‘The Dark Pelosi’ (With Waterboarding!)
by Steven CrowderSure this one’s been a long time coming, and with everything that’s been going on, how could I NOT make a video about the twitchy old bird. It isn’t enough that she’d been undermining our administration for years, now she’s got to come out and play the “victim” card. Poor Nancy, skunked again! Come on ma’am, it’s getting old.
–
Note: I know the video gets a little personal, but thanks to Wanda Sykes… That is a concern of mine no longer!
Email this to a friend | Print |
Share on Facebook
| Tweet this
| 
Follow Us on Twitter
Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
72 Comments
Hahaha, that's funny!
Off-topic: did anyone check out the Twitter message from Adrianne Curry?
"It's ok, Adam didn't win because Americans hate gays. That's ok, you f–king homophobes, u can have ur cute mediocre singer."
http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/b125187_twitterve...
Wow. We have a female Sean Penn blasting middle America for voting Kris Allen over Adam Lambert.
Dude… Drag… Oiii…
Water boarding Pelosi…. Awesome!
But you could have at least covered up the legs… Many a bad memory of SF after seeing that… yeesh…
Keep up the good work.
No! No! but HELL, Nooooooooooooooooo! Do not let Pelosi resign, she is the gift that keeps on giving!
Not bad Steve, not bad. I would have enjoyed a hefty dose of blinking eyeballs to go with those hairy legs.
But that's just me.
Steve
I love your videos I really do but this one just was not that realistic.
Everyone knows if you pour water on Nancy Pelosi she will melt……
Seriously though, Keep up the good Work
Great work as usual, Stephen! I guess the actual acts of "evil in the alleyway" are best left to the imagination.
Was that Nancy Pelosi or Joy Behar? I guess there's not much difference. Both are seriously lacking in the brain department.
I've got to go with Individualist on this one — Pelosi will melt.
Haha. Good stuff, man! Your impression of Nancy Pelosi was frighteningly accurate.
all this needed was some flying monkeys…and a little more lipstick.
That was funny again Steven,. I’m sure there is a liberal throng burning you in effigy as we speak, well done.
With unemployment at 10%, the Treasury unable to sell US debt, GM and Chrysler bankrupt, every month another half-million jobs disappear and a president who is intentionally killing the country, at least we can come here and get a good laugh. thank you
Are you kiddin' me? Steve Crowder in drag blows the pom poms off Joy Behar in peddle pushers any day of the week.
Nancy looks particularly hot in this video.
Wink, wink: How about some drinks and a movie?
OMG, I think that's right! She WOULD melt if you poured water on her! You, in a dress, truly horrifying…
All banter aside: Speaker Pelosi should resign. She is damaged goods to her own party, and our intelligence community/military have no confidence in her support AT ALL. How are they supposed to fight the good fight, knowing this woman may well turn over on them if it's politically expedient for her to do so? Never mind what the Right thinks about this woman–as a powerful government official, she has just caused too much damage to repair her relationship with the CIA & the military. She is a danger to us all if she retains her seat. Get someone with credibility in there. And in Murtha's seat, too.
I still think Pelosi and Joe Biden are probably the same person…..
Let the good times roll. Waterboard! Waterboard!
Dude, You're the only conservative comedian out there.
You have the market cornered.
Eww, hairy Pelosi legs.
or float.
So we should build a bridge out of her?
I should've know the Joker had a sister named Nancy. The hairy legs go with the whole environment thing too.
It's obvious to everybody but liberals she lied. When Clinton lied the excuse was "everybody lies about sex". Are we now going to hear "everybody lies about water boarding"? Of course, the Left has already got a good start lying about it so this would just be par for the course.
Man. Steven, I waited all last week for a video and was truly disappointed when you didn't have one – but the wait was TOTALLY WORTH IT.
Well done! (As always)
Not that kind of flotation device. Think brown in a porcelain bowl.
You've got to feel dirty after impersonating that troglodyte? Seriously, I would never feel clean again.
One question though? When you parody someone aren't you suppose to look worse than they are in real life? Your Pelosi was way to pretty! If you do it again may I suggest perhaps hitting yourself in the face with a battleship! That would get you a little closer to her real appearance. Just a suggestion.
