Sunday Matineé: ‘Sunday in the Park with George’
by Larry O'Connor1984’s landmark musical “Sunday in the Park with George” was one of the most polarizing and debated shows to reach Broadway in the past thirty years. It marked Stephen Sondheim’s first collaboration outside of the watchful artistic and commercial gaze of his long-time director and producer Harold Prince. It also served as the inspiration for a whole new genre of introspective concept musicals which are hated and loved by theatre-goers and theatre professionals alike.
“Sunday in the Park” is a semi-fictional account of the painter Georges Seraut and the creation of his masterpiece, “A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte.” Seraut is best known for his brush stroke method called pointillism where the final grand image of the painting is comprised of hundreds of thousands of tiny dot-like strokes that the eye melds together at the right distance… yes, a pre-curser to television! But, also intriguing to book writer James Lapine was the use of color and creation of color on the canvas. Seraut, in the age of Renoir and Monet, would not blend colors on his palate–he would only use primary colors and he would force the eye to blend the colors on the canvas. Seraut called this method “Chromoluminarism.”
Unlike conventional musicals, the show opens with a scene between the two lead characters rather than a big opening number. During the scene we are introduced to Georges, an artist sketching his model/lover, Dot, in a Paris park. When Georges doesn’t like the shade created by a tree in the park, he erases it from his sketch book and it flies out of the scene on stage. When Georges wants more boats in the river, he draws them and they appear on stage. The entire stage is what occurs in Georges’ mind–we are invited into the artist’s mind as he creates his masterpiece. Here are two Broadway Giants, Mandy Patinkin and Bernadette Peters, in the title song “Sunday in the Park with George.”
We are also slowly introduced to all of the other figures in the painting as we learn back-stories and sub-plots about their characters and their significance in Georges’ life. But the main story in Act 1 is the conflict between Georges and Dot. Georges is the artist focusing on a vision that no one else can see or even comprehend if he tries to explain it to them. Dot represents the rest of the artist’s life. She represents all of the things that serve to distract the artist from his vision. He loves Dot, but he can’t give her the life that she wants. He knows that this causes her pain, but the power of his vision and creative desires overpower everything in his life. Al of this is conveyed in a brilliant song, “Color and Light,” which so perfectly defines these characters and their conflict. Listen closely how Sondheim uses the staccato style (short, clear-cut tones and chords) to reflect and emphasize Seraut’s pointillist painting style.
To protect her feelings, or perhaps to punish Georges, Dot moves out and takes up with the local baker, becoming his mistress. The next thirty minutes of the play bridge together scenes, snippets of scenes, and portions of three or four different songs making a grand journey into the various characters of the paintings’ consciousness. Part of the sequence is referred to as “The Day Off” and other parts are identified by the name of an individual song, but the whole journey is a non-stop sequence of theatrical episodes that are connected together in a way not scene on Broadway before this. Georges is constantly sketching throughout the proceedings and he sings at various times on behalf of the characters or in tandem with them–a soldier, a boatman, a nurse, even a dog or two. Dot takes the stage to explain to us why she left Georges for Louie the baker. For those who claim that this show is devoid of any real melody, please take notice of this infectious performance.
At the end of this extraordinary sequence of mini-scenes and songs, Georges sits with his sketch pad and reflects on his day’s work. As he does, he get to peer into his inner thoughts and we finally get to understand a little bit of his motivation. The song, “Finishing the Hat,” has become an anthem of sorts for artists and theatre people world-wide. And it has been the inspiration for countless creative professionals. More on this song later, but be sure to watch the scene after the song. It has a great little exchange between the “ugly American” characters and an obnoxious French person trying to communicate. Also, we see a bit of very clever staging used to reveal that Dot is now pregnant with Seraut’s child.
The Americans are taking Louie the baker back home with them and Dot with child are to go as well. Dot tries to get Georges to reveal his feelings and to beg her to stay with his child, but Georges knows that he could never be the man Dot and a child would need. In one of the truly great “break-up” songs written for Broadway, Georges and Dot realize that they do not belong together. Please, take note that the song never really ends or fully resolves. It sounds like it’s about to… but then the lyric “I have to move on” almost sounds like a fragment of another song…
Now, free from distraction, Georges’ finally completes his work and the first act finale of “Sunday in the Park with George” is a theatrical experience of music, lyric, performance, costuming, lighting and scenic elements which will live in the memories of all of us so fortunate to have been in the tiny Booth Theatre in the mid-80’s. From 1:20 to 1:30, listen to how Sondheim gleefully uses harsh, dissonant chords that build up and resolve into a perfectly satisfying chord right on the word “Harmony.”
