Change? Not so Far: Our Border Drug War Still Rages
by Gary A. “Rusty” Fleming Jr.The year 2009 has been hyped by the media and political elites as the year of “change” in America. I’ve been filming and reporting on the drug war being waged in Mexico and along our southwest border for over four years and as far as the first six months of 2009 go, even though a lot has happened in that time, not much has changed. On the surface it would seem progress has been made and indeed positive steps have been taken by both the U.S. and Mexican governments. But looking beyond the stories and stats reveals something uglier and more severe that has even the experts questioning the current strategy.
One thing I’ve learned in documenting the drug war is that statistics alone don’t tell the story and for a true picture you have to dig beyond the numbers and the hype to draw a real conclusion of whether progress is being made or not.
The current death toll for this year in Mexico’s war against the cartels just peaked over 2,400. This is about the same number of narco-executions as last year at this time and at this pace we will probably exceed last years toll of 5,400. No real change there. But if you drill down on this number what you find is staggering as it relates to the number of law enforcement officials in the execution tally. Though the exact number of local municipal police is not known for certain because many of the narcos dress up like police to conduct operations, it is reported by intelligence sources that over 1/4 or 600 of these executions have been local, state and federal law enforcement agents. Since the first of the year, thirty-one active federal agents alone have been killed in Mexico.
To put that into perspective can you imagine the media blitz and public outcry that would occur if thirty-one FBI agents had been gunned down in the streets of America this year?
Next, the use of the military to prosecute this war by Mexican President Calderon has for the first time in decades, actually put the cartels in a corner and thus a position of having to defend themselves. But a close look at this strategy proves that this is having mixed results at best. In March of this year President Calderon dispatched the army to the border city of Juarez to restore law and order back to a region that had become the murder capital of the western hemisphere. The murder rate immediately dropped 96%, but by April there were 63 murders reported in the Juarez area and despite the presence of nearly 10,000 military and federal personnel in Juarez, there were still 10 homicides during one 2-day span in that month.
The situation across Mexico does not seem to be improving but rather shifting. Like the proverbial story of plugging the leaking dam with your fingers-you plug one hole and two more spring up just a few feet away. As the military and federal forces continue to apply pressure on the narco-terrorists, violent outbreaks in regions once thought “safe” from the narco-war, start to rear their ugly head. This past weekend military and federal agents in the resort mecca of Acapulco engaged a group of armed gunmen in a gun fight that broke out just a block away from Los Flamingos, the same resort where the rich and famous frequently spend their downtime.
Once the battle began the armed gangsters sped off to a safe-house located in yet another “high rent” district within the city limits and there, federal forces engaged in a six hour shoot-out with the assailants where they exchanged over 3000 rounds fired from automatic assault rifles and 50 fragment grenades detonated. Sixteen assailants and two soldiers lost their lives that day.
Some in the American media were shocked to see this but what so many people don’t realize is that these resort cities are major ports of entry that are home to major shipping lanes. These same lanes of open commerce are perfect camouflage for the cartels multi-ton shipments of South American cocaine and heroin, military grade weapons from countries such as Venezuela, and precursor chemicals from Asian countries for the manufacturing of methamphetamines. These ports are worth billions to the cartel businessmen who pay millions of dollars each month to the para-military soldiers they employ to guard these ports and the wares being shipped through them.
As the second half of 2009 unfolds we are no doubt going to see more and more of these outbreaks in cities once thought of as “off limits” to narco-terror.
One point I should explain is that the main reason we see six hour gunfights in the streets of Mexico and not here, has more to do with corruption than any other single component. When U.S. law enforcement engages in taking down a criminal organization such as the narco-insurgent cell in Acapulco, it is a highly refined, intelligence driven operation, many times involving numerous other agencies from all levels. Close tabs are kept and often times weeks or even months will pass before the actual takedown is ordered. This is accomplished because the information about their operation has little chance of being leaked to the narcos they are pursuing. On the other hand in Mexico, once intelligence is given to the forces that are charged with pursing the narcos they sometimes only have a few minutes or hours to act on it or it will certainly be leaked to the narcos. This makes up for much of the open violence we are seeing in Mexico today and since the corruption within the ranks of the Mexican agencies at every level exceed even what the Calderon administration thought existed-violent outbreaks like this are not likely to change anytime soon either.
