‘Terminator Salvation’ Delivers Action but Little Real Drama
by S.T. KarnickThe “Terminator” films are about the takeover of the world by machines, and unfortunately the series has itself manifested that phenomenon, being increasingly taken over by special effects and action sequences at the expense of identifiable human concerns.
Terminator Salvation, the fourth film in the apocalyptic action series, is heavy on action and sensational visual effects, but weak on the things that originally made this series so popular. It will please audience members who don’t expect too much from it.
Terminator Salvation is the first in the series without Arnold Schwarzenegger as a primary character, and the series has moved increasingly away from the personal, intimate approach of the first installment (in which the fate of Sarah Connor was at the center of the story and her relationship with Kyle Reese is at the forefront).
True drama is created when characters with whom we can identify are forced to make difficult moral choices. That requires the creation of strong characters and the crafting of situations where they are forced to decide between conflicting goods and harms–not just strategic questions (how best to defeat the enemy) but instead situations involving difficult trade-offs (such as whether to put an innocent person in mortal danger in order to save others).
Unfortunately, Terminator Salvation tends to fall short both in creating characters and in crafting interesting new dilemmas for them, instead relying too much on contemporary action movie conventions and clichés. The hollowness of most of the characters and the lack of real, personal dilemmas undermine the drama of the film, leaving only the flash and bang, which are admittedly diverting but leave one wanting more soul.
The use of apocalyptic imagery and Christian themes certainly has helped sustain interest in the series, and Terminator Salvation retains those elements and builds on them (particularly the theme of self-sacrifice, which has always been strong in the series).
However, the move away from the human-scale of The Terminator to the now all-too-typical world-scale action makes the film much less interesting. These elements are reminiscent of Transformers and Steven Spielberg’s uninspired remake of War of the Worlds and suggest a serious lack of imagination and inspiration.
As with Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines, James Cameron, co-writer and director of The Terminator, was not involved in making Terminator Salvation, and his ability to place strong human relationships at the center of momentous events (Titanic, Aliens, The Abyss) is sorely missed here, as is that of his co-writer and producer of The Terminator, Gale Ann Hurd. (Hurd’s involvement in the Fox TV series Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles is evident in the show’s stronger presentation of character relationships.)
The people behind Terminator Salvation certainly appear to have tried to create some relationships among the characters and thereby force them to make some dramatic choices, but the characters are continually overwhelmed by the big events swirling around them. Hence it’s difficult really to care for them, as they tend to remain somewhat generic stand-ins for real human beings.
In this regard Christian Bale and Bryce Dallas Howard in particular fall short, whereas Sam Worthington does a superb job of making Marcus Wright real, human, and appealing–rather ironically, given a plot element that I won’t reveal here.
Despite all of these elements working against it, Terminator Salvation earned significantly more money (in nominal dollars unadjusted for inflation) in its first weekend than The Terminator did in its entire theatrical run, and it’s likely to do well overall. Nonetheless, although the producers have left room for a sequel, it’s difficult to envision further installments having much attraction for audiences unless the series begins again to accommodate real human beings with real human concerns.
For that to happen, it would perhaps be a good idea to return to the low-budget, human-centered approach of The Terminator, though that’s exceedingly unlikely at this point.
–S. T. Karnick, editor of The American Culture website







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
27 Comments
I really like Terminator: The Sarah Conner Chronicles. To me, it was must-see-TV. I'm kind of bummed out about the series being canceled. Fox, please give it another chance.
I think the main reason I enjoyed the show so much was the relationships of the characters. I love all the actors but Lena Headey as Sarah Conner is my favorite. Her humanity really shines thru and she is so damn attractive.
they cancel all the shows I like. I usually avoid a program for a few years so I don't get caught, but when I do start watching a program that gets killed it really grates my cheese.
Yeah Buckwheat, I feel the same. They lure you in and then pull the rug from under you.
