“The Greatest Organizational Threat to the United States”
by Gary A. “Rusty” Fleming Jr.That statement ought to be a wake-up call for every citizen and politician in America today. Even though the mainstream media has only recently pounced on this statement, you should know that it has been posted on the DEA website since 2005 where I found it while researching my “Drug Wars” documentary. The “greatest organizational threat” the Department of Justice is referring to are the men who make up the four primary cartels operating in Mexico and the United States today: the Gulf cartel, the Sinaloa cartel, the Juarez cartel and the Pacific cartel.
Now, it is important to understand that these organizations are primarily in the business of selling narcotics. You have to look at this the way they do—it’s like any other multi-billion dollar business, in that it seeks to make a profit on the manufacture and distribution of goods. The making, growing, selling, and delivery of their products are all part of their internal operations. Pretty much everything else they do is ancillary operations to support that end, and those are the operations they outsource. That includes most of their dirty work—the collections, kidnappings, torture, and assassinations—which they contract out to paramilitary gangs,which are put together piecemeal or recruited directly from gangs such as MS-13, los Zetas, and others.
Many people have asked me what is it that makes these cartels so different and so much more inherently dangerous than in previous years. One word: “organization.” As I go around the country and speak on the subject of narco-terrorism I always begin by telling my audiences, “these are not your daddy’s cartels.” It is, without a doubt, the biggest single mistake law enforcement and government officials make when they are trying to assess the situation along our border and how to deal with the drug cartels.
This is not drug dealing as usual. These organizations are so highly “organized” they rival their legitimate counter-parts at most major companies in America. Obviously it wouldn’t take much to jump over the bar set by GM, Chrysler and AIG these days but you have to remember even those companies are operating openly, in a world of free trade and legitimacy. What does it say about a company that has billions of dollars in revenue, no open accounting system, thousands of employees world-wide, and has never spent one dime in advertising and never lost money? They have managed to stay ahead of the entities they are at war with (rival cartels and law enforcement worldwide) in technology, operations, and weaponry through the worst of economic environments and at the same time grow their business.
Like any CEO of a Fortune 500 company, these drug lords have sought to expand their profitability and there are two primary ways to accomplish that end; decreasing expenses and increasing income.
The decreasing of expenses—Lead is cheaper than Silver
Through violence and public acts of brutality—using bullets and fear instead of hard cash when it comes to the corrupting of police, judges, and politicians.
The increase of income—Wholesale to Retail
In years past the cartels have worked in partnerships with American Street gangs to distribute large quantities of narcotics but now—be it through merger or murder, they are assuming more and more direct control over the retail sales of narcotics in the U.S. (the same wholesale market that is valued at $15-$40 Billion turned into $150-$200 Billion retail).
Taking these factors into consideration and adding the fact that once a DTO is in total control of the region they are fighting for, such as the Laredo corridor, they instantly move into extorting legitimate businesses to compliment their operations (trucking companies, customs brokerage firms, money exchange houses and car dealerships) and for money laundering (banking and real-estate).
They train their operatives with the finest military training available on the planet. The core group of men commanding Los Zetas, for example, is trained and outfitted with sophisticated weaponry: automatic assault rifles, heavy-caliber machine guns, bombs, and grenade launchers. They are experts in explosives, GPS technology, wiretapping, and counterintelligence and they have standing orders to kill anyone who interferes with the delivery of their loads.
I have the only interview of one the young men featured in AC360’s piece last week about young assassins who were recruited by the Zetas at the age of 13. Recruitment of young teenagers into gangs is nothing new, but giving them para-military training and state of the art weaponry is. This new wave of young recruits is giving the narcos in Mexico the best of operational circumstances and giving us our worst nightmare, a bumper crop of highly trained and highly motivated domestic terrorists that come from among our own families.
To see what we are up against, just combine the virtually unlimited financial resources of the drug lords with a group of killers trained in anti-drug warfare, and you end up with an efficient, well-equipped force that will stop at nothing to complete its mission.
For more please visit: www.drugwarsthemovie.com







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
59 Comments
I wonder what the easiest way to put them out of business would be? Hmmm… let me think… I'll come to me.