Act two of “Sunday in the Park”, like many of Sondheim’s shows, is problematic. It’s been posited that Act One is really a complete one act show which ends in such a satisfying way that Act Two didn’t stand a chance to live up to the promise. Still, I find Act Two to be thoroughly satisfying, just in a different way. We are taken to 1984 Chicago, where Seraut’s painting is on permanent display. In an inspiring use of vivid imagination, we are guided through the thoughts of the two-dimensional figures in the painting and we learn what it is they all must be thinking while frozen forever in a masterpiece.
We are in Chicago also to see a young, modern, visual artist named George who is presenting his latest exhibition in conjunction with Seraut’s painting. We learn that George is none other than the great-grandson of Seraut. All of the actors from Act One take on new roles in modern-day Chicago and some of the parallels are fun. Patinkin play George, of course, and Peters plays Marie, George’s grandmother and therefore, Dot and Georges’ daughter. My favorite is the actress from Act One who plays Seraut’s mother who appears in Act Two as an unforgiving art critic.
George is at a standstill with his art. He is constantly struggling to find something new. His personal life is in a shambles and he’s going to have trouble finding income for his next project if he can’t get out of his artistic rut. He is incredibly close to his grandmother, Marie, but refuses to accept that he is in fact Seraut’s great-grandson, as she insists. He writes the notion off as family legend.
Marie carries a little red grammar book that her mother used to learn English. We had seen this book in Act One so we, the audience knows that the story is authentic. Georges is to take his art to the Island of Le Grande Jatte for an exhibition celebrating Seraut, Marie is to go as well. Unfortunately, she dies before she can make the trip and we see a crest-fallen George sitting alone in the park reading from the book. As he continues to read the notes in the back of the book that Dot had left almost as a diary about Seraut, Dot appears from the past to connect with and inspire George.
And so the disintegration of their love in Act One is finally repaired and resolved with this song in Act Two. now we see where those lyrics “I have to move on…” came from and why “We Do Not Belong Together” never really sounded like it fully resolved. As he connects with his past, George is newly inspired by not only Dot but all of the characters from the painting and by art itself. He is ready for his masterpiece.
Time for trivia and anecdotes. Back in 1984, the big hit musical was “La Cage Aux Folles” with music and lyrics by Jerry Herman and book by Harvey Fierstein. It was a crowd favorite but many theatre insiders secretly had disdain for it as an old-fashioned and insipid show which used caricatures instead of fully formed characters and had pointless song and dance numbers just for the sake of having a pointless song and dance number. Other than the subject matter, “La Cage” could have been written in 1955. When “Sunday” opened, the battle lines were drawn and you were either a “La Cage” person or a “Sunday” person.
The rivalry got heated and the egos involved were formidable. You often hear writers and actors and directors showing disdain for any kind of competition within the theatre industry. “Oh, we’re all one big family,” “We want everyone to succeed,” “You can’t really compare art”… well, not in New York in 1984. I don’t remember the folks involved in this debate demurring much. They were out of the closet about their opinions of Herman’s work or Sondheim’s work. So much so that when “La Cage” swept the Tony awards that year, Jerry Herman said, “There’s been a rumor that the simple hummable show tune is dead. Well, it’s alive and well at the Palace.” What a nasty swipe at Sondheim. Sondheim had the last laugh though as “Sunday” became one of the few musicals to win the Pulitzer prize for theatre.
When “Sunday in the Park” was work-shopping and beginning previews, “Finishing the Hat” hadn’t been written yet. It has been reported that Mandy Patinkin has having a lot of trouble understanding his character’s motivations in the first act. Finally, very close to opening night, Sondheim presented him with “Finishing the Hat.” With that one song, Patinkin’s entire character fell into place. “Finishing the Hat” has become the anthem to so many in the theatre and other areas of the performing arts. But, I wonder if Mr. Sondheim truly recognizes how far-reaching that little four minute song has become. Last year, in his acceptance speech for best score of a musical for “In the Heights,” exuberant composer Lin-Manuel Miranda shouted “Mr. Sondheim look, I made a hat, where there never was a hat, and it’s a Latin hat at that!”
My father was in the publishing business. We worked for the same magazine for over twenty years. In the late 1980’s he left his company, sold his house, cashed in his pension and started his own magazine. It was his vision, it was his dream, and it became his obsession. I had already moved to New York and was working on Broadway. One day, a large manila envelope came in the mail. Inside was the first issue of his magazine with a hand-written note clipped to it. It simply read: “Dear Son, Look, I made a hat, where there never was a hat.”
