<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: J.J. Abrams&#8217; Reboot of Classic &#8216;Star Trek&#8217; Could Reach $65M for 4 Days! Easily Biggest &#8216;Trek&#8217; Opening Ever &amp; $200M+ Domestic is Possible!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/smason/2009/05/06/finaltracking58/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/smason/2009/05/06/finaltracking58/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:29:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Poll: How Much Will &#8216;Star Trek&#8217; Make This Weekend? &#124; The gadgets</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/smason/2009/05/06/finaltracking58/comment-page-1/#comment-511078</link>
		<dc:creator>Poll: How Much Will &#8216;Star Trek&#8217; Make This Weekend? &#124; The gadgets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 16:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=129382#comment-511078</guid>
		<description>[...] so far have been more modest, ranging from $40 million (Box Office Prophets) to $65 million (Steve Mason at Big Hollywood) to $74 million (Box Office Guru). Variety, however, think it can top $100 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] so far have been more modest, ranging from $40 million (Box Office Prophets) to $65 million (Steve Mason at Big Hollywood) to $74 million (Box Office Guru). Variety, however, think it can top $100 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FormerFan</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/smason/2009/05/06/finaltracking58/comment-page-1/#comment-1251442</link>
		<dc:creator>FormerFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 05:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=129382#comment-1251442</guid>
		<description>No, DS9 lasted 7 years like TNG and Voyager. I know because I watch all the episodes.  The only exception is Enterprise, which sucked and was cancelled early. 
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Star_Trek:_Deep_Space_Nine_episodes&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Star_Trek:_D...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, DS9 lasted 7 years like TNG and Voyager. I know because I watch all the episodes.  The only exception is Enterprise, which sucked and was cancelled early. </p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Star_Trek:_Deep_Space_Nine_episodes" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Star_Trek:_D.." rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Star_Trek:_D..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gideon7</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/smason/2009/05/06/finaltracking58/comment-page-1/#comment-1312614</link>
		<dc:creator>Gideon7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 22:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=129382#comment-1312614</guid>
		<description>Sorry Carolyn, but that remark puts you above 9.0 on the ST geek scale.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Carolyn, but that remark puts you above 9.0 on the ST geek scale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rad islamic jiha</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/smason/2009/05/06/finaltracking58/comment-page-1/#comment-1274374</link>
		<dc:creator>rad islamic jiha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 21:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=129382#comment-1274374</guid>
		<description>revised, it made 82 million domestically and 200 million worldwide </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>revised, it made 82 million domestically and 200 million worldwide</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rad islamic jiha</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/smason/2009/05/06/finaltracking58/comment-page-1/#comment-1342078</link>
		<dc:creator>rad islamic jiha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 21:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=129382#comment-1342078</guid>
		<description>you&#039;re wrong about the numbers the first star trek move in 1979 grossed over 200 million domestically. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you&#039;re wrong about the numbers the first star trek move in 1979 grossed over 200 million domestically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miami Harold</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/smason/2009/05/06/finaltracking58/comment-page-1/#comment-1238486</link>
		<dc:creator>Miami Harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 19:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=129382#comment-1238486</guid>
		<description>Personally, I liked Star Trek: Enterprise better than any incarnation since the original series, though Deep Space Nine had its moments.  Yes it only lasted four seasons but as I recall, so did the original series.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I liked Star Trek: Enterprise better than any incarnation since the original series, though Deep Space Nine had its moments.  Yes it only lasted four seasons but as I recall, so did the original series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Carolyn</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/smason/2009/05/06/finaltracking58/comment-page-1/#comment-1184122</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Carolyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 19:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=129382#comment-1184122</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t the first Enterprise captain Robert April?  I think he was Pike&#039;s predecessor. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#039;t the first Enterprise captain Robert April?  I think he was Pike&#039;s predecessor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerplunk</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/smason/2009/05/06/finaltracking58/comment-page-1/#comment-1183778</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerplunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=129382#comment-1183778</guid>
		<description>Does he get to be wheeled around in a washing machine with blinking lights? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does he get to be wheeled around in a washing machine with blinking lights?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gideon7</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/smason/2009/05/06/finaltracking58/comment-page-1/#comment-1184382</link>
		<dc:creator>Gideon7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 17:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=129382#comment-1184382</guid>
		<description>Bruce Greenwood plays Pike. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce Greenwood plays Pike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RKBailey</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/smason/2009/05/06/finaltracking58/comment-page-1/#comment-1251278</link>
		<dc:creator>RKBailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=129382#comment-1251278</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be seeing it at 10pm PST. Can&#039;t wait! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ll be seeing it at 10pm PST. Can&#039;t wait!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

