intellectual whose worst enemy is his own pride. Smart people generally don’t make intellectual miscalculations; they make careless errors.  Sometimes, a mistruth is so often repeated in society that even smart folk like Maher accept it as fact. A good example would be Bill Maher’s constant claim that the Bible encourages slavery and the founding fathers were anti-Christian.

Firstly, Bill would be right to say that the founding fathers were anti-religion.  One could say the same thing about most pastors heading churches throughout the United States today. A disdain for man-made religion does not equal a hate for personal faith in God. 

As a matter of fact, oftentimes as one grows in their relationship with God, they find themselves saddened by the state of the modern church. People like John Adams and Benjamin Franklin (the same people whom Maher loves to quote) would be perfect, powdered-wig crystallizations of religion-hating, God-fearing Christians. A simple glance through the founding documents or personal journals of the founding fathers confirms it.

As for the Bible being a rampantly pro-slavery piece of literature… false.  It’s true that there are passages in the Bible dealing with slavery, which when read in modern America without the proper context, seem cringeworthy at best. Nowhere in the bible, however, is there an open-ended encouragement of the practice and in multiple places, being what we would consider slavery today is thoroughly condemned.

See, we have to understand that the slavery referred to in the Bible is most often not slavery as we know it today. In both Old and specifically New Testament times, people would go into slavery themselves if they were unable to pay their debts, or unable to pay their own cost of living (which would then be covered by their master). They would have more in common with a lower class worker or a college student still mooching off of their parents than the race-based slavery we’ve known in the Western world.

A prime example of where one does see race-based slavery in the Bible, is when a little group of people were enslaved by the Egyptians solely because they were Hebrew (Exodus 13:14). Anyone know what happened next?

Anyone? Anyone?

…God was pretty ticked. Angry enough to bring the freaking plagues. [Note: They were kind of a big deal.]

The Bible also does address the act of “man stealing,” (exactly the kind of thing that Africans did to their own people) and had this to say about it: “Anyone who kidnaps another and either sells him or still has him when he is caught must be put to death” (Exodus 21:16).

God then went on to put such folks in the same category as murderers and rapists. I guess you could say he had a thing about that.

In the end, don’t blame Bill Maher.  He’s just accepting common mistruths because he doesn’t know any better… and nobody will tell him. Maybe he needs an uneducated, God-loving, gun toting, tea-partying, redneck in his Hollywood entourage.  You know… just to keep him in the know.

Note:  No, I do not actually think that George W. Bush was a war criminal. Even though I was undercover, I felt dirty just wearing the shirt.

March 16 will mark the 40th anniversary of the Broadway opening of “1776.”  Written by Sherman Edwards and Peter Stone, it went on to run for 1,217 performances.  It’s hard to believe that forty years ago it was still popular to write an unabashedly patriotic musical that openly celebrated American Exceptionalism and painted the founding fathers not just as humans but as the intellectual and moral giants that they were.  Because the 1972 film version is tantamount to a filmed version of the play rather than a Hollywood re-interpretation, its original intent and form is easily accessible to today’s audience.  It deserves a good look and therefore, is this week’s Sunday Matineé. 

“1776″ uses the character of John Adams as the main protagonist in telling the story of his legendary fight to convince the continental congress to adopt a resolution calling for independence from King George.  The show follows the journey of Adams’ victories in convincing congress to form a committee to draft the Declaration of Independence, the ensuing debate over the contents of the declaration, the conflict between the Northern states and the Southern states over slavery and finally, the climactic scene depicting the signing of the declaration.

The brilliance of the drama in this show is not “will they do it?” since everyone in the audience knows they will… the drama lies in “how are they gonna pull this off?”  The show uses a simple but very theatrical and dramatic device by showing a giant day calendar on the wall above John Hancock’s desk.  Each new scene shows the calendar page ripped away revealing what day we are witnessing.  Everyone with at least a 1st Grade education knows that we are all counting down to July 4th and the tension genuinely builds as we see the day coming closer and yet it doesn’t seem like Adams and his coalition will get all of the states to favor a declaration in time.

