Ragtime: On Second Thought
by Larry O'ConnorHere’s something you don’t hear from bloggers very often: “I was wrong!”
Back in January I wrote about the announced revival of “Ragtime” at the Kennedy Center. I described the extreme leftist views of E. L. Doctorow upon whose novel the musical is based. I also described the central character’s story arch which follows his path from hopeful, young and talented African-American to spiteful, vengeful domestic terrorist.
A few weeks ago I was lucky enough to see the production and I was delighted that although the script remains unchanged form the original, some slight nuances in staging, focus and character inter-action has softened the radical nature of Doctorow’s dogmatic cynicism and has illuminated truly hopeful and inspiring visions of an America to be proud of.
For the purpose of full disclosure I should reveal that I had tangential involvement in the original production of “Ragtime” and was able to witness many aspects of the creative process. I have always been an admirer of the piece and yet have had a resistance to its overall theme. After wiping the tears from my face after the curtain cal in Washington DC, I began trying to figure out why this show now speaks to me in such an uplifting way. After weeks of examination I believe I have the answer: Blame Canada.
OK, I’m only half-joking. It’s not Canada’s fault, but a Canadian’s. The original production was produced by the now defunct Livent corporation headed by Canadian Impresario and convicted felon Garth Drabinsky. In the roaring ’90s Garth stood astride the theatre industry with a hugely successful revival of “Showboat” and multiple touring productions of blockbuster musicals in Canada. His Canadian production and theatre owner/operator company, Livent, was envisioned as a vertically integrated production and booking organization in the style of the old Hollywood studio system. Livent began when Garth was ousted as Chairman of Cineplex-Odeon the movie theatre chain he founded in 1979. After leveraging its rapid expansion with miles of debt his new partner MCA sent him packing. Garth was allowed to leave with one asset, the Pantages Theatre in Toronto and the rights to present Phantom of the Opera there.
From those humble beginnings, Livent was born. He paid huge amounts to attract the best creative teams and spared no expense in producing gigantic productions. His “Showboat” revival directed by Hal Prince was infamous for its excessive budgets as well as its enormous scale… in terms of the physical production and the size of its cast.
So Garth with his grandiose visions (mostly of himself… seriously, his autobiography is titled “Closer to the Sun”) decided in 1995 that it was time for Livent to produce an original musical instead of just staging revivals or Canadian Tours of Broadway productions. The traditional path for the creation of a new musical begins with either a composer, lyricist (or composer/lyricist team), book writer, director or any combination of these entities envisioning an idea that they then collaborate on and create the beginnings of a new show. Depending on the existing reputation or track-record of the writers or director, a producer could be brought on rather early to help finance part of the writing process in exchange for an option on the script. If the writers are unknown they usually will write an entire script and go through many revisions before a producer will pick it up.
In the case of “Ragtime” and the “vertically integrated” vision Garth had for Livent the process was totally reversed. Garth optioned the rights to “Ragtime” from Doctorow and sought out a team to create his show. He actually auditioned song writing teams by having them write a handful of songs and then present them to him for his judgement. Garth selected Terrance McNally to write the libretto and the team of Lynn Ahrens and Stephen Flaherty to write the score. Graciella Danielle was selected as Choreographer with Frank Galati as Director. McNally, Ahrens, Flaherty, Danielle and Galati was a dream team of Broadway talent and true to form Garth paid top dollar to attach them to the project.
If you review the articles written at the time of “Ragtime’s” opening you will see a common thread in the quotes of all of these people. They all say in gushing prose that Garth was one of the most hands-on, creatively involved producers they ever worked with. Everything Livent did was a reflection of Garth and his philosophy. And he often talked about a “Trilogy of America” consisting of “Showboat”, “Ragtime” and “Parade” (a musical about the lynching of Leo Frank, a Jewish man accused of raping and murdering a 13-year-old girl in Atlanta). Garth was quoted at the time saying “I have always felt very emotional about the way that minorities are decried and raped in different ways,” he says. “I don’t walk around waving a socialist flag; with me, it’s a matter of legal justice and social equity.”