The violence in the U.S. has not reached anywhere near this level but by no means does that equate to an unaffected United States. What happens in Mexico has a very profound and deep impact on many aspects of American life. Starting with law enforcement and security, the Mexican drug cartels remain the greatest organizational threat to the United States and our national security.
There is not one major city in America that is not seeing the presence and residual of the narco-insurgency that is quickly taking over the drug running, extortion, murder and other criminal enterprises from what used to be reserved for the old mafia and modern American street gangs. This is one change that will be catastrophic for many in our country.
How about border security? Change? Well again we have to look closely and go beyond the stats. Yes illegal immigration is down, but there has been no decrease in the amount of drugs coming into the US. And the fact that illegal immigration is down begs the question; is the border fence really the reason why or is it due to our ailing economy and the fact that we are starting to enforce the rule of law with regard to that issue in this country?
How about drug consumption? Change? According to government stats it’s at the same percentage rate as it was 20 years ago, so even by that stat there is no change. But they failed to note that we have 100 million more people living here than 20 years ago thus another 1,000,000 people addicted to drugs in this country.
These are not assertions and hollow allegations by Rusty Fleming. These are all well documented facts as stated by the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security as well as the Drug Threat Assessment report for 2009. All of these agencies combined with the top criminal justice and gang experts from around the country, all agree on one point, the narco-terror machine that is tearing up Mexico and many other Latin American countries today, is alive and well in the United States of America and their current trend of growing and expanding shows no signs of change.







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
36 Comments
In the US it's never been as much a war, than a concerted police action. In a war one would lay waste to complete city blocks without much concern about collateral damage. This truly is a conundrum. On one hand, in the US, we must consider civil liberties, on the other we must consider the vast damage of the drug culture. This is one issue where I cannot even pretend to have the answer. Legalization is not an option.
Thank you Mr Fleming. Your article exposes another layer of media complicity in Obama's Oz.. We are in the Matrix and the progressives are the Agents. When was the last time a prime time documentary was shown discussing the cartels and the drug wars and their infiltration of and danger to the US? Why is Napolitano not in the news every day over this issue? Where is the public concern? If you don't live along the border you probably think Mexico's drug problem is under control. By not reporting the major networks are not bringing to America's attention security issues that would upset the progressive's apple cart. A campaign to promote English as the country's official language is again struggling to find attention. The progressives hate the idea of America defined. They want America to be everything to all people and therefore nothing to anybody. Issues like border vulnerability, people, drug, and gun smuggling, gang activities, and the drug wars should be factual and frequent if the conservative media would like to expose the threats to the country and the lack of effective, efficient government intervention.
recent statisitics show that since the wall/National Guard actions over the last year, street purity of cocaine is @42%, as compared to 60% several years ago. Decreased purity hurts casual use heavily, so one must assume that strides are being made. Most marijuana is grown in the US, so that's not really the problem.
Not to mention the rampant decriminilization of said substance; which along with domestic cultivation we actually approve of…
We also believe legalization is not the answer; it's unintended consequences would include far more addiction, and increased public intoxication and dangerous behavior, traffic fatalities and whatnot…
I must respectfully break with fellow conservatives concerning the "War on Drugs." We have to face the simple economic fact that there is a real (and inexplicable) demand for controlled substances and that our current policy of interdiction and elimination simply plays right into the hands of our enemies. The violence in Mexico and the power of the drug cartels are not the result of drugs themselves but the mountains of cash generated by drugs. The drug trade is the quintessential black market and the vast sums of cash it generates do nothing but help prop up gangsters like Chavez in Venezuala and Morales in Bolivia. The gargantuan profits of the trade make it inevitable that there will always be evil men ready to move i and take fantastic risks to suppply their merchandise.. If we legalize most controlled substances we will shut off this flow of cash to these barbarians. I would much rather have Upjohn and Pfizer supplying these substances than the Cali Cartel. It would be a bitter pill to swallow (so to speak) and the amount of addiction in the US would certainly rise. Nevertheless I think that we must look facts in the face and decide on real and fundamental changes in our drug policy.
