Lonewolf Diaries: Virginity’s for Suckers. Get Your Sex On, Kids!
by Steven CrowderIs there anything more abnormal than being a mid-teen virgin in the year 2009? Not if you’d hear Hollywood tell it. After watching a slew of teen-movies this weekend, I feel quite pathetic. It seems that all this time, I’ve been trying to follow my convictions and make a difference in this world, when I really should have been spending my time scoring with chicks. Has anybody else out there come to this realization as of late?
In the same breath, ladies; You simply haven’t been empowering yourselves as young women unless you’ve been riding the old bone rollercoaster. Purity is for losers, don’t you know…
From TV shows aimed squarely at young dames such as “Gossip Girl” or “90210,” to hit teen films like “American Pie” or the recent “Adventureland,” the message in regards to sexuality is quite clear; If you’re still a virgin at 16, there must be something wrong with you. Sure, it would be bad enough that all of these programs are laden with super-model-turned actors having sex like banshees (the parents are never around, mind you), but Hollywood doesn’t stop there. No, the good old folks in Tinseltown feel the need to twist the knife and go out of its way to point out the abnormality of abstinence.
The truth is that even in the most liberal of statistics, over 40% of kids remain virgins through their teen years. Keep in mind that a good percentage of those poll’d in these “blind studies” are men and let’s be honest… A good 30% of them are probably lying, so you can bet that the real statistics would favor the lonely little virgins even more.
If you were an alien dropped on to planet Earth however, forced to deduce the sexuality of the human species solely from what Hollywood pumps out, you’d probably think that nobody made it past 16 without having schtupped a myriad of partners.
One would have to wonder how much different that statistic would be if Hollywood WEREN’T pressuring teenagers to engage in the horizontal mambo. If Hollywood put all of its “virginity is for suckers” energy into promoting “saving sex till marriage,” I bet we’d see a very different, much more lopsided statistic. Of course Hollywood could never do that, as they don’t believe in “forcing ones beliefs on others”… Unless of course said beliefs include situational ethics, then it’s time to preach it father, preach it!
Women, correct me if I’m wrong, but there doesn’t even seem to be that “dime store floozy” stigma attached to being the “town pump” anymore. Girls who choose to save themselves are often portrayed as the “ugly-pretty shy girl” who only comes into womanhood once she gives it away. Do you feel more femininely empowered now that sex is expected of you at an early age?
So just to get things straight… Upholding traditional values when it comes to sex and marriage = judgemental and unrealistic. Making fun of the quirky abnormality that is a young-teen virgin = that’s just good TV.
With the soaring STD/STI rates, one would have to wonder if going back to the “unrealistic views of teenage sex” might not be so bad after all. The painful truth is that in its attempt to remain “morally neutral,” Hollywood is causing us to raise a nation of cads and harlots… Thanks again Sean Penn!






Subscribe via RSS
304 Comments
Zac Efron promoting teen abstinence in "17 Again" seemed to me to be a positive moment. It did pretty well.
Post Moderen Culture promotes sex as the end all, be all of life. Trust me, it isn't.
Sadly, I think this boat sailed years ago.
Good points though.
Freakin' brilliant, Steven. And case-in-point…look how the Left villifies Carrie Prejean for her moral convictions.
Now Jason Voorhees has been preaching abstinance for a long time. Send all horny teens to Crystal Lake for the weekend.
Sex sells. its part of capitalism.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_wFEB4Oxlo
Was this the Boat – Darn!
The secular left has an agenda in promoting libertine lifestyles to the young. First of all, a seething hatred for religious or spiritual values, and the long term destruction of the nuclear family. You cannot have lockstep cradle to grave unquestioning socialism as long as loving families raise their own children to be humble, obedient, love others as themselves, and put God and Country over selfish pursuits.
Therefore, sex 'em up… get them having sex at 10 or eleven. Make them question their sexuality by promoting
perverse ideas such as transgender while they're in 4th grade. Interfere with the parent's responsibility by handing out prophylactics to 7th graders. Restrict or forbid home schooling.
Get the picture?
For the win.
Post of the day!!
Do they do much pointing out of the illegality of underage sex? The long prison sentences? The lifetime as a social leper on the sex crimes registry?
Didn't think so.
Yeah, but then he goes and poses with a topless/naked model in Interview Magazine? That really encourages abstinence!
Keep it up Steven. Raise the bar, your generation will follow.
This is the nexus of their agenda.
DC’s motto: The Govt Machine will assimilate all; resistance is futile.
This is why the big teen comedy script I've been dabbling with includes a character that is choosing to remain a virgin until marriage. Are all the characters like that? No, but it would also be unrealistic to conclude everyone wants to get busy. That's my issue with the teen comedies (I'm 26 myself) – that EVERYONE wants to have sex when, in real life, it's not quite like that. A little balance is always appreciated, especially when the character who's abstinent is just as cool and down to earth as the others, not some moralistic zealot.
I'm writing something now where the lead character (early 20s) has had sex once and regrets it. He eventually falls for a girl, they sleep together, but their relationship remains throughout the whole show (at least that's the plan). I imagine them getting married by show's end.
And I like American Pie. The good teen comedies manage to get the love message (or some message resembling "at least wait and do it with someone you care about") while the bad ones just go for the T&A and no message. As for Adventureland, I still haven't seen it but being sixteen and a virgin can seem like the end of the world sometimes.
I think there's a difference between portraying a virgin as a screwup/defective/whatever… and showing the angst that can go with the territory.
American Pie and Adventureland (and most of the classic teen comedies) have anything but supermodels in the cast. However, with 90210 and Gossip Girl, I agree. But I'm a guy so I'd rather claw my eyes out than watch one of those shows.
And I might as well say it… I'm a virgin, 26 years old. It's not for religious reasons, I'm just incredibly unlucky and bad with women. On the other hand, I'm in no rush and I'm kinda sorta passed the "Oh no! What'll people think?!" stage. I'll meet her when I meet her. Hopefully she'll be the one.
we are the Borg…
Sex, drugs, and Rock-n-Roll, hey everybody let’s all get laid! Wait a minute… perhaps that was really dumb?
You are so right. Were has our pride gone? I start blushing at some point practically every time I go to the movies or turn the television on. It really is horrible that the media begins attacking us at such a young age. I am extremely blessed to be brought up in a Christian home with morals, but many of my friends don't hold the same values as I do. All I have to say is, my parents would die of shame if I did some of the things they do all the time like it's no big deal. It really is sad that purity has become something of a joke. Thank you for posting this, and God bless.
Master Crowder: I hope you have about a dozen children, and all of them girls. Make sure you show them this naive infantile rant when they're about 11 or 12 so they understand your expectations for their behavior to "service" the neighborhood boys and be proud and feel empowered about it. Congratulations Grandpa!
Good luck with all of that.
"If Hollywood put all of its “virginity is for suckers” energy into promoting “saving sex till marriage,” I bet we’d see a very different, much more lopsided statistic. Of course Hollywood could never do that, as they don’t believe in “forcing ones beliefs on others”…"
Hmm. Actually, Hollywood used to do EXACTLY that. Let me think, when was that … oh, yes, that was called the Golden Age of Hollywood.
Nice to be old enough to remember when Hollywood did indeed force its belief on the public that saving yourself for marriage was the ideal. Yes, it did help to create a culture where there were strong marriages and strong family ties. Ah, well, we were all probably terribly oppressed and just didn't know it. Yeah, that's it…
If you have girls I'm sure you must be proud of raising a bunch of little sluts. I have three teen girls, all of them happy, all of them into saving themselves for marriage. If you give up to the degenerates, degenerates is what you will end up with.
Virginity is powerful. That's why they hate it.
I honestly have no qualms with anyone's sexuality within legal parameters. Whether you lose your virginity at 16, or remain a virgin until marriage, I really do not care and do think a stigma should be attached to anyone with sex.
That being said, one must present all the dangers and responsibilities that are synonymous with living a sexually active life during the teen years. If one's aware of all the dangers and still chooses to do it, there is not much you can do anyway. The vicarious peer pressure that Hollywood puts into the movies regarding sex is shameful, but it's still one's decision whether or not they feel they are ready to be sexually active and that can occur at any age.
Alex P. Keaton's friend Skippy (Marc Price) from Family Ties went on to a career as a stand-up comedian. In one routine, he looked my generation in the eye and said "because you guys had sex with everyone, I can't have sex with anyone." Teenagers need to learn self-control, but more importantly that sex is great, but it isn't the be-all end-all of your life. Many teens have this "sex all the time" thing thrown at them, and they believe it's normal. Abstinence is the best policy, but knowing that teenage hormones are not subject to pure reason, they need to understand that no condom is perfect, STD's are everywhere, and if you can't practice abstinence, try at least to get as close to it as possible. My parents said "if you can't be good, be careful." It is important that teens who choose not to become involved in sex before marriage not be marginalized. Fidelity to one other person in your life is a noble goal. It's a valid, and very traditionally legitimate option.
Many movies did promote the message but others certainly didn't (they didn't promote the exact opposite of course, they just didn't mention abstinence per se). And of course, they couldn't be explicit about it. I remember the Marx Brothers always seemed to be chasing tail, but that was it, and it was all for laughs. I believe Groucho says in Animal Crackers, "If you'll excuse me, I have to sow some wild oats" and he walks off with a bunch of young gals.
As for me, I wasn't raised to be abstinent (secular Jew) but I was also raised to not rush into anything either. I believe there is room for both messages. And I haven't rushed into anything yet.
I hope your syphilis clears up soon. The dementia is making you say really nasty things.
As a single female in her 20's it annoys me that people believe there's something wrong if you don't have sex by the age of 16 or even 18. NEWSFLASH: I hate to break it to some people but there is more to life than sex! I feel more empowered personally that I have held myself to a higher standard because it shows I'm in control both physically and emotionally which seems more powerful to me than giving into every whim and desire.
I think that liberals promote this mindset to continue to "enslave" people by the system so they can continue to benefit from it…all in the name of "free will"…the pattern:
Sex >> "Birth Control" >> Pregnancy >> Abortion
or
Sex >> "Birth Control" >> Pregnancy >> Birth >> Welfare
Both of those end with political outcomes that the liberals use to get votes so no wonder they're promoting sex. Who cares about what is safer and better? It only matters if it pads their pockets because that's how they keep their jobs. I believe that their liberal philosophy it is based on what "feels good" and if it "feels good" it must not be wrong. Don't misunderstand, sex isn't wrong in the proper context. (i.e. Marriage) But from my own personal research sex especially at such a young age rarely has any benefits and can lead to long term problems in the future. I'm thankful that my parents instilled in me values that will benefit me for years to come.
Apologies if this appears twice.
Well said, Lawhawk. As I mentioned above, not every teen is focused on sex all the time, but it doesn't hurt to be educated and careful.
Hormones transcend economics. Fortunately, so does objective morality.
Right on Steven! I love reading your blogs and seeing your videos. It gives me hope. I'm a 24 year old virgin….I know, I know, 40 ain't far off….don't remind me, my guys make fun of me enough. I taught middle school girls in my Sunday school class for almost 6 years. Some had eventually become promiscuous in their later high school years, but I always had this commitment not to be hypocritical with them. I felt strongly responsible to my God, my girls, and my fellow taxpayers. Pregnancy and STDs are not worth it regardless of how damaging that would be to my Christian witness.
Besides, I'm cute and I work construction, so believe me, I get hit on plenty. It is certainly not for lack of guys trying. God's got my husband out there somewhere, until then it's a sick game of hide and seek.
You reeeally don't believe that, do you???
<sarc>
Haha Prejean's moral convictions where she poses topless and lies about it? And she was not villified she was just shown to be a liar as she touted her morals.
How many vibrators do you own? Haha Hey webmaster dood, I know this will be censored. Hahaha
I agree with you Steven. Another thing my husband and I have noticed with the pre-teen shows right now is how the writers make the parent's characters so incredibly stupid and naive. Was pretty sure that is where my 9yr old son was picking up the 'tude, so we experimented and kept him off of Nickelodean for a couple of months. Did the trick. He doesn't even miss it anymore.