No worries Rusty, the revenue hungry Obamatons will save us. The titans of Detroit and Wall Street didn't last 90 days, so don't tell me these narco-punks have what it takes to resist the federal government's inevitable co-option of this uber-profitable form of private enterprise. Sure, customer service and product quality will go down the tubes as prices go through the roof, but that's just the price we will all have to pay for "progress”. It's all good!
Wait, I think I figured it out: placate them by making millions of their countrymen legal?
Put them out of business? I say grant them immunity and put them in the Treasury Department.
Does anyone really think that Tim Geitner has a better handle on how capitalism works than these guys?
I can guaranty these cartel bosses understand capitalism WAY better than Geithner and Obama. It's unfettered money making, stomping and killing any threats that get in the way. It's for government to put a little selective brakes to it, not take it over.
Ok, I don't want to spend too much time in the conspiracy theory department, but perhaps the answer to controlling the narco business and all other types of commerce, both illegal and maybe even legal, will be to go to a cashless world in which all transactions are handled electronically and can be monitored by 3rd parties. A cashless world was one endtime prophecy that I learned as a young evangelical, but it seemed so far off when ATms were new in the 70s and nobody had heard of the internet yet. But now the idea does seem to be actionable, especially when you include the concept of a world currency. Now don't get me started with ID numbers somehow permanently adhered to each person (RFID anyone?) which was one sign of the beast that we were also warned not to accept, and that will usher in the end of the world, having nothing to do with global warming. Happy Sunday, everyone!
I disagree. ACORN is a greater and more existential threat to the United States than any armed group.
Well, it is mostly our fault for giving them the guns… just ask Hillary!
Meanwhile, officials don't think anything is wrong! See http://www.elpasotimes.com/ci_12033826
But, things are from from fine….go to youtube and search on 'Mexican Incursions into the US'
Being from the great state of TX… this disturbs me very much.
Well, it is mostly our fault for giving them the guns… just ask Hillary!
Meanwhile, officials don't think anything is wrong! See http://www.elpasotimes.com/ci_12033826
But, things are from from fine….go to youtube and search on 'Mexican Incursions into the US'
Being from the great state of TX… this disturbs me very much.
If you'all haven't seen Rusty's movie, do so. I saw it in a humanities class at U.T. El Paso taught by Dr. Howard Campbell, a much respected expert on the drug wars in Juarez and Mexico in general, we are literally on the front lines of the crossborder drug wars. It's not for the squemish, severed heads and much gore, but it's neccessary to the story. Rusty has shown extrordinary courage making this film, let's all see it and learn the facts of the death and destruction going on there everyday. It's tragic, and it could come across our border, it's easy to breach. Just like TINA FEY, I can see Juarez, Chih.,Mexico from my front porch. I was asked to help out on Dr. Campbell's new book but had previous committments, but Dr. Campbell is an expert on the subject, it's at the publisher right now, and will be a definitive book on the subject, watch for it.
Dual threats from divergent sources, but good point. We won't be conquered in a conventional way, it's happening from the inside. We should make legal immigration by Muslims from various Middle East almost impossible to happen. Let's learn from England's mistakes.
THe wonderous quality people have is that of adaptation. There are no real barracades to the inventive mind. For example, how many of us really belived we'd have an out in out socialist sleeping in the White House as an elected POTUS? It's unbelieveable but true!
Oh wait, oh wait, oh wait, lemme think… Hmmmm.. I'm really straining myself… Oh, yeah, it's coming to me… (Something about the phrase "Gimme Eat!", quoth General __ De Coverly…)
Woooo. That was tough reading. I sure hope I can make it through Fleming's DVD. I'll thave to ake a shot of Tequila first to steady the nerves. The Tequila won't be because the drug lords scare me – what scares me are the blind, deaf, brainless morons who are supposed to 'fight' them.
Maybe I'll have to swallow the whole bottle – and the worm as well.
Good description, Rusty, and better than the BS from our rockers, Hildabeast and the Weathermen, with acoustics from the Winter Soldier. You should look at why these cartels are profitable, the banking collaborators. If they coannot work the money, then they have no wealth. Their laundry and investment partners are their power, abetted by the moral hazard of the our own and G20 governments. They do not buy their weapons from where private citizens do; they buy where governments buy, and they bank where dictators do. Nail their financial partners and you nail them.