[...] Change? Not so Far: Our Border Drug War Still Rages by Rusty Fleming [...]
I don't believe marijuana is a gateway drug in the sense that using it will inevitably lead to the use of heavier drugs per se. I do however believe that it IS a gateway drug in this sense; the dealers that sell pot will gladly sell you coke or smack etc., or point you to someone who will. So buying pot on the street is the gateway to access of harder stuff. If pot were legalized outright, or home growth was permitted plenty of potheads would never come into contact with users and dealers of the harder stuff. I think this is worth a try.
Agreed, but instead of letting sanity prevail, they are putting tobacco in the same illegal context. Soon, they'll be more black market cigarettes sold than taxed. If you try to legislate behavior, people will find other means. It doesn't work – even back in the 30's and prohibition – and yet they never learn.
I agree, I no longer use tobacco but, I have started growing it in my garden just so I have access for the black market.
I think many of us are starting to lean in your direction jhshub, I am retired law enforcement who spent most of my time working narcotics. It's time to try something different.
1 in 2 teenagers in the U.S. has smoked a joint within the last 30 days.. There is nothing inexplicable about it at all. It's all that nice cozy "tolerence" the libs are always yapping about.
We *must* legalize marijuana.
According to the ONDCP, 60 – 70% of the cartel's income comes solely from marijuana sales in the U.S. Legalizing marijuana will therefore strip the cartels of 60 – 70% of their income and bankrupt them. No business could survive a loss like that!
Legalization is the only way for us to win the drug war. The cartels have corrupted the Mexican police and government, and now the troops sent in to fix the problem are themselves accepting cartel bribes and committing rape, murder and torture with immunity from the Mexican military justice system. The amount of marijuana money the cartels receive is so great that we will not be safe until it is eliminated.
Seventy years of prohibition in this country has resulted in 15 million regular marijuana users, and a further 100 million people who acknowledge they have obtained and consumed marijuana during the prohibition. The prohibition is NOT reducing marijuana use!
Legalizing the production and sale of marijuana to adults will end the cartel murders, end drug dealers in our schools and end the easy access children have to marijuana.
An estimated 3,000 people will be murdered by the cartels during the second half of this year. These are lives that would be saved if we legalized marijuana today. We *must* legalize marijuana!
While I agree that we should consider legalizing Marijuana, you have two major logical falicies in your arguments.
The first is that legalization would cut out the cartel's profits. This is not only unprovable, but unlikely. The cartel's won't stop selling pot just because it's been made legal, nor will we be able to stop "unlicensed distributors" or any such thing like that. It would take years, perhaps decades, for a normal market to supplant the current black market for pot, and so, while some of their income might dry up, it wouldn't be the entirety of it.
The second is claiming that prohibition has had no affect on the number of people who've used or tried pot. The reason for this is you simply cannot know the numbers of people who would have tried or used pot without prohibition of the substance. Not unless you have access to a device that can look into parallel universes.
That said, I agree that we should look at, minimally, decriminalizing pot, and honestly, I think it should just be legalized across the board.
legalization brings a whole host of unintended consequenses with it; most notably the imprimatur of society's approval. Being a psychoactive substance, motor vehicle use will become hugely more dangerous- don't think for a second folk wouldn't use pot all of the time- and that's just one factor…
De-criminilization makes FAR more sense. Most marijuana is grown not in Mexico, but in the US…
It's the 1930's and Al Capone all over again. Only now I guess it's Juan Capone. If people want it, they'll always find a way to get it.
I have been torn lately over this issue, leaning towards the legalization a little myself. Never used it, never will, I'm as conservative as they come; -but the war on drugs is not working, one has to admit. We're between a rock and a hard place right now.