Interesting this comes from someone who used to be on PBS's Arthur. If there is one show that is responsible for the sex-crazed generation, it's that one. (The fact that my preschool daughters love it and watch it every week is totally irrelevant.)
This article sux! I wouldn't wanna nail u anyway, Crowder.
Stop being a little skank, sweetie. No more leather pants until you do your chores!
Screw daddy, take it off, sweetheart!
Here’s the type of metrosexual shytstain that passes for a liberal "male.” No wonder even liberal women want Conservative Men.
What post were you reading?
Glad you are not my father or the father of my children!
Hate to break it to you Steven, but waaaay back (in the 80's) we thought that if you didn't lose your virginity by 16, there was something wrong with you. I'm not saying it's right, I'm just saying it's not a new phenomenon, and it predates my adolescence by oh, a few thousand years, probably. The current libertine attitude has been fairly stable about the last 40 years. I don't see much substantially different now.
That's actually one of my pet peeves. It has nothing to do with sex or religion: I HATE shows that feature parents and teachers as oblivious idiots. I think that's why I never got into Saved by the Bell. "What? My son went on a joyride to Vegas? Why, my son would never do that! He's in his room studying right now!"
Okay, rant over.
You know what show did parents justice? Freaks and Geeks.
So how do you work away the knots in those muscles after doing a long day of carpentering?
Thank you, Steven!
And if you think it's difficult for teens/20-somethings in this culture, imagine how difficult it is for people ages 30+ who are still not married. You might as well tell people you're from another planet.
Maybe. Thanks, that was funny.
Well, underage abortion is legal and encouraged. In fact, if you are a 16 yr girl, it is easier to get an abortion than to find an aspirin in school.
Makes sense, right?
What is that old saying, Youth is wasted on the young!
Money is wasted on Hollywood.
You know that was a great article. I wholeheartedly agree with it. It's a shame how hollywood and the left promote promiscuity like it's a badge of honor. It's the wrong message. Your led to believe that sex is the only thing great in life. And that it must be experienced first chance you get, and then as much as you can afterwords. With as many people. Hence, disease and illness. But., as you mentioned in this great article, that the polls taken are not really that accurate, because boys are not going to admit there virginity to some stranger. So there is still a glimmer of hope. Before I end here, I must confess to something. Well, forget confession, It wasn't a sin.(technically) I lost my virginity at the ripe old age of 19. And you know what, I was glad for that. It made me appreciate the way I was raised. With good,strong morals. And ESPECIALLY, the respect for the opposite sex. The funny thing is how I came to lose my virginity. It served to educate me in how weak I was, and that I blatantly led myself to that fateful/wonderful day?? After all I was saving myself for marriage. Can you imagine that??? A !9 year old(boy) in 1984, saving himself. HA! Of course I had to lie through my teeth about it. But now I sit here and say I was pretty dam proud to last as long a s I did! So if there are any teenagers reading this article, or this post…Don't fret. Being a virgin IS cool. It shows your character and your ability to be a strong, moralistic, and righteous person. Sex is great, but waiting for the ideal moment, and the right person, will be worth it's weight in gold.
LOL! If you haven't had sex by the time you are 26, you will never have sex. BTW, when they say "abstinence" they usually are not referring to an adult who can't get laid.
I put a hippie in a headlock under each arm until they lose control of all bodily functions and I get a good stretch.
Commisar Roe: I hope you never have children, period.
It never enters your sick, twisted mind that someone might want to abstain from sex simply because they don't want to be a slut and sleep with anyone that comes along, eh?
Pathetic.
can anyone say…good job hollywood.
I'll keep my own counsel on that, Dan. But my kids believed I believed it, and knew I would enforce it. The girls' worst fear was having to introduce their current boyfriends to me, since they weren't allowed to go out with anybody I hadn't met, and they knew I had spies everywhere. I simply pointed out to the boys that we always needed new voices in the church choir, and it was up to them if they were going to sing bass or soprano. My son was a good young man, but also very smart, and I know he managed to get outside my spy network. They're all happily married and have children whose parentage is not in doubt.
By actually being funny, unlike yourself.
With our amazing appearing, disappearing and re-appearing posts, this will probably end up as a duplicate. But here goes anyway:
I'll keep my own counsel on that, Dan. But my kids believed I believed it, and knew I would enforce it. The girls' worst fear was having to introduce their current boyfriends to me, since they weren't allowed to go out with anybody I hadn't met, and they knew I had spies everywhere. I simply pointed out to the boys that we always needed new voices in the church choir, and it was up to them if they were going to sing bass or soprano. My son was a good young man, but also very smart, and I know he managed to get outside my spy network. They're all happily married and have children whose parentage is not in doubt.
If by "benefit" you mean you will go through life single and never experience real love, I guess your parents did a good job…and forget about kids, a woman's fertility begins decreasing in her late 20's. At least you won't be able to pass your family values on. I guess evolution does work!
You keep going young lady, don't give in until you feel it's time. And don't pay any attention to these jackasses and there posts.
Interesting. You know, when I was single, the lack of sleeping with dates got me several marriage proposals, while many of my friends giving it away but wanting the big commitment got nothing. I even had a boyfriend once, whom I did not sleep with, tell me he'd never marry a girl he met in a bar. NOBODY has as much sex as hollywood depicts, unless they're really messed up or are in some kind of business, and EVERYBODY lies about sex in some way or form.
Stop forcing your morality on us.
One would think that organizations like PETA and other left wing groups would support abstinence and other traditional American values. Think about it, these people tell us we need to be more aware of our actions. PETA tell us that we should refrain from eating meat. Eating as well as sex is natural, but as humans we can control these natural urges. We need to eat yes, but we can choose to get our protein from another source; in essence we move away from our animal behaviors into more civilized behavior. Animals eat without any regard, so to be civilized we should choose what we eat carefully. Animals fight for dominance, we being civilized discuss with words. Animals also engage in sex with very little regard as well, so I see abstinence as a move towards civility when we cast off what makes us animals. That's why I hate left wing groups like PETA or even environmentalist. They constantly tell us to cast off what makes us animals and be more civilized when it comes to meat, the environment, ect; but when it comes to sex they say we should embrace what makes us animals. And until these groups see their own philosophical double-standards I'll continue to ignore their message whether they have merit or not.
My parents say I have to report you the the Public Health Department because you gave me syphilis, gonorrhea, and genital herpes. Then you moved out of town. Please post your address so I can have them get hold of you. They will be the guys in the haz-mat suits.
If you haven't had the pie by the time you're 26, you will never have a sweet tooth again.
EXCELLENT!!!
Yay! Troll needs more pie to fuel his delusional arguments! Go eat a bullet, you antagonistic moron.
JB, she didn't "pose" topless. I know what topless posing looks like and she wasn't doing it. You're just upset that TMZ didn't remove those stars from the photos. The most exposing of those photos was definitely not a pose for the camera.
She explained all that and, having been in the business, everything she said about those shoots was perfectly plausible and very likely to be true as she said. Good on her…she won this battle!!
Hmm… Then I blame my parents (well their generation anyway) and shows like the ORIGINAL Degrassi High… :/ I remember at the age of 9 (and I am 27 mind you) being pressured about sex or seeing sexual images…. granted my dad was still stationed in Europe and all.. and even their commercials were (and probably still are) sexually charged…
Steven – as a teacher in a Christian school, let me encourage you: plenty of people in their twenties, thirties and – gasp! – higher haven't had sex.
And believe me, man, it's intentional. Incidentally, even hotties have convictions. (And a quick right hook.)
You only got 3 diseases from her? Lucky!
OH MY! I am SO unfortunate to never have had a male in my bed, especially one like you who feels that they're God's gift to women! Whatever shall I do?! Forget the notion of adopting from poor countries and giving them a chance at a great life–I NEED to have the fruit of my own womb in my arms to prove that I'm a female.
Go back to the cave you came from and go find a woman who will actually believe your bull crap.
Gee Gary. You just did an unlawful mind meld on the SciFi channel and then tried to pass it off as hearsay testimony. What other naughty things have you done? Enquiring minds want to know.
You rock. I was going to comment on this thread, but you took the words right out of my mouth (You do realize that's unsanitary, right?). LOL!
Now we know why you never provide pie. You are too busy having sex with it. We know who you are now, Mr. American Pie. So you are right, evolution works, and your bloodline is cut off unless nature allows mating between a cave dwelling cherry and a cherry pie to produce offspring.
I just heard Dennis Miller on O'Reilly say that when he was speaking at an event with George HW Bush, Bush told him to keep it clean, his wife was going to be there. The whole matter of decency in front of women is just gone, girls are laughing at nastiness, setting the tone that they are 'one of the guys.' Kinda feel that each time I watch Red Eye and hear the really off-color cracks by Schulzie.. shows little respect for the women on the show.. Girls have turned into something that I guarantee they'll not want their own daughters to be..
Thank you for bringing that up, I have none. Some people have problems with honesty. I am not one. There is a verse in the Bible: What you would do in secret, shout ye also from the rooftops. I know that whatever I do here, though none human may find out, my God in Heaven knows, so why hide? My conscience is clean, how's yours?
A couple of months ago I read an article about a study that showed that teenagers who watch TV and movies with sexually explicit themes and images are more likely to get pregnant or get their partner pregnant than those who don't. The article includes quotes like:
"Dr Chandra said that sexual content on TV had doubled in recent years, coinciding with teenage pregnancy rates edging up after decades of decline."
"Studies have found a link between watching television shows with sexual content and becoming sexually active earlier, and between sexually explicit music videos and an increased risk of sexually transmitted diseases."
"Among the 718 youths who reported being sexually active during the study, the likelihood of getting pregnant or getting someone else pregnant increased steadily with the amount of sexual content they watched, the researchers found."
The article is in the UK's Times Online: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_an...
Man, Hollywood, it sucks for research and science go and trip you up like that.
Personally, Johnny Boy, I find shooting my 12 gauge and my .38 Special into something satisfying, like a propane tank or something living just to piss of a lib. Then on those really, really stressful days, I go curbstomping morons. Then I have to go wash off the unused brain cells, often times it's just too messy and somehow the morons reproduce too fast for me to keep up. Sorry I missed you.
Thanks Knuckles! I'll do my best! May God bless ya!
You know, most of her stuff is political trolling, but Auntie really shows what she's made of when she gets down to the level of HA HA, YOU'VE NEVER HAD A WOMAN.
Stay strong, I know it's difficult. God is with you, always, until the very end of the ages. (Matthew 28:20)
She was the lonely sort
Just a little too short
Her jokes were dumb and her favorite sport
Was hockey in the winter
He was duly impressed
And was quick to suggest
Any sport with a puck had to be about the best
As he jabbed his elbow in her
(Get it? You get it?)
…Honey, honey, hey baby, don't you want a man like me
–fz
Everytime my 4 teenagers try to explain why Latter-Day Saints live the Law of Chastity till they get married they just get dumb stares from kids their age.
I always explained it to the kids I taught in Jr. High like this:
Its like the Milkman pulling you over and giving you a speeding ticket…he can do it but he does not have the proper AUTHORITY !!!!!
You can have sex when you are 13…. but unless you are married, you don't have the AUTHORITY to have sex.
(And no I don't think it is OK to get married at age 13 !!)
Ahem….It always seemed to flow right over their heads as well…….
Probably inevitable. Modern culture tends to corrupt, and modern Hollywood culture corrupts absolutely.
Now I understand why I never liked Saved By The Bell: I never bought into the idea that adults are dumber than kids. That's why you don't have children teaching school.
If they'd gone the other way and shown that it was just Obfuscating Stupidity, I might have been convinced… Never trust grownups. They're always up to something, especially if they're Boomers.
It wasn't too long ago in times of plagues and famine that folks got married and started bearing children not long after they finished puberty. And school schedules were such that children could help with the harvest. So I don't know exactly how I feel about this post.
As Ron White puts it, there's a difference between a right and a capability.
Actually sex is legal between two consenting underage people. It only becomes illegal when one of them is a legal adult.
Nothing sexier than a woman with a shotgun in her hand…sweet!!!! Hey jonnyboy…I thinks it's time to get out of your mothers basement. It's starting to effect your brain.