For our finale today, I bring you last year’s Tony Awards. Mandy Patinkin accepting a life time achievement award on behalf of Stephen Sondheim and then a scene from the visually stunning revival of “Sunday in the Park with George.”
Stage Right is on Facebook.







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
25 Comments
I've never seen this show, but I love the soundtrack. I would love to see it performed sometime, but I think it would never be as great with out Patinkin and Peters. If I had been part of the discussion in 1984, I would have been firmly in the Sondheim camp.
I've never seen this show either, but listening to the tracks, I notice that the melodies are very similar to the ones in Into The Woods, which is not surprising, I guess, since they're both Sondheim.
Thanks Stage, you are continuing my education in all things theater. You should issue degrees at some point!! At the very least, you should write a book about all these — an analysis of theater!
I have not seen this one either, nor did I realize it created a theater-schizm. It's certainly an interesting one, but I (personally) wouldn't call it great. I guess I'm discovering that I'm just not that much of a Sondheim fan. I've always been a fan of Mandy Patinkin though, and I'm happy to see more of his work.
Nice work as always!
Ah, Sunday In the Park with Geoge. Another Sunday Matinee sitting at my computer weeping. . ."we lose things and we choose things". . .and 'Move On'. . .it makes me feel when I'm just listening to it, but to see Mandy and Bernadette performing it is a gift, especially in the context of the show/your post. Georges and Dot will always belong to Mandy and Bernadette in my opinion. Bernadette can just "be" and she says torrents. I had forgotten that La Cage swept the Tony's that year. I remember enjoying La Cage too for the big, pretty, fun, romp and extravaganza it was, and at that time I didn't feel Sunday In the Park with George was robbed, but now revisiting it in it's entirety, it was! BIG TIME! Thanks for your insight and the trivia.
I saw Bernadette Peters in New York for a performance of Song and Dance. What a singer. I remember pouting because we couldn't get tickets to see Cats. When we went to the theater and I saw that it was by Andrew Lloyd Weber, I thought this might not be bad. When Ms. Peters appeared and started singing, then I knew what we were seeing was magnificent. I would have loved to see this show. I just realized that the actor who appeared at the end of the scene from the first clip is Brent Spiner. Wow, Commander Data. I knew he was in the production. How young he looked.
I"ve seen it, both the original production and a few others since. It is awesome–and I remember exiting the theater in NYC about 3 weeks into the run and instantly running to a payphone (pre-cell days, folks) and calling a friend in L.A. and damn-near singing him the show from memory because it so completely imprinted itself upon me. But then, I did that with "Sweeny Todd" too. For me, this is the show where the always-adorable always-brilliant-voiced Ms. Peters transcended her cupie-doll cuteness image and became a much more deeply-ranged actress on the musical stage. We always knew she had it in her, but this was the one that let her do it–and the "cutesy" stuff actually helped it, especially when she's the old lady in Act II. I also think, perhaps because it was Patinkin who originated it, that this is one of the few major shows where the hero is not a big, booming baratone of a voice.
I saw this in Chicago 20 plus years ago at the Goodman before I truly appreciated this painting. How I wish I would have had your terrific analysis to understand the show!
I've got two questions about Finishing the Hat. First is a technical question about Patinkin. Is he singing loud enough that an audience could hear him? Having never actually seen him in person, he seems much quieter than I would have expected?
Secondly, is the first part of this song mean to be about frustration — struggling to focus on the hat? Or regret — ignoring the wider world as he focuses on the hat? Or am I way off base?
Any thoughts?
Hi Andrew…
This was a special taping of the show done for American Playhouse and released on video (later DVD). I believe they taped it over the course of a couple days, once in front of an audience, but other times with an empty house. That accounts for some of the camera angels taken from on stage. The sound feed is coming direct from the actor's body mics and the theatre's mixer right into the video equipment. Because of that, your not getting that ambient theatre sound that you expect to hear.
Having seen him perform in Evita, Sunday, Secret Garden and his own concert I can assure you the audience can hear him. That being said, he is one of those actors who really uses dynamics with his voice to make dramatic nuances in his lines. He does mutter some of his lines as Georges, and it works with the introverted and odd nature of Seraut in the first act.
I tend to really like this take on the song: http://www.sondheim.com/commentary/finishing_the_...
Although, I don't think the song only works on the level that this writer explains, I think it's a good response to your question.