Legalizing marijuana won't "win" anything anymore than legalizing alcohol did. Now we simply have 40 million legal alcoholics in this country and higher death rates on the highways along with all sorts of other nasty numbered statistics like spousal abuse and divorce rates and drop outs and work productivity loss and so forth. Drugs and alcohol (addiction in general) are modern man's answer to slavery and the same people who are doing it now illegally will simply do it legally once you legalize it. Point is, there will always be consequence as long as people use them..
You're right of course- everyone will lose no matter what we do (or don't do, it seems). I wish we could go back to serious law enforcement- yes, I mean getting deadly serious with traffickers, or it will never be eradicated. But our legal system has made that impossible, so I guess we will forever have this problem.
The reality is that the war on drugs is more complex than most people realize. The dealers know how much they can have on them to go from misdemeanor to felony. Law enforcement can routinely bust the local dealers but more replace them because of the money. I may not be a fan of the death penalty, but if drug dealers were executed instead of jailed, the risks may outweigh the reward. The other consideration is that drug possession combined with a gun possession should increase the crime to a felony as well. Dealers are likely to have both, users not quite as much.
Nice to see the thoughtful comments regarding legalization (or decriminalization of narcotics.) The political class is always identifying problems and then promising "cost free" solutions that won't inconvenience anyone. (Mr. Obama seems prone to this trap.) As far as drugs go there are no perfect policy solutions. It's as simple as that. Anything that we do will have both foreseeable and unintended consequences. Those in power have a responsibility to opt for policies that maximize public benefits while keeping the social costs as low as possible. If those costs are unpopular then they should have the moral courage to defend them. The social, economic and (dare I say it?) moral advantages of legalization seem to far outweigh the inevitable costs. Again this is not a pretty decision but it is the right one.
Will Obama place himself under arrest? Oh, I forgot he was a "God" therefore above the law.
"The social, economic and (dare I say it?) moral advantages of legalization seem to far outweigh the inevitable costs. Again this is not a pretty decision but it is the right one. "
Only if you think the United States of Amsterdam is an attractive notion… I don't personally… Although I am not against making it all legal in Las Vegas and then building a border fence around the city.. Go ahead and do drugs all you want there and when you complete rehab and demonstrate a year of sobriety we'll let you back out.. What happens in Vegas should STAY in Vegas. lol
"The United States of Amsterdam" puts it in a nutshell. Holland has discovered (surprise, surprise) that legalization has resulted in more criminal influence, not less.
I smoked pot for 40 years, and would have agreed with the proponents of legalization – right up until I started living in an area where high-end bud is a significant, if not the primary, engine of the economy. Having lived all over the country in urban and rural situations, as well as having been everything from a blue collar guy to a computer guy to a professional musician, I figured I was hip to it all.
Silly me. The level of casual criminality in a drug-based economy is staggering, and the corruption noted in Fleming's article makes itself evident in every single transaction you face. Period. The results of multiple generations of drug use aren't very pretty, either, and situational ethics are the order of the day. The Mexican narco-gangsters are heavily entrenched in both marijuana cultivation and methamphetamine production, despite the fact that marijuana is essentially legal here through "prescriptions" for medical pot that allow the growth of 25 plants per "patient." (The outside possibility exists, by the way, that that equals 25 pounds or more a year worth $4-5k a pound. And of course no one would grow more than the allotted 25 plants, now would they?)
Anybody who thinks legalization is going to lower the instance of criminality is living in a cloud of denial. There is absolutely no evidence that US law enforcement is doing anything but losing ground to the pot and meth producers. Why would anyone believe that the US Government would be able to rein in the gangsters who have already created the infrastructure of a multimillion-dollar-a-year business simply by making it legal?
This is a painful, painful question, and one that doesn't admit of simple answers. Hollering "Ollie-Ollie-Oxen- Free" doesn't qualify as addressing the issue, though.