“1776″ is unique in many ways.  Most striking is the fact that the stage is populated by many, many men and there are only two women in the show: Abigail Adams and Martha Jefferson.  And Abigail only appears through her letters with John–she does not actually interact with the rest of the cast.  Martha only appears for one scene, a somewhat apocryphal moment when Franklin and Adams send for her to provide Jefferson a much needed conjugal visit so he can re-focus on the writing of the declaration.

So, other than that, it’s a 2 1/2 hour long musical with a bunch of wig-wearing guys sitting around debating in 18th century aristocratic costumes.  No chorus, no dancers, no special effects, no leggy dancers… not really the recipe for musical theatre success.

Because the film was such a faithful replica of the stage production including using most of the same principal actors, clips from the film should provide you with a great taste of what it was like to witness this show live at the 46th Street Theatre (now the Richard Rodgers) 40 years ago.  Here is the great opening number, “Sit Down John!”:

How great is that?  “One useless man is called a disgrace, two are called a law firm, and three or more become a congress!”  That’s the great William Daniels playing John Adams, a role he will always be associated with.  And what brilliant writing as the congress is in a great debate over the pros and cons of opening a window?  They all agree it is too hot, half want the window open, the other half don’t want to let in any flies, Thomas Jefferson forms a coalition trying to strike a compromise… it seems the only thing the entire congress can agree on is their hatred of Adams.  In one opening number, Sherman Edwards defines the character of Adams and his single-minded focus on pushing the issue of independence plus he illustrates the ineffectiveness of congress and their antagonism to Adams.  All put to song… I’ve said it before:  Great musicals are often defined by their opening number.

Another thing to note as these clips keep coming:  One of the most thrilling things to hear on stage is a full male ensemble singing robust songs in multiple parts.  There is something about hearing great male singers in full voice with close layers of harmony.  “Guys and Dolls,” “Les Miserables,” “The Music Man” and “1776″ all feature songs like this and it never fails to please the audience.

One of the great surprises of “1776″ is how much humor there is in it.  At first glance, it’s pretty dry stuff, but Edwards and Stone take great liberties in using some facts about the characters of these men and then expand upon those traits drawing them out and making the comedic elements of their personalities as broad as possible.

Here’s an example… it’s no secret that the Lee family of Virginia was historically prominent and influential.  Dating their origin to the Jamestown colony in 1639, they became established in the colonies through tobacco farming and politics… they were the Kennedys of their time–rich and political and not a little pompous.

History tells us that one of the strategies Benjamin Franklin and John Adams used to move the Declaration of Independence along was to get Richard Henry Lee to make the motion in congress.  He was so respected and carried so much weight that he would be accepted as the sponsor of the resolution (where as Adams was hated by all).  It was up to Lee to ride to Virginia to get the approval of the House of Burgesses to make the motion.  Here’s how “1776″ portrays the man and the moment:

I’m glad the scene is included before the song as well.  You can see how brilliantly Stone uses actual quotes from giant men like Franklin and incorporates them seamlessly into the dialogue.  Also, Stone clearly has a reverence and love for these men and what they did.  Make no mistake, this is ”American Triumphalism, the musical” and there are no apologies made.  You see this show and you learn one thing:  America is great.  Period.

OK… gotta show a little more of the humor and then we’ll move on to the meatier stuff.  Here’s a brilliant song depicting the debate within the committee over who should write the Declaration of Independence.  Again, pay attention to the clever lyrics.

Franklin:
Mr. Adams, but, Mr. Adams
The things I write are only light extemporania
I won’t put politics on paper; it’s a mania
So I refuse to use the pen in Pennsylvania

Sherman:
Mr. Adams, but, Mr. Adams
I cannot write with any style or proper etiquette
I don’t know a participle from a predicate
I am just a simple cobbler from Connecticut

By the way, yes, that’s Ken (The White Shadow) Howard as Thomas Jefferson.

