Lonewolf Diaries: James Cameron Wants to Limit the Middle-Class, Keep Third World Impoverished
by Steven Crowder“It’s China, it’s India Anywhere the middle-class is exploding, everyone’s sucking up more power. Population’s continuing to grow, you know we’re going to have to do something about it.”
There it is folks. Straight from the mouth of James Cameron himself. When caught off-guard without his DNC talking points, he admits that the much talked about middle-class is “booming” in America, not shrinking. Also through his comparison to modern China and India, he even acknowledges that the class gap is closing because of –gasp– capitalism! Something must be done about it, and lil’ Jimmy is just the wimp for the job. Somebody call Sean Penn, just in case he needs a sidekick on this one.
Now remember, James Cameron hates capitalism (rumor has it that the creature in “Alien” was based on his own mental interpretation of free enterprise). He believes that it’s destroying the world and needs to be dealt with accordingly. Unless of course it interferes with the production, promotion or distribution of the most expensive motion picture of all time. Then it ain’t no thang, baby!
No, the “thang” that really bothers Cameron is when middle-class Americans act as selfish, evil consumers in order to better their own lives. You heard Jimmy. They’re “sucking up more power,” acting as nothing more than bottom-feeders of Mother Earth’s resources.
You’ve seen the middle-class nowadays, haven’t you? Gone are the days of a chasm-like class gap where the wealthy owned the only automobiles in the country, the first color TV’s, or even the handful of mammoth-sized cell phones that doubled as desk chairs. Today the lowly middle-class American often has several cars, computers (complete with the interwebz), air-conditioning, summer cottages and smartphones.
… Those smug little bastards. They couldn’t leave well enough alone. Why couldn’t they (i.e. you) learn their place and be content with their mediocrity? Who do they think they are, Jimmy Cameron? If we let this go on, James Cameron’s entire classist structure will be more off-kilter than Kirstie Alley at a pole-dancing class.
See, in James Cameron’s world there is “us” (meaning the pre-destined wealthy) and “them” (those relegated to the life of the masses). What works for “us” –mansions, SUV’s, private jets etc. – doesn’t work for “them.” The only thing that can continue to shrink the gap between “us” and “them” is free enterprise. Ergo, it must be stopped at all costs, even if that cost includes people’s lives.
Which brings us to China, India or any third-world country trying to pull themselves out of oblivion and into the new world. See, in the United States, limiting free enterprise means that the middle class will take a step backward. Sure, our lives will be made far less convenient and much more difficult. but in a place like India it means that they will never even have a middle-class to begin with. Whereas our computers might become a little slower, our houses a little more uncomfortable and our water/utilities a little more expensive… They will never get to experience the wonder of a modern computer, clean running water, or even electricity. All of those things require “sucking up energy.”
That’s bad for Gaia, and people like James Cameron are “going to have to do something about it.”
Modern day neo-environmentalist policies have always hurt the middle class. People like James Cameron don’t care because they don’t believe that there should even be a middle-class to begin with. They believe in the old European class structure of the “haves” and the “have-nots.” The ultimate sadness however, is that for the third world, these policies often mean death.
Then again, I guess that if they would rather die, they had better do it…And decrease the surplus population.
It would be the “green” thing to do, and would help curb the oh so ever-growing populace. Wouldn’t that be perfect?
Email this to a friend | Print |
Share on Facebook
| Tweet this
| 
Follow Us on Twitter
Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
180 Comments
translation: you pathetic little creatures need meaning and fulfillment in your crappy lives? go see one of my sh!tty, overpriced, overproduced, purely-derivative-bordering-on-plagiaristic movies! be thankful for awesome people like me telling you how to live!
I'm game..when the Obamas of the world, as well as their supporters such as Soros, Buffet, Gates, Pelosi, Reid, Schummer, Clinton, Cameron, Hanks, Streisand,..etc., only expect and take from this system exactly what they need..I said NEED..rather than what they want or have earned..I will reluctantly reconsider this system.
But their types never will..so I'm safe.
Cameron is just echoing the fears of discredited useful idiots like Paul R. Ehrlich (The Population Bomb</>) and Harry Harrison's Make Room, Make Room.
There's only so much stuff and all these "people" are using it up!
I wonder if Mr. Cameron would support "programs" that limit the ability of "undesirable" peoples from reproducing?
Somewhere in a special part of Hell, Margret Sanger and Adolf are high fiving each other.