Firefly, one of the best series ever IMO, didn't even last a full season.
Every reviewer seems to have missed the point when talking about the lack of "humanity" from the characters in the movies sans Marcus. The humas have been beaten to the point that they have no humanity left. The character of Marcus Wright is supposed to give the humans their hope back both metaphorically and pshysically (see transplant scene at the end)
Did anyone else notice this? Please tell me there are some people out there who got it?
I applaud the filmakers attempt at something different.
I'll back you up on that. Though a lot of these reviews strike me as grading on a nostalgic curve. I loved T1 & 2 but let's face it, they aren't really that deep, just good old fashioned action. I went into T4 expecting 3 things: men fighting machines, Christian Bale kicking ass, and lots of explosions. I wasn't disappointed and I think anyone expecting more are fooling only themselves.
4400, Surface, Pushing Dasies get the axe but one season premise shows go on and on and on…
Yeah I wanted to see more of Surface. A very well done show. After each episode, I wanted more.
Ya know, I think i could help the Networks pick shows that people would like. Of course, I'm sure most people think the same about themselves.
Me too. Wierd, i thought my opinions were the only ones that mattered. Others feel the same way about themselves? Huh.
They should make me a judge on American Idol. I'm not pitchy Dawg, Nor do I clap like a drunken seal. Simon Rules, however.
Buckwheat, so that is your blog? I will read it later today. I am still kinda new to blogging but I am really enjoying sharing and learning. Ya know, some people talk about how bad the net is, but there is so much that is positive too. Just depends on where you look. I sound like Forest Gump now. HaHa. ( Ya never know what ya gonna get )
Fox *ALWAYS* cancels the good shows, whether "Terminator" or "Firefly" (both of which happened to feature Summer Glau). It's a sad fact of life, like water being wet and Al Gore being an overblown lardbutt.
And I too will sorely miss that show with its characters and their relationships. Those, in my view, are what ought to drive the story and action, not vice versa.
As far as Terminator:Salvation, I am reserving judgement since I have not seen it.
So, you would think that after the mother of all temper tantrums, Christian Bale could have at least put forth a stellar performance.
yeah it is linked here. I have like one reader. It is really just a place for me to blow off steam. I only really comment here and on my blog. I feel like such a tool saying I have a blog, but there it is.
Welcome to the internets. I think it just might catch on
"Firefly, one of the best series ever IMO"
You don't have to put IMO in there Cajun, Firefly being one of the best series ever is a verifiable fact. What Fox did to that show should be considered a Crime Against Humanity.
If they had cut out the whole Marcus Wright back story, and had him mysteriously appear in the middle of a battle asking for John Connor, it would've created more suspense and made the film more interesting. Who is he? What does he want? Was he from the future, or from the past? And what's his connection to Kyle Reese? But we find out the answers to all these questions in the first 20 minutes. So who really cares? From then on, the plot seems to just be going through the paces towards an outcome that was determined in the very first movie.
You've summarized exactly what makes a great movie for me.
I wouldn't say you've described "The Terminator", though. That and the first sequel were just feature-length chase scenes.
T2 was already losing the plot when it was suggested that the reason each T100 looked like Schwarzenegger was because they were mass-produced Arnolds. That, however, completely contradicts the premiss of the original, in which Kyle Reese has to wait until the very last moment before he can be sure who the Terminator is (when he points a gun at Sarah Connor).
Likewise, in one of the flash forward scenes in that film, another terminator is seen attacking Reese's camp – by surprise (because they are not in fact mass-produced Arnolds). That terminator is played by Schwarzenegger's bodybuilding partner, Franco Columbu.
I will and always have pointed out the fact that Mr. Bale works, this is his Job. His job is to cloak himself into the character completely when ACTION is called, and If some jack@ss starts wandering around the set when the director calls ACTION. I too would blow my damn top on him. This blowout was private and out of the public eyes and perhaps if the idiot who stole the tape didn't post it, things would've cooled down later. I again personally would have that idiot booted off set whenever I'm in scene though.
