Sunday Matinee: Les Miserables
by Larry O'ConnorSunday matinee will be a weekly post focusing on an individual Broadway show. I’ll discuss some of its history, trivia and little-known anecdotes as well as analyze the political, social or cultural ramifications of the piece. In fact, let me start with a little-known theatre fact: Did you ever wonder why Saturday matinees on Broadway are at 2:00 and Sunday matinees are at 3:00? My understanding is that years ago, the Sunday matinee was scheduled for 3:00 so the actors would have time to go to a late church service on Sunday morning. Because of the late hour of the prior night’s performance, actors tend to sleep in rather late on Sunday mornings. The Noon Mass is sometimes the only option for church and then a nice lunch after church would have made a 1:30 call way too tight. I wonder how many actors on Broadway these days take advantage of that schedule.
Les Miserables
I’ll start with a rather blunt declarative: “Les Miserables” is the greatest musical ever written. It’s taken me years to get to this point. “My Fair Lady” was there for a while for me, then “A Chorus Line,” then “Sweeney Todd”… but after over twenty years of reflection from seeing that first invitational dress rehearsal at the amazing Broadway Theatre in the Spring of 1987 and after seeing the under-appreciated revival from two seasons ago I have reached the conclusion that there is no better piece of musical theatre than “Les Mis”.
*Spoiler Alert* If you are a regular reader of my Stage Right postings, I assume you have a certain affinity for the theatre. And after almost 25 years I would assume you’ve already either seen the show or at least heard the score. But if you haven’t I have to warn all readers that it will be impossible for me to discuss this show without revealing major plot points. So, if you don’t want to read spoilers, then kindly click on one of the discreet banner advertisements to your right and be on your way!
Click this link for a detailed synopsis of Les Miserables.
Is the story liberal or conservative?
At the beginning of Les Mis when we follow Valjean’s journey off of the chain-gang and observe his attempts to integrate with civilization after 17 years of imprisonment for stealing bread, it is easy to think that this play is about government oppression, law and order versus compassion, social prejudice… you know… liberal crap! And throw in the conditions of the starving and the homeless and the heroic intellectual college student’s stand against authority and on the face of it this is just left of “Hair”.
At the end of the day you’re another day older
And that’s all you can say for the life of the poor
It’s a struggle, it’s a war
And there’s nothing that anyone’s giving
One more day standing about, what is it for?
One day less to be living.
At the end of the day you’re another day colder
And the shirt on your back doesn’t keep out the chill
And the righteous hurry past
They don’t hear the little ones crying
And the winter is coming on fast, ready to kill
One day nearer to dying!
These lyrics could be the anthem for ACORN for God’s sake. But look deeper in to the story and you’ll see that although the plot does use the plight of the poor and the anger at the aristocracy in 19th Century France as a catalyst for the tragic events to come, the over-riding theme of Les Mis is redemption. And, more specifically, redemption through God.
Valjean is the protagonist, and Valjean is the epitome of a conservative. After a bishop shows him mercy, Valjean vows to start a new life and leave his past behind him:
One word from him and I’d be back
Beneath the lash, upon the rack
Instead he offers me my freedom
I feel my shame inside me like a knife
He told me that I have a soul,
How does he know?
What spirit comes to move my life?
Is there another way to go?
I am reaching, but I fall
And the night is closing in
And I stare into the void
To the whirlpool of my sin
I’ll escape now from the world
From the world of Jean Valjean
Jean Valjean is nothing now
Another story must begin!
And what a story it is. In eight short years he has become a factory owner and mayor of Montreuil-sur-Mer, now that’s a capitalist… this dude is Victor Hugo’s Mitt Romney. Within the next twenty minutes of the show, Valjean shows compassion (forces Javert to put Fantine in hospital instead of prison), honesty (reveals himself as 24601 rather than let an innocent man be jailed in his place), and integrity (by keeping his vow to Fantine and going to rescue Cosette). When we next see Valjean in the slums of Paris, he and his now grown adopted daughter Cosette are distributing money and care to the starving homeless. He isn’t petitioning the government for programs, he is using his own funds for charity. He goes to the barricades not necessarily because he believes in the students’ cause, but so he can watch over Marius for the sake of his daughter… what a father would do out of love for his daughter is the greatest example of conservative values. And what is Valjean’s great, second-act show stopping song? A prayer to God.