Perfect for a Hollywood movie! Big, imposing bad guys with cool military hardware? Check. Current threat? Check. White? …eh heh heh heh, about that…nevermind, Hollywood! (runs away)
[...] Dandelion Salad placed an interesting blog post on â [...]
The Obamists and other liberals will never defend us against that kind of threat. The only thing that could possibly stand in the way of the drug lords is a fully-armed citizenry allowed to conduct legitimate local law enforcement without the hindrance of ACLU lawyers and Constitution-shredders. The Obamists find armed American citizens to be far more dangerous than foreign armies and foreign invaders.
Obama's battle plan is "surrender, and declare a victory." We need a President who will say to Mexico, fix this problem with our assistance, or we'll fix it for you, and it won't be with words and pretty speeches." What are the chances?
I'm not looking for root causes. I'm not crazy about the war on drugs, but if we're going to fight it, let's fight to win. And whether drugs are made legal or kept illegal doesn't change my view of what you do to people who directly threaten the national security of the United States.
Ditto, and I'm not being sarcastic either, you summed up how I think about it pretty much, and much better than I could have.
The primary duty of the Federal government is to defend the borders of the US, but they don't want to do that (and haven't wanted to for some time) because they're under the notion that having "the longest demilitarized borders in the world" is some sort of badge of honor. It's not, especially in the world of today. In fact in the world of today making that statement makes them look patently naive and ridiculous.
If they can't do it, then the people have to be allowed to instead of having to worry about having their rights further stepped on by the government to make foreigners and special interests groups happy.
No kidding, I hear Hillary's new pantsuits have built in knee pads since she's been doing nothing but kissing butts around the world to try to make them like America again.
Yeah, and they keep throwing the Posse Comitatus Act at us. It's venerable law, but it's not the Constitution. Our history has long kept the armed forces from acting militarily within the confines of the United States, and that's good. But it doesn't mean we can't have them on the borders. We have been fortunate not to need them there much, but we have done it in the past, and most notably with Mexico and another set of violent bandits.
And the militias have morphed into the National Guard, but that's a perversion of their original purpose of defending the sovereignty of the several states. If the national government is paralyzed, let's get some governors who aren't afraid to use their state militias to protect the borders. Nope. Won't happen. The states, as we have discussed elsewhere, have willingly surrendered their sovereignty to the national government. We're on our own, or we're screwed. Alternatively, in the next two election cycles, we can elect representatives and leaders who aren't ashamed to say "America is worth protecting."
[...] Amy created an interesting post today on â [...]
Yeah, because banning ethnic groups from citizenship in America has worked out so well for us so many times and never put blood our our ha—wait, we're in the world where the Holocaust DID happen, right?
Yeah, because banning ethnic groups from citizenship in America has worked out so well for us so many times and never put blood our our ha—wait, we're in the world where the Holocaust DID happen, right?
Outstanding. More Hillary lies and deceit. I was at Sen. "give me medal, I'm a hero" Kerry's dog and pony show last week at U.T.El Paso for a short while. They invited experts, took testimony and had they're minds made up when they got off the airplane. Obama's "European Vacation II" and Hillary;s jaunts about the globe have a common theme. "We're SORRY we're Americans!" " It's ALL OUR FAULT" "Bush did it, not us!" Where exactly is the factory in the U.S. manufacturing authentic AK-47's, fully automatic, ready to go right out of the box? Do want or need one, just curious.
The drug problem is actually much worse than this blog author writes and has strategic overtones involving the very real threats posed by Russia and China to America.
No doubt there are many indigenous bad actors, co-opted paramilitaries and politicians, etc. in the drug trade out to make a dishonest buck. But overlooked is the fact that that for fifty years the drug trade, globally, has been infiltrated and exploited as an asymmetric weapon by the KGB and associated communist intelligence services.
You can’t possible understand the “drug problem” without having read Red Cocaine:
Red Cocaine: The Drugging of America and the West by Joseph D. Douglass.
Douglass has dealt with these issues in a professional capacity working in the intelligence community and gets his information directly from high-ranking communist defectors.