[...] Lonewolf Diaries: James Cameron Wants to Limit the Middle-Class, Keep Third World Impoverished by St… [...]
I wanna do a movie about the Na'vi… it'll be awesome, its like Avatar meets Apacalypto! Sweeeeeet!!!
"I, for one, welcome our new green overlords."
Big fan Steven but the thing about the monster from "Alien" can't possibly be true. Cameron wasn't involved in the first movie, that was Ridley Scott, and the alien was designed by H.R. Giger, who was famous for using sexual imagery in his art. That's right, the alien was basically a living, breathing(?), killing phallic symbol.
Maybe the rumor you heard has to do with the Alien Queen from "Aliens."
No, abortion isn't doing it. That's why Obamacare will abort the sick and the eldery at the other end. It's like a "death sandwich."
I think your sarcasm detector broke. Might wanna see about that…
naahhh… I wont reconsider even then. Like my mom always said, "Just cause everyone you know is jumping off a cliff, doesn't make it a good idea".
Ha, fair enough. But he could have at least gotten the movie right…
I am still amazed at the simple-mindedness of the Left. I know I shouldn't be, but I am.
Yes, that's real good knowledge of your subject. Another hallmark of the Breitbart school of "journalism".
Mr. Cameron may want to do something about me, but I'd like to see him try.
Cameron is an idiot and until us bottom feeding middle class people STOP SEEING HIS MOVIES and BUYING his plastic covered "un green" DVDs, we can't complain.
Cameron and his eco-whacko friends don't want third world people to improve their lives because, particularly in Africa and South America, they consider them part of the wildlife. They're nothing more than primates that Jimmy and his pals can fly in to study in their natural habitat.
In your mind, we're all pleased as petroleum punch that there's an oil spill because we HATE the environmnet and want the earth to be awash in radioactive coal dust.
Get a job, hippie.
Well they give you something almost on a daily basis to shake your head at.
Steven,
Idea for a skit for you re immigration:
You at Ellis Island or a mockup – opposite you, is you, dressed and acting like an immigrant, can't speak the language . . . Dialogue consists of what coming to America use to be, an opportunity not a hand out . . . etc.
Cut to today, you jumping a fence, running through the dessert being shaken down beat up, then tortured for money in a holding pen on the US side, throw in a home invasion. Now as you get to your first job mowing some liberals lawn, he walks by you, reading the pinko-commie times, and says "You know in the old days, when America was a racist country, you people had it much tougher, don't forget to get the hedges." The immigrants response/you is only "moron . . " as you walk away.
with arugula
I blame Gaia she is trying to kill us all with here black plague she must be stopped. IT'S ALL GAIA'S FAULT
Are you picturing Rahm Emmanuel swimming out to the oil rig at night in a wetsuit with a waterproof bag of C4? 'Cause I am.
How's those wacky conspiracy theories workin out for ya?
Ah yes the margret mead approach "Lets sit back and see how they deal with arterial bleeding, Hmmmm not to well, wait looks like they have a plan, Hmmmm Ive never seen a machette used as a surgical tool. Now we can wait and see how they deal with infections. Hmmmm tiger licks I wonder if that works oh oh i guess he wasnt licking.
Hey I'm just sayin….take from it what you want. Also, if you want a cure for that typical lefty knee-jerk you got goin on there, go to the Harrison Ford thread and see a response to another dolt like you given by a guy that works or worked for BP in the Gulf…..
"When caught off-guard without his DNC talking points, he admits that the much talked about middle-class is “booming” in America, not shrinking."
How do you get this out of Cameron's comment? He was simply pointing out that an increasing number of people in large, third-world countries like China and India are becoming wealthier and moving into the middle-class. Potentially, hundreds of millions of people who are now riding bikes will now be driving cars. People who now live mainly a subsistence lifestyle will begin consuming a large number of manufactured goods. It doesn't take a genius to realize that this could have a huge impact on the environment. Contrary to what many people here seem to think, we do not have an unlimited amount of resources.
I'm curious, do you have a car? A TV? An air conditioner?
Why would it need to be discussed here?? After all just turn on the MSM, they are all comparing it to the exxon valdez, which is a lie, and crying about how horrible it is. Never mind that it hasn't affected the eco system to any degree that can be measured.
Wait 'til you see what awaits you after you pass the bar. You're right about the simple-mindedness. Almost unbelievable, sometimes.
Why do you hate poor people?
It amazing how captilism lift people out of poverty, even in communist countries: see China. More amazing how socialism drives people into poverty, even in capitalist counties: see America.
Here's an overhead shot of "Do as I say, not as I do" James Cameron's house.http://virtualglobetrotting.com/map/james-cameron...
I'm sure he'll be moving into an energy efficient modular soon to help out.
Al and Tipper just bought:
The couple spent $8,875,000 on an ocean-view villa on 1.5 acres with a swimming pool, spa and fountains, a real estate source familiar with the deal confirms. The Italian-style house has six fireplaces, five bedrooms and nine bathrooms.
And I'm supposed to curb my selfish lifestyle? I'm buying a fleet of Hummers!
Here's an overhead shot of "Do as I say, not as I do" James Cameron's house.http://virtualglobetrotting.com/map/james-cameron...
I'm sure he'll be moving into an energy efficient modular soon to help out.
Al and Tipper just bought:
The couple spent $8,875,000 on an ocean-view villa on 1.5 acres with a swimming pool, spa and fountains, a real estate source familiar with the deal confirms. The Italian-style house has six fireplaces, five bedrooms and nine bathrooms.
And I'm supposed to curb my selfish lifestyle? I'm buying a fleet of Hummers!
Because there are literally hundreds, if not thousands, of these rigs operating world-wide and they have been operating without blowing up and dumping oil on a regular or even semi-regular basis. Therefore, the safety record of such rigs is well-established for anyone who wants to consider the facts logically rather than emotionally.
I'm not downplaying the potential problems along the gulf coast, but I am saying that overall, it's a blip on the screen, not a trend or pattern.
Spoken truly like the person who has his and sees no need to let anyone else have theirs. Why are you so greedy?
This is the ultimate expression of greed any individual can make. Cameron has and enjoys having "his, but he's greedy and believes that if others can also get to the point where they can enjoy the same things as Cameron, then there will be less for him. So, he says no one should access to what he has, so he can keep his own.
He must have been the kid who constantly fought tooth and nail for the largest slice of pie at the dinner table.
Nonsense….the fish, birds and other wildlife will soon be coated with a healthy and protective coat of "all natural" oil. It's the best thing that happened to them.
"Overlords"—That is soooo NOT a Freudian slip!
I haven't seen Avatar and don't intend to. I've heard that its plot is almost identical to Disney's Pocahontas. Wonder if Disney might sue for infringement?
Your comment is an excellent example of how you libtards confuse news with op/ed pieces. Get a job! Better yet, get a life!
I look forward to the day James Cameron's job is off shored to India.
And its going to happen. There used to be 7 American guys on my firewall team at work. Now there's 3 Americans and 4 Indians. And honestly, they're better than most of the Americans they replaced.
And the didn't really replace anyone, we re-orged the Americans to other teams, and then brought these guys in rather than hire locally.
India is really rocking and rolling these days, and do not expect them to stop anything because wimpy modern liberal Americans don't like it.
I agree with your statement and list, except for Bill Gates. He actually earned his money, and now he is personally using it to try and improve the world.
And that's not easy for me to admit, but honestly, I have to admit it. I worked for IBM when Gates and Microsoft were busy destroying their low end computer/software division.
Of course, that's what abortion and physician assisted suicide are for.
Coming soon to a federal building near you, death panels.
http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/oregon_hea...
You do realize how pathetic it is that you abhor these web sites, yet feel compelled to read and comment on them.
Do you have actual, live friends?
Agreed. When he stops over to my house he can take up the matter with Wolfgang, my German Shepherd.
My problem is with his support of Obama and his programs..when we both know that because of his wealth; he would never be touched by Obama's decisions.
I also have a problem with the Gates, Buffets and Winfrey's of the world making the bulk of their wealth here in this nation..but spending it overseas..I believe that charity begins at home..
Just my personal opinion..
Actually..your momma is right..sometimes you just have to grab your principles and hold on tight..
Well then, why don't you go out, get a gun, and start whacking people?
After all, you've already made the moral decision that if its either you or them, they'll go. So man up.
Start walking down main street, plugging away at those you deem undesirables.
I work on a global I/T team with four guys in India. And we're always discussing things like this. They explain India and it's culture to me, and I explain the way America really is to them, not what the MSM shows them.
Sathish referred to it as the time before the freedoms.
And I can't think of a better way to describe it.
And we can use the dead ones as torches to light the way to the Future! Or something…
It ain't easy or cheap saving the world, they need to have proper living arrangements that reflect the enormity of their caring and compassion.
You give him more credit that I do. If you ask me, he's just reciting memorized talking points to what he believes is his target audience.
He most likely doesn't have the slightest idea what he's talking about. But then again, when it comes to modern liberals, when has that ever been an issue?
And how is the burgeoning success of millions of Chinese and Indians James Cameron's "problem?" Was it not a problem when, say, Americans and Europeans were burgeoning?
Seriously, don't you see the disconnect here? Us car-driving, jet-flying, coal-burning, strip-mining, vegetation-paving, water-defiling First-Worlders telling other countries that their having even a tenth of what we have is a "growing problem?" It's like some well-fed yuppie environmentalist who wants to save the rain forest telling subsistence-living Brazilian peasants and tribesman that slash-and-burn farming is Bad. It's just clueless and rude and stereotypically Ugly American behavior.
You can sum up this attitude with an old saying: "Fuck you, buddy, I got mine."
Nah, they'll never call them what they really are.
Just like Orwell's "Ministry of Truth" was dedicated to re writing history and promulgating lies, the death panels will be called "Societal Enhancement Panels" or "Health Rights Panel" but NEVER what they really are.
Yeah, those poor people are getting way too uppity. Just who do they think they are, getting wealthier, moving to the middle class, driving cars, eating more food, drinking clean water, improving their standard of living!? Those selfish, selfish people. Don't they understand that unselfish, caring people like you need whatever resources the earth has left to drive YOUR car, live in YOUR air conditioned home, take YOUR vacations, eat YOUR food, drink YOUR bottled water?
Those Third Worlders – they sure do have some nerve.
"How's that "drill, baby, drill" workin' out for ya?"
Not nearly fast enough. Only leftist ecotwits get upset over occasional oil spills.
"an increasing number of people in large, third-world countries like China and India are becoming wealthier and moving into the middle-class. Potentially, hundreds of millions of people who are now riding bikes will now be driving cars. People who now live mainly a subsistence lifestyle will begin consuming a large number of manufactured goods."
And you think that's a bad thing.
When did I say people in third-world countries shouldn't be able to have theirs? You need to learn how to READ and stop spewing your free-market/Ayn Rand talking points. I was just saying that it seems obvious to me that economic advances in third-world countries could have a huge, negative impact on the environment. Are you denying this?
So, you're celebrating the economic decline of your own country and the off shoring of American jobs? I doubt you would feel the same way if it was your job being off shored.
You seem to have plenty of bullshit….
So you consume nothing while composting at every turn, right?
Do you think China and India should start thinning their herds?
So, what more humane? To start thinking about overpopulation now and to put measures into place to deal with the problem OR just let the world's population grow and grow until we face massive starvation? At some point, we are not going to be able to produce enough food to feed the world's population. Let's see who is the "greedy" one then. Will you be willing to see your kids go to bed hungry to feed a kid in the third-world? If your answer is no, then shut up with your self-righteous garbage.
Oh please, you're addressing a superior being. This person would never buy anything produced or sold or manufactured. Or sell anything bought or manufactured, or manufacture anything bought or sold…..or whatever…..
So buying a gun and the necessary ammunition is out of the question….
And right now this superior being is accessing the internet psychically…
The only reason we have the luxuries we have is because others do not. There are not enough resources in the world for us all to live first-world lifestyles. There is not enough oil for the 6 billion (and growing) people in the world to drive cars. So, if you want to get all self-righteous than maybe you should prepare for a decline in your standard of living because that is what will have to happen at some point.
Yea, look at all the abject poverty in socialist Sweden and all of the prosperity in deregulated sub-Saharan Africa.
True, we do not have unlimited resources, which is why capitalism works so well. When something gets scarce, the price goes up, which creates an incentive for entrepreneurs to explore for new supplies or an alternate way of meeting the need. The alternative is to fix prices, ration (i.e. decide who is worthy), and doom everyone to scarcity for a longer period.
Great insights, Steven. The hypocrisy of Cameron and his ilk is there, obvious to see, but only those with the objectivity and mental capacity to connect the dots will ever get it.
You're probably read it, but I'm finishing up Atlas Shrugged and it's rocking my world. I think you'd like it.
I think that some liberals WOULD like it actually. What was it that John Holdren said recently in front of a group of college kids? "We can’t expect to be number one in everything indefinitely."
Liberals are so tormented with guilt over America's success and wealth that they'd gladly hog-tie this nation with endless regulations and laws in order to "spread the wealth around."
Incorrect. The reason we have these luxuries is that we built them from our hard labor, the same hard labor that people in India and China are profiting from today. Proven reserves of oil have continually increased every decade ever since drilling began in the 1800's, despite frequent panics that we are running out. Why? Because as the price of oil increases (due to increasing consumption) the reward for finding new sources does as well, and some places where it was once too expensive to drill become profitable.
And don't forget innovation. There is not enough arable land to grow all the crops we need for everyone to own and ride a horse, either. But who cares? We stopped riding horses long ago and started using trains, cars, and buses. If the cost of owning a car gets to high, either inovative people will find a way to make it cheaper, or come up with a better form of transportation. And when we do, we will all be richer, not poorer for it. I don't lament the fact that I am not rich enough to own a horse today. If I can get me, my family, and my stuff around tomorrow without a car, I won't lament losing it either. What I would lament is the government making it impossible for me to own a car, and also killing the industry that could come up with its replacement.
James Cameron is a douche and now that he has his wealth he wants to keep the "unwashed" from invading his space.
My guess is that in twenty five years, when people reach for a movie about humans and strange creatures battling it out in outer space they will still reach for Star Wars not Avatar. When the hype dies, and this movie has been a hype machine, this film dies. Hollywood leftists and their supporters have short attention spans and the rest of us will not keep it alive. And that, my friends will be the worst thing these leftists could experience, rejection. Rejection and accompanying obscurity, Hollywood leftists fear these things. I wouldn’t be surprised if they lay in bed at night and worry about a future like that.
Cameron appears to hate the middle class but not enough to stop him from marketing his product to their kids. Funny thing is, Cameron's movie would never have been made in the world or country that he advocates. Hollywood is a massive carbon producing industry and they leave behind the Godzilla of carbon footprints. Hollywood is exponentially worse, there are no agencies or committees to weed out a bad product before it ever hits the shelves as we see in most other industries.
The headline should read… James Cameron does his best impersonation of Captain Nemo, of the Jules Verne/Disney classic, 20000 leagues under the sea.
As I said, Hollywood leftists have a short attention span. Cameron is right to worry.
"Save the Planet and Kill Yourself, or We Will Do It For You!"
How's the hope and change working out for you?
Not at all a crazy thought. I even went further (and I'm not a conspiracy type at all) …
This admin hates coal (Biden, etc)… gases kill miners this month (I can see their ppl researching mines re safety, choosing a cpl that wd not surprise ppl if a "problem" arose…and sabotage it).
The oil rig explosion??? Eco-terrorism def a possibility. Why is nothing being said as to what caused this? No one is even asking (MSM news articles).
These 2 things – what convenient timing re the Leftist agenda. Way too convenient. Someone really needs to dig into these.
What scares me, is the old saying that things always happen … in threes. Uh-oh… tick-tock tick-tock…
Will you be willing to see your kids go to bed hungry to feed a kid in the third-world?
Will you????
Indeed. I'd say, one rig explosion is still safer then.. say… buying oil from countries that then funnel said money into terrorist causes that have been taken thousands of lives every year for the last four decades.
Thank God I never saw Avatar and I never will.
Totally wrong, ngj. Check your premises.
There is no "pie" of resources of which we have selfishly gobbled the majority. We create resources out of the abundance the earth (and God) provides, of which there is no shortage.
Nuclear power, solar, hydro, wind, new ways to reach uncountable reserves of oil and gas, there's so much untapped richness that we haven't even begun to explore! The only thing holding mankind and capitalism back is the evil of Marxism and the self-destructive, self-loathing environmentalists.
Let me get this straight: One side of Hollywood (comprised of celebrities like Angelina Jolie and George Clooney) wants to help people in poor countries like Africa, but the other side of Hollywood (comprised of environmental activists like Al Gore and Leonardo DiCaprio and James Cameron) say that it is better to leave other countries just the way they are even if those countries are in need of help.
I cannot believe this. It is an act of doublethink. Hollywood claims that it wants to give aid to third world countries and now Hollywood wants to not help those third world countries for fear that Hollywood will hurt those third world country people the same way the American military tried to kill the Na'vi in Cameron's movie "Avatar".
Hollywood is definitely a strange territory to set foot on.
Don't have a computer either, eh?
I'll answer your question, with the expectation that you'll answer mine. After all, you are a reasonable person here for the purposes of reasoned debate.
Here goes: I don't hate the environment. I love the outdoors. Some of my fondest memories of childhood involved camping trips, backpacking, hiking, etc. Joyce Kilmer National Forest was awe-inspiring.
However, the whole country can not be returned into virgin forest. It's been at least 5000 years since Man realized he didn't have to be a hunter-gatherer. Man has the knowledge and ability to alter the environment to suit his needs–in the same way that a bird gathers twigs and stalks to build a nest, so too does Man gather wood, stone, and clay in order to make a house. Man requires land to grow food. Man requires land to build dwellings.
Cont'd
I didn't even waste my time reading your article after seeing it was written off of a partial quote with no context. You expect an intelligent person to take your word on your interpretation of what he said? Maybe it was correct, but supply something more substantial next time.
look at what you just wrote. James Cameron, creator of 2 of the highest grossing movies ever. I don't care if you liked them or not, saying that his job will be offshored makes you look like an idiot.
Right back at you with the self-righteous garbage. You can shove the Cass Sunstein crap too.
Fox isn't the one who is advocating "doing something" about the energy use of the "middle class". If that was official Fox policy, you can bet the Big sites would be saying something about it.
It's a joke, dude. And it's "How are those wacky…"
Straight out of the Alinsky playbook: just change the language and packaging to make atrocities acceptable to the masses.
So then why bother commenting? Why waste everyone else's time with your smarmy bullshit?
That's the neat thing – we just keep making more "pies".
I just laughed my ass off…
Or I should demand that my doctor give me two radical mastectomies immediately because I might one day get breast cancer leading to widespread systemic cancer …
The list goes on. Notice how they don't apply the disaster argument of Greece when considering the implications of the current social democracy agenda of our government. Greece is collapsing, therefore, there should be no more social democracies … ever.
Two words: Cameron fanboy.
Ahh yes of course….
"The script for the 1979 film Alien was initially drafted by Dan O'Bannon and Ronald Shusett.[10] Dan O'Bannon drafted an opening in which the crew of a mining ship are sent to investigate a mysterious message on an alien planetoid. He eventually settled on the threat being an alien creature; however, he could not conceive of an interesting way for it to get onto the ship. Inspired after waking from a dream, Shusett said, "I have an idea: the monster screws one of them";[10] planting its seed in his body, and then bursting out of his chest. Both realized the idea had never been done before, and it subsequently became the core of the film.[10] "This is a movie about alien interspecies rape," O'Bannon said on the documentary Alien Evolution, "That's scary because it hits all of our buttons."[11] O'Bannon felt that the symbolism of "homosexual oral rape" was an effective means of discomforting male viewers.[12]"
It's implicit in your argument that we can't afford for them to achieve the things we take for granted because their is a finite amount of resources. Meanwhile, you obviously have yours, but you seem to feel that everyone else give theirs up first for your high-minded ideal.
Your answer already is "no" so stop throwing hypocrisy in our faces. You do realize that the money being spent by our government to support our populace with entitlements is actually China's money and in all probability is stealing food out of the mouth of a poor Chinese girl orphan somewhere?
He can still be motivated by greed without really being aware of it. His mind rationalizes the greed by calling it "evironmentalism." He's really being compassionate in his world.
Now, now, you were just the one celebrating teh idea that resources are finite. I would think the idea of American decline would cheer you right up. After all, we've already raped more than our fair share, haven't we?
/sarc
In other words, your arguments about economic supremacy and resource use don't jive.
he just wants one of us to say "Yeah, I don't want them progressing" so they have some ammunition for the Rightwingers are racist jingoists arguments.
Do I wish there was no pollution yes. Problem is untill the world runs on kangaroo farts (i saw a program extolling the virtue of kangaroo gass as opposed to bovine gas, but they never said we should eat kangaroos, i guess they are too cute) and rainbows this is what will happen on ocassion. We all need to be better stewards, but this hand wringing about it solves nothing. In college my environment classes all left it unsaid that the only way out of this mess was for about 10% of us to live in caves, and that the rest should all disappear. But you know it is funny that these enviro-religionists never seem to sign themselves up for the solution.
You must be logged in to post a comment.