Bring him peace
Bring him joy
He is young
He is only a boy
You can take
You can give
Let him be
Let him live
If I die, let me die
Let him live
Bring him home
Finally, on his death bed he sees a vision of Fantine and Eponine welcoming him to heaven and he sums up Victor Hugo’s over-riding theme of the show with the lyric:
To love another person is to see the face of God.
Valjean is a combination of Ronald Reagan, Rudy Giuliani, John Wayne and Pope John Paul II. Les Mis is a conservative show, but, what makes it so great is that liberals don’t know it and they can enjoy it without any qualms.
Is it just another big, British “spectacle” musical?
The timing of this production (mid to late 1980’s) as well as set-designer John Napier’s affiliation (he had just done “Cats” and “Starlight Express”) allow some people to categorize Les Mis as just one of the many “spectacle” musicals which came out of London at this time. Those shows were all lumped together as, shallow, reliant on sets and special effects, loud, overwhelming… I heard them written off as Burger King of Broadway meant to appeal to unsophisticated tourists, but not real theatre mavens. I’ll utilize another post defending these shows, but despite how you feel about them, it is absolutely wrong to lump Les Mis in with them.
True, Director Trevor Nunn’s prior forays into musical theatre were Cats and Starlight, but Les Miserables has much more in common with some of his other efforts like 1984’s “Cyrano de Bergerac” with Derek Jacobi (a production like you have never seen!) and, mostly, his landmark production of “The Life and Adventures of Nicholas Nickleby”. Both Les Mis and Nickleby were co-directed by Nunn and John Caird. The fact is, Les Mis is such a huge and sweeping story that it would be nearly impossible to tell the story without major scenic elements. However, other than the giant pieces used for the barricade scene (which also double as the slums in the first act) Les Mis is actually a very spare set. A genius use of turntables in the stage (which is hardly a “special effect”, turn tables have been used for years in theatre) which effortlessly bring minimal set pieces (a table, a gate, some chairs) as well as the various performers sweeping in and out of Valjean’s life give the impression that this show is a technical wonder, but it’s actually a very traditional scenic design, just updated to utilize the computerized stage-animation technologies of our time.
And to call Les Mis “loud” is to be too simplistic. Are their loud moments? Of course, they are depicting a gun battle and a rebellion for crying out loud. But the most moving moment and emotionally impactful are the quietest moments. Fantine alone on stage in a spotlight singing “I had a dream my life would be, So different from this hell I’m living, So different now from what it seemed“. When she holds out the note on “seeeeeeeeeeeeeeemed” the music stops for a moment and all the audience hears is the silence in the theatre before she sings the last line of the song. Same thing when Eponine sings “The world is full of happiness that I have never knooooooooooooown.“ In Les Mis, the most meaningful moments occur when we are alone with one character and they are revealing their most personal thoughts to us. That is not spectacle, that is drama.
“But I don’t want to see a show about a bunch of college protesters fighting against the police!”
That’s what my Uncle said to me when I forced him to see Les Mis in 1987. And at first glance, I understand that this plot line is a trouble spot for a lot of conservatives. So let’s address this issue. First of all, understand that the students are protesting against an in-effectual government. Their hero is Gen. Jean Lamarque who is often described as a leftist. But the rebels in the June Rebellions of 1832, which are depicted in Les Mis, were rebelling against the monarchy and in favor of Republicanism. In the context of 1832 France, Republicanism stood for self-government with liberty, popular sovereignty and civic virtue. You see, back then, left was right!