Of course the cartels will stop selling pot, their customers will desert them for the LEGAL, safe and attractive "marijuana bars" (or whatever we want to call them) that open up. Answer us this question Peregry, when was the last time you bought your beer from "some guy" selling out the back of his car?
We do a great job of stopping "unlicensed distributors" of tobacco and alcohol today, what makes you think marijuana will be any different? People want quality, they want to know that their herb hasn't been laced with lead, glass and hairspray, what better way to do that than to buy the lower-priced, quality-guaranteed herb sold at the legal marijuana stores? Legalization will decimate the cartels in exactly the same way legalization of alcohol destroyed the gangsters 75 years ago.
Actually we can know the impact the prohibition has had on marijuana use. Everywhere that's moved to legalize marijuana (including Amsterdam) has seen a reduction in use, NOT an increase. Legalization makes marijuana much harder for kids to obtain because it drives out illegal sellers and forces the legal sellers to card their customers, just like with tobacco and alcohol today.
And even if we did not know, as you claim, is that justification for the continued arrest of 2,000 people every *day*? Or the continued shooting of family pets by SWAT teams? Or the no-knock raids? Or the alienation of our police forces from our young people? Or the denial of sick and dying people to the medicine that works for them?
Marijuana prohibition is significantly more harmful that marijuana could ever be! Marijuana's production and sale to adults must be legalized. It must be allowed to be sold in bars under exactly the same laws as alcohol.
Our president – and let's face it – the past President – paid no attention to this even as it spills over the border. it's as if those in Washington just couldn't care about anything real – they just play around with politics in some weird sort of Washington culture that has nothing to do with the real world. I think that the left thought that this clown that's in now could really "change" things but all we got was another brand of the same thing. What's it going to take before someone DOES something? We really do have the worst of the worst in Washington. How could such a great people produce such poor leaders?
But what we don't have are running gun battles in our streets as illegal alcohol suppliers kill each other securing lucrative alcohol markets. Disputes between rival breweries are settled in court, not on the street.
Rival brands sell alongside each other in stores today, and the death rate caused by illegal alcohol suppliers is zero.
That's the success of legalizing the production and sale of alcohol to adults. The exact same thing will be achieved when we legalize the production and sale of marijuana to adults.
In the second half of this year an estimated 3,000 people will die at the hands of the cartels in order to secure their drug profits. If we legalized marijuana today the vast majority of these people would still be alive come Christmas. Everybody who supports the prohibition supports the continuation of these savage murders. Give these people a break, end the prohibition!
How can you make that statement, Rob? Amsterdam never legalized the production of marijuana so where do you think all the herb comes from that's sold in the coffeeshops? ..illegal sources of course!
It's an absolutely ludicrous situation! Who in their right mind would allow a product to be sold but then not allow it to be produced? The only place that's available to meet demand is illegal sources. But even still it's a better system than ours, the Netherlands is now closing prisons due to lack of prisoners. Crime is down and people are safer because of their system, and when they legalize production they'll drive out the criminal gangs altogether.
And the story you tell about the criminality and corruption in a "drug-based economy" was observed by you during a period of prohibition. Do you observe the same levels of criminality and corruption associated with the legal tobacco and alcohol markets? Of course not, because they are legal.
The legal alcohol market "works", the legal tobacco market "works", and both of these products are mass killers. A legal marijuana market will also "work", and unlike the alcohol and tobacco, marijuana has never killed anybody.
Anyone who is against a change in the laws is simply asking for more of the same. The War on Drugs is, has and will always be a dismal and sicking failure in American history.
The ONLY solution is legalization. Just as it was with alcohol prohibition, so it is with the prohibition of Cannabis.
The proof that legalization is the ONLY solution is that the powers that be are willing to discuss it.
You're dead right man!
I just can't see where the confusion is. People say to me "you're wrong, learn the facts" but they never once cite even one source to back up their statements.
The cartels openly and blatantly murder both their opponents and innocent people in order to intimidate law enforcement into leaving them alone. They're open about their reasons for these killings – they confess it when they're caught, they send notes to police officers telling them and they put signs up around their cities boasting of it. They kill to protect their drug profits.