Brilliant as always!
I'm not touching that one. 8-(
I'm just going to assume you are talking about Chinese Food and leave it at that.
I'm not touching that one. 8-(
I'm just going to assume you are talking about Chinese Food and leave it at that.
yeah… that's the ticket. Chineeeese food… yeah, that's it…
or drop a house on her………
I'm sticking with the OZ references on this one.
Fortunately, in this economy, houses are cheap. We can drop much more house on her now than we could have a year ago!
Love these videos!
Nice nod to Heath Ledger with the freaky tongue thang. I recognize that fence in the alleyway…Pelosi must have been near the Mexican border (I am shecking da map!)
As someone above said, Steven has the market cornered on the conservative comedy. His satire does more to take the sheen of the "Pelosicrats" than all the talking heads combined.
Can't wait for the next installment.
Hey, they finally waterboarded Nancy. And Steve was right there to catch it. You beat out a lot of people who've been waiting for that scene, Steve!
Too Awesome!
Steven, you are…too Awesome!
Thank you so very F*&%^#g much for Ms. Nancy-Spot-On.
P.S. Loved the punk'n on Monica's show as P.H…..yes again, too awesome.
What do you mean "not realistic?" That was really Nancy Pelosi on the video. Although she was prettier than I remembered.
If only we could arrange to have the House drop on her, they just declined to probe her CIA remarks. Honesty and transparency indeed.
Do we want to know how it is that you remember her? Are her legs really that hairy, or worse?
Remember, I live in San Francisco. We're a captive audience. Worse yet, I was still a Democrat activist when she started clawing her way to the top. Los Angeles, on the other hand, is so bloody huge that you could live your entire life there and never run into your Congressional representative. Not true in our tiny town. And yes, her legs are that hairy, but like the rest of her, I didn't remember them being that shapely.
Crowder is great as always, but SanFranNan is always disturbing to me. The joker lipstick and impression was a great addition.
Impeach Pelosi!
Steve, you should have had Pelosi touch her face more and say things like "I can't feel it!" or "is my head still there?" or "do I have a happy face or a sad face?" or other Botox-related thoughts.
Not a good thing to see when drinking morning OJ. That stuff burns when going through ones sinuses.
Nice work. I think the week off gave your motors a recharge.
Pelosi doesn't deserve to be called "lady." Jackie Kennedy, Laura Bush – ladies. Nancy Pelosi – feamle, woman but in no way a lady.
As for the rest of the video…quite disturbing to watch, but on the money.
Dark Pelosi vs the Dark Phoenix. One is hungry for political power while the other is insane with cosmic power. Both have insatiable hungers. Dark Phoenix looks a lot more sexy than Dark Pelosi.
"It's all part of the THE PLAN!" (maniacal laughter, licking the lips). That was hilarious, Steven!
As entertaining as it can be sometimes to see how much of a joke this woman is (and how she parodies her own party), the thought of her being in line for the presidency (should anything happen to Obama and Biden) is way scarier than it is funny. Of course, if Biden & Pelosi are really the same person, then I guess . . . we're screwed anyway. Next in line is Harry Reid, right? Honestly, 2010 can not come soon enough (and then 2012).
Wow, it's like someone took Dane Cook and beat the funny out of him with a shovel.
I think you might have had an easier time impersonating Pelosi if you had just used the skull of a chihuhua.
That made my day………………..Thanks
Thats one of the funniest things ever I saw. I mean that to. HAHAHAHAHA!
A WITCH!!! A WITCH!!!!
(Holy Grail reference)
I think you've got her vacuous stare down pat. Loved the peep-toe shoes.
It's not that we "hate" gays… It's just that we love cute straight men who apparently sing better…. That and we have enough Perez Hilton's in the world
!
How about the 34 deaths of detainees while in custody of the US Military that are ruled to be homicides?
All of this "waterboarding Pelosi" stuff is…, kinda indicative of the Right's sadistic streak. sorry, just sayin'.