And even though a good conservative would not advocate street riots to advance one’s cause, the real epitaph of the student rebels is sung by Marius in the stirring Empty Chairs and Empty Tables:
From the table in the corner
They could see a world reborn
And they rose with voices ringing
I can hear them now!
The very words that they had sung
Became their last communion
On the lonely barricade at dawn……
…..Oh my friends, my friends, don’t ask me
What your sacrifice was for
Empty chairs at empty tables
Where my friends will sing no more.
Not really an anthem to the cause. More of a song of regret and reconsideration, I think.
The greatest Act One Finale of all time
I’ve discussed how Les Mis is a triumph of storytelling and stage direction as well as technical theatre excellence, but in the end, this show boils down to a really great score. The music is sweeping and powerful, tender and moving, funny and raucous, and climactic and chilling. And in one song in particular, composer Claude-Michel Schönberg and librettist Alain Boublil achieve all of these things at the same time. Act 1 finale “One Day More” became an instant classic upon its first public performance and continue to be the single most impressive song written for the musical theatre. It borrows much from Leonard Bernstein and Stephen Sondheim’s “Tonight” from “West Side Story” but it achieves even more by expressing to the audience every character’s individual storyline at the end of the first act by utilizing a different musical motif for each character individually, and then in a triumph of overlapping counterpoint the different musical themes heard in songs earlier in the show combine into a cacophony of music that dares the audience not to come back for Act 2!
In One Day More the writers manage to convey to the audience:
- Valjean’s plan to run away with Cosette to America.
- Marius and Cosette’s despair at being separated after falling in love.
- Eponine’s heartbreak over Marius.
- Marius’ torn feelings of wanting to follow Cosette but feeling obligated to stay and fight with his friends at the barricades.
- Enjolras rallying the students for tomorrow’s rebellion.
- Javert’s plans to disguise himself as a rebel to undermine their plans.
- Mssr. and Mdme. Thernardier’s plans to loot and steal from the fallen corpses at the barricades.
- Marius’ final decision to stay loyal to his friends and fight by their sides.
All of these plot points are brilliantly conveyed through song. And what an amazing song it is. Here is the original Broadway Cast, without the benefit of turntable or an on-the-ball sound technician, from the 1987 Tony Awards (with a 1 minute prologue of “At the End of the Day”):
Frankly, to see One Day More at the end of Act 1 is reason enough to see Les Mis.
Timeless
Finally, what makes Les Mis so great is that it is timeless. Its story resonates now as much as twenty years ago and as much as it did in 1862 when Victor Hugo released the novel. I think it would have resonated in 1770 America, and even in Shakespeare’s Elizabethan England and even way back in Euripides’ Greece. Because it speaks to the greatest struggles on human kind. Man vs. himself, Man vs. God, Man vs. Man. And Man’s struggle against power and the wicked, tyrannical use of it.
I fully expect to see a breathtaking production of Les Mis with my grandchildren some day (and my oldest kid is not even 10 so it better be a while).
Do You Hear the People Sing?
If you’re like me, you need a regular fix of Les Mis and, now that the Broadway revival has closed it looks like a trip to London is your best shot where it is currently in its 23rd record-breaking year. But, in the mean time, I highly recommend this 10th Anniversary Concert Version of Les Miserables filmed at the London’s Royal Albert Hall. Watching this proves that this show doesn’t need any of the special effects and technical wizardry to sustain its greatness. It is performed with no staging at all. Just the actors at microphones singing the show. It is an all-star, dream team of Les Mis performers including:
Colm Wilkinson as Valjean – He is the original and the greatest. This role will always be his. Like Yul Brynner in “King and I”, any actor to play this role will not just be playing Valjean, they will be playing Colm Wilkinson as Valjean
Lea Salonga as Eponine - Yes, she is known as Kim in “Miss Saigon”, but her turn as Eponine is the single greatest interpretation of this role. Always tender, always sympathetic, and never whiny like some Eponines are.
Michael Ball as Marius – Yes, he’s a little old and a little chubby to pull it off completely, but his voice is the purest I have ever heard sing these songs.