So a woman isn't a woman unless she's married, pregnant and barefooted on the front porch? And I thought liberals believed in Women rights where a woman can choose to live their life as they see fit and not as a man sees fit. It's sad that you don't notice your own contradictory beliefs; perhaps the only fascist here is you.
Haha, Ain't you just being sweet yourself! Problem as I see it is, Johnny Boy is still a boy. Either that or some hostler roped him in and placed a couple of rubber bands so he wouldn't procreate. Thank you Hostler, whoever you are.
I'm glad she's still hanging around. We've needed a new smokin-hot-dumb-as-a-bag-of-hammers-chick-who-doesn't-realize-she's-being-laughed-AT ever since Paris Hilton ruined the fun by getting all self-aware and ironic about it…
Excellent post, Mr. Crowder. Here's my question to the trolls: Why does it bother you so much that some people have decided not to rush into having sex? What's it to you? It's not affecting you in any way. I'm sure you can find plenty of people who share your views and are willing to have sex with you, so why the nasty comments? If you disagree with the point of Mr. Crowder's post – fine, live your life the way you want to. But why are you personally offended by people that have higher standards than you?
Many of those marriages were arranged, and the betrothed were more knowledgeable about what marriage meant and that it was for life. Most teenagers in the postmodern world are too ignorant and immature for marriage. On the other hand, I know a lot of adults who are too ignorant and immature for marriage. If your point is that it's natural for teenagers to want to have sex, then you're right. However, (as stated in my last comment) studies have shown that minimizing their exposure to sexually explicit material reduces the likelihood that they will engage in sexual activity. Besides, the point of exercising self-control is to make the choice to do something you know is right when part of you really wants to do something else.
"You cannot have lockstep cradle to grave unquestioning socialism as long as loving families raise their own children to be humble, obedient, love others as themselves, and put God and Country over selfish pursuits."
This is a Capitalist country. "selfish pursuits" aren't just IN the blood of our system, they ARE the blood
I always love this theory because of just HOW much supposition and logical leaps have to be made for it to work. In order to carry out this kind of massive, all-encompassing socialist conspiracy. I mean, the basic theory at play here is that the WHOLE of the entertainment industry from the Hollywood studios aaaaaaaall the way down to online pornographers and all points in between are all providing sexually-explicit material as part of a long-term coordinated plan to weaken the nuclear family which is in-turn part of an even LONGER-term coordinated plan to institute socialism DESPITE the fact that socialism would mean the end of them as businesspeople…
(continued)
(continued)
…It's a completely irrational prospect, particularly to the "adult" industry which one imagines would be the tip-of-the-spear in such a scheme. For pity's sake, people, think about it: "Sex workers" have literally been Capitalists longer than anyone else on the planet – they were selling "it" back when "it" was LITERALLY "IT"
Thus, for this conspiracy to work AT ALL requires either a massive organization at the head of it working all the parts to FORCE them to act opposite their own obvious interest OR a single insanely well-organized individual supervillian. In which case… who, exactly? The Soviets are gone, the Chinese NEED us to remain a free-market so they can keep using us as a bank. So… who? Who's SPECTRE here? Soros? The Bilderbergers? The Reptilians? Illuminati? Trilateral Comission? Elders of Zion? Legion of Doom? Guild of Calamitous Intent? C'mon, tell me: Who's the bad guy this week?
My Momma told me "Who's going to buy the cow if they can get the milk for free." That one really worked for me! I also had the chance to study sexuality and learn that during the 1940's girls discovered that so-called premarital sex usually did not lead to marriage after all, so they would NOT have sex and then marry that one! I just escaped the sexual revolution myself, and I learned a lot from watching those around me suffer. Now that we have been happily married for over 20 years, I wonder if the ones who were having sex at 20 are having sex now–so many are divorced or in "dry" marriages. Natural Family Planning, which forces us to wait while the woman (me!) is most interested, but allows us to have a honeymoon every month, has made our sex life indescribably great!
It is completely normal for a teenager to NOT be sexually active.
It is, however, NOT normal for a teenager to be somehow glad or even content about that fact. I knew plenty of people NOT getting laid in school, I was one of them. I look at the folks who promote it as a superhappyfuntime way to live like that movie about the people who had perfectly healthy legs but went about in wheelchairs because they'd "fetishized" paralysis.
Hmm… I agree that this culture of teen sexuality which stigmatizes virginity is wrong, but I don't think it has anything to do with Hollywood being liberal. The product supplies what consumers demand, and teens obviously prefer sex-focused pics over anything approaching restraint. I don't think movies promoting sexual morality would ever sell, especially among teens, and would subsequently be of little value. Same with violence; I am depressed that horror flicks — avatars of violent and sexual depravity — are such a lasting tradition of American of culture. It's not fair to punish the audience or the producers, though. Money goes where it goes.
I think it's an honorable thing that so many people wait until they're been joined in marriage before commencing with the coitus and fruitfully multiplying. It's the best way, no question about it. If I had a teenager, I'd certainly bang the drum slowly, repeatedly into their thick skulls. Now that we've covered about 3 percent of the population, let's address the rest of us, The Perverts Who Decided To Not Wait For True Love And A Government Document.
Sex is fun. We like it. We like it with different people. We don't need to be in love to have it. Beer really helps this dystopic view of sex, but it's not necessary. We don't see it as something that's ugly or distasteful, we see it as something that brings an equal portion of pride and shame – it's not ethically free, and it exacts a cost. Yet we still pursue it, because, yes, it brings happiness.We don't deify it – it's not a sacred rite, unicorns do not flutter and pixie dust is not spread when it happens. Conversely, chunks of human souls are not bled when it happens out of wedlock, and with every out-of-wedlock performance, an angel is not sodomized. Some decisions are better than others, but as adults, we're free to decide.
Finally, blaming Hollywood for teenage sexual activity is just silly. If youre teenager is taking their cue from what they see at the movies and on E! as appropriate adolescent behavior, the problem is probably a bit closer to home.
Not true. The age of consent varies by state. Many states the minimum age for consent is 16. Nearly all states have added so much to their legalese to their sex laws that an older-but-still-underage male can be found guilty as a sex offender for sex with his girlfriend.
Only as recently as 2007 have Indiana, Florida, Connecticut and Texas passed "Romeo and Juliet" laws. Lawmakers in these four states have recognized consensual sex between minors or an adult 18 years of age and a minor 14-16 years of age as intimacy and not the same as molestation. Underage sex is still illegal, but now some descretion can be applied by authorities.
An example of this is the case of a Florida man who, at 17, began having consensual sex with his 15-year-old girlfriend; when he turned 18, the girl’s disapproving mother pressed charges and he plead no contest. He was then legally compelled to register as a sex offender. He was finally able to remove his name at the age of 28 when Florida passed this law.
http://womensissues.about.com/od/datingandsex/a/R...
In some states, yes. But in others there are complex restrictions regarding age differences and state definitions of "legal age". Recently a woman in New England has been fighting to get off the sex register due to a conviction some 20 years ago where the sex act occurred on her 17th birthday and the boy was 3 days under 16.
And of course Steven's point is still valid. Encouraging or condoning underage sex is bound to lead to cases where a difference in age of a day or two could lead to 20 year prison sentences occurring simply due to a corroded understanding of sexual responsibilities and appropriate behavior.
Actually, since people have been convicted for simply reading text stories about underage sex, I wonder why any sex education promoting anything but complete abstinence is not considered encouraging child pornography or pandering? Food for thought, anyway.
Personally, I think any attempt short of genetic engineering to prevent sex between adolescents is futile. Evolution will win.
One other alarming and "icky" development is girls acting out with other girls to turn the guys on. What the hell is that all about?! I'm writing from a VERY small town in the upper midwest and that is apparently very widespread. In my experience (long ago in the wild early 70's!) guys did not need any incentive to be "turned on"…we would no more have thought of dancing nasty with another girl or making out with one than cutting off our own leg. Seriously! Does everything have to devolve into sex and perverted sex at that?!
Promiscuity hurts…it is NOT a good plan and does NOT make anyone involved happy.
One other thing…re the "conspiracy"…I don't think there is a conscious conspiracy to ruin families and young people and society…I think evil has taken root in people's hearts…they have been led to believe in themselves as the ultimate power-God is a myth…the earth and all "animal" instincts over-ride all. It is an evil that is spreading…those of you on the left can't possibly think that what our society has become is GOOD. Rampant-RAMPANT-STDs, unwanted babies, abortions that kill more than have died in all our wars…broken families with hurting wife, father and children…alcohol and drug abuse…all to "party". Well, party on Garth…
There's nothing irrational about it. There is a reason that conquering armies freely distribute alcohol, drugs, and pornography to their subordinates: because these things serve a dual purpose of being both emasculating and highly addictive. The users gleefully participate in the crushing of their own spirits. It is a self-exacerbating cycle; ergo no massive organization or well-organized supervillian is necessary.
(While the topic here isn't alcohol or drugs, the glofiying of easy sex to a teenage boy just as combustible–and immoral—as yelling "FREE BEER!" at an AA newcomer's meeting).
California long ago got rid of its "statutory rape" statutes and replaced them with "unlawful sexual conduct." In cases of an adult and a child, the distinction is unimportant because the penalties are as harsh as ever. But when it comes to younger people, the law specifies when the penalties kick in, if at all, based on the difference in ages between the youngsters. Children age twelve or under cannot give consent under any circumstances, regardless of the age of the other child. But if two children age twelve or under do have sex, it is not addressed by the penal code (criminal statutes). It is addressed rather by the civil code, the health and safety code, and the welfare and institutions code, each of which have specific sections relating to juvenile law. As with all one paragraph-long discussions of the law, this is an oversimplification, but you get the idea.
Mi gs iz u r a lonle gi in momz bsmt.
I posted a comment about California law on the subject. It may show up, it may not, but it was just informational only.
What is the matter with you? That was completely unnecessary and foul. Grow up, boy, and try to pretend you are at least half civilized. They won't censor you, but they should.
Don't get too riled up by these fools. We get trolls here, but today they have been unusually crude and unusually unintelligent.
As an escapee from the era of "sex, drugs, and rock 'n roll", all that talk about so-called "free love" was crap.
I knew too many kids who went over the deep end with the excesses of the time—lots of STD's, abortions, babies without stable parents (relatives intervened, thank God), and druggies who got trapped in that lifestyle and are still there.
To add to that, a number of emotionally ill misfits, and others who landed in prison, committed suicide, or died of an overdose was not unusual. It's only by the grace of God that I got out of that counter-culture crap. The "turn on, drop out" life was a dead-end, literally.
A lot of today's kids who get their cues from Hollywood are so out of touch it's crazy. Put a good book in their hands and they wouldn't know what to do with it. Tell them to go out and get a job and it's "what for"? Tell them to "save themselves" and not cheapen themselves by doing cheap tricks for the moment and they look at you like you're from another planet. To those kids and those toying with the idea to go for the lies—-WAKE up before you throw away your life, and realize that the virgins, and drug and alcohol-free youth who VALUE their worth are not only smart–they're also not mental head cases. You can LEARN from their example and living out their convictions. Because a few high school acquaintances showed me by example that that life was desirable and worthy, I changed course and I will be forever grateful for the courageous teens of then, and now, who have and will take a stand for what is right. They may not ever know what an impact they are having on an impressionable young person(s).
This is so true, virgins are thought to be prehistoric, like that cell phone that looked like a fridge everyone use to walk around with.
It may not be the in thing, but i would rather be out and still have my dignity than in and lose a piece of myself every time i give Harry, John and Peter what they want.
Try telling someone you are 22 and still a virgin, they look at you like you have three heads.
Or he's, y'know… a guy?
Thanks! It really doesn't bother me, though. It's nice to see some good fighters when it comes to a battle of wits. I love so many of the blogs on here, and have commented on others, but you're totally right, today is a bit unusually unusual. Something in the water….oh well. Have a great night!
Thanks! It really doesn't bother me, though. It's nice to see some good fighters when it comes to a battle of wits. I love so many of the blogs on here, and have commented on others, but you're totally right, today is a bit unusually unusual. Something in the water….oh well. Have a great night!
