NBC’s ‘Last Templar’ Is Interesting Answer to ‘Da Vinci Code’
by S.T. KarnickProduced by the justly respected team of Robert Halmi Sr. and Robert Halmi Jr., and starring Mira Sorvino as a brilliant archaeologist and martial arts expert, NBC’s miniseries The Last Templar is a likable though fanciful and indeed frequently silly four-hour miniseries about the hunt for an ancient document that could shake the foundations of Christianity if it should come to light.
If that sounds familiar, that’s because of the obvious similarities to The Da Vinci Code, the bestselling novel by Dan Brown and film by Ron Howard. In both Brown’s novel and Howard’s movie, the protagonist’s quest leads to the revelation that Christianity as we know it is a sham invented by the Catholic Church to allow a small group of people to have undue power over the world. According to The Da Vinci Code, Jesus Christ did not die on a cross but instead married Mary Magdalene and had a family, and his descendants are alive today.
That’s all taken from a set of arguments presented by three men in England a couple of decades ago, who outlined this amusingly preposterous theory in a series of charmingly paranoid and apocalyptic books with titles such as Holy Blood, Holy Grail. Brown’s story is more of a jeu d’esprit, albeit badly written and boring, but Christians understandably took great offense to its thesis.
The furor will surely resume this spring as we approach the May 15 release of the film version of Angels and Demons, Brown’s prequel to The Da Vinci Code. However, those who conclude that Brown’s book insults Christianity and spreads lies about their religion should take comfort in the fact that The Last Templar takes a very different perspective on that story line.
After a long, long narrative that jumps from the United States to Turkey and includes more than enough chase scenes and characters mucking about in old ruins, the protagonist, Tess Chaykin (Sorvino), finds the document everyone has been seeking throughout the story. It is a manuscript that has been preserved by the Knights Templar, a secret society, over the centuries, and it purports to be a “gospel” written by Jesus Christ in which he claims to be a mortal human being, not the Son of God as described in the Bible. That, of course, is essentially the same matter at issue in The Da Vinci Code.
The Last Templar’s treatment of the issue is quite different, however. Upon finding the document, Tess tries to convince her main antagonist, the sinister, aged weirdo William Vance, that no one can ever know whether what the document says is true anyway: a two-millennium-old hoax is still a falsehood regardless of how old it is. That’s a very good point indeed, but Vance remains nonetheless intent on taking the document so that he can use it to “prove” that Christianity is a lot of hooey. His belief is that doing so will put an end to all wars, which he posits are caused solely by religion.
Tess, who started out in the story as an atheist who says she believes only what she can see and God isn’t in that category, has just finished fervently praying for the recovery of her new boyfriend, FBI agent Sean Daly, who is lying in a coma after injuries sustained in a shipwreck (part of the quest, you see). Sean has been portrayed throughout the story as a faithful Catholic and has engaged in several very earnest discussions about religion with Tess, who has satirized and insulted him while he has responded with exceeding reasonableness and kindliness albeit not particularly scintillating theology.
Tess has fallen in love with Sean despite his inadequacy as a theologian, and in her anguish over his dire medical condition—which clearly can be cured only by a huge dose of Hollywood sentimentality and wish-fulfillment—she turns to the only source of miracles she knows; God, of course. Having just done so when confronted by Vance’s arguments for atheism, she desperately tries to convince Vance to give up his quest to destroy all faith in God (which is clearly about as likely as convincing Democrats to give up their addiction to tax dollars).
Alas, Tess’s entreaties are all in vain, and the elderly Vance tries physically to wrest the document from her hands. They struggle over possession of the document atop an exceedingly picturesque but windy bluff overlooking the sea, and not at all surprisingly the pages are soon dislodged from her grasp, caught by the wind, and carried off into the sea below, never to be recovered. “Crap, now we’ll never know!” says Tess’s crestfallen expression.
What’s particularly dizzying about Vance’s arguments, of course, is that they’re ones that have been frequently made by atheists in recent years in attempts to characterize Christianity as not only wrong but in fact nearly as dangerous as the burning of fossil fuels. This gives the miniseries a bit of extra relevance and piquancy, which is probably never a bad thing.
The notion that a secret document disproves the Bible’s claims about Christ’s divinity is clearly not going to sit well with Christians, of course, even when the claim is made in fictional form—as the furor over Brown’s novel proved.
(Those who don’t wish to know the resolution of The Last Templar should skip the next paragraph.)
There’s a final twist, however. Although Tess and the other characters in the story never do find out whether the document is authentic and true (and hence must take their religion on faith, as it were), the audience does get to know the answer. In a flashback to the time when the document was originally hidden, during the Crusades, we find that it is indeed fake, and that it was created for the very same reason as motivated Vance’s crazed quest, the idea that destroying the Christian church would end all wars.
