Hollywood’s Greatest Year: 1939
by S.T. KarnickThis year marks the 70th anniversary of Hollywood’s greatest year, 1939. Accordingly, Turner Classic Movies is celebrating the anniversary this month by showing 39 films released in ‘39, starting with The Wizard of Oz. Throughout the month, TCM will also screen a new documentary, 1939: Hollywood’s Greatest Year.
It’s a truism among fans of classic movies that 1939 was the Hollywood cinema’s greatest year. But if it has become something of a cliche to say so, it’s only because it’s so undeniably true.
It’s really rather amazing to consider how many classic or transcendentally classic films were released during that annus mirabilis. Among the most highly praised then and in the ensuring years were the following:
- Gone with the Wind
- The Wizard of Oz
- Stagecoach
- Beau Geste
- Goodbye, Mr. Chips
- Gunga Din
- The Women
- Wuthering Heights
- The Roaring Twenties
- Love Affair
Those would be enough for a great year in itself, but there was so much more–such as Ninotchka, Only Angels Have Wings, Drums Along the Mohawk, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, The Hunchback of Notre Dame, Allegheny Uprising, The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes, The Hound of the Baskervilles, Stanley and Livingston, The Man in the Iron Mask, Dark Victory, Of Mice and Men,Young Mr. Lincoln, The Rains Came, Midnight, The Private Lives of Elizabeth and Essex, Union Pacific, Babes in Arms, The Little Princess, Another Thin Man, The Story of Vernon and Irene Castle, The Hardys Ride High, Golden Boy, Dodge City, Gulliver’s Travels, The Light That Failed, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, The Old Maid, Son of Frankenstein, Destry Rides Again, and many, many others of like quality.
And from overseas: The Rules of the Game, The Four Feathers, The Stars Look Down, The Story of the Last Chrysanthemums, and others.
And perhaps even more impressive is the high quality of even the year’s lower-budget films, such as Code of the Secret Service and Secret Service of the Air, both starring Ronald Reagan. What all the Hollywood films mentioned here shared was the industry’s ability at the time to alternate scenes of grandeur and intimacy with consummate skill and confidence.
The Hollywood movie factories had been perfected by the mid-1930s, and the studios were amazingly adept at turning out greatly entertaining movies that reflected and reinforced the values of their audience. Although the stars and other filmmaking principals were paid amazing sums of money then as they are now, the industry did not then reflect the elitism now rampant in Hollywood.
The studio moguls, who were largely self-made and from humble origins, enthusiastically accepted the nation’s founding values and made sure that their product reflected those notions.They did so both for patriotic reasons and because they knew that was the best way for them to make money.
Thus while MGM head Louis B. Mayer was a staunch Republican and the Warner Bros. were supporters of FDR, all shared a strong patriotic love for their nation and shared their audience’s values.
Also important was the more conservative social values that arose during the Depression 1930s after the social excesses of the Roaring Twenties. Audiences preferred movies to reflect values such as personal responsibility, long-term thinking, the value of hard work, personal sacrifice for the good of others, modesty, and the like. Hollywood was voluntarily under the authority of the Production Code, which set moral standards for the industry and protected the studios from a race to the moral bottom and an unbridled pursuit of sensationalism.
The Production Code was clearly not a straitjacket on creativity, given the impressive films made while it was in place during the 1930s through the 1950s. Contrary to the claims of many critics (and the Wikipedia entry cited here), the Production Code Administration was willing and in fact eager to work with producers to ensure that films could be as creative as possible without undermining the nation’s morals.
Refraining from undermining people’s morals may seem rather a quaint notion to many people today, but it indicates a sense of honor, decency, and humility that is sorely lacking among all to many purveyors of cultural products today.
Of course, there’s no sense in hoping for a return of the Production Code, but a greater sense of responsibility on filmmakers’ part would certainly be welcome. It would benefit the movies both morally and esthetically.





Subscribe via RSS
28 Comments
So I've always wondered, what is Hollywood's second greatest year?
Unfortunately, the "production code" we have now is much, much worse than a morals code. Almost 8 years after 9/11 we still have not seen a single TV show or movie that has honestly depicted America's enemy.
Well 1939 may have been a great year for Movies, maybe the greatest year, there is also one thing about 1939, CASE – White. It was not a good year to be a Pole, 70 years, as most who where alive as young adults are now in the twilight of life, it is only the memory that will live. Then there was "Gone With the Wind" They are all gone now, Hollywood and the Movie Business, really has "Gone with the Wind" Pretty much only John Wayne lives on, if popularity lists mean anything.
And "Love Affair" with Irene Dunne and Charles Boyer was the best, IMO.