Perfect… The ad under the video when I got here says: "My Wrinkles Are Gone!" It's a sign! Get that sea-hag outta there.
Good work Steven you always crack me up & make me think at the same time.
They were totally stylish! I wonder where he found those…I could use a cute pair of peep-toe shoes…
maybe you should just lighten up.
ChMAO! Steven, brilliant as always.
Brilliant! Damnit, you are a funny, funny man. With fantastic hair! Thank you – the ribbing of Pelosi was way overdue.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QcNA5ZxkCxY
Some thongs man should not know…..
Pelosi's legs are definitely one of them.
Editing post I meant things but it is funnier the way it came out
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NrLIuaZC6dY
[...] That reminds me, have you seen the latest Steven Crowder video?: [...]
Steven, thanks bud. You had me laughing out loud to that awesome visual of Nancy getting water-boarded. The only way to make that visual any better would be if it was the REAL Nancy.
Nancy Pelosi is devious, stupid, and arrogant all at the same time. The most traitorous woman in America, indeed.
Too bad he ain't funny. I saw lots of his material on you tube and it was all realy weak. He needs to either be a conservative or be a comedian, the two just don't go together. Steven, If you do chose comedy over right wing jibberish, then try harder to get some A material.
She shouldn' t resign – she should commit suicide instead……..by DROWNING!!!
Great just when I was finally coming to grips with and getting over my phobia of Chucky dolls you got to go and give us the Nancy Joker. Back to therapy. I will send you the bill.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oy85tDCpYuY
Um…..
All I can say is….MORE!!!!!!
Seriously freakin high-larious. Please make San Fran Nan a regular character! Nothing, and I mean NOTHING, warms my cockles like some good Pelosi mockery.
By the way, a nice coat of dried Elmer's glue on the skin duplicates Nan's stretched-to-the-breaking-point-skin oh so realistically.
Steven, there is a fine line between being a genius and being insane, you have just erased that line! Keep up the great work!
THANK YOU, Steven — for having the Audacity of Hope to actually depict what's needed to get to the bottom of the whole Nancy Pelosi – CIA is lying controversy.
http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggraham/2009/05...
We'll get the truth out of her…unless she just melts.
If your point is to point out a perceived hypocrisy on Ms. Pelosi’s part, why not just say so? Referring to her as a “broad”, or a “dame”, or “tutz” or “hag”, or “old bag” (which, by the way, are not only laughably outdated terms, especially given your age, but also points to an obviously cloistered upbringing) undermines your polemical stance, because being female has nothing to do with whether she lied or not. And that is also true when you refer to her as looking like the joker. It is sexism. Pure and simple.
Why? Well, I will tell you why. Because if she was a he than you would have never made comment about her looks, or even brought up the mere mention of her gender. And by the way, I’ve watched every last one of your videos, and not one time have you mentioned the “maleness” or “looks” of any or all of the individuals who have caught your ire. So, why do it when it comes to Ms. Pelosi? Cause you’re a sexist pig–and a hypocritical one at that. In fact, in one of your videos you criticized liberals commenters for attempting to belittle you for your “imperfect teeth” and “ruddy complexion” by claiming that this kind of rhetoric is typical of liberals, and you admonish them for doing so. Oh the irony of it all, Mr Crowder. You attempt to criticize Ms. Pelosi for a perceived hypocrisy, whilst you all the while commit an act of hypocrisy of your own by criticizing her for her looks!? Mr Kettle, meet Mr. Pot. Someone is calling you black, Jack.
See, It makes you appear simple-minded and foolish, Mr. Crowder. Though, there are plenty of other things you’ve said that have contributed to the notion that you’ve long since cornered the market on idiocy. But you’re not an idiot because you’re a male, Mr. Crowder, you’re an idiot because you clearly do not think before you speak. And when and if you actually do think, you are so entrenched in the dogma of your failing beliefs (beliefs which, by the way, have been rejected by the American electorate at large, and will soon be relegated to fringe status, in a few years hence), that you are unable to see that there are not only two sides to a coin, but (and I dare I say this to someone so painfully devoid of thoughtfulness) maybe even three, or four, or five.