"But from my own personal research sex especially at such a young age rarely has any benefits"
See, that's where you lose people – rightly or wrongly. When a dude is 18, sex doesn't NEED to have "benefits" – it IS the benefit
For the record sweetie, Steven is a good looking young man with a brain in his skull. Were it that you were as fortunate.
Once upon a time, Dennis Miller was going to be the next Carlin. I don't know if there's been a sadder fall in modern comedy.
excellent, Kate. All I remember from that lovely time of sexual freedom is a great sadness and lots of lying between sexual 'partners.'
Personally, I believe that the hot center of today's leftist ethos is 'sexual liberation.' That heat drives support for abortion and easy divorce and unending childishness among leftist people. Their world is a cold and lonely one, its silence filled with faux intellectual chatter (eg, that Garafolo woman).
Are you sure?
Darling, you're dead on. I'm right there with ya! Thank goodness for parents with values that teach them to their kids! Neither abortion or welfare is the righ answer. Preach it!
To all those that are saving themselves for that special someone they marry,
my husband was 40 when we got married. Now I'm not saying that any of you
are going "to be that old" when you tie the knot, but I'm sooooo glad he waited
for me. Our love life is wonderful and it won't be long 'til we have our 10th
anniversary.
[...] Lonewolf Diaries: Virginity’s for Suckers. Get Your Sex On, Kids! by Steven Crowder [...]
Perez Hilton!!!!! Steven is not interested in you. Go back to 9th avenue will ya.
You know, most of her stuff is political trolling, but Auntie really shows what she's made of when she gets down to the level of HA HA, YOU'VE NEVER HAD A WOMAN.
Yes, a sad and pathetic creature that enjoys trying to inflict misery on people whom he/she deems to be subhuman.
Bob, I have tried to give you the benefit of the doubt as you sometimes post coherently. Unfortunately, I think you have officially now crossed into official Troll territory.
Congratulations. Your parents must be so proud.
I don't think it was just times of plagues and famine. Menstruation was a sign that a girl was ready to be married because she was now capable of having children. I think as women have become more liberated, the idea of the young bride has become unacceptable to society.
On the other hand, modern sex between teens has little to do with pregnancy if (IF!) they do it responsibly. I imagine that is the real crux of the problem. When do kids/young adults become responsible enough to understand the consequences of their actions? I guess we have decided on 18 being the magic number.
[...] good column came out from Stephen Crowder with which I agree: Is there anything more abnormal than being a mid-teen virgin in the year [...]
[...] Campaign Against Virginity A good column came out from Stephen Crowder with which I agree: Is there anything more abnormal than being a mid-teen virgin in the year 2009? [...]
Helly-wood isn't what it used to be. There might be a half dozen people in the entire region who are fit to carry John Wayne's hat (I know one personally). As for the rest – Pfftt!
Sow the beans, reap the flatus.
A beauty queen tries to stay above the fray and remain professional as she is (contractually?) expected to be, therefore she must be too stupid to realize she's being laughed at? Great display of your powers of logic and observation there, Bobby. Your future as a reality-TV star awaits.
I'm not gonna lie, all I read was "Alex P. Keaton's friend Skippy (Marc Price) from Family Ties " and I knew immediately that your post was genius. Thumbs up.
…I gues I should go back and acutally read it now.
It's capitalism when the government wants to tax it.
"When a dude is 18, sex doesn't NEED to have "benefits" – it IS the benefit
"
Then they get to reap the benefit of gonorrhea, syphilis, and blue pills later on in life. LOL
Besides, single mothers living off the Government dime are a key Democrat voting block and therefore an important part of the Leftist voting agenda. If teens don't start having sex early and often and young, how do you create single mothers and get that very important familial decay cycle started?
Don't worry. You'll find her. My husband was sort of in your shoes too; then, he found her. It tends to happen when you least expect it. We were set up for example.
Great article, Steven, and true. Keep up the good work.
Defending the sale of sex (particularly to the most vulnerable) as just another sign of a healthy capitalistic society is ridiculous and abhorrent. A healthy level of self-interest is essential to capitalism, yes, but losers like those who push sex on kids shouldn't get a free pass for being "good capitalists." They have more in common with Obama than with those who bring out the best in capitalism. Like Obama, they're willing to sacrifice people (their customers, the unborn, those who disagree with them) to serve their own ends. They support Obama because, like him, they don't really care about the welfare of their target market, as long as they can keep raking in the bucks (or the kudos from bottom-dwellers like Wanda Suck-up). They can publicly endorse free enterprise (for all or just for folks like them) or socialism (as long as it doesn't hit them in the pocketbook), but ultimately, with their screwed up priorities, they'll bring out the worst in everything they touch.
Let's not just accept lowlifes like this as "necessary evils" that come with capitalism. They are a cancer in any country, and they don't deserve to be defended simply because they know how to make a free enterprise system work for them (at the expense of everyone else).
Exactly. Just as free will means you're able to sin–not that you have a right to.
Want a real wake-up call? Try reading the fiction on the bookshelves today targeting "young adult." It makes the Hollywood movies look tame.
http://the100mostannoyingthings.blogspot.com/
yeah I'm gonna have to go with that…..he's a dude, c'mon!
My husband and I saved ourselves for marriage also (with God's help, of course, since we were both tempted, more than once, to do otherwise). I was 28 and he 31 when we married. It was definitely worth waiting for.
just out of curiousity Stephen… who'd you site for the 40% number? I'm willing to wager the honest ones would make it even higher… (in terms of non-sexually active teens)
Nothing says love like the "Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free" attitude so many hedonistic singles have towards their "significant others." What do the others actually signify in this case–other than, "You exist to give me pleasure" ?
Choosing to engage in pre-marital sex does not lead to "real love." Even if ModernElegance remains single, she'll have more of a real grasp of "real love" than you're likely ever to have. And she is passing on her family values already by sharing them with those willing to listen. If she marries, her children will benefit from her good example (and likely not fall victim to the STDs–speaking of "thinning the herd").
Bob
you are very wrong. Paris Hilton is not hot.
Very good post! I came out of the same era…and know many people who are stuck in that time-warp and have wasted their lives…partying. It's beyond sad.
While it may be illegal for an adult to have sex with an underage person, there is little prosecution in cases when the ages of the involved is close (i.e. 5 years or less). When the local law enforcement is presented with the facts that your daughter (or step-daughter) is a minor, they may overlook the fact that the 20 year old is committing a crime. The girl may have wanted to have sex, but she is not an adult. As a responsible parent, you press the issue only to find that there is no justice. You feel powerless,and try protecting your children with that on your mind.
Thank you Ted!!!! I thought I was alone. I have never found her attactive either & just could not understand why anyone else did.
Good for you! I am sure the right person will come along eventually! More power to you & keep up the good fight.
"You know, most of her stuff is political trolling, but Auntie really shows what she's made of when she gets down to the level of HA HA, YOU'VE NEVER HAD A WOMAN."
"Yes, a sad and pathetic creature that enjoys trying to inflict misery on people whom he/she deems to be subhuman."
It would seem that auntie is portraying / harboring a few facists setiments. Guess the Aunite is a tribute to Orwell.
I remember my mother being appalled by movies like Peggy Sue Got Married and Pleasantville. These movies tried to convey that even in the 50s kids were overwhelmingly doing "it". She maintains that in reality nobody did it. That guys were slapping each other on the back for making it to 1st base. And if they made it to 2nd they were moving on to another more chaste girl the next day.
Crowder you are so right, Hollywood not only wants to mold teen behavior now, but they want to rewrite its history as well.
Back in my day (the 90s) my virginity was a burden I had to get rid of as soon as possible. I wasn't ready, and I didn't want to and looking back I realize most of my friends probably felt the same way.
The abstinence teachings from my mother and the church consisted of "The Bible says don't do it, so don't do it. Pregnancy. AIDS." With my daughter I plan on stressing the self-respect factor more than the "Jesus can see you" factor.
You are just a creepster. Get back under your bridge.
There is a difference between "not getting laid" and choosing to wait for marriage. I believe in love and marriage. I am 21 and haven't had sex. I am waiting for the one I want to spend the rest of my life with. When sex becomes used as a tool for pleasure, it looses its meaning. It is hard when people and friends your age, all they want to do is go out and binge, then have dry sex on the dance floor. But guess what? Waiting and not participating is worth it.
Son of the Republic –
I'm not exactly sure I'm keeping up a fight but thanks anyway.
Believe me, sometimes I wish I could go back in time and kick myself in the butt for not taking advantage of certain opportunities that presented themselves in high school. I worked retail and one of the girls who worked at the store was a model! But I was too tongue-tied to do anything (but I wasn't about to lie or drink my way into her bedroom either).
I'd bet dollars to donuts in a televised debate she would wipe the floor with you.You'd probably flee after peeing your pants with the bright lights and whatnot.
Its funny but I have been thinking about the oversexualization of young girls for a long time. What happens in my mind is the confusion, and emotional pain that follows is nothing anyone ever talks about. The whole 60's free love stupidity of if it feels good do it is held up while no one ever addresses the inner space tahts been harmed. Yes, I said harmed. Girls who have been pressured either by peers or by a sinking feeling that they are missing something are harmed worse emotionally than physically. Sex has been turned into something you do. Its not special, its not even beautiful. Whats sad is these kids have no clue as to what they are missing. There is no true intimacy when its just sex. And sorry girls you aren't like guys. Samantha Jones is a lie and a myth. You can't walk out of a sexual situation like men can because you aren't men. Stop trying to act like one. Everytime I see a woman say she just likes having sex with no strings attached I start smiling…because you can see she is lying to herself.
Misery? I thought abstinence was the best thing since sliced bread.
so true. However, they do have a great deal of trouble getting them to the polls… enter ACORN, courtesy the US taxpayer. Nice, eh?
several very good points are made here. First of all, selfish self interest is fine; it appeals to the objectivist in us. And we don't like conspiracy stories any more than you. However, it is an institutional mindset- not a real 'conspiracy'. Like you will always see a black guy and a blonde female together but NEVER the reverse. Why? The NEA and Hollywood seem to be in cahoots about exposing children to raw sex ASAP. As far as killing themselves off as business people, these are mostly artists who engage in commerce.Ergo, clueless about Adam Smith. So, it's more of a loose collection of secularists who despise what they see as 'small minded' religious conservatives, and intend to lord over their demise with glee.
Make sense?
we are sure your comments would be equally elucidating. Thanks for the kind words…
This is exactly why I despise movies like "The 40 Year Old Virgin". I could only make it half way through that one. It really bothered me that they were sending the message that if you choose not to have sex, somehow you are not "normal". What makes them get to define normal? And why are they, to use a religious term, so "evangelistic" about others having sex? Why should it possibly matter to them?
Actually – he chose to remain a virgin until marriage at the end of the film…
Haven't you watched Judge Judy or Judge Joe Brown? An endless parade of people not doing enough thinking above their waist, who in lots of cases are reasonably intelligent otherwise, ranging from stupid things done by youngsters involving boyfriends and/or girlfriends, to stupid things done by otherwise mature adults involving boyfriends, girlfriends, and/or spouses. You don't have to watch long to understand why both keep going on about personal responsibility, with Judy's often-made comment about how young people should live alone in small apartments until they're ready to marry making perfect sense.
The (anecdotal) evidence is in. If you don't hold off at least until your mid to late twenties, when your brain can start thinking past the hormones and your life is getting settled, you've likely got misery and suffering coming that may be with you for life. Keep your pants on until you can think straight, know happiness.
No. Since sliced pie.
Thanks, Steven! Nice to have a guy on my side!
Nice boat, if you ask me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtuAOT_c2EA
But what about the Hays Code? You have to remember that if many of today's movies were made then, they would not be allowed.
Steve, you're obviously a closeted gay, so just go with it.
Has anyone noticed that the tolerant left accuses people of being "gay" an awful lot?
I would like to see those studies. But I'll take your word for it. Yes, I think the point I was trying to make is it's awfully hard to know where to draw the line. I wasn't exposed to much racy content growing up, and yet me and my buddies were uber-horny at a young age. The girl-crazy gene was working overtime even prior to puberty or being exposed to any explicit material.