Michael Maguire as Enjolras - This role sort of became his one-hit wonder. He won the Best Supporting Actor Tony for it but he hasn’t been able to sustain a huge Broadway since. But when 6 foot plus Michael Maguire thrusts his fist in the air holding a rifle and the lights catch his white sleeves and he belts out in a clarion tenor voice “One More Day Before the Storm!” I dare you not to get shivers.
Judy Kuhn as Cosette – The first and only Cosette to not come across a little bit annoying. For the love triangle to work the audience can’t be thinking “My God, what does he see in her? He should totally go for Eponine!” and with Judy Kuhn, you don’t say that. I totally saw what Marius saw in her.
There are a few other great things about this DVD. First it is performed with the Royal Philharmonic Orchestra which is a much lusher orchestration than the Broadway production. The additional chairs make the music that much more thrilling. There is also a chorus of hundreds of singers seated behind the orchestra who stand and punctuate the larger musical numbers with a triumphant sound unheard in a theatre production, only in a concert like this.
Finally, this DVD boasts a remarkable finale where 17 different actors from around the world parade down the center aisle with a flag representing their country. It is revealed that they are Valjeans from all of the International casts of Les Mis. They perform a breathtaking rendition of “Do You hear the People Sing” and “One Day More”. Thanks to YouTube, I’ll use it for the finale of this Sunday Matinee: (keep a sharp eye for the Japan Valjean)
Stage Right is on Facebook.







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
32 Comments
Certainly got me interested in watching it but I didn’t read the whole article because I don’t want to spoil or taint it. I will see what I think. I’m not in to live productions, though, but I’m pretty sure there are movie versions that I can get the jist from and may read the book.
WOW! What a great tribute to a simply magnificent show! I saw “Les Miz” in London in 1991 and I am still impressed with this great musicial. Thanks for the reminder of its greatness.
I may be mistaken but didn’t Hugo write the first part of the original book when he was young and then came back and finished it when he was old/older?
That doesn’t really have anything to do with the musical I know, quite frankly I’m amazed they were able to condensed such a long book into a show to begin with.
Don’t you think it’s a little silly to inject this play with partisan politics? I understand this site’s clientele’s hunger for more “conservative” entertainment, but shoehorning Les Miserables into the liberal vs. conservative paradigm is just overdoing it.
Thank you for that!
I agree wholeheartedly. I hate to sound like one of those gushers in an advertisement, but I’ve seen it 3 times. The second time I saw it was the best. It was the only time when one of the effects concerning Javert worked (I’m reluctant to say which one and post a spoiler).
Opus, yes, Les Mis took a long time for Hugo to write (and the incident where Valjean intercedes for Fantine is based on a real life encounter between Hugo and the cops when they were busting a prostitute). And the musical cuts out a lot of amazing stuff from the novel. (Gavroche and Eponine are siblings, and there’s an extremely suspenseful section where Marius goes to Javert to tip him off to a kidnapping plot, and Javert comes off as an awesome, pistol packing badass) I’ve adored the show since I saw it in the nosebleeds in London in 1987, and just saw it at the Hollywood Bowl last summer, where it kicked ass. I’ve got myriad recordings (German, anyone? How about Hebrew?) and I’ll love it forever, but I think it’s cheapened by trying to inject modern politics into it. Personally, I think the lesson to be drawn is that *gasp* truth, honor, love, etc., are universal and transcend ideology. (Having said that…not sure what ‘conservative’ values Javert’s suicide endorses. You could argue that ‘clinging too tightely’ to his religion makes him kill himself
And what to make of the fact that the truly criminal characters–the Thenardiers–get off scott)
But ultimately I think West Side Story has a better score.
I hadn’t seen the international bit until just now and there at 2:17 is the Japanese Valjean (like you suggested keeping an eye open for) and it is CHAIRMAN KAGA from the original Iron Chef!!! I’d recognize that face and voice anywhere!