Of course, I'm Irene Dunne's # 1 fan. <g>
I would never want the return of the Production Code.
Lately I've been wondering how they can come up with even two or three.
I didn't see any of last year's nominees, as nothing really grabbed me.
A couple of the most recent best-picture winners were "make-up" Oscars for all the times Scorsese and the Coen Brothers were passed over ("Taxi Driver," "Raging Bull," "Goodfellas" — "Fargo," "O Brother, Where Art Thou?").
"The Departed" and "No Country for Old Men" were good, but far from their best work.
I would say 1927.
As a conservative, I'm not specifically looking to have a ton of "politically conservative" movies produced per se. I just am sick and tired of so many movies being obviously geared towards promoting a liberal political agenda. I'd actually prefer it if movies were a lot less politicized altogether. Even if the movies were somehow magically and suddenly less political, I would still want to see the plum roles going to actors for reasons other than how much money they contributed to The Democratic National Committee or their ability to "bravely" stand up and call George W. Bush a moron.
1940 was an awfully good year. Hitchcock alone made two great movies, Rebecca and Foreign Correspondent.
[...] Read it. [...]
I saw the special. In 1939, the Academy could nominate 10 movies for Best Picture. Then it went down to 5, now it's back to 10. Given the quality of movies, where is the Academy going to get 10 movies, these days, to nominate?
Let's not forget "Bachelor Mother" (1939) with the beautiful Ginger Rogers and David Niven, along with great character actors like Charles Coburn. What a fun movie to watch during the holidays.
Amen!!
I'm going to jump to the 70's and pick 1972…based soley on "The Godfather."
I know this has been discussed before, but why no movies about the fall of Communism, and that remarkable moment in 1989 when we witnessed the fall of the Berlin Wall? Why no movies about the Bay of Pigs (ok, at least anything I've heard of? Why no movies about Lech Walesa's inspiring uprising in Poland?
Why do they have to keep producing movies about fighting Hitler (ad nauseum)?
And, yes, as one poster already commented … why no really honest depiction of radical Islam in the wake of 9/11? (I did see Flight 93 and Twin Towers. I thought those were good films. )
For the same reason there's no films about the Gulags, Stalin's re-education camps, Castro's prisons, Chavez's dictatorship, etc. Hollywood kisses the rear of communists and dictators. The films you suggest glorify the destruction of Hollywood's beliefs – the films I just named reveal the sickness of Hollywood's beliefs. Ergo, those films aren't made.
And besides – Hollywood doesn't really make films anymore. They make sermons. Which is why the theater pews are getting emptier by the week.
Actually, attendance has been pretty darn good this year, in spite of the recession and higher ticket prices. It's been mostly rising all year, except for a stall during the spring. Summer's been going gangbusters, as the grosses for "Transformers," "Star Trek," "Up" and "Ice Age" will attest. And next week that wizard kid returns, to hopefully zap Bruno straight into oblivion. Me? I'm actually kinda looking forward to the talking guinea pig movie.
Excellent point.
[...] cinema’s greatest year. But if it has become something of a cliche to say so, it’s only because click for more var _wh = ((document.location.protocol==’https:’) ? “https://sec1.woopra.com” : [...]
Yes. Me and my sister watched it again when recently aired as a 1939 movie but we always loved this movie. What a fun pair Rogers and Niven were.
I second 1940.
The documentary was a bit jumbled but fun. Me and my sister are eagerly trying to watch all 39. She has never seen this Chips or Love Story, and is eagerly awaiting to tell me how right I am about their superiority.
How is it possible that a guy like Ted Turner can be an admirer of Fidel Castro? I have yet to figure out how he performs the mental gymnastic to make this possible.
The Adventures of Robin Hood also a 1939 film. I beleive it was the 1st full length motion picture (end to end) shortly after the Wizard of Oz came out.
that is "Full legth color" – apologies for the prvious truncated post.
If the Production Code came back–so long as Hollywood was able to produce 10 good films a year–I would be all in favor of it. This article made me do a quick inventory of my film collection, and 1939 has a better representation on my shelf than any other year.
Give me back the whole nasty "studio system", the Production Code and all the rest. So long as it produced one picture as good as Robin Hood, Drums Along The Mohawk, Gunga Din or Beau Geste, it would be worth it. That, and it would have the added benefit of shielding us from the thundering stupidity of actors who would never be allowed to give an interview without their publicists and studio minders…
1940 – Philadelphia Story. Definitely a good year.
[...] It’s a truism among fans of classic movies that 1939 was the Hollywood cinema’Read more at http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/stkarnick/2009/07/05/hollywoods-greatest-year-1939/ [...]
You must be logged in to post a comment.