You would be hard pressed to find a single DEA agent who has even heard of Red Cocaine, much less read it; despite having a professional responsibility to know such information.
While well intentioned, this blog author is trying to be sensational with what is at best tactical information. There is a strategic, existential threat to America that he is overlooking; so I doubt he read Red Cocaine as well.
So much for my naive thinking of "we need to just shut down the border". The training and weaponry the narco-soldiers posses is chilling. I have an idea – let's cut our military budget in half.
One thing I've learned from TV news, no one really cares when only drug dealers get killed, even the gun-banners just add them to the "innocent victims of gun violence" tolls. If known regular dealers started regularly dropping from one-shot precision sniper fire, no collateral damage, the cartels would run out of willing retail salesmen. No additional flak to mention, probably just gangs going at it. Later on the public can get tired again of the mantra on "victimless crimes" in the face of the statistics, as self-defense gets claimed for any charges arising from removing these sellers of known dangerous destroyers of communities and lives who threaten our children and ourselves by their mere presence.
Just mentioning a solution that hasn't been tried, that should work, fighting fire with fire etc. Not that I'm advocating anything here…
Apparently the new system doesn't display "comment in moderation," but hides the reply after reloading while showing the otherwise-correct reply count. Like before, it'll show up on your personal ID comment page but not in the article. Let's see if mine shows up here someday…
The best way to stop the drug trade is to let the Government tax and regulate it.
As this has clearly kept FDA-regulated prescription narcotics and other medicines off the streets and out of the hands of illegal dealers and abusers. Nope, no drug trade there.
Okay, it did.
(…insert comment involving knees that indirectly references Monica by an activity…)
A question – I'm not saying I buy into but I need to ask it. If you executed, every man, woman, and child who was a drug user/seller, how long do you think there'd be a problem?????
The problem will be exacerbated if all drugs are legalized.
"Banning ethnic groups from citzenship in America… blood on our ha… Holocaust… blah blah blah"
Yeah, we are living in the world where the Holocaust happened. Not the COUNTRY in which it happened. Shame on for for insinuating that this great country has even a drop of Holocaust blood on its hands.
What world are you living in, Hunter D.?
Unfortunately we have leaders (e.g. Director of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano) who think that combatting this serious problem is as easy as sending a few more National Guard troops to the border or taking away the guns from honest citizens. Just like the War on Terror, these leaders are not dealing with reality. We see the results of their "head in the sand" mentality every day in Arizona and in our border towns, especially.
http://the100mostannoyingthings.blogspot.com/
Okay.
Although it would be interesting to whip up a federally-issued illegal drug dealer's license, price it at $1 mil, and sic the IRS at those not reporting all their income with the DEA and FBI getting those actually trying to use it. While the courts would likely strike it down, that may take awhile, to bring a case you have to show you've been hurt. So you'd have those who bought one who should have known they couldn't use it, and those complaining the license requirement is hurting their business. Fun all around. Heck, some people would but one just for the novelty of it, help pay off the national debt.
They are getting rich by simply SUPPLYING the DEMAND here in the United States. SOMEONE had to overlook the very infiltrating of the drug SYSTEM into the US. Meaning that government's hands are not clean, whether local, regional or national. Instead of all the WHINING, PATHETIC druggies and instead of the very rich , privileged ones (from government to Hollywood) getting very expensive assistance from physicians (including those using drugs) – let's find a way to make use of these druggies – put THEM on our borders and let THEM try to clean up the mess they SUPPORT! LET them DIE FIGHTING FOR THEIR COUNTRY.
I have it from a very trustworthy source that HTML v 3.0 will have <sarc> tags.
Quickest way to end the head in the sand mentality is to bring the issue of the day to their own doorstep.
This may be aprocyphal, but I heard tell of a politician who advocated that the Gov't can buy out your land if they feel a road needs to be built. The politician voted for it, and the next day he got notice that the gov't was going to buy the land his house was on to build a bypass. The bill came up for a second vote and was summarily defeated.
So, let's target these ostrich leaders' children-let's sell them drugs, let's have them sell drugs, let's bring the drug war to their basements and bedrooms. A few personalized threats (some of which will have to be carried out) will do the trick.