I enjoy your posts, and the inside look at Broadway they provide. I don’t share your taste – preferring the musicals of the 30s-50s – but I Les Miserables is one of my favorite novels, so perhaps the musical wouldn’t be too awful. Perhaps you could add a short clip to the post (and those in the future)?
Thanks again. Sad that we’ve come to the stage where you feel you can’t use your real name, but considering the milieu in which you work, and the desire no doubt to continue working, it’s understandable.
Kudos!
Great article and have enjoyed sharing Les Mis with others. I’ve seen it many times and always thought of it as very conservative. But I’ve appreciated it even more as a near allegory for Law vs. Grace. Jean Valjean accepts the grace extended to him from the priest (God) and is radically changed from bitterness and selfishness to being a person who changes towns and lives by his magnanimous life. Javert is a person of the Law (The song “Stars” clearly spells this out), very much like a Pharisee which Jesus criticized for following the letter of the Law but missing the principle behind it. Javert can’t accept the grace Jean Valjean freely offers and is ultimately ruined by his rejection of the gift. Grace does not fit into the world view that he has and so he must leave that world.
I was living in NYC when Les Mis opened and was fortunate enough to see it two days after it opened. I have seen it three times on Broadway and once in San Francisco. I have to agree, the best Broadway musical ever made.
JEFF PERREN:
It’s great strength I believe is its fidelity to the novel. Hugo was a self professed socialist, but he wrote of men who were giants. The clash between Vajean and Javert is a clash of great values. Both men are giants, both are devoted to the highest standards of justice. But one is flawed, fatally so, and eventually he must confront this flaw. When one realizes he is so flawed,so wrong, he cannot allow himself to continue to exist. Giants! Compare and contrast to the pigmys who made up trash like “Rent”.
Great feature, I hope Sunday Matinee continues.
“Any vice in moderation can be a virtue
but any virtue taken to its exteme is a vice.”
Um, not to quibble, Christopher, but which St. Paul did you have in mind? Surely not Saul/Paul of Tarsus, the apostle?
Stage Right,
Thank you for your excellent article. I LOVE Les Mis and have been fortunate enough to see it three times — on Broadway shortly after it opened, in London a few years later, and the traveling show in my home state a few years after that. It never gets old.
The brilliant music, lavish costumes and genius set design have all been discussed over the years (though not quite as eloquently as you did), but it is the message of the play that always moves me to tears.
You are the only one I have ever heard discuss Les Mis that recognizes that this show has such a conservative and faithful message.It is a masterpiece.
Thank you for sharing your insight. I look forward to reading your future articles.
John,
Thanks for your comment, particularly the point about Hugo writing about giants vs today’s focus on pygmies (the post-modern’s view of Man). On that basis, I’ll give it a try. Hard to conceive, though, of Claude-Michel Schönberg (whoever that is) writing better music than Gershin, Porter, or Rodgers. But picking a ‘best’ out of a dozen or more ‘truly superior’ is inevitably an exercise in personal taste.
Regards,
Jeff
Great review and what a great show!! Someone alluded to this above, but I think the show can be summarized as God in 3 person – God of grace (Valjean), God of Law (Javert) and God as folly or fake (Thenardie). I think Hugo challenges us to “seek the face of God” and provides 3 aspects/profiles from which to choose. We can enjoy the God of grace, fear the one of Law or pleasure ourselves in the one of folly. What a blessing to choose the one of GRACE and redemtion and forgiveness. Javert cannot exist in a world of grace and kills himself.
JEFF PERREN:
I don’t know how extensive your knowledge of Hugo is, but he wrote a novel, published, to the best of my knowledge, only once in English, with a forward written by Ayn Rand, called “93″. If you want to read about giants, of both sexes, find this book. The title refers to the year of the French Revolution, the conflict between Royals and Rebels, mothers and children. A simply wonderful novel that is all but unknown in this country. While he may have proclaimed himself a socialist, Hugo wrote of men and women who were great individualists, who never waivered in their beliefs or principals. Try this book if you can find it.