Remember this: when ACTION is called.. in the general vicinity, NOBODY MOVES! That "veteran" work hand should know that if he has been in the business for a long time. Mr. Bale was right, the majority of bloggers, posters and tv personalities where ALL dead wrong.
That's a good point. Terminators were designed to sneak into Resistance bunkers and open fire. They were so convincingly human that dogs had to be used to detect them. Making every Terminator look like Arnold would defeat the whole purpose, wouldn't it?
But then again, I don't remember it ever being suggested that Arnolds were mass-produced. There was the first Terminator Arnold. The second Terminator Arnold was similar but not the same in appearance (because Arnold was older). The third Terminator Arnold was designed like the second one so it could get close enough to the future Connor to kill him. That's three Arnolds. Hardly mass produced.
He was right to be angry. He was right to complain. The tantrum, on the other hand, was kind of silly.
Terminator Salvation is a good movie. True, none of the cast members will be nominated for a "Best Performance" Oscar but who cares? We get to see a lot of wicked cool Terminators, hunter-killers, explosions, car chases, automatic weapons fire, etc. This is the best Terminator film since the first one. T2 had Ahnald as a brat's personal teddy bear and in T3, Kristanna Loken was just too good-looking to be a plausible threat.
Just enjoy the movie, it's a good one.
That photo of Arnold is rather a metaphor for his current predicament, isn't it? Figuratively, he's about that bashed up. Unfortunately, I don't think there's a hyper-alloy combat chassis under the Governator's skin.
Governator = Terminator 2, hah, great analogy, I'm guessing even Arnold will laugh ruefully at that when he hears it. The T-1000 (the unions) and the Cyberdyne legislature nail him and the wrecked Ahnold is forced to melt himself in the budget cauldron! Sadly, there was no Sarah to fight for the taxpayer child John…oh wait, maybe there is…
I don't recall it being suggested in the films, but I think there was an interview with James Cameron around the time T2 came out where he said something like that.
I have to say I have never seen a group of reviewers complain more about a movie and yet miss the point more. NOTHING that any film maker does with the Terminator series is going to be a surprise. Everyone knows the ending, the characters have been talking about it for three frigging movies now. If they kill John Conner and go with another character to save the day the fans are going to be pissed.
Not to mention that with ever movie the original timeline has been changed and will never be what was viewed in the first movie. By delaying judgement day in the second movie John Conner will not be the same person he was origninally suppose to be. Nor will Skynet be the same system it was orignally created to be, it had 10 more years of upgrades, hardware advances and integration to use when it finally becomes self aware. So to be pissed off that the future version is not EXACTLY like what was predicted in the first movie is a waste of time.
One of the early promos for T2 revolved around the T800 manufacturing process, with the Arnold skin added at the last moment, telling the audience 'He's baaack.' And in other scenes it was made clear that the T800 mech portion was mass produced.
Likely, SkyNet had a myriad set of flesh templates he could wrap around the T800 frame. They just had to be burly sorts to fit around the machinery. This wasn't necessary for the later 'liquid' models. So SkyNet just needed a lot of bodybuilder magazines for reference material to create the flesh templates. The T800 could have looked like any well known body builder. (The more photos available the better the detail to derive.) So if Mickey Hargitay showed up to kill Sarah Connor it would have been a dead giveaway but who in the 80s would recognize the young Mickey Hargitay and realize this was no 60 year old, meaning he had to be a killer cyborg from the future!
More importantly, the Arnold template was reused in T2 for a very important reason. Sarah Connor would recognize it and the adult John Connor knew this when he chose his agent to stop the T1000.
I liked it. Is he – isn't he??? at the beginning. Being human. Good looking actors. Yeah, I liked it.
Visitor recommendations…
[...]one of our visitors recently recommended the following website[...]……
You must be logged in to post a comment.