Oscar ratings up 11% and up over 14% with the coveted 18-49 demo!
by Steve MasonGood news for the Motion Picture Academy. Despite the fact that the five Best Picture nominees had combined to gross less than $300M domestic by showtime, Oscar ratings were up considerably from last year’s all-time low. Early numbers show that the ABC telecast scored a 27 share, surging by 11% overall and by over 14% with TV’s “money demo” 18-49s. Compare that to last year when the show was down 25% in households from 2007 and down 30% among 18-49s.
The credit should go to producers Lawrence Mark and Bill Condon, although I can see why the streamlined show is a bit of a Rorschach test for viewers. If you love movies, and especially actors, last night’s show was respectful and enlightening. If you are inclined to dislike awards shows and actors, then the telecast would be pretty dreary.
I loved the multi-presenter set-up for the four acting categories. Each nominee was treated as a winner with a past winner talking about what made their performance one of the year’s best. It was cool to see people like Sophia Loren, Robert DeNiro, Joel Grey, Eva Marie Saint and Ben Kingsley take part in the presentation of major awards. (I had the opportunity to interview Kingsley when Schindler’s List was released, and he is a student of acting. He described another actor’s performance as “letting the monster out of the box too soon,” and it stuck with me.)
As for Hugh Jackman as host, he was very different from the string of comedians we have seen in the job. He didn’t feel the need to riff on current events or politics, instead playing it as a fan, and the two musical numbers were hit-and-miss. I was really worried about the opening number until the Anne Hathaway as Nixon finale. It was a bit strained and a little desperate. The second number created by Baz Luhrmann (Moulin Rouge!) worked better with Beyonce, the High School Musical kids and the duo from Mamma Mia!.
Overall, in the modern post-Bob Hope, post-Johnny Carson era, I rank Jackman in the upper tier of those that have tried their hand at the impossible job. He’s well below Billy Crystal and Steve Martin, but much better than John Stewart, Whoopi Goldberg and Chris Rock. It’s apples and oranges really, because Jackman is so different.
As for the structure of the show, I enjoyed the layout of the broadcast from screenwriting to cinematography to post-production and music. One of the reasons the show came in at less than 3:30 is that presenters handled multiple categories. Steve Martin and Tina Fey were an inspired pairing. The same can be said for Natalie Portman with a Joaquin Phoenix-style Ben Stiller.
The two hilights of the show? First, there was Judd Apatow’s inspired mini-feature starring Seth Rogen and James Franco in their Pineapple Express characters, randomly recruiting two-time Oscar winning DP Janusz Kaminski to be part of the fun. Hilarious. The other high point was the way that the three Oscar nominated songs, winner Jai Ho and nominee O Saya from Slumdog and Peter Gabriel’s Down to Earth from WALL-E were blended together seamlessly with a mix of Indian dancers and African rhythms and John Legend stepping in on vocals for Gabriel.
Danny Boyle refrencing Tigger while accepting Best Director was nice. Kate Winslet was more put-together during her speech than she has been at previous awards stops, and Sean Penn was Sean Penn. “You Commie – homo-lovin’ sons of guns,” kind of says it all.
Steve Mason is on Facebook and now also on Twitter.







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
22 Comments
I think the multi-presenter format was used like a safety net to hold the audience. 'Didn't see any of the nominated movies? Aren't familiar with the nominees? Look, here are stars you know, stars you like! See? Keep watching for more stars you know.'
Watched the show with two teens. It was a great opportunity to teach them how to identify hypocrisy, selfishness, greed, ignorance, ambition, vacuousness, envy, callowness and poor breeding. It was also painfully clear how pitifully little formal education most of these "social leaders" have. Since they fancy themselves part of the country's "intelligentsia", I'd be curious to find out the academic backgrounds of the major lefty stars.
I'm really surprised to see that the audience of this was up! I wonder why that was considering how pitiful the movies up were.
I'm not a big fan of Sean Penn, and I wasn't rooting for him to win, but "you commie, homo lovin' bastards!" is probably the funniest unscripted "bit" anyone did that night. Funny, just-crude-enough and gets it's "point" across on a dozen different levels: Now, anyone who has any criticism of his (kinda syrupy) plea for equal rights will immediately be framed as "see, THAT'S exactly what he was joking about!"
Disagree all ya like, but the man has skills.
I don't see how Penn's comment shows he has "skills". He was obnoxious from beginning to end. I certainly don't think he made anyone more anxious to see Milk.
Sean Penn was being mocked on sports talk radio all morning long, so I think the basic reaction to his being an a**hole was just a big "that figures"
I can't see a single thing funny about his comment.
Um, Erasmus, how do you infer from MER’s statement that he/she DIDN’T use the Slumdog acceptances as a stark contrast to the “hypocrisy, selfishness, greed, ignorance, ambition, vacuousness, envy, callowness and poor breeding” of the “major lefty stars?”
Talk about bitter jerks – and it isn’t MER.
Hey what is the big news here? Congress has higher rating too. Must be that stupidity is contagious!
I believe flagrant name-calling can sometimes be a sign of poor breeding, or some other personal….. issues.
Those figures don't factor in the 11 o'clock hour, when they do the numbers will be very close to last years.
Well, at the urging of the contributors of our esteemed web site, we turned it on, although I have to say by the time Maher came on it was sheer will power for me.
For what it´s worth, nobody at work today even mentioned the Oscars. Including all the young ladies. So why should I care?
"Sean Penn was being mocked on sports talk radio all morning long"
That's where I turn for my opinions on cultural matters – sports talk radio!
LOL
I agree that the multi-presenter format was cool and treating them all like winners was a good idea.
But the ceremony as a whole was deadly dull, as was 2008's crop of movies.
Love it!
The startling thing about this year’s Oscars was how different people’s reactions to it was.
Other networks actively counter-programmed against it. HBO ran Taking Chance and a new Big Love, Fox ran NASCAR, and NBC ran a Dateline special.
People openly said that they didn’t care to watch it, or who won. And they didn’t get shouted down or marginalized.
Good for ABC regarding the ratings, but things are changing for the Oscars. Not for the better.
Yes, I'm sure YOU would be calm, collected and erudite when placed before an audience of millions. Apparently your CV qualifies you to be a shallow snob.
My guess about the rising ratings in part has to do with the favorites being big stars this year, whereas last year they were all unknowns. Penn and Winslet and Ledger and Cruz versus Day-Lewis and Cotillard and Bardem and Swinton.
Personally, I liked the "Pantheon" idea. I thought the first dance number warmed up as it went along. The second one didn't quite work.
didn't watch–don't care–
They did so well they climbed all the way to being THE THIRD LOWEST RATED OSCARS EVER.
The show stunk, plain and simple. If more people tuned in than when they were at bottom last year the only thing I'm willing to attribute it to is that there was absolutely nothing else on that night. I sure looked.
i like kevin and joe
You must be logged in to post a comment.