I'm not necessarily advocating violence on our elected and appointed leaders. Historically, though, the United States of America has done well when the citizenry takes up arms against tyrannical overlords.
I thought of that, too. It makes sense. But it also seems to mean that a much larger number of comments are going into moderation than before. Oh well, let's keep plugging at it and hope they finally figure out how to make it work smoothly. So far this morning, I've been able to go straight from Intense Debate e-mails to the posts, but only once did I get directly to the post I'm replying to. On long threads, that can be a real chore.
[...] extent this is true but the fact is, anyone can make an income on the internet and becoming “The Greatest Organizational Threat to the United States” – bighollywood.breitbart.com 04/05/2009 That statement ought to be a wake-up call for every citizen [...]
Ya I know, it sounds stupid and xenophobic. Who seeks to destroy us and undermine us as a country in this era. The Chinese are using plain old, good old espionage to undermine us economically and get sensitive military data. It's being carried out of the U.S. in laptops daily. Pre 9/11 this would have never occurred to me, one set of my grandparents were natives of Mexico, who am I to exclude anyone. But post 9/11 our most obvious enemies are easy to identify, they are young brainwashed Muslims with Jihad on their collective minds and aren't afraid to kill as many innocent Americans when they go to see Allah as they possibly can. Therefore Muslim native "students" ages 17 to 49, seeking "a better life" have EARNED some increased scruitiny. I'll be in England this summer, as I have stated before, I want to see the effects of a huge Muslim influx has had on G. Britain. I don't think it's good, we'll see.
I'm sitting in the computer lab of a HUGE university library. I'm going to find 'Red Cocaine" on your recommendation, thank you!
Legalizing dope makes sense, first of all because it's an issue of liberty. Second because it denies the principal source of income for these goons. Education has turned drunk driving from something to brag about to something to be ashamed of. Honest education about dope would make clear that intoxication has costs and consequences worth considering. For starters. The dope is here, it's a fact of life. We are warehousing in prisons an army of young people and disrupting the lives of their innocent children in an effort to prohibit others from exercising their right to pursue pleasure. Past time to get our priorities straight. The cartels are already taking over whole towns in California. Denying them drug revenue would be a major blow, but they have to be rooted out like cockroaches from every position of power and influence they have gained. Legalization would free law enforcement to concentrate on the serious criminals, not free enterprise.
As for mixing this up with the Holocaust, it's apples and oranges. I'm not calling for the wholesale murder of Muslim men in the U.S. Let's just batten down the hatches for a while. The FBI is watching Jihadist traing camps spring up in this county and guess what? It's not a bunch of Muslim old ladies and little girls and old people learning how to bomb and kill Americans, it's young men. You know, scruffy beards, dark middle eastern complexions, even the occasional American Taliban type. Let's be sensible.
http://www.amazon.com/Red-Cocaine-Drugging-Americ...
This book is ten years old, detailing stuff even older. "New and used" starting at $64.95? Are you trying to sell a copy?
At this point I am mandated by tradition to inquire as to which substances you are currently imbibing, primarily by drawing combustion products into your lungs. References to a religious location of eternal punishment are not required but highly recommended.
No, I am not trying to sell a copy. And as for it being 10 years old and the information even older; what does that matter? The information in it is true and relevant today. That most professionals are ignorant of the contents should concern us all.
On a related topic, the Soviets and their eastern bloc satellites also use terrorism as an asymmetric weapon. They were/are the nexus of international terrorism for over 50 years, running a bull pen that included Carlos Ilyich Ramiros (Carlos the Jackal), Yassir Arafat, Saddam Hussein, and a host of others. There is an encyclopedic amount of data supporting this, yet we engage Russia as some sort of ally.
Or consider North Korea and Iran. They are emerging nuclear threats yet we don’t want to acknowledge that the only reason they have such technology is because Russia and China want them to.
Russia & China have their clandestine fingers into drugs, terrorism, rogue nations and a host of other asymmetric threats to America.
The point is that all of these facts must be included to have any meaningful strategic analysis of these problems.
Drugs are not the only issue today with an “untold story” component. Check out http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=7077264&am... :
British investigators concluded, based on forensic evidence and intelligence reports, that the murder was a "state-sponsored" assassination orchestrated by Russian security services. Litvinenko was an outspoken critic of the Kremlin.