Which is hilarious, because I made my biggest blunders in my careless 20s. I was much more responsible (read: scared) in my teens. Did I say hilarious? I meant ironic.
Yup, it was a whole lot easier when you just traded some goats or cows for a bride and an endless supply of it whenever you wanted it on your own terms. Or the parents got you in an arranged marriage ten seconds after puberty hit, no worries then. That whole concept of "vying for her affections" is too much hard work, like you're convincing her to be an equal in a partnership or something equally ludicrous. Let's just make everyone happy, we'll hold auctions. Want some and don't have money, put yourself on the block, specify beforehand if you want one-time or something longer. Got money, then you can bid and be a little choosy. Don't approve of selling, commie? Fine, we'll have "date clubs" with the really needy on display. Don't forget the "age appropriate" groupings. Then everyone can get it when they want it, and it's happiness and sunshine all around.
Because we all know what might happen when you don't get it in school. You get miserable, give up and get used to it. Why at some point, you may even believe it really isn't that important, learn to be happy on your own, perhaps decide you want someone to share your life with instead of just a bed for awhile. Lord knows such absurdity must be stamped out, hard. Misery when you don't know any better leading to happiness when you do, how outrageous!
Back in my day, the Roman proconsul used to host lavish orgies with teenage sex slaves. And the pagans ridiculed the Christians for their values.
That's unfair to Steve. No self-repecting gay would ever date him.
It Is called a joke and if you think about it then you will see that a vibrator has many other than sexual uses. Too bad you people jumped to the sexual conclusion. I just posted it as a joke since I can and have been censored here for less offensive replies.
But for the truth I will post something that you may find repulsive and offensive but it is the truth. I fail to see how Sean Penn and Hollywood are to blame for this. Hell when I was 12 I did not even know what Anal meant let alone what it was.
So anyway take a look at this site and the findings.
HOUSTON – (April 8, 2009) – Middle school youth are engaging in sexual intercourse as early as age 12, according to a study by researchers at The University of Texas School of Public Health.
In the study, Markham and colleagues defined sexual intercourse as vaginal, oral or anal sex. According to their research, by age 12, 12 percent of students had already engaged in vaginal sex, 7.9 percent in oral sex, 6.5 percent in anal sex and 4 percent in all three types of intercourse.
The study found one-third of sexually active students reported engaging in vaginal or anal sex without a condom within the past three months, and one-fourth had four or more partners. The more experienced students in all three types of intercourse were more likely to be male and African-American.
http://publicaffairs.uth.tmc.edu/media/newsreleas...
Are you honestly defining a woman's empowerment by her willingness to sleep with the neighborhood boys, rather? Forgive me but my own empowerment was won not through my ability to have sex. I achieved empowerment through my choosing to love my God, myself, my family and country. I am a better person not because I've slept with a slew of guys but because I respected myself more than to sleep with a slew of guys.
And, yes, that's precisely what I pray my daughters will learn and cherish as they grow to womanhood themselves. It's what I teach them every time they ask what this or that they heard on tv or in some movie really meant.
Because people with higher standards make them look stupid and it reminds them on how bad they actually feel about themselves.
How's this for a Hollywood feature film. "A blood curdling scream emits from a Brooklyn medical center doctor's office when a pretty, young 16 year old has just been informed that she is HIV positive." Unfortunately, that scenario happened and I overheard it. It shook me to my core. Truth is far more devastating than celluloid. The 16 year old will be playing herself for the remainder of her life. Yet, that which is reinforced by celluloid images and storylines soon gets played out over and over in life. Can someone stop the madness?
You nailed it.
it is sad that this is so bloody obvious… like lambs led to slaughter, baaaaing all the way. Families in general need to wise up, and fast. Thanks for the kindness…
wonderful contribution that happens to be spot on correct… congrats!
You are just plain wrong about that. A son of my wife's coworker is on the sex offender list for exactly this type of "crime". The girl's father, who is a local lawyer, insisted on prosecution. His daughter had been sleeping around and he wanted to teach her a lesson. The boy was charged with a felony and he pleaded guilty to a lesser crime to avoid jail.
I can't claim to be a PETA supporter, but their organization exists to protect what they see as the rights of animals. That is their cause. Why should they devote their resources to pushing YOUR cause? It's quite possible that some PETA members are also in groups that support things you believe in, but it's simply ludicous to say that an organization that exists to promote one ideology has a "double standard" if they don't devote their time to a completely unconnected idea.
very nicely done, Ms Elegance… isn't it telling that the craven weakness you are experiencing comes at the hands of left wing males? Our belief is that sex/romance is far better when earned than bought, and courting is one of the most wonderful of all human rituals. You got a 'rise' out of Auntie as well and were delivered some pie…
Actually it seems these numbers are the bare minimum when we can pretend to assume the "young adults" can assume responsibility. 18 for voting and contracts, 16 for driving (varies and is moving upwards), 21 for drinking. Societal tolerance matters, drunk driving becoming much less tolerated led to underage drinking crackdowns and raising the drinking age to where (in theory) alcohol is kept away from the most inexperienced group of drivers.
With sex though, it seems we've given up thinking there can ever be responsibility involved. Adult to minor remains as the only consensual act with serious legal repercussions, solely because "age of consent" denies it's consensual. Even that is getting chipped away, sometimes for good reasons as the current legal morass snares unintended victims. There are already exemptions for parental consent, which seem based in allowing the underaged to marry (and then have sex) with parental permission but since marriage no longer means anything…
I'll grant that in the "old days" short lifespans made early sex necessary, but then "adulthood" by necessity started much earlier than today. There are still places in the world where that qualifies. However in the "modern" world there is neither the expectation that people that young take on serious responsibilities nor a desire to entrust such to them. Why is sex given such a pass? We don't allow 16 year olds to drink if they promise to only do it at home, nor 14 year olds to drive while insisting it's only okay if they stick to high-survivability cars. Sex can lead to death, and the killing of others, with lifespans shortened by various amounts, let alone chronic conditions for life. But for this one thing, we don't mandate responsibility? We send them off thinking everything will be fine because they'll use the magic piece of latex? And we know how powerfully the pleasure of sex hits the brain, at that age it can be intense. Would you allow a kid a snort or two of coke, then expect them to stay away from it unless they were sure they could handle it?
For anything else with such dire potential consequences, we insist on tight regulations with legal penalties. For this, we don't even send them off for a training class with a strict warning to wait until they're old enough. Squashing the Hollywood culture of permissiveness while insisting on abstinence until they're of legal age is the least we can do. And even that is a major cop-out from our responsibilities as a society.
Stay the course, gal. From someone who has been in your situation before, you have nothing to be ashamed of and you are NOT missing anything. Sex has it's time and place- it was ment for a purpose, and that purpose is not self gratification. It is the deepest form of communion between and man and his wife, a completely selfless and binding act. THAT is worth waiting for.
so good to see Anti's alter ego… perhaps now, with proper instruction, we can have a proper pie!
Apologies if this appears twice.
I haven't seen the film in a while but, if I recall, Carrell's character, by being a virgin, actually had the effect of making his friends re-evaluate their love lives and their priorities. And as the poster above me mentioned, he waits for marriage after all, despite being tempted throughout the film.
Strange you're so certain of that. Do you think he's hiding in your closet?
You obliviously didn't read what I wrote. The idea of treating animals better is an act of civility. So, they are pushing a philosophy of civility where we cast off what makes us animals. Animals don't care about the environment, thus for humans to be aware of our actions we must cast off what makes us animals. Or even when it comes to war, animals couldn't care less about hurting another animal. Liberals say diplomacy before war or words instead of fist; so they telling us to cast off what makes us animals. All have merit, but while they constantly tell us to be more civilized in nearly action they tell us to embrace animal behavior when it comes to sex. There is a philosophical double standard in that they contradict themselves with their message of casual sex. I never said that they SHOULD promote abstinence, I just figured they since they preached civility with food, animals, the environment, war, and behavior they would also preach civility in sex.
Down With Sponge Bob!
Hey man, if you haven't gotten any punani by age 26, even after trying, then I'm sorry.
But remaining an unweeded garden is your choice too, it might even turn some babes on.
Still, I'd advise getting your freak on sooner than later, because dude…unless you're dating Rosie Palmer every night, blue balls are no fun and neither are sticky sheets.
Wait, your husband "found her", so that must mean it wasn't YOU.
Yeah, but so is a good roll in the hay. You should try it one day.
i was already belly-laughing at the title: virginity's for suckers.
isn't that what clinton told mon?
I had a female type friend (yes, FRIEND!) who once remarked another friend was amazed she wasn't upset over a former boyfriend getting married and even attended the ceremony. She asked me why this other girl was acting this way and it was obvious to me why. My female type friend was a nice Mormon girl and though she never talked about it, it was obvious she was going to wait until her wedding night.
No matter how casual we try to make sexual relations, there is still going to be an emotional investment to the act which will result in hard feelings if the relationship sours. She never had sex with her former boyfriend so she never had an emotional investment that would make the break-up hard.
Dude your religion is hiding the fact that you can't score
I noticed the supporting characters were all having relationship problems or messed up lives because of sex.
Sean Penn has personally done his bit to make sure there are fewer teen virgins. Ask him about visitors to his burned-down trailer houses in Malibu some time.
DeizeMae, I'm 24 and still a virgin too. As you said, it's not for lack of guys trying. As far as I'm concerned all it does is narrow the playing field for me. A firm stance on your morals will scare away all the creeps and leave you with a few good and decent guys. I dated a lot of creeps in my time (unfortunately) and it made it a lot easier to drop them when I realized they had a problem with me not "giving it up".
I'm engaged now to a great guy who absolutely loves the fact that I am a virgin. He thinks it's one of the most attractive things about me. I honestly thought I'd never find a guy like that, but God had plans I didn't know about. =)
So far in this topic "Auntie" has claimed if a guy doesn't get it by 26 he never will, and if a woman doesn't go for it in her 20's she'll stay single, loveless, and childless.
Therefore AF (America's Funniest) is about 25 1/2, using his massive powers of persuasion to talk up some girl he presumes is a virgin with his stunning displays of logic, while showing how manly he is by courageously trolling at a conservative web site. "Hey babe, see how brave I am, I'm hacking these morons to pieces!" You can smell his frustration in his frantic nonsensical posts, the brain above the neck hasn't kicked in yet.
Soon he'll be about 25 yrs 11 mo and 27 days old, trying to really impress her by robbing a mini-mart while he still has time. At which point either natural selection will be invoked, or perhaps he can take a cooking class in prison. Either way his trolling here ends, and there's a slightly increased chance we'll finally get pie. Happy days are a'coming soon!
My first reaction to your original post was that you were absolutely correct, but it exuded a bit of self-righteousness. This is better. It's nice to have clearly witty, savvy gals around who can be a positive example to little girls.
As a 24-year-old mother of 3 –two of which are girls– I whole heatedly agree with your statement there. We've had this strange paradigm shift in our culture where men are more attractive if they are effeminate and women are more attractive if they come off as being one of the guys. While people tell me I'm such a "cool girl" for being so… guy-like, they call my husband… rude names for being a good man.
I'm sorry if I came across as self righteous because that was not my intent at all!
This made me laugh so hard that tears are streaming down my face!
I never really appreciated the cliche that related me to a cow…not that I don't agree with the sentiment. I just don't like the correlation between "buying" a woman to get her "milk" (or her vagina).
I support Crowder's thoughts here, but I do take issue with some of the posters. I would argue in this case, that having a young couple get married so they could have sex probably didn't lead to happy sex lives later–more likely in divorce. I also wonder how you made the correlation between pre-marital sex and sexlessness in middle age. I don't get it. And what does natural family planning have to do with the rest?
Except that he was poking some 15 year old while making Disney movies with her, and had her sending him pictures of her little timmies. Yeah, he's a great guy!
Actually, "family movies" do exceptionally well at the box office, as (among others) Michael Medved has pointed out several times.
Then why doesn't Hollywood make more of them? Why are otherwise family-friendly movies polluted with a single sex scene or a handful of extreme obscenities?