Is it possible that she was informed and is now trying to cover her ass? Of course, Mr. Crowder. But lying and/or covering ones own ass-be it hypocritical, or otherwise-is not grounds for being “booted” from the U.S. House of Representatives. In fact, members of both law-making bodies are often lauded for doing so. Is that cynical of me to say? Of course not. In fact, this supposed lying happens all the time, especially when a Republican has sat in her position (see Mr. Hastert’s lying about his knowledge of events regarding the 2006 Page Scandal, and Mr. Gingrich’s lying about his misuse of tax exempt funds, respectively, as examples)
All this assumes, of course, that she did lie (which, frankly, you or me, or anyone else on the planet who was not actually in the room at the time is unable to prove or disprove with any certainty). But what the actual facts that do exist thus far? Well, when she called on the CIA to provide evidence that she and other Democratic members of both the House and the Senate had been briefed as to the specifics of said waterboarding, what was their response? They said they were unable to prove it and, in fact, said “We may have been mistaken. They may not have been informed, after all.” Hmm. That’s interesting, do you know something, are you actually able to PROVE something that no one else in or outside of the beltway has been able to, Mr. Crowder? Or, are you just a a spy in the house of dumb? I mean, clearly you are not a member of any branch of the U.S. Armed Forces, nor are you under the employ of the CIA. Oh, but how do I know this? Because you are an ignorant fool who clearly has no idea what he is talking about, as is evidenced by this doozy located at 1:42, in the video, above: “And considering that she is accusing the CIA of deliberately misleading her, ESSENTIALLY [emphasis mine] calling members of our Armed Forces liars, I’m inclined to believe the latter”. Now, if you were an actual member of any branch the U.S. Armed Forces OR under the employ of the CIA, you would know that they are not, as you have so boldly stated above, one and the same. The CIA is NOT a member of the U.S. Armed Forces, Sir. Not by a long shot.
But maybe I’m not giving you enough credit. Maybe I’m assuming you’re just two dumb to know what is so plainly stated in 11th grade history books, maybe, just maybe, you used the word “essentially” as an out, maybe you conflated the two in an attempt to bolster your argument, to make it appear as Ms. Pelosi was dishonoring the fine men and women of our military with the hope a driving a wedge, home? Either way, it’s a lie, Mr. Crowder. And attempting to smear liberals by making them appear to dishonor members of the Armed Forces is not simply and very Karl Rovian of you, it’s also really quitepathetic.
And for the record…
The CIA has a long, storied history of lying–not only to the American people, but also to members of both the Executive and Legislative branches–and they have been doing so for decades. And that is not some paranoid, delusional anti-governmental screed, there are many hundreds of books on the subject, Sir. Some, in fact, were written by the very same members of the ACTUAL Armed Forces that you mentioned above.
SHOCKING!! I know. How dare I accuse members of my own government of lying to its people? At least I can provide actual, empirical evidence to back that up. Can you, prove anything in the claims you have made against Ms. Pelosi, Crowderhead? Or, are you not MANLY enough to defend yourself, to stand up for and behind that which you espouse? Something tells me I will be waiting a long time.
If your point is to point out a perceived hypocrisy on Ms. Pelosi’s part, why not just say so? Referring to her as a “broad”, or a “dame”, or “tutz” or “hag”, or “old bag” (which, by the way, are not only laughably outdated terms, especially given your age, but also points to an obviously cloistered upbringing) undermines your polemical stance, because being female has nothing to do with whether she lied or not. And that is also true when you refer to her as looking like the joker. It is sexism, pure and simple.
Why? Well, I will tell you why. Because if she was a he than you would have never made comment about her looks, or even brought up the mere mention of her gender. And by the way, I’ve watched every last one of your videos, and not one time have you mentioned the “maleness” or “looks” of any or all of the individuals who have caught your ire. So, why do it when it comes to Ms. Pelosi? Cause you’re a sexist pig–and a hypocritical one at that. In fact, in one of your videos you criticized liberals commenters for attempting to belittle you for your “imperfect teeth” and “ruddy complexion” by claiming that this kind of rhetoric is typical of liberals, and you admonish them for doing so. Oh the irony of it all, Mr Crowder. You attempt to criticize Ms. Pelosi for a perceived hypocrisy, whilst you all the while commit an act of hypocrisy of your own by criticizing her for her looks!? Mr Kettle, meet Mr. Pot. Someone is calling you black, Jack.