Anna, not only are they both Sondheim, but they also had the same book writer/director, James Lapine. Woods came a few years after Sunday and was the very next collaboration between the two. Sondheim has been known to write his songs to cater to the specific talents of his actors. For instance, Glynis Johns was not capable of very strong breath support and could not sustain long held out notes, that is why "Send in the CLowns" is a series of very short lines.. "Isn't it rich?, (breath), Are we a pair?, (breath)…"
So, since Bernadette Peters was in both Sunday and Woods, it is possible to find some similarities in the styles of her songs… I agree that "We Do Not Belong Together" has the same feel as "Children Will Listen"… but the songs are not alike as much as the style is similar, you know what I mean? And since it is the same composer writing for the same actress… I guess it stands to reason.
Jane… you're not alone… "We lose things, and then we choose things" takes me right back to a partiicularly rough break-up and it always gets me. I think I listened to that song over and over again…. to help get me through it.
One other interesting thing about the Tony's that year… Best Actress went to Chita Rivera in Kander and Ebb's "The Rink" instead of Bernadette Peters. Also, the Best Actor went to George Hearn in La Cage. Hearn had just come off of the National Tour of "Sweeney Todd" to do La Cage and in later years he would praise Sondheim by saying that he was the reason he pursued musical theatre instead of opera. So George Hearn was able to bridge the Herman/Sondheim gap by bringing his talent to both sides of the equation… one more thing about Hearn. He also starred as Max in Andrew Lloyd Webber's "Sunset Blvd." so he actually worked that musical theatre divide as well!
Yes! She came right back to Broadway two years later and won the Tony Award for "Song and Dance" where she had to carry an entire 1st Act of a musical single-handedly. The entire first act was her, alone on stage singing an entire 1 Act story. A great performance. In the 1980's she did "Sunday" then "Song and Dance" and then "Into the Woods" Not a bad stretch!
Wow. Great post! The things I learn here… and I'm not even a theatre person! LOL I'm gonna have to get the DVD.
Just as an aside, the Seraut (which ahs special significance to us Chicagoans- it's at the Art Institute) has a brilliant parody of it featuring 'Simpsons' characters… it's available online…
Just as an aside, the Seraut (which has special significance to us Chicagoans- it's at the Art Institute) has a brilliant parody of it featuring 'Simpsons' characters… it's available online…
But in the original production, he was singing sans microphone. Way back in the day, singers could actually be heard in the back row and were trained to sing to the back row. Now, they all use microphones and it's just not the same. It always sounds canned to me.
Yes, but remember that there was backlash directed at Sondheim because he was changing the structure of the American Musical. His "musicals" were more operatic and dark. They didn't have the happy ending for the big Broadway musical. I remember the Herman camp and the Sondheim camp sparring. It was the same when Disney came along – the traditional Broadway camp and the new Disney camp – though nominated in almost every catagory, Beauty and the Beast won only one Tony's the year it premiered.
A book….? Hmmmmm….. I'm listening……
OK Bev… now for the real irony of your Disney part of the tale…. what show beat "Beauty and the Beast" for Best Musical? Sondheim and Lapine's "Passion", the epitome of dark, free-form, concept musicals. Broadway had come full circle!
I hear ya Bev… but, to be fair, I think that in 1984 they may have already begun incorporating body mics on Broadway.
My brother lives in Chicago. Our family has a joke about that Chicago pride in this painting. When it first came out I sent him the cast recording and my Dad and I would go on and on about the show because we had seen it and gotten hooked on it. My brother would just look at us and say "Yeah, well I've seen the painting.". And from then on, when ever the show is mentioned, my brother will alwys chime in with "I've seen the painting!"
(By the way, I've seen it too, and until you stand before it you never really grasp the scale and accomplishment of it)
I'm not in publishing, but it seems to me that you're putting together a pretty good book here about theater. Not only a history, but a little politics, a little behind the scenes, trivia, and analysis.
Beauty and the Beast was pretty impressive, but I would have been surprised if it had won because it seems "too commercial" for an awards show.
Stage, that's an interesting take on the song — I didn't hear the song that way. Miller makes some good points, but he doesn't address the uplifting ending, when George finishes the hat. If it were about blame, I would have expected something a little more smug — "ok, I finished the hat, now I will give you my attention." Instead, George seems rather thrilled that he finally achieved his goal, and it sounds like he has regained his freedom.
Also, where painters' have an affinity for certain colors and shapes, composers have the same for certain chord progressions, tones, and rhythms. That's why you can identify a composer's work, like a painter's, even if you are not a scholar. If you listen closely you will hear the shadows of all Sondheim's musicals scattered throughout each of his works. Same for all the great composers. FYI – I just saw Mandy P. in concert with Patti Lupone this weekend and he is still fabulous. I haven't seen him live since Sunday In The Park With George.
You must be logged in to post a comment.