60 – 70% of their profits come from marijuana. So when we legalize marijuana, with the same restrictions as alcohol and tobacco, we'll eliminate 60 – 70% of the cartel's income and that will END the murders.
If anyone can prove otherwise then please cite your sources – don't just post unsubstantiated opinion.
The FDA wants to regulate tobacco right out of existence and it is essentially becoming illegal because it causes cancer. Pot is much more carcinogenic than tobacco, plus it sucks the energy and ambition right out of chronic users. Not to mention the potential public health/weight issues due to people getting the "munchies" and eating every bit of junkfood they can stuff in their faces. Why are we in the process of criminalizing tobacco, only to decriminalize a potentially much more harmful substance?
Nonsense. First of all the FDA is NOT trying to make tobacco illegal. A prohibition on tobacco would be a stupid, deadly failure just as the prohibition on alcohol was and the prohibition on marijuana is.
Basic economics will tell you that where there's demand there will always be supply to fill it. If you make a product illegal the demand doesn't magically go away, it's simply diverted to illegal suppliers. That's a simple truism of economics and is why prohibition does not work.
And as far as "pot is more carcinogenic", yes it very well might contain more carcinogenic chemicals, but it also contains something that not only prevents them from causing cancer but that removes cancerous cells from our body. That's why marijuana doesn't cause cancer and is why cancer rates don't go up with an increase in marijuana use.
And as to your last point, many athletes enjoy marijuana. Many successful business people do too. People who sit around eating junk food all day may or may not be marijuana users. You can't enforce a policy on our society that causes 2,000 arrests a day and 6,000 brutal murders a year just because some people haven't learned yet how to look after themselves!
Education and legalization for adults will keep people safe and end the horrific and obscene cartel murders.
It doesn't matter how draconian you make the sentences, there will ALWAYS be someone else willing to take the risk. Keeping it illegal keeps it in the hands of criminals. The more you clamp down on them the more you drive up prices and profits. The result is worse and worse criminals are drawn into the market for the higher and higher profits you're creating.
Is that really your long-term goal?
I cannot find a government source other than Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard that provides this 65 percent profit figure for marijuana in Mexican cartels. Can someone provide a link to an official government report? Honestly I am claiming ignorance on this topic, I would like proof. On the surface it sounds slightly off-base. Isn't cocaine many times more profitable?
I'm on the fence about this issue myself. Culturally, I don't know what legalization does. No, it won't be Reefer Madness, but it will have an effect, and perhaps a not desirable one. Do pro-legalization people really want marijuana to go the way of cigarettes, federally regulated and taxed to kingdom come? Is the bloated government sticking their fat hand in another pie the answer? How about just de-criminalization?
Why aren't the Democrats decrying the violence in Mexico like they do the violence in Iraq? To Democrats, is violence in foreign countries acceptable as long as Americans are not being killed?
Obama is open to illegal drugs. Read Obama's book about how much Obama enjoyed MaryJane and cocaine with his alcohol.
It was from John Walters, the last head of the ONDCP. He stated that figure near the beginning of last year:
http://tr.im/oEnB
"American drug users are paying ruthless Mexican kingpins nearly $14 billion annually for their meth, heroin, cocaine and especially marijuana – monies that are helping fund an unprecedented bloody turf war that's threatening Mexican institutions, the White House drug czar said.
John P. Walters, director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, said marijuana, not heroin or cocaine, is the "bread and butter," "the center of gravity" for Mexican drug cartels that every year smuggle tons of it through the porous U.S.-Mexico border.
Of the $13.8 billion that Americans contributed to Mexican drug traffickers in 2004-05, about 62 percent, or $8.6 billion, comes from marijuana consumption. "
Put me in charge of the war on drugs and the illegal immigration issue and we'll have those to little irritations sorted out, pronto. Oh, BTW, I'll need some help from my buddies in Special Forces…
…those two little…
You must be logged in to post a comment.