Smells more like an agenda than mere marketing to me!
So right.
I was extremely upset that the topless scene was cut from "Escape From Witch Mountain"!
haha, just kidding. But really – this movie was a big success, and very unobjectionable content wise.
Hollywood always have trouble with quality. They make a quality kids movie, it does well, they make a crappy kids movie, and it bombs.
Of course if they make a crappy teen slasher movie, they still skim a profit… and so thus that is the common practice.
I really don't have a problem with attributing faults with Hollywood to their tendency to dollar-chase. Their output is a mirror image of ourselves.
Because ACORN was committing voter fraud by making an effort to register people?
No, I really think they are sexing us up because its profitable. Who wants to go to a movie to be preached at anyway? Your imaginary movie promoting regilious and spirtual values bombed at the imaginary box office.
or for a real one, go rent that one about Kirk Cameron as a fire fighter. Sorry, but the truth is that movies like what you describe are out there. How much of the Breitbart audience is really interested in that when they can go see Kirk and Uruhra getting it on?
Jeff, what a really odd and confused comment to make. Did you seriously not understand a word Crowder wrote? How could you conclude that he wants young teen girls to "service the neighborhood boys", after he wrote a whole column calling for Hollywood to end it's promotion of juvenile sex?
Work on your reading comprehension.
You know what's funny? My primary reason for choosing to wait until marriage was simply to spite all the people who said that EVERYBODY did it, and I would, too. It just infuriated me that someone would condescend to tell me what I would CHOOSE to do, simply because it was just so hard, and everyone caved eventually. I'm not one to follow the crowd, and I resented the implication that I would. I considered it a point of pride that I didn't do what everyone else did: I didn't have premarital sex, I didn't drink before I was 21 (except occasional wine with my parents….. CRAZY, I know), I've never smoked or done drugs, etc. And amazingly, I've never been accused of being boring or sanctimonious.
It's amazing how fulfilling my life as been in spite of the fact (or perhaps because of it) that I haven't lived up to a single Hollywood stereotype.
"Like you will always see a black guy and a blonde female together but NEVER the reverse."
Firstly… what does that have to DO with anything?
Secondly… I'm going to conclude you did NOT see Star Trek this weekend, then?
"So, it's more of a loose collection of secularists who despise what they see as 'small minded' religious conservatives, and intend to lord over their demise with glee."
See, THAT I can see. I mean, I dunno about a "collection," but I know *I* always get a warm feeling whenever the religious fails at, well, anything. But that sounds basically plausible to me. My objection is to the notion that it's all this HUGE plan as part of a HUGER plan for world-socialism. I'm sorry, that's just dumb.
"A beauty queen tries to stay above the fray and remain professional as she is (contractually?) expected to be, therefore she must be too stupid to realize she's being laughed at?"
Watch the tape, listen to The Donald speak. HE'S mining this show for all the tabloid ink it's worth. SHE seems to think he's doing her a favor. Do you buy that? Cuz she seems to…
Depends on what we're debating, I'll grant. I mean, I wouldn't want to challenge her on the price of various shoes in Beverly Hills, that's for darn sure. Politics, though? Biblical business she's apparently very fond of? Yeah, I'd probably take that – on the condition that NEITHER of us is allowed to use a coach – unless of course The Donald or this "Marriage Group" wants to buy ME one, too
Totally agree. I wrote a longish post on precisely that subject here: http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/05/02/zac-efron/
"Riding the bone roller coaster" Are you serious? How about "Duffeling the Hog"? It's much more polite.
"But guess what? Waiting and not participating is worth it."
I'm making a concerted effort to NOT be a jerk her since for what it's worth I have a certain amount of respect for people who actually ARE able to practice what they preach in this case (up until he point where the preaching gets annoying, then they can jump of a bridge for all I care.) But, the logical being in me is COMPELLED to point out: You don't "know" it's worth it. You're HOPING it is. You BELIEVE it is. But you don't KNOW. Green eggs, ham and all that. I mean, concievably you could get to "it" and then suddenly go "wow, this was TOTALLY not worth waiting and not participating." Just sayin.
Your post makes no sense. You cite no statistics that actually relate to Hollywood and teen sex or give examples of how the latter relates to teen sex, simply listing shows and movies – one which being from the 90s. Furthermore the statistic you do cite is simply useless to helping your own argument because as you yourself erronesously admit virgintiy through teenage years is probably higher than 40%, because, as you state, a "good percentage" of this blind-study are men (nevermind their teenage men/boys). If this statistic favors "lonely little virgins even more" then it doesn't help your argument. So, then you go on to blame Hollywood for this "lopsided statistic." I don't know what hill you live on, but lopsided things are usually just that, lopsided. Not something that as you admit to, is greater than 40%. In fact that's not a lopsided statistic it's marginally positioned to one side, at best. Lopsided does not equal simple majority, for that matter, because then there would be no need for lopsided things, now would there?
All-in-all your blame for Hollywood is negated by your own argument. Maybe next time you and your fellow conservatives can derrange something up that's a little better consturcted and doesn't just prove to everyone that you too are in fact strung out on oxycotin.
not yet- will see it this weekend… the other reference was about the constant media reminder of interracial relationships; what we meant is that you literally never see the reverse- we saw Uhuru and Kirk kiss way back when- so that's water under yon bridge. Face it- the so-called 'artistic' community, which is not business savvy, makes money up front. A $40 million budget is spent as if it was a grant; which of course it is. Then the business people get involved. In the years we have monitored Hollywood we have seen a dedicated attempt to spread secular humanistic left wing propaganda. It's just what they believe…
I said that there was "little prosecution". I can site two examples of this happening, but the parents of the girls involved were not lawyers, so the DA did not pursue the case. The parents could have gotten a lawyer involved, but that costs money. The daughters pleaded everyone to drop the charges anyway, but I took issue with the age of the young men (19 and 20) involved in relationship to the girls involved (14 and 15). I won't excuse that type of age difference for a number of reasons. The young men knew that they could pressure the young girls. Add the fact that there was alcohol involved, and you may have a rape charge as well. If the age difference was 2 years or less, then I wouldn't be as concerned, but I draw a firm line after that. I'm not a fan of college age adults going after junior high and high school kids.
The example you cite is becoming more common than before, but it depends on a number of factors. The biggest one is either a DA or a lawyer that has an axe to grind. Otherwise, most of the time, nothing is done. As for your coworker's son, I'm not sure he deserves to be labeled a sex offender, but the law doesn't take ages of those involved into account when sex with a minor is concerned.
no, they were making up fictitious voters- and they organize to take indigents to the polls as well.
Families headed by ONE man, With One Wife, one or more children, who worship the ONE God, and own one or more guns are the scariest! Be one of those those if you can ;o)
Only partially, because while Efron's character convinced his daughter not to sleep with her loser, criminal boyfriend, there was little issue with the fact that the daughter was conceived while the parents were in high school.
Real message: not going to college because you have a kid and wife at 18 won't stop you from owning a large home in LA, and so long as you really each other, you are mature enough for sex and whatever consequences come from that. Just find someone better to be stupid with than the school bully.
I believe it was the Apostle Paul who said it was better to marry than to burn (and that was directed possibly at young widows, but I think it can be extended logically to this situation.) What we have is a very long period of abstinence and physical maturity. This is because of better nutrition and college. I think the Victorians coped with this by underfeeding their children to delay maturity.I suggest we encourage young marriage, but with some provision for the fact that the young couple is not as mature.This also goes along with an 'abolish teenager status' plan. Instead, young adults are made apprentices to learn skills and responsbilities and provide an outlet and a use for that rampant energy. This theory supposes that we could teach kids to be more mature than we currently do.One proviso might be that the young couple stays at the father-in-law's house in the spare bedroom until they 1)Accumulate their downpayment. OR 2) The slightly older guy finishes college.Its a very radical scenario suited for a SF novel, but I think its probably better than what we have now.
Agreed. Forget any morals , principles, or character. All we ever see is all fun and no consequences, no STDs, no emotional damage done.
Something that shocked me recently…. in jr. high now, getting to 2nd base means getting/giving head. Just lovely.
I found it pretty easy to keep from having sex as a teen, not because I didn't have offers, I just couldn't stomach the idea of having sex with any male I knew. I wasn't shy at all, maybe considered ugly, who the hell knows, but I know friends of mine that stayed virgins and they were far from the shy, ugly, pathetic stereotype people push off on virgins. I personally don't care what other people choose to do with their bodies, but I do think people should think more about the consequences of sex before hooking up with random people.
The main problem with teens is they have such low self esteem, most will give into having sex so they aren't the butt of a joke. I personally never cared when my virginity was insulted. Granted, I like shows like Gossip Girl, movies like American Pie, ect., I blame parents more than entertainment, considering through my teens I read, listened to music, watched television shows and movies with sex involved, but my Mom, Grandma, and Grandpa taught me from a young age that sex involves more responsibility than just doing it.
Do Merck and Durex own Hollywood?
http://heyitsjustablogman.blogspot.com/2008/11/me...
http://heyitsjustablogman.blogspot.com/2009/03/co...
I never got it either, from what I learned from a coworker who was also a dairy farmer, cows are high maintenance, requiring milking three times a day besides feeding and… cleaning up. Owning just one seems bad enough, but managing a herd? Three times a day with little sleep, how do you keep up? And getting milk for free is normally stealing, when you jump the fence into the farmer's field and squirt out your own. Unless you're dumpster diving behind the supermarket, and hoping you don't get sick. A better analogy would be renting a cow, but I've yet to hear of any arrangement where that worked out.
The major problem with getting married young is whether it's out of love or lust. Going by the parade of real winners on the half-hour courtroom shows, I think knowing which is a real problem under 25, let alone 20. It does take to around the mid to late 20's to think despite the hormones. If you get married young, this is the evaluation time. If you're good friends and it's working out for you, then you stay. If you're only really together for some enticing then consummation, then you go. And these days any kids that happened mean a lot less in the decision.
However, as learned in the days of arranged marriages between adolescents, one of the toughest parts of a long-term committed relationship is starting a long-term committed relationship. Once you're in, even if you think you'll do better elsewhere, you want to stay in. It's taken decades of "your happiness comes first" claptrap to start changing that, and when has that ever worked out when family is involved? We put up with kids, spouses, jobs we don't like, waste valuable vacation time visiting relatives we really don't care that much for. Willingness to sacrifice is the biggest factor in making a marriage work. If they've been raised right and understand that's a part of life, let them get married young, good chance it'll stick.
That's why pre-marital doesn't work. It's done for individual happiness, your own pleasure, plus I'll note that often it can be one-sided, one takes what the other, hoping for more, freely gives. If the point gets reached where greater happiness lies elsewhere… Living together before marriage also fails, they tend to find nothing has really changed except a legal document is making it harder to separate. If they didn't want to wait for marriage so they could separate easily, in case things don't "work out," then why should they expect things will be better when they make it harder to part ways? Thus you get divorces, or sexless "ongoing living arrangements."
Your commitment to marriage should match the commitment you expect in the bedroom. Two people who have been waiting, pumped up and ready to go, ready to jump together and merge, wherever it takes them. You try to "sample" that commitment beforehand, why that's like before you get to the bedroom you… well, you know.
Oh, natural family planning, aka the rhythm method, promoted amongst Catholics? That's letting it build up during the days of the month after the theoretical ovulation, and then the monthly gift, then using the "grace period" before the next ovulation. Given research I've read showing the days right before ovulation actually matter most in getting pregnant, and the well-earned stereotype of Catholics having large families, I'd recommend instead taking a break when it seems too routine and waiting until both are really eager to start up again.
Witness Exhibit A for Jinja's case, named Joe.
Those able to control that urge must be scary to those who are certain they couldn't. I wonder if alcoholics feel the same way about those who've never had a drink. "C'mon, just try one, it's not going to harm you!"
So you would be willing to (metaphorically) beat up a pretty girl, as long as it's on your terms? Are you working yourself up to take on a former beauty queen, Sarah Palin?
Anti, you're an idiot.
Teens–in general–do not possess emotional maturity to match their hormones & secondary sex characteristics; they do dumb things such as sex. The sex itself is not the issue, but the emotional issues that go along with having sex.