So, the aforementioned conjugal visit between Jefferson and Martha occurs and Franklin and Adams wait for him to emerge from his chamber.  A wonderful scene between the two of them speculating about how history will (or will not) view them, and then comes Martha to sing the praises of Tom.  On Broadway, it was a young Betty Buckley wowing Broadway audiences for the first time.  Here on film, it’s the sumptuous and aptly named Blythe Danner… oh how I miss seeing her on stage and how superior she is on film to her daughter.

And, there you have it.  All Jefferson needed was one night with Martha and the next morning he cranks out the Declaration of Independence!  Who knew?  If I had one night with a young Blythe Danner, who knows what great writing I’d be capable of?

So, now things get a little tricky.  You see, the block of voters who oppose the declaration and wish to keep their allegiance  with the King are labeled in the show as “Conservatives.”  This was a real sticking point in 1969 when the show came out and in 1972 with the film.  In fact, the Nixon Administration complained at the characterization of those against the creation of our country as being the forefathers of the modern conservative movement.  Frankly, knowing that the vast majority of millionaires in the Senate are Democrats, and knowing that the ideals Adams, Jefferson, Franklin and Washington represented fit perfectly with the values of the modern conservative movement, I don’t see the problem.  But if you think in shallow terms and watch this scene thinking that these guys represent the “Republicans,” then yeah, I think you can see the problem:

The purpose of this series of articles (Sunday Matineé) is to highlight great shows from Broadway’s past.  Not just shows written by conservatives or for that matter shows which always take a “conservative” world view.  I have no idea about Stone and Edwards’ politics, but I do know that as a conservative thinker, I can watch this show and love all that is great about America.  I feel pride with my spiritual connection to the forefathers and celebrate their courage and brilliance.  I am not forced to defend my modern-day political perspective and I can objectively feel a kinship with these men and respect for the revolution they spawned.  That is not only great writing, it’s what is now lacking on Broadway in so many of our shows.  And I maintain there is a vast audience for it.  So, please don’t send e-mails or post comments telling me that the writers of this show hated conservatives… if they did, it doesn’t matter.  Their work stands up to any objective scrutiny despite the inclusion of the above song.  If a modern-day conservative sees themselves in that number, it’s more a problem with their own perspective and self-analysis, not a problem with the writing.

So the original draft of Jefferson’s declaration is read and debated, almost line by line.  And slowly, Adams wins his votes and Jefferson loses large chunks of his original draft… until the issue of slavery is approached.  As we know, Jefferson’s original draft had language decrying the ownership of slaves (modern revisionists overlook this and ignorantly paint Jefferson as nothing more than a racist, slave owner).  The Southern states refuse to sign on until the language is removed and Adams and Jefferson dig in.  Notice the brilliant staging in the way Franklin is positioned, observing:

Franklin convinces Adams to let it go; the issue of independence was too important and they agree to let future generations work out the problem of slavery (four score and seven years in the future, to be exact).  The final scene depicts, of course, the signing.  When staged properly, it brings chills and cheers:

The good humor and joshing regarding the consequences of their treasonous act is immediately shifted to the weight and reality of the situation upon the reading of the dispatch from General Washington.  And with bells tolling and the orchestra swelling, our country is born.

Here’s a bit of trivia about this play: In the first act, scene three, during the initial debate over independence, there is a twenty two minute stretch of unending dialogue without any music to interrupt it.  This is the record for the longest duration of time in a musical without a single note of music.  In this day of rock opera and endless, banal recitative, it’s so refreshing to see a musical not be afraid to talk to the audience rather than sing at them.

One more bit of trivia… Years later, William Daniels starred in the great and under-appreciated NBC drama “St. Elsewhere.”  In the final season, they had a storyline that took his character to Philadelphia.  In one scene, he is walking around the grounds of Independence Hall and says, “I don’t know what it is about this place but it makes me want to get up and sing.”  Few got the inside joke…(Good Lord, I really am a geek, aren’t I?)

For our finale, I want to take you back to the opening number.  This time, the Broadway cast of the recent revival as seen on the Tony Awards.  Pay close attention to those magnificent male harmonies as they are even more evident in this version versus the film version seen above.