Television’s Demographic Scam: Bamboozled Advertisers Could Learn Something From Madonna, NFL
by Ben ShapiroEveryone knows that the typical advertisement on the Super Bowl goes for millions of dollars. And we all wonder why the ads they produce for that money feature children peeing in pools, monkeys farting, and bungee jumping cars. Those don’t seem like particularly good uses of company funding.
And they aren’t. They’re commercials targeted to the younger demographic. And as the Super Bowl itself shows, the younger demographic isn’t where the cash is. The advertising agencies had better wake up and smell the coffee: older, more conservative audiences are the ones that should be targeted now.
The networks and the NFL get it: we’re getting old as a country. Seven of the last eight Super Bowl halftime shows have featured Boomer and Gen X icons: Paul McCartney (2005), the Rolling Stones (2006), Prince (2007), Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers (2008), Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band (2009), The Who (2010), and Madonna (2012)? Perhaps the under-40 crowd remembers Madonna, but if they do, it’s in a very vague half-sleep state.
And yet America’s commercial advertisers seem to think that the most valuable audience is the 18-49 crowd. For years, American advertising has been run on the notion that young audiences are more valuable than older audiences; that if you grab a youngster’s brand loyalty early, you’ll grab ‘em for life; and that older audiences are set in their ways. That’s how so much liberal television has been sneaked past advertising honchos – young people tend to be liberal, and so the honchos figure that liberal television will appeal to the most lucrative demographic. Even if more older people watch than younger people, the advertisers figure, they need to greenlight young-skewing programs to hit the target demo.







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?