Comments on: Lonewolf Diaries: Do ‘The Jews’ Run Hollywood?

By: bestowadeel

bestowadeel — Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:02:54 +0000

Ben has really made great contribution to the hollywood. I am impressed by the latest info about him.cooper stt

By: bestowadeel

bestowadeel — Mon, 17 Oct 2011 06:49:46 +0000

This is truly amazing. I would like to see some more updates on this issue here.how to get rid of canker sores

By: garment daily business reports

garment daily business reports — Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:18:03 +0000

Awesome website…

[...]the time to read or visit the content or sites we have linked to below the[...]……

By: AGosnell

AGosnell — Mon, 30 May 2011 03:48:31 +0000

The author states that Hollyweird is anti Christian.Well, that's true.They are also anti everything American and everything moral.They are a bunch of substance abusing hypocrites who are against God because they want to be God.

By: Hojo

Hojo — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:51:23 +0000

Why do muslims have the highest homosexual popluation of all religions? Is it because they kill their women and cover up the ones they do have and end up being a bunch of dudes staring at each other lustfully? Was Mohammad a homosexual? I think he was because he sure hates women.

By: Dave

Dave — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 23:57:46 +0000

That last batch would include Ronald Reagan – not one of Ronnie's eight great-grandparents was actually born in the U.S. That's right. Not a single one. No Mayflower there. All eight were immigrants who came over well into the 1800s. Heck, even many Jewish families have been in the states longer than that. Look up Benjie Cardozo.

By: Dave

Dave — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 23:57:13 +0000

Everything you said is typcal vicious racist bullcrap. But let's forget that and go with your logic for a second. According to you, you're "part Jewish" (something I doubt). Do you realize that if Jews had never entered the U.S., you by definition wouldn't be here?

You seem to want to get rid of people who "have no strong historical or cultural tie to the Founding Fathers ". Well, for consistancy, that would include the vast majority of European-Americans who aren't of Anglo-Saxon descent – Italian-Americans, Swedish, Norwegian, Greek – most of whose ancestors did not arrive in the U.S. until way after the American Revolution/Founding Fathers. That would also include almost all Irish Catholic-Americans (well, I doubt you'll miss the Kennedy family, who would be disqualified under such a rule) as well as many other Anglo-Saxon people whose ancestors didn't come here until the 1800s.

By: Dave

Dave — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:13:26 +0000

Uh, ok, what is the point of this? If you have a problem with Hollywood, good for you, but why single out Jewish people? The majority of "Hollywood liberals" are not Jewish. Also, thanks a lot for the following brilliantly idiotic anecdote:

"Having worked my whole life with Jews who seemed content with perpetuating the negative “Liberal Hollywood elite” stereotype"

Your whole life, eh? When is your 23rd birthday coming up again? March, was it?

By: David Starrels

David Starrels — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:32:52 +0000

This is a really disturbing blog simply by the fact that the Jews are being targeted as the ethnicity to scrutinize in the obviously vast ethnic and religious pool of those who work in Hollywood. He's not even denying the age old cancerous anti-semitic notion that the jews run Hollywood. He draws a clever/nasty distinction. Its not the good jews who run Hollywood, its only the bad ones. So who are these bad Jews? Bad Jews are Jews who aren't staunch conservatives as described above. Good Jews are obviously those who agree with Mr. Crowder's world view. So its not the good Jews who run Hollywood, only the bad ones. What are we left with according to Crowder? The implication that the Jews still run Hollywood, albeit the bad ones.
Crowder also makes very interesting assertions about practicing Jews, stating that they tend to be very conservative in world view. Where are the figures for such statements?
You don't even need to deeply analyze this blog to see how wrong it is. What right does anybody (especially somebody not even Jewish) have to divide an ethnicity of people into good and bad based on a conservative belief scale, and then to add insult to injury, imply that all non-conservative Jews are morally bankrupt. A truly ignorant and mean spirited blog entry.

By: Suarezguy

Suarezguy — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:43:04 +0000

I don't see how Hollywood is a "cesspool of immorality" and I think very few people are not pro-family; I don't see why wanting to allow alternative families or practices makes you not decent.

I'm also not sure that there's support for Hamas or anti-Christianity, unless disagreement with Christian ideas makes you anti-Christian. Christianity includes so many aspects and interpretations that a negative portrayal of one or some Christians is hardly a critique of all of them.

As something of a relativist myself, I think that there are right and wrong acts but just because you accept that doesn't mean you must accept whole particular codes. We should also question our own beliefs so that we don't keep proudly believing faulty, harmful ones.