John,
My reading of Hugo’s novels is extensive (though incomplete; I never finished Han of Iceland). I have read ‘93 a few times, with the Rand forward. I’ve read a fair amount of his poetry and essays, too. I’ve also read nearly every word ever published of Rand’s, many times over a period of more than 30 years.
I loved this! Thanks so much for writing it and I look forward to reading more.
I did the costume designs for Les Mis (the stuff we didn’t rent) for our local high school two years ago. A huge undertaking, but one of the most gratifying experiences of my life.
I know, a high school production sounds lame. But they had the voices to pull it off and it was wonderful. Didn’t make a cent- those revolves don’t spin around for free, y’know- but we will remember it always.
Even though they were doing the ’school version’, it was still very powerful. The wonder of live theater- I’d have just been tying on Marius’s revolutionary sash and forcing Eponine’s stubborn Asian-American tresses into the appropriate elf-locks, and I knew they were just ordinary suburban kids- yet I cried every time she died.
If I ever need energizing for a job- I just pop in the DVD and watch “One Day More’.
I adore the 10th Anniversary version! It was my first experience with the show and it spoiled me completely. I cannot tell you how many times I watched it and listened to the soundtrack!
I was fortunate to see a production in Chicago some years ago, with a different cast. It was still wonderful and I would give anything to see it again.
But there’s something special about the first cast you get used to. It’s difficult to avoid comparisons, even though another cast may be just as good or even better!
The traditional Christian view is that any virtue taken to its extreme (especially if it overrides other virtues) can become vice — except for the three theological virtues of faith, hope, and love.
The same thing goes for ideas; when one true idea or fact is taken to the extreme and overrides all others, it becomes a bad idea or a crazy heresy.
Saw it three times…the first in 1989 in Minneapolis, next in Winnipeg, Manitoba (Canada for those of you in Rio Linda) and then back to Minneapolis (we must drive 350 miles to get there). I would never tire of it-would be neat to see it again. The first time we were in the first row seats on the floor, so close to the stage we were able to look down into the orchestra pit…so when this show started up (and it IS loud), we sat there stunned and almost beside ourselves with wonder-every once in a while my husband and I would just look at each other and grin…or wipe tears! So glad to see others feel the same way. Lovely touching (or rousing) music, beautiful singing, interesting story line…Les Mis has it all!
Heh..Zsusza…are you old enough to remember the 80’s MOW “Mazes and Monsters” starring a young actor named Tom Hanks? Based on a cheesy book I eagerly devoured as a teen, it deals with the eeevils of a thinly disguised Dungeons and Dragons. I don’t think I share your concerns, but you might check it out as a curiosity.
Re: one more note on Les Miz, interesting to note that Hugo’s other much-adapted masterpiece, Hunchback of Notre Dame, contains an evil prelate who is the opposite of Les Miz’ saintly Bishop of Digne. Apparently while Hugo was deeply religious, he didn’t care much for the Catholic Church later in his life. Quite a towering artist, with skills in many genres and art forms, and also a gadfly to political and religious authorities, as every good artist should be.
I plowed through Les Miserables over the course of a summer in my 20’s…now I may have to go back and tackle it again.
Re Harry Potter
The Oz series by Frank L. Baum maintained good morals in most respects but the bad writing hopelessly dates the books now.
I object to Harry Potter because the books are so egregiously awful. The prose is terrible, the plotting is silly, and the characters are thin. There really is no driving conflict since Harry is a deus ex machina in himself at ever turn.
Give it time, and you will see that Rowling’s silliness passes away just as Oz has. While LOTR and Narnia march on. Why? Because they are suffused with powerful truths and not simply Manichean nonsense.
I’ll give Rowling credit for invention, though. There’s a deal of good invention in her fantasy world. But there was in Oz, too. It’s invention which sells these stories far more than any moral content of good vs evil.
