RESPONSE TO NEA CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT: Throwing Yosi Sergant Under the Bus Isn’t an Answer

by Patrick Courrielche

“Senate confirmed my boss today…and we’re off!” — As posted by Yosi Sergant on Twitter August 7th. 

Those were the words of the former Communications Director of the National Endowment for the Arts three days before the conference call. However Rocco Landesman, Chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), in a recent statement declared that Yosi Sergant acted “unilaterally and without the approval or authorization” from his superior.

landesman
NEA Chair Rocco Landesman 

Taking the Chairman’s statement at face value and moving on would be the easy thing to do. However, the details of the Chairman’s statement need to be addressed. 

First, if the former Communications Director “acted unilaterally and without approval or authorization” from his superior, why is he still working for the NEA? Wouldn’t an act as rogue as bringing together a pro-Obama arts group and encouraging them to create art on health care have triggered an immediate dismissal if it was actually without authorization? 

Let’s not forget, Buffy Wicks from the White House Office of Public Engagement was on the call. And from the transcript of the call it is obvious that she was aware of the goal of the call, which was to “support some of the President’s initiatives,” and cognizant of the audience’s affinity for the President, hence her thanking them for the two-plus years of support on his campaign. 

6a00d8341c4df253ef01157008b65e970b-800wi
Kalpen Modi with President Obama

Secondly, what specific aspect of his actions were unilateral and without approval? Definitely not the encouragement of the art community to tackle health care, energy and the environment, because that same request was part of a different but similar conference call invitation scheduled for August 27th. That invitation was sent out by Kalpen Modi (”Kal Penn”), Associate Director for the White House Office of Public Engagement, and was sent to a completely different arts group. As discussed in a previous post, the NEA and the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) were on the invitation and scheduled to be on that conference call as well. However both federal arts organizations backed out of participating on the call, which was held two days after my original article went live on Big Hollywood. 

Thirdly, in the first issued statement by the National Endowment for the Arts, the NEA stated that they “participated” in the call. In Mr. Landesman’s new statement, the NEA’s involvement changed to “helped organize and participated” in the conference call. Why did “helped organize” get added to the classification of their involvement? 

The National Endowment for the Arts has already conceded that some of the language on the conference call was “not appropriate.” Clarification on the three points above would bring full transparency to this federal agency. 

Also in need of clarification are the statements from the White House. ABC News’ Jake Tapper reported Tuesday that The White House has issued a response to the August 10th conference call. The White House seemed to concede that the call was inappropriate, stating that the call had the “incorrect appearance that politics” had something to do with NEA grant decisions. 

White House spokesman Bill Burton told ABC News the following:

“The point of the call was to encourage voluntary participation in a national service initiative by the arts community. To the extent there was any misunderstanding about what the NEA may do to support the national service initiative, we will correct it. We regret any comments on the call that may have been misunderstood or troubled other participants. We are fully committed to the NEA’s historic mission, and we will take all steps necessary to ensure that there is no further cause for questions or concerns about that commitment.” 

ABC News also reported:

Today White House officials are meeting with the chiefs of staff of the executive branch agencies to discuss rules and best practices in this area, a conversation during which they will be told that while the White House lawyers do not believe that the NEA call violated the law, “the appearance issues troubled some participants,” Burton said. “It is the policy of the administration that grant decisions should be on the merits and that government officials should avoid even creating the incorrect appearance that politics has anything to do with these decisions.” 

I am happy that the White House is reacting to the inquiries regarding this issue. But I’d like to address “the appearance issues” that Mr. Burton referenced. 

Buffy Wick
Buffy Wicks

The August 10th conference call audio shows that the NEA and The White House Office of Public Engagement knew that they were speaking to a pro-Obama arts group about addressing the topic of health care. This came at a time when the issue of health care reform was being vehemently debated nationally. Additionally, the invitation to the August 27th conference call shows the same structure as my conference call, including a third party moderator in Americans for the Arts, references to tackling the same recovery agenda issues, and the participation of the White House and the NEA. As mentioned this meeting was held two days after my original post, and the NEA backed out of being on that call. 

It seems to me that there is more than an appearance issue. 

The above issues should be addressed by both the National Endowment for the Arts and the White House for there to be a resolution to this arts effort.