I did not lose my virginity until recently & I am 36!
As I said before, you're an idiot.
Awesome! So nice to know we are not alone. My brother is still a virgin at 23, so we stand strong together. What a blessing from God to have found your man. But the creeps make you appreciate your fiancée even more, I'm sure. That's exactly what I'm waiting for….the one God brings to me. Congratulations on your engagement and best wishes for your wedding day!
Something nobody ever tells you – the pill, IUD, heck most everything out there short of a condom doesn't always prevent fertilization, it often just prevents the egg from implanting on the uterine wall. Perfectly good babies falling out every month. Kinda mortified me after years of being on the pill and my later belief that life starts at conception.
[...] One would have to wonder how much different that statistic would be if Hollywood WEREN’T pressuring teenagers to engage in the horizontal mambo. If Hollywood put all of its ‘virginity is for suckers’ energy into promoting ’saving sex till marriage,’ I bet we’d see a very different, much more lopsided statistic. Of course Hollywood could never do that, as they don’t believe in ‘forcing ones beliefs on others’… Unless of course said beliefs include situational ethics, then it’s time to preach it father, preach it!” [...]
Yeah, but you don't seem to agree about the virtues of abstinence. If somebody says to you "I choose not to have sex," you assume that it's not the choice they wanted to make, it's just that they're too unattractive to get laid.
Abstinence is not always a face-saving maneuver.
By "misery" I mean the invective and hatred you fling at those who disagree with you. Note I also said "trying" to inflict it upon others. Obviously, you fail most of the time, judging from the mockery you receive in response. The fact that you are trying shows you have a rather diseased little soul.
Speaking of mockery: pie or cake. Bring it.
Has anyone noticed that the tolerant left accuses people of being "gay" an awful lot?
…as if it were a bad thing?
Wow, I think you might just be onto something here! Well done!
RT
http://www.privacy-resources.us.tc
Teenagers were having sex long before there were such a thing as movies. It is biological, nothing you can do will stop the hormones of healthy teenagers.
Quotes of the day
http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/13/quotes-of-t...
i don't think hollywood or the mass media industry should really be promoting such values as abstinence, surely its an informed choice one should make on their own with all the relevant information, making sex unobtainable will make teens want it more, that is if they haven't been brainwashed into abstinence already. Ironically sex is one of humans most natural functions yet it is our culture (which we made/make) that has led us to the degree which we tell people not to do it…there is something inherently wrong with that…Our culture won't and can't be changed over night and probably won't for a while, as someone else stated on here, "sex sells", and that means money. Teens should be educated about sex and arising issues and also how mass media represents sex, it is no wonder some teens are so messed up if they take everything they see/hear literally. This education should ideally come from parents, yes it is your job! it is probably hard cos teens probably don't want to hear it and they think they know it all but they will have questions – just be prepared to answer them when they ask, or reccomend someone else to ask or repuatlable source, eg. cool uncle.
step back and realise the agenda of mass media – teens on the whole don't like to be sold to, once they realise this they might start to think for themselves..obviously this is part of growing up.
I agree with you completely. I am a female and the whole ugly-pretty shy girl is complete correct, sad enough. It kinda sucked going through high school and no one even being remotely interested in me. I didn't even get my first kiss until I was 16. Now that I am in college things have changed. People think differently, and some actually think. I've had/have a long term boyfriend and I am still a virgin. We are waiting until marriage. Just to think about the climax of how great sex would be when you wait. It would also be way more enjoyable knowing you're not going to get an STD or what not with your partner.
OK. We have your vote as to whether you would date Steve. Assuming that you have self respect.
The star of Adventureland is returning home after college. Definitely not 16. Not really a great example.
The real problem here is not whether teens wait for sex or get it on as soon as they can. The problem is that we aren't educating the younger class well enough on the matters of sex. Kids need a proper education regarding sex early on so that we can hopefully steer them away from dangerous behavior. Some kids are going to choose to have sex regardless of whether we want them to or not. However if we properly educate them, then at least most of them will do it responsibly and safe.
There was an article in the economist a while back featuring a detailed study that looked into why there where so many teenage pregnancies in the heavily christian areas of the united states. They eventually came to the conclusion that it was because in christian communities they tend not to educate their children about sex because it is a taboo subject. Because of this, when the kids decide to have sex (teens will be teens) they do it in an unsafe manner without the use of condoms. It seems to be wide practice that apparently not talking about sex and blocking out the subject will somehow prevent it from happening. In this day and age it should be quite apparent that eventually censorship just doesn't work. If you don't talk about something it's not going to go away.
So I think all this talk about whether or not to wait until marriage is really just a waste of our resources. We should instead be focusing on how to better educate our children about sex and making sure that they don't do it for the wrong reasons and that they have the proper knowledge to do it safely. Each person is going to make their own decision whether or not to have sex so at least when that time comes we should make sure they are prepared and understand the consequences of their actions.
so, do you think this is a new phenomena? Teenagers have been fooling around with sex forever because it is the Biological imperative, it feels good so they do it. Also birth control is not black magic, the pill stops the sperm from reaching the egg, the condoms do not have little holes to give you super AIDS, and there are a thousand other RELIABLE ways to avoid pregnancy.
But by simply ignoring the issue and putting your head in the sand, you deprive a generation of the knowledge to protect themselves even as adults. a teenage who abstains and becomes an adult who wants to experiment wont bother with a condom, probably because he wont know how it works
as for 40% staying virgins, 50% have had oral sex, seems alot of people are alot more curious then you'd like to think, and i have a SOURCE!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/arti...
*groan*
If that's how you reply to a simple allusion, avoid all books without at least one illustration on every page.
Did you even read the article? All Hollywood promotes is getting it on! Too much indoctrination of abstinence, as your reply suggests, is very very far from being any problem whatsoever.
Excellent points, Steven.
But Rosie is so fun! For absolutely anything in your imagination that you want to do or see, bam, Rosie delivers. No matter what is going on in your life, however things are screwed up, bam, Rosie is there for you. Whenever the need arises, be it late at night or first thing in the morning, bam, Rosie is ready. And Rosie is the one it's okay to visit even when married. A trusted friend for life, that's Rosie!
Instead, he turned out to be the next P.J. O'Rourke. I suppose that some people would consider that sad.
Redd Foxx used to have a joke about the woman who wrote to her husband in Paris, under the suspicion that he was taking advantage of being in France to cheat on her. "I hope you're not buying something that you can get for free back home…"
He wrote back: "S__t, hon, I'm not looking for no bargains."
It is indeed a cold world to live in. Sex is apparently the only means of generating heat.
All of Carell's co-workers are even more tied up in sexual issues than he is, and the only one who turns out not to be a complete basket case because of it is Seth Rogen's character, and even he admits that his lifestyle probably isn't healthy in the long run.
Is everyone on this site (including the author of this article) out of touch? Have you not seen the recent rash of movies coming out that actually extol the virtues of sexual responsibility? The 40 Year Old Virgin, Knocked Up, Superbad, Juno, etc., as crude as they are, have all portrayed the costs of sexual irresponsibility and then by the end of the films make heroes out of the characters who choose to either "wait" or take responsibility for their actions. Being naive about the reality of sexual behaviors is what puts kids at risk. Getting them to think and understand the risks is far more productive than ignoring the subject or preaching a naive "abstinence only" message.
And what is this paranoia about "liberals" and "seculars"? I happen to be both a liberal and an atheist, and guess what? I have only had sex with my wife. Holy crap! In fact, my atheist friends growing up were the ones who avoided sex as teens because their parents told them what the realities were. The religious kids — who apparently aren't convinced by their parents' story of an invisible man in the sky who loves them and will burn them forever and ever if they even *think* about sex — were the one's engaging in the riskiest behaviors. And my generation who grew up in the 90s were, in my mind, bombarded by a much more sexually charged media than today's kids.
Sex is a biological imperative. We all have the desire because it is genetically programmed. Kids, by default, will have sex every chance they get. It takes a brain to apply some impulse controls and put social and personal responsibility ahead of the primordial drive to copulate. If kids are taught the reality they can differentiate between the fantasies of movie scripts and the realities of biology.
It Is called a joke and if you think about it then you will see that a vibrator has many other than sexual uses.
Yes, there are many shapes and hardnesses available, they're good for wrapping with sandpaper to do detail work on wood. The classic styles are also good for mixing drinks, nothing like a martini that's neither shaken nor stirred.
Ah, great study you linked to. Lets examine some parts you left out of your quotes, with some emphasis added.
Christine Markham, Ph.D., assistant professor of behavioral science at the UT School of Public Health, and colleagues examined sexual risk behaviors among middle school students in a large southeastern U.S. urban public school district.
“This is one of the few school-based studies conducted with this age group to look at specific sexual practices in order to develop more effective prevention programs,” Markham said. “This study shows that although most seventh graders are not engaging in sexual risk behaviors, a small percentage are putting themselves at risk.”
(…)
Markham said, “These findings are alarming because youth who start having sex before age 14 are much more likely to have multiple lifetime sexual partners, use alcohol or drugs before sex and have unprotected sex, all of which puts them at greater risk for getting a sexually transmitted disease (STD) or becoming pregnant.”
(…)
“We need to develop prevention programs that address the needs of students who are not yet sexually active in order to promote skills and attitudes to help them wait until they are older to have sex,” Markham said. “And we need to provide skills and knowledge related to condoms and contraception for youth who are already sexually active.”
The study recommends that sexually active students also need to receive accurate and factual information and services related to STDs and pregnancy testing, as well as skills for future abstention and risk reduction for those who intend to remain sexually active.
Oh, and I love this line: "In 2000, youth between the ages of 15 and 24 accounted for 9.1 million or 48 percent of all new STD cases, according to a report by the CDC." So back during the Age of Clinton while liberals were complaining about "making a bid deal over nothing" with Monica, it was "just sex," practically half of the new infections were among those to whom Hollywood promotes its "Virginity is weird!" message. You're doing a great job making Crowder's points for him!
So, you've linked to a study showing how risky young sex is, where abstinence is preferred over even sex with "adequate precautions," which basically says as of 2000 decades of liberal sex education were a failure, and it also pegs the "youth" range as old as 24 indicating when sufficient maturity to be an "adult" about sex begins. And, as the liberals love to hear, minorities hit hardest.
Stephen should thank you for such an excellent job of backing up his piece.
You people are morons. I hope Texas leaves the union and you can all move there and not have science, or interesting human narratives. You can all watch movies about jesus and the rapture, and no one will have to worry about the kids getting evil ideas from Hollywood. People want a decent story in their movies and shows, not an after school special. Maybe if you keep breeding your kids stupid enough, they will be so retarded that they can't figure sex out on their own. Then just ban every movie ever and sex will become a church controlled ritual. How is it that conservitives don't understand action/reaction? There is sex in Hollywood because there is sex in the real world, and it creates drama. Getting rid of sex in Hollywood won't get rid of sex in real life. It will just make entertainment boring and unrealistic.
Great article. I disagree with just about everything that is done in Hollywood. I think it not only adds to the whole "teen" situation but it makes people like myself and probably others question, like you mentioned, your younger years an if you really did it right. I think it just adds altogether to the moral decline of society. We all make mistakes but when Hollywood glorifies them and promotes making those mistakes we know we have issues.
…maybe considered ugly…
Darling, assuming that's your real picture, I'll grant you're not Hollywood Standard but you have nothing to be ashamed about by me.
Definitely keep writing. If TV portrays it the opposite, then shut it off. Voting with your feet works even if we need to do more. That said, I should mention sometimes knowing people who lived the so-called liberated lifestyle is enough of a turn-off to go more traditional and wait. There's less angst than you think when you realize you don't have anywhere near the problems your friends who didn't do, plus you don't have the crazy/abusive boyfriend to go with the myriad of kids who have to spend the weekend each with a different father, the custody court cases, etc. By the way, I am the proverbial movie title virgin – you can figure that out on your own – and it's no big deal to wait even double-time than you have.
Oh, and by the way, I'm a bellydancer, so hardly the ugly stereotype of chicks who can't attract men.