Garth was the driving creative vision behind “Ragtime”, not the writers and not the director. And Garth seems to have been bent on trying to illuminate all of America’s flaws through the mounting of this show. Specifically, the troubles of America’s past with regard to racial and religious bigotry. And he had a like-minded collaborator in Doctorow as we have already seen in my previous post on this show.
Looking back, I can now see that the uncomfortable, cynical edge to the original “Ragtime” was the reflection of a successful Canadian business man, spurned once by Hollywood with a chip on his shoulder and something to prove to the American entertainment industry that sent him back to Canada in shame those many years ago. And, I think, because of the underlying resentment for America that snuck through many of the scenes in “Ragtime” our audiences were reluctant to fully embrace what was a brilliant work because the emotional impact was alienating to many Americans love and pride in our country.
Which brings us back to the Kennedy Center. A few minor changes in the mounting of this production has made a world of difference. First, the cast is scaled down by about 35%. This helps the audience focus on the main characters rather than the enormous and overwhelming number of chorus and ensemble members that filled the stage originally.
Also, the set is much more basic and not designed with “spectacle” in mind. For example, in the beginning of the show, one character leaves New York on a ship with Admiral Perry to explore the North Pole while and immigrant ship passes them in New York harbor arriving at Ellis Island. A fantastic song, “Two Ships Passing” then sets the stage for a handful of story arcs. In the original production two eight-foot ships traverse the stage utilizing computerized deck automation techniques. They looked really cool, cost a lot of money and were completely unnecessary. In fact, they distracted from the performances of the ACTORS on stage.
Another major improvement is the staging of the anthem “Let Them Hear You” I discussed the lyrics of this song in my original post and this scene was most troublesome in the way that it seemed to rationalize the violence perpetrated by Coalhouse in the name of social justice. But director Marcia Milgrom Dodge has Coalhouse collect his gangs guns during the song. He also emphasizes the lyrics that convey the idea that using your voices and words to confront the flaws of our nation is always the solution and that violence never is.
One last change that makes this production so much better than the original. And this is something that the creative staff had nothing to do with. In the middle of Act One Coalhouse Walker and Sarah sing “Ragtime’s” signature song, “Wheels of a Dream”. It is an anthem of hope, promise, optimism and belief in all that America can be. In the show, the song sets up the tragic events that follow and makes the evil racism that occurs even that much more hateful and despicable. But now, in 2009, sitting blocks away from the White House, the song means so much more.
I did not vote for President Obama and I don’t support much of anything that he or his administration is attempting to do. But knowing the historical realities of our country’s struggle with race relations that are depicted in “Ragtime” and then knowing what has transpired and the incredible, unbelievable progress that has been made over the past 100 years, this song resonates in such a positive and inspiring way that makes it impossible to not think of our first black President and what that means to so many in our country.
Here are Tony Award winners Brian Stokes Mitchell and Audra MacDonald from the original production:
A final happy ending to this story: About a year after the Broadway Opening of “Ragtime”, Livent, the vertically integrated, publicly traded company that promised to revolutionize the theatre industry, collapsed. The same kind of leveraged debt that endangered Cineplex-Odeon, toppled it’s step-brother, Livent. And Garth Drabinsky has been convicted of fraud and forgery.
And, the revival of “Ragtime” at the Kennedy Center is now in negotiations for a transfer to Broadway.
Stage Right is on Facebook.







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
12 Comments
(SPOILER ALERT) The problem I had with the movie RAGTIME (and I guess it followed the book on this) is the police chief played by James Cagney ordering the summary execution of Coalhouse. There didn't seem anything in the character that suggested he would do such a thing. I understand that Doctorow was following the general storyline of "Michael Kohlhaas," and Coalhouse had to pay a price for his rebellion, but the police chief saying "Shoot him!" just seemed to be a by-the-numbers leftwing denunciation of The Man.