See, It makes you appear simple-minded and foolish, Mr. Crowder. Though, there are plenty of other things you’ve said that have contributed to the notion that you’ve long since cornered the market on idiocy. But you’re not an idiot because you’re a male, Mr. Crowder, you’re an idiot because you clearly do not think before you speak. And when and if you actually do think, you are so entrenched in the dogma of your failing beliefs (beliefs which, by the way, have been rejected by the American electorate at large, and will soon be relegated to fringe status, in a few years hence), that you are unable to see that there are not only two sides to a coin, but (and I dare I say this to someone so painfully devoid of thoughtfulness) maybe even three, or four, or five.
Is it possible that she was informed and is now trying to cover her ass? Of course, Mr. Crowder. But lying and/or covering ones own ass-be it hypocritical, or otherwise-is not grounds for being “booted” from the U.S. House of Representatives. In fact, members of both law-making bodies are often lauded for doing so. Is that cynical of me to say? Of course not. In fact, this supposed lying happens all the time, especially when a Republican has sat in her position (see Mr. Hastert’s lying about his knowledge of events regarding the 2006 Page Scandal, and Mr. Gingrich’s lying about his misuse of tax exempt funds, respectively, as examples)…
All this assumes, of course, that she did lie (which, frankly, you or me, or anyone else on the planet who was not actually in the room at the time is unable to prove or disprove with any certainty). But what the actual facts that do exist thus far? Well, when she called on the CIA to provide evidence that she and other Democratic members of both the House and the Senate had been briefed as to the specifics of said waterboarding, what was their response? They said they were unable to prove it and, in fact, said “We may have been mistaken. They may not have been informed, after all.” Hmm. That’s interesting, do you know something, are you actually able to PROVE something that no one else in or outside of the beltway has been able to, Mr. Crowder? Or, are you just a a spy in the house of dumb? I mean, clearly you are not a member of any branch of the U.S. Armed Forces, nor are you under the employ of the CIA. Oh, but how do I know this? Because you are an ignorant fool who clearly has no idea what he is talking about, as is evidenced by this doozy located at 1:42, in the video above: “And considering that she is accusing the CIA of deliberately misleading her, ESSENTIALLY [emphasis mine] calling members of our Armed Forces liars, I’m inclined to believe the latter”. Now, if you were an actual member of any branch the U.S. Armed Forces OR under the employ of the CIA, you would know that they are not, as you have so boldly stated above, one and the same. The CIA is NOT a member of the U.S. Armed Forces, Sir. Not by a long shot.
But maybe I’m not giving you enough credit. Maybe I’m assuming you’re just two dumb to know what is so plainly stated in 11th grade history books, maybe, just maybe, you used the word “essentially” as an out, maybe you conflated the two in an attempt to bolster your argument, to make it appear as Ms. Pelosi was dishonoring the fine men and women of our military with the hope a driving a wedge, home? Either way, it’s a lie, Mr. Crowder. And attempting to smear liberals by making them appear to dishonor members of the Armed Forces is not simply and very Karl Rovian of you, it’s also really quite pathetic.
And one more thing…
The CIA has a long, storied history of lying–not only to the American people, but also to members of both the Executive and Legislative branches–and they have been doing so for decades. And that is not some paranoid, delusional anti governmental screed, there are many hundreds of books on the subject, Sir. Some, in fact, were written by the very same members of the ACTUAL Armed Forces that you mentioned above.
SHOCKING!! I know. How dare I accuse members of my own government of lying to its people? At least I can provide actual, empirical evidence to back that up. Can you, Crowderhead? Or, are you not MANLY enough to defend yourself, to stand up for and behind that which you espouse? Something tells me I will be waiting a long time.
You must be logged in to post a comment.