Thus The Last Templar takes the same material as The Da Vinci Code but posits the exact opposite conclusion.
I imagine that quite a few people watched The Last Templar during its initial showings, and that many more will do so over time. In cultural terms, this exchange of views is exactly what Thomas Jefferson said was the great value of freedom of speech (“Notes on Religion,” 1776): “Truth will do well enough if left to shift for herself. . . . She has no need of force to procure entrance into the minds of men.” Thus not only is The Last Templar an interesting antidote for those bothered by The Da Vinci Code, it’s an object lesson for anyone not entirely comfortable with the idea of cultural freedom.
The Last Templar can be viewed online by way of NBC’s Last Templar website.







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
22 Comments
So that’s what happened to Mira Sorvino…
The Da Vinci code book was poorly written and the movie was boring. The Name of the Rose shows that you can take shots at organized religion and still entertain. I have very low expectations for Angels & Demons, which was a horrible book. Every chapter ends in an! exciting! reveal!
Thanks for “spoiling” the ending. We watched the first hour and quit, not being exactly enthralled by the story, and they hadn’t even gotten to the religious bit yet.
Just goes to show there really is nothing new under the sun.
Geez Karnick! It’s just another stupid TV movie. Whining conservatives are just as annoying as whining liberals.
How nice, that “The Last Templar” is ripped off from a novel by the unspeakable Steve Berry, called “The Templar Legacy.” Therein the talentless Berry reveals that Christianity is a hoax, and actually tries to write a Gospel translation (protected by the Templars) that is so clunky and silly it defies description.
The same Steve Berry wrote “The Alexandria Link” which Orson Scott Card tears apart as completely evil:
http://www.ornery.org/essays/warwatch/2007-02-18-1.html
I made the mistake of reading a Steve Berry novel. Once.
Jimmy C—you read that passage exactly as I intended it. I’m glad it got a laugh. There’s a scene in the film in which Sorvino’s character is menaced by several thugs in a subway, I think it was. She dispatches them with a series of brilliant martial arts maneuvers. Right…..
Did anyone see the South Park episode about the true origins of the Easter Bunny? Puts DaVinci Code to shame.
If an author or filmmaker presents a world view that is evil, like Steve Berry does, I have a perfect right to despise and deplore his work. Perhaps he is very personable (many found John Wayne Gacy a very amusing clown) but what he writes does matter. If you read Orson Scott Card’s careful deconstruction of Berry’s work, you find that Barry is either intellectually lazy or a liar.
Nope, I’m not a Jew. I worship one, though, so I get a bit riled up when anti-Semites ooze into my field.
Oh God, The Last Templar is written by Raymond Khoury who is a mindless liberal and an Obot through and through and his fiction is liberal garbage. At least The Da Vinci Code has an interesting plot while The Last Templar is just plain boring. When yill you guys ever learn?
==a lapsed non-christian==
Izzat a Christian who has lapsed into non-Christianhood, or a non-Christian who has lapsed into Christianhood?
S.T. and Jimmy C:
Mira Sorvino as “brilliant archaeologist and martial arts expert” is consistent with an item on many “What I’ve Learned From The Movies” lists:
If you are female, attractive, and have a nice figure, it is possible to become a world-renown expert in any hard science – nuclear fission, genetics, archaeology, biology, etc. – at the age of 24.
Examples:
“Fantastic 4″: Jessica Alba as Director of Genetic Research of major company.
“The World Is Not Enough”: Denise Richards as nuclear engineer.
“Relic”: Penelope Ann Miller as biologist at Natural History Museum
Ms. Sorvino is in her 30’s, so I suppose she used her post-age-24 years to work on her jujitsu.
“Fantastic 4″: Jessica Alba as Director of Genetic Research of major company.
Hey, Reed insisted.
“The World Is Not Enough”: Denise Richards as nuclear engineer.
HAHAHAHA! Named “Christmas Snow”, no less. HAHAHAHAhahahahahaha….
“Relic”: Penelope Ann Miller as biologist at Natural History Museum
Ok, I actually bought this one. But 2 outta 3 ain’t bad, as Meatloaf once noted.
The appetite for Gnostic conspiracy-weaving has never been laid out more brilliantly than by Uberto Eco in “Foucault’s Pendulum”. Unlike Brown, whose “brilliant research” for “Da Vinci Code” apparently consisted in cribbing from the shabby “Holy Blood, Holy Grail,” Eco exhaustively examines the whole gamut of Gnostic ideologies, from the Bogomils, Cathars and the Abligensians to the various Masonic orders.
His conclusion is that the best way to keep a cosmic secret such as the truth of the Gospels is to lay it out in the open where everyone can see it. The meek and lowly of heart will find it, and the proud,clever bastards will continually confound themselves by twisting it into innumerable conspiracy theories, on the principle that God would only reveal Himself to superior creatures such as themselves.
It all boils down to the question Jesus asks his disciples: “Who do you say that I am?”
As soon as the jousting scene was over it was turned off and deleted from the dvr.
Something like this is actually going on in the Muslim world. The world’s oldest known Koran was found in Yemen in 1972, and has yet to be released to scholars, as Islam continues to ignore this primary source. I can’t imagine Christianity ignoring the discovery of so much a a scrap written by Paul or Augustine. The Nag Hammadi library and so-called gospel of Judas were widely publicized.
I am waiting for the “Mohammed Code” movie to come out. You will never see it because everyone knows if you make it, the Muslims will kill the actors and director.
Christians may be upset and annoyed that their religion is pilloried in movies, but it goes to show that we are more tolerant because we know that the Truth can survive all assaults against it.
Atheists may not believe in Christianity, but they certainly know how to make a buck from it, that is faith you can believe in.
I’m a cradle Catholic, and have to say that I enjoyed both “The DaVinci Code” and that Templars miniseries. Call me crazy, but one silly book that wraps every myth and legend about the Catholic Church into one plot AT LEAST needs to be applauded for effort, even if it has to distort the myths to accomplish its purpose. It’s fiction and fluff, the stuff of light entertainment. I never felt offended that some silly hollywood liberal got his religious facts wrong, and I thoroughly enjoyed reading (and watching) the vain attempt to make a highly fictional novel some sort of cultural flashpoint.
What is so risible about Dan Brown and his anti-Catholic screed is that he didn’t even do his homework. His works display an appalling ignorance both of historical facts and Catholic teaching. Leave aside the inanities of inventing an evil Opus Dei religious order of hitmen (it is a lay organization devoted to personal spirituality and good works); Brown nearly succeeds in getting everything about both the Catholic Church and the Gnostic Gospels wrong except for the occasional ‘and’ and ‘the’.
The Gnostic Gospels do not deny the DIVINITY of Jesus; they deny his HUMANITY. The Jesus of the apocryphal Gospels is a kind of animated meat puppet who doesn’t eat, drink, leave footprints, or even blink. The root of Gnostic cosmology is that all created matter is evil; Jesus would not corrupt his divinity by actually taking on a real human nature, but merely adopts a human appearance, in order to instruct a small group of elect how to escape from this “prison of flesh.”
Brown gets this distinction exactly ass-backwards. Real 2nd Century Gnostics would have stoned him to death
The Catholic Church has always stressed that Jesus is both fully God and fully man. While teaching that our human nature is subject to concupiscience or Original Sin(think of it as a default setting to get things wrong), the Church does not condemn our flesh as evil.
Contra HGATOR: Brown’s work can be described as ‘evil’ insofar as what he disingenuously describes as a “blend of fact and fiction’ is actually a blend of fiction and other fiction which Brown labels as ‘fact’. THE PROTOCOLS OF THE ELDERS OF ZION is also fiction; I do not hesitate to call that evil as well. The intent of both is to distort and demonize people of faith.
I also stopped watching after the opening jousting scene. From that point I just fast forwarded to the historical flashbacks.
And then that pretty much ended when the three Templars get washed overboard…during a storm…IN FULL CHAINMAIL, and swim to shore. I have a suit of chainmail, there’s no way you’re swimming out of a bathtub, much less through a storm tossed Mediterranean!
This line, “Tess has fallen in love with Sean despite his inadequacy as a theologian,…”, is just too enjoyable not to say “thanks” for it.
[...] A smart blogger added an interesting post on Big Hollywood Blog Archive NBCs Last Templar Is Interesting …Here’s a small excerpt [...]
[...] Code, it
[...] This chap placed an interesting blog post on Big Hollywood Blog Archive NBCs Last Templar Is Interesting …Here’s a brief overviewBicycle Regular-Size Playing Cards 3.99. Numbers, letters and Home Playing Cards Poker Size (2-1/2×3-1/2). Jumbo indexed (meaning larger numbers and. Books, Books on DVD & VHS, Reference & Bookstands. Shuffling is a breeze with this automatic card shuffler. playing cards with large print for individuals who are blind or have low vision. Shopping is the best place to comparison shop for Adult Cards- Card Games Compare products, compare prices, read reviews and merchant ratings. Low Vision Playing Cards Poker Size Playing Cards and Card Holders The Low Vision Playing Cards Poker Size are a great gift for to anyone who has trouble seeing the numbers and. Blue Low Vision Plastic Coated Playing Cards: Low Vision Plastic Poker size- 2 1/2″ x 3 1/2″ Price: 10.00. index that are good when playing Texas Hold’em poker. The selection of low vision, jumbo index playing cards in this section are meant to help those [...] [...]
You must be logged in to post a comment.