I am honestly not very familiar with Ragtime. It sounds like it's still a very leftist, anti-American presentation even with the changes?
By the way, as an aside, while I love the Kennedy Center, I have always laughed at the statute of Kennedy's head in the lobby. It looks like it was made of cow patties and then bronzed.
It's been a lot of years since I red "Ragtime" but I recall when I finished it, I thought it was the most spectacularly awful literary book I'd ever read.
Andrew, it's so funny you should say that. At intermission, I looked up at the statue and said to my friend: "Wow, I had no idea JFK had such bad acne."
It actually is not anti-American. It is a legitimate depiction of cultural issues at the turn of the last century. It is true that here was racism and sexism and exploitation of workers and immigrants and those subjects are dealt with. but the hope and promise of America shines through. And, frankly i walked away with the overwhelming pride in how we as a nation have confronted those issues, rectified them and how the individuals effected by those issues have become successful beyond anyone's wildest imagination.
Only in America!
That period of America is fascinating. The movie wasn't. I couldn't get through the book.
Glad this production was good.
"bad acne" — LOL!
It's good to hear that something that struck you as (for lack of a better word) "anti-American" in its prior incarnation would now fill you with pride. That says a lot about the changes they made.
I know that we Americans have had our horrible moments — what country/people haven't? And I have no problem with those things being depicted in art. However, I feel that to depict such acts, it is only right to also make it clear how far the country has come in eliminating that kind of conduct and at redressing those wrongs. No matter what many want to think, Americans really are great at righting our wrongs.
P.S. Glad to see you posting again at BH. I always looked forward to your behind the scenes stories on Theater.
I read the book, and saw the movie (several times). Never saw the Broadway version. I will say that the movie was both excruciating to watch and yet totally engrossing. I think it was James Cagney's last appearance, but I could be wrong. I think the message in part was "before you point your finger at the Southerners, start looking at white society everywhere." The book and the movie took place in New York City and suburban Westchester County. Racism was nearly as insidious in the north as it was in the south. It just wasn't formally institutionalized. I hope the play accomplishes what Doctorow did in the book. His prose was syncopated like the music of ragtime. As jazz comes to the forefront, the music and the words capture a different beat. I'm wondering how the play would bring in the side story of the architect who was murdered by a cuckolded husband (a true story, by the way). And "The Entertainer" by Joplin was the song my piano-student daughter wanted to learn most. She finally got pretty good at it. Glad to see the revival didn't go over the top to satisfy current Rainbow Coalition sensibilities.
I think the message in part was "before you point your finger at the Southerners, start looking at white society everywhere."
Not to digress, but why do you think "All In The Family" was in Queens and not , say, Atlanta or Mobile? Because racism did not just exist in the South. Just because the North fought the South to free the black slaves does not mean that Northerners actually thought of Blacks as equals.
I agree. There were several plays, movies and TV shows which attempted to get that message across. The "Ragtime" movie was just a particularly large, lavish and elegant production.
Given the timeline of the revised production before it hit the Kennedy Center, it's worth wondering if the "tweaking" of the play's focus is due solely to improving the overall show, or it the "tweak" is the result of last November's election, and the tweakers feeling overall more favorable towards the U.S. (i.e. — Had McCain won, there would have been no adjustments to "Ragtime" from its original production).
I will always love Garth Drabinsky, no matter his crimes. As a one-time fan of most of Doctorow's works (I've read "Ragtime" seven times), I no longer can read him. As I've moved to the right from the "mushy middle" I find him intolerable. I've followed "Ragtime" up and down the East Coast in numerous Equity and non-Equity productions since '98 (saw the original cast four times) but curiously living only 2 1/2 hours from D.C., I did not make it down to see this lauded revamped production. I would love, however, before I die to hear that glorious score performed by an old-fashioned 40-member orchestra with voices equal to the original casts'.
I had a magnificent, memorable night at the Kennedy Center not long ago. Every once in a while I come across the picture of 'ol cow patty-pizza face and I am instantly taken back to that night.
You must be logged in to post a comment.