Actually, when you hit your thirties and you haven't, you don't talk about it. Too much of a challenge in the wrong kind of way for some people.
I agree it shouldn't be linked to capitalism, but to be fair, communism has always been against porn and prostitution. Don't know where this new brand with libertinism comes from. Maybe it's a new amalgam.
I guess that's a good point, LOL!
I can top you: I didn't watch a rated R movie until I was 17.
I can top you: I didn't watch a rated R movie until I was 17.
People think the Kinsey report is a source, too, don't they? I heard it was a little less enlightening or truthful than it was cracked up to be.
So you never heard of this concept called ugly people and that they have trouble getting laid?
If everyone looked as if they wanted to look, everyone would get laid and very nicely too.
Sex it not something that anything is going to control. Not any statistic anyway. Sex and the urge to procreate is something that is a natural part of life. Humans do it and want to do after puberty no mater what the case and there isn't a movie that is going to stop that from happening.
I hate to break this news to you but, sex and the act of it has been going on long before cinema. Stop thinking that preaching anything is going to change the fact that humans, who's hormones have started to "rage” are going have sex no matter what. It's survival of the species.
Humans are not even a monogamous creature. The control of sex and sexual habits was the idea of religion thousands of years ago. It's not something that is in our genes as a species. And yes, we are just that a species of animal. We may think differently then other animals, but we are still just that, animals.
There always are some exceptions to the rules. But anyone who isn't getting any is lying to themselves if they say they really don't want it. Everyone wants to have sex, even if it comes from the basic survival instinct.
The Golden Age of Hollywood also featured rampant sexism and racism. The only mention of homosexuality was to hint that certain despicable characters were "light in the loafers". The Red Scare infringed on people's political and 1st amendment freedoms (all in the name of protecting freedom, of course).
And not only that, but guess what? People did have sex before marriage. They did have homosexual experiences (actually, since sex with women did come later at that point, boys were probably more likely to engage in certain homosexual activities at that point – and if you think it was very rare, read the Kinsey studies, done in the 40s and 50s).
If you want to go back to the "good ol' days" well… for one, the good ol' days weren't. And for another, you have to look at the whole picture, and there were plenty of other things going on.
Oh, and btw, if you're also one of those conservatives complaining about the tax rates going up slightly, in those good ol' days, we also had a top marginal tax rate of 90% (the point at which this tax rate kicked in was significantly higher relative to today's top marginal tax rate tho).
Oh, you mean, "Do as I say, not as I do," doesn't work on teens? I wonder why abstinence only education hasn't worked! It can't possibly be the hypocrisy involved.
No kidding. I remember the Sweet Valley High novels when I was in high school. One of them I happened to pick up wasn't much better than a Harlequin romance. I diched 'em and, following my dad's advice, began a reading program of the classics. Never went back to the fluff, but it's still there for plenty of other kids, and I imagine it's only gotten worse since I was in high school. I'm grateful my parents paid attention to what books I was reading (for school or for fun). I intend to do the same for my kids.
Ooooo, yeah, you got me there. Although, I did only see two R-rated movies before I was 17: one was The Patriot (I can hear Homeland Security buzzing over my apartment as we speak…../sarc) and the other was something that I THOUGHT was a documentary about Rudolph Valentino, but got halfway through before I realized WHOA! This is no documentary! OMG My virgin eyes! Yeah, that was an experience.
You know, you have a point…… one of the better defenses for gay marriage I've heard (and I'm one of those people who doesn't care what the state's policy on the matter is as long as they don't dictate to religion what they can and cannot accept) is "It doesn't have anything to do with you; it doesn't hurt you, so why do you care if two dudes get married?" This can be turned right around on them in any situation involving sexual decisions: If it's MY decision to wait for sex until marriage, why should you care? I'm not harming you in any way. In fact, studies demonstrate that my choice will probably produce some better-adjusted children some day who will cause you fewer headaches should you ever run into them….. so perhaps you should be encouraging my choice instead of denigrating it.
Excellent point, Holly. Obviously, you said it more concisely than I could.
Adventureland was about a 22-year old. Unless we've started stretching the definition of 'teen', I don't think that qualifies.
Agreed, this drives me nuts. This is, in fact, why I liked 300 so much: the men in that movie were MEN, the women were women, and both were strong, but in completely different ways. I LOVED the depiction of that marriage – they were equals, and they each admired the unique qualities about the other.
This is also why they're going to struggle to cast John Galt in the Atlas Shrugged movie…. he's a manly man, and there aren't many of those in Hollywood.
To begin, let me paraphrase a quote from one of my favorites from the good ol' days, Chico Marx: Who am I going to believe, you or my own eyes? See, I was there, alive, back in that alleged hellhole where every woman was chained to her stove, every homosexual was hounded into suicide, every leftwinger was sent to a gulag somewhere, and from every lamppost dangled a lynched minority member. You know, that racist, sexist horror that we used to call the good ol' days.
Funny how the people who actually lived through that period don't remember it that way. I remember a time when you could send a five year old to the corner store without worrying that he'd be kidnapped. Nowadays, sending your kids out to play in the street will get you a call from the local CPS. I remember when women didn't talk about a "rape epidemic" as they do now, because there simply wasn't one, back in those horrible sexist days when women were able to walk the streets at night with impunity. And yes people had pre-marital sex in those days, but that was called an indiscretion, not a healthy, happy lifestyle choice. See, people used to have this quaint idea called a Moral Sense, which helped us create a framework for dealing with one another, which, even according to Kinsey's skewed statistics (most of the men were overseas in the 40s and 50s, you know, fighting wars), seemed to work for the majority of people. Does the new system of everyone doing whatever they want work as well for as many?
And yes, I do believe that I'm entitled to all the money I earn, which nowadays in this golden era of tolerance and sexual promiscuity for everyone is considered a radical notion. Silly me.
Is there anything in this world that doesn't get force fit into a false dichotomy? And of all the psychologically, emotionally and spiritually meaningful things to a human being, we do it with SEX?
The options in determining what's right for an individual's sex life are broader than (a) get laid as early and as often as possible or (b) save yourself to marriage. I believe both of these world views is damaging to people.
Sex does mean SOMETHING. It can be one of the most intense bonding experiences two people can share with each other. It's the only human need you cannot supply for yourself. That's something really powerful you can share with someone. And let's not forget the potential to bring life into this world.
On the other hand, it doesn't mean EVERYTHING. Sometimes, it's just a primal, intense lust-filled romp in the hay. The idea you should save yourself until marriage is unrealistic, and truthfully, not good for marriage. It leads people to marry too young, a problem enough in itself, but it also puts a tremendous amount of pressure of your sex life. It takes forever to get comfortable with yourself, with the idea and you will always wonder if you "missed out" (note: you probably didn't, you just don't have the toolset to fix your current sex life).
This is an issue that really gets to me. You can do a lot of damage to a kid by brainwashing them towards an extreme, particularly with something like sex.
O'Rourke was ALSO much funnier before he started taking sides.
It is the "end all, be all of life." Especially "be all of life," what is the point of a species? To continue the species through subsequent generations, and that is accomplished with sex.
If you had a point, it would probably be that our culture has turned sex into an act of pleasure or recreation, not an act of species proliferation.
there is a difference between sex and making love, and our culture has forgotten that. I do appreciate your critique. Thanks!
You're doing it wrong.
"Chico Marx: Who am I going to believe, you or my own eyes?"
The quote is "well who are you going to believe, me or your own eyes" indicating she should believe him.
"I remember when women didn't talk about a "rape epidemic" as they do now, because there simply wasn't one"
True. There "simply aren't" any homosexuals in Iran either, as dear old Mahmoud Ahmadinejad says. Perhaps you would rather go live there. I'm sure there "simply isn't" any rape of women there either.
What if your daughters are really really horny?
To paraphrase: "Why does it bother you so much that some people have decided TO rush into having sex? What's it to you? It's not affecting you in any way. I'm sure you can find plenty of people who share your views and are willing to NOT have sex with you, so why the nasty comments?"
So "woah, that was a really bad idea of mine way back when, better try to warn my kid not to do that" is hypocrisy?
Odd, I thought it was called experience or even wisdom.
Context: discourse that surrounds a language unit and helps to determine its interpretation.
The fact that my comment was in reply to another comment suggests context. It would probably benefit you in the future if you read what I was responding to before responding to my comment. In other words, understand the context of the comment. It deals with Zac Efron promoting abstinence, then hanging out with naked ladies. Kind of doesn't make a whole lot of sense and it's also not realistic for him as a person to abstain from sex as whole, but it does cast his message into a weird light – that being, "do as I say, not as I do,"
In my experience, teenagers don't really handle that kind of logic well. Your own discussions with your children aren't particularly relevant to my comment, nor was I suggesting that they were hypocritical. How could I? I do not know you, or anything about you.
Well, you might wish to consider the term "hypothetical" as well.
Well, you might wish to consider the term "hypothetical" as well.
That's right, the original quote was "Who are you going to believe, me or your own eyes," which Chico said to Groucho, who wasn't actually a "she." If you'd read my comment, you'd see that I said I was paraphrasing, not quoting. Paraphrasing is a big word; perhaps you might want to check a dictionary to see what it means.
Also, why are people who want to believe that things are much better now so very, very angry? If things are so much better, why aren't you happier? And why do you believe the only solution to a rape epidemic is Islamic fundamentalism? Young people today…
Anne – have you read the posts? The nasty comments are coming from people who are critical of waiting to have sex until you're married or at least emotionally mature enough to handle it. Nice try at trying to deflect the criticism back to the conservatives, but it won't fly. If you personally want to have hot monkey sex at the age of 15, go for it, it really doesn't bother me (except when I'm expected to pay for your illegitimate children through social welfare programs), all I ask is that you respect my decision to abstain. In case you hadn't noticed, the intolerance is coming from the liberals, not the conservatives.
MARRY ME!
If you're so tolerant why are some on your side calling girls who DO choose to have sex young sl*ts?
Yes, but even as a member of the hard left I have no qualms in saying PETA are completely crazy. I mean, sea kittens? SEA KITTENS? What an utter waste of energy, time and money. Not to mention all the "I'd rather go naked than wear fur" ads. Like that'll stop people. If you're defining civility in sex as freedom from pressure to have or not have sex and freedom from rape, I definitely agree, they should preach it.
[...] Statistics Prove Condoms Ineffective Against HIV; Virginity’s for suckers. Get your sex on, kids! …. [...]
What about Captain Kirk tho? There is a BIG HOLLYWOOD HERO, like maybe no other, that certainly gets his Interstellar (and Interracial) jiggy on like where no one has gone before!
[...] Statistics Prove Condoms Ineffective Against HIV; Virginity’s for suckers. Get your sex on, kids! …. [...]
My wife and I just watched "Say Anything…" again for about the hundredth time, and we noticed that when the the two main characters "do the deed" it is the first time for both of them. They are both high school graduates and virgins! It's a really big deal to the characters and represents a distinct shift in their relationship. Sure they aren't married, but at least they waited until they were out of high school. Actually, the one girl in the movie who had sex early, Corey, is the one who is portyrayed as emotionally unstable and kooky. It just shows how much Hollywood has changed in 20 years.
Dumbest thing I've heard today. I don't think it's a good idea to encourage people to just follow their biological urges.
I can relate to this post in many ways.
I'm 18. I'm a Christian and I've never had a boyfriend. Never even been kissed, let alone had sex. I can still remember freshmen year of high school, thinking there was something terribly wrong with me. Now, however I am proud of all of these things. I see girls my age all the time who have had tons of boyfriends, had sex, gotten pregnant, you name it. And I get sad, and then I get mad.
The messages teens are recieving through Hollywood are all wrong. Hollywood doesn't portray sex as an intimate act designed for marriage. Which is what I believe it is. It's usually something that can be given away on the first date and usually has no consequences.
I could go on forever about this topic but I think I've said enough for now. Hollywood isn't oblivious to the messages they're sending. They have a purpose. They think sex is cheap and they know it sells.
Absolutely, CA!
The realities you are talking about, specifically that human beings have bodies that beg to have sex and
brains that can plan ahead, is called natural law.
You must be logged in to post a comment.