Mark Levin: The Thomas Paine of our Time
by Orson BeanIