And one more thing…

The CIA has a long, storied history of lying–not only to the American people, but also to members of both the Executive and Legislative branches–and they have been doing so for decades. And that is not some paranoid, delusional anti governmental screed, there are many hundreds of books on the subject, Sir. Some, in fact, were written by the very same members of the ACTUAL Armed Forces that you mentioned above.

SHOCKING!! I know. How dare I accuse members of my own government of lying to its people? At least I can provide actual, empirical evidence to back that up. Can you, Crowderhead? Or, are you not MANLY enough to defend yourself, to stand up for and behind that which you espouse? Something tells me I will be waiting a long time.

Why? Well, I will tell you why. Because if she was a he than you would have never made comment about her looks, or even brought up the mere mention of her gender. And by the way, I’ve watched every last one of your videos, and not one time have you mentioned the “maleness” or “looks” of any or all of the individuals who have caught your ire. So, why do it when it comes to Ms. Pelosi? Cause you’re a sexist pig–and a hypocritical one at that. In fact, in one of your videos you criticized liberals commenters for attempting to belittle you for your “imperfect teeth” and “ruddy complexion” by claiming that this kind of rhetoric is typical of liberals, and you admonish them for doing so. Oh the irony of it all, Mr Crowder. You attempt to criticize Ms. Pelosi for a perceived hypocrisy, whilst you all the while commit an act of hypocrisy of your own by criticizing her for her looks!? Mr Kettle, meet Mr. Pot. Someone is calling you black, Jack.

See, It makes you appear simple-minded and foolish, Mr. Crowder. Though, there are plenty of other things you’ve said that have contributed to the notion that you’ve long since cornered the market on idiocy. But you’re not an idiot because you’re a male, Mr. Crowder, you’re an idiot because you clearly do not think before you speak. And when and if you actually do think, you are so entrenched in the dogma of your failing beliefs (beliefs which, by the way, have been rejected by the American electorate at large, and will soon be relegated to fringe status, in a few years hence), that you are unable to see that there are not only two sides to a coin, but (and I dare I say this to someone so painfully devoid of thoughtfulness) maybe even three, or four, or five.

Is it possible that she was informed and is now trying to cover her ass? Of course, Mr. Crowder. But lying and/or covering ones own ass-be it hypocritical, or otherwise-is not grounds for being “booted” from the U.S. House of Representatives. In fact, members of both law-making bodies are often lauded for doing so. Is that cynical of me to say? Of course not. In fact, this supposed lying happens all the time, especially when a Republican has sat in her position (see Mr. Hastert’s lying about his knowledge of events regarding the 2006 Page Scandal, and Mr. Gingrich’s lying about his misuse of tax exempt funds, respectively, as examples)…

The CIA has a long, storied history of lying–not only to the American people, but also to members of both the Executive and Legislative branches–and they have been doing so for decades. And that is not some paranoid, delusional anti-governmental screed, there are many hundreds of books on the subject, Sir. Some, in fact, were written by the very same members of the ACTUAL Armed Forces that you mentioned above.

SHOCKING!! I know. How dare I accuse members of my own government of lying to its people? At least I can provide actual, empirical evidence to back that up. Can you, prove anything in the claims you have made against Ms. Pelosi, Crowderhead? Or, are you not MANLY enough to defend yourself, to stand up for and behind that which you espouse? Something tells me I will be waiting a long time.

Why? Well, I will tell you why. Because if she was a he than you would have never made comment about her looks, or even brought up the mere mention of her gender. And by the way, I’ve watched every last one of your videos, and not one time have you mentioned the “maleness” or “looks” of any or all of the individuals who have caught your ire. So, why do it when it comes to Ms. Pelosi? Cause you’re a sexist pig–and a hypocritical one at that. In fact, in one of your videos you criticized liberals commenters for attempting to belittle you for your “imperfect teeth” and “ruddy complexion” by claiming that this kind of rhetoric is typical of liberals, and you admonish them for doing so. Oh the irony of it all, Mr Crowder. You attempt to criticize Ms. Pelosi for a perceived hypocrisy, whilst you all the while commit an act of hypocrisy of your own by criticizing her for her looks!? Mr Kettle, meet Mr. Pot. Someone is calling you black, Jack.

See, It makes you appear simple-minded and foolish, Mr. Crowder. Though, there are plenty of other things you’ve said that have contributed to the notion that you’ve long since cornered the market on idiocy. But you’re not an idiot because you’re a male, Mr. Crowder, you’re an idiot because you clearly do not think before you speak. And when and if you actually do think, you are so entrenched in the dogma of your failing beliefs (beliefs which, by the way, have been rejected by the American electorate at large, and will soon be relegated to fringe status, in a few years hence), that you are unable to see that there are not only two sides to a coin, but (and I dare I say this to someone so painfully devoid of thoughtfulness) maybe even three, or four, or five.

Is it possible that she was informed and is now trying to cover her ass? Of course, Mr. Crowder. But lying and/or covering ones own ass-be it hypocritical, or otherwise-is not grounds for being “booted” from the U.S. House of Representatives. In fact, members of both law-making bodies are often lauded for doing so. Is that cynical of me to say? Of course not. In fact, this supposed lying happens all the time, especially when a Republican has sat in her position (see Mr. Hastert’s lying about his knowledge of events regarding the 2006 Page Scandal, and Mr. Gingrich’s lying about his misuse of tax exempt funds, respectively, as examples)

All this assumes, of course, that she did lie (which, frankly, you or me, or anyone else on the planet who was not actually in the room at the time is unable to prove or disprove with any certainty). But what the actual facts that do exist thus far? Well, when she called on the CIA to provide evidence that she and other Democratic members of both the House and the Senate had been briefed as to the specifics of said waterboarding, what was their response? They said they were unable to prove it and, in fact, said “We may have been mistaken. They may not have been informed, after all.” Hmm. That’s interesting, do you know something, are you actually able to PROVE something that no one else in or outside of the beltway has been able to, Mr. Crowder? Or, are you just a a spy in the house of dumb? I mean, clearly you are not a member of any branch of the U.S. Armed Forces, nor are you under the employ of the CIA. Oh, but how do I know this? Because you are an ignorant fool who clearly has no idea what he is talking about, as is evidenced by this doozy located at 1:42, in the video, above: “And considering that she is accusing the CIA of deliberately misleading her, ESSENTIALLY [emphasis mine] calling members of our Armed Forces liars, I’m inclined to believe the latter”. Now, if you were an actual member of any branch the U.S. Armed Forces OR under the employ of the CIA, you would know that they are not, as you have so boldly stated above, one and the same. The CIA is NOT a member of the U.S. Armed Forces, Sir. Not by a long shot.

But maybe I’m not giving you enough credit. Maybe I’m assuming you’re just two dumb to know what is so plainly stated in 11th grade history books, maybe, just maybe, you used the word “essentially” as an out, maybe you conflated the two in an attempt to bolster your argument, to make it appear as Ms. Pelosi was dishonoring the fine men and women of our military with the hope a driving a wedge, home? Either way, it’s a lie, Mr. Crowder. And attempting to smear liberals by making them appear to dishonor members of the Armed Forces is not simply and very Karl Rovian of you, it’s also really quitepathetic.

http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggraham/2009/05...

We'll get the truth out of her…unless she just melts.

All I can say is….MORE!!!!!!

Seriously freakin high-larious. Please make San Fran Nan a regular character! Nothing, and I mean NOTHING, warms my cockles like some good Pelosi mockery.

By the way, a nice coat of dried Elmer's glue on the skin duplicates Nan's stretched-to-the-breaking-point-skin oh so realistically.