Dismissed as just a spectacle? The heck? I’ve never seen the show, live, but I have the soundtrack, and–dude. One of the best there is! Stars, On my Own, the aforementioned One Day More… Any critic who dismisses this musical gets thier opinions dismissed by me. I’ve got no time for that kind of poor judgement…
Fabuous piece!!
I have seen the show numerous times and also believe that it’s one of the best Broadway has seen.
The Tenth Anniversary DVD IS a gem!!
Wonderful post!! thank you. One of my favorite musicals of all time
Thank you, Stage Right. An excellent review and wonderful memories for me of seeing this superb show a few times (enough to create my Nom de Plume, at least!). Two related items you didn’t mention that I’d like to highlight as well:
* The parallel between Valjean and Javert is showcased in the musical to great effect; much of their revealing numbers (”What Have I Done” and “Stars”) are even set to same music. (And in a nice book-ending way, so is “Javert’s Suicide”.) I found this a beautiful illustration of Hugo’s relentless emphasis on *values*. Both men pursue them diligently; Javert only realizes too late his are tragically distorted. But that revelation actually doesn’t make him any less conscientious, and true to his own code: when he realizes he’s fundamentally wrong about Valjean, he takes the only logical course to a man of real principles.
* The portrayal of the Thernardiers are, to me, a tragic missed opportunity. I suppose you need some comic relief in all this revolution and romance, but these are the *true* villains of the story — characters *without* values, amoral, in a “world where the dog eats the dog” — and to portray these wretches as humorous gamesters *badly* misses this point. Because they’re funny we’re not really supposed to take them seriously — and we really should.
Oh, and Valjean was in prison for 20 years, not 17. At least in the musical.
I’d like to respond to all of the great comments here… but the over-riding thought in my head as I just finished reading all of them is: “Man oh man, Big Hollywood has some really really really smart readers! And, IMHO, Stage Right seems to attract the cream of that crop!”
I feel so fortunate to be able to express my love for the theatre and to sometimes reflect on the political or cultural impact of a show.
I’m just going to respond to one thing here. For those that object to “injecting politics” into a show like Les Mis, let me say this:
As I have expressed in other posts here at BH, the left have an unending opportunity to inject their philosophy and their perspective at all stages of the creation of a play. From the leftist universities where aspiring playwrights are supposed to be educated, to the leftist non-profit theatres where young playwrights are supposed to be developed, to the Democratic Party-funding theatre owners’ and producers’ offices where young playwrights need to sell their product, to the workshop or rehearsal process where young playwrights have their visions molded by bohemian actors and directors, all the way through opening night where young playwrights have their work evaluated and reviewed through the prism of leftist theatre critics.
I work in an industry which allows politics to be injected at every stage of the creative process and now you are asking me to sit silently when, on those rare occasions, I finally see something on stage that moves me at my deepest level and speaks to my fundamental values.
I am constantly asked to work on “Rent” or “A Chorus Line” and to overlook the politics and appreciate the talent that is up on the stage… and I do, I really do. But when I see my values and my politics up on the stage once in a blue moon, I will stand up and I will cheer and I will tell the world why.
Thanks, again, for reading.
Jim P,
on Harry, you might get a kick out of Harold Bloom’s take.
http://wrt-brooke.syr.edu/courses/205.03/bloom.html
But time has flown, so you’ll probably miss this.
[...] at BigHo we are getting a review of twenty-five year old musical Le Miserables which ponders the all important question: Is the [...]
Sorry to disagree with Stage Right, but for all you reading this who have never heard the soundtrack before, Frances Ruffelle is the one and only Eponine and way outshines Lea. Lea just doesn't have the right voice or the right emotions. Also, Judy Kuhn's voice is waaay too low for Cossete's vocals. She even squeaks on a few high notes.
about the Thenardiers-in addition to being villains, they're also the comic relief. you just can't kill/jail the comedy. Javert is the villain in the true sense of the word-he makes Valjean's life hell, and ultimately is punished for it(his death). btw, thanks for telling readers that the book is awesome. your review is great
You must be logged in to post a comment.