AND WHAT, EXACTLY, WERE LITVINENKO’S CRITICISMS? The MSM never seems to want to state them.
When the media mentions Litvinenko's assassination, they will say, like this article did, that "Litvinenko was an outspoken critic of the Kremlin." But they never state the specific criticisms.
So let’s be specific. Two of Litvinenko’s criticisms were that:
1.Putin and the FSB were behind the 1998 apartment building bombings that launched Putin to national prominence and the presidency and which was the catalyst for the Second Chechen War, and
2.that al-Qaeda's #2, Ayman Al-Zawahiri, is a trained FSB operative.
One would think such claims are relevant to a nation embroiled in a global war on terrorism.
Drugs are not the only issue today with an “untold story” component. Check out http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=7077264&am... :
British investigators concluded, based on forensic evidence and intelligence reports, that the murder was a "state-sponsored" assassination orchestrated by Russian security services. Litvinenko was an outspoken critic of the Kremlin.
AND WHAT, EXACTLY, WERE LITVINENKO’S CRITICISMS? The MSM never seems to want to state them.
When the media mentions Litvinenko's assassination, they will say, like this article did, that "Litvinenko was an outspoken critic of the Kremlin." But they never state the specific criticisms.
So let’s be specific. Two of Litvinenko’s criticisms were that:
1.Putin and the FSB were behind the 1998 apartment building bombings that launched Putin to national prominence and the presidency and which was the catalyst for the Second Chechen War, and
2.that al-Qaeda's #2, Ayman Al-Zawahiri, is a trained FSB operative.
One would think such claims are relevant to a nation embroiled in a global war on terrorism.
"Red Cocaine" wouldn't surprise me any more than the "Red White and Blue Heroin" that's been flowing out of Afghanistan since we ousted the Taliban, and it shouldn't surprise anyone else. All of our governments have been using drugs and military hardware to earn extra cash and to wage quiet genocide across the globe. The cartels didn't invent this evil. The cartels are simply following the plans laid out by our military and intelligence services over the last forty years.
I've never read "Red Cocaine", but I'll make sure amazon delivers it in the near future.
First of all, we don't have leaders. That's the root of the problem. Second, these people aren't providing poor solutions because they don't understand the problems, or because they're stupid. They're providing poor solutions because the pro-mexico, pro-drug, anti-america lobbies are paying them to do exactly that. Wake up, people.
The idea isn't to stop the drug trade. This is a free country. If I want to smoke a little dope, and I'm not hurting anyone by doing it, why should anyone care? This is about taking the job (and the pay) out of the hands of people like these cartels and putting it into the hands of legitimate private industry.
So you're saying that this makes less sense than wasting hundreds of billions of dollars on a failed drug war, losing millions of lives to violent prisons for non-violent crimes, and nearly a hundred years of government lackeys pointing the finger at someone else? The drug war is a failure. Prohibition doesn't work. Legalizing the dope will create jobs (it will create INDUSTRIES), stimulate the economy, and send these cartel scumbags back to the poverty they so deserve.
We can also create lots of jobs by building minimum security prisons for drug offenders, no dealers just users. Counseling with detox as needed, behave yourself and with testing you can get work release, Three Strikes and it's hard time. Stimulus spending, things get built, jobs for the construction then later for all the staff, improves communities. And cuts back on the casual users, it's not as harsh as regular prisons yet would be more effective than a fine and perhaps some little required drug ed class or group therapy etc, thus judges wouldn't have problems sending them there. The penalty for a snort of coke would be disruptive but not life-destroying, humiliating but not harshly punitive, first offense would be the last for many.
Once you get the casual users out of the picture, that leaves the cartels trying to make money off the hard-core addicts. Time takes care of them soon enough.
Right. That's logical. Let's build more prisons for pot smokers rather than admitting what we all know to be true… Pot is less dangerous than alcohol and should never have been illegal in the first place. If we could prevent people like you from reproducing, the world would heal itself.
The one who wrote this article is a fucking stupid cause it is obvious what he is saying, the problem with this is how to find a way to stop it and I think the smartest way is legalizing drugs.
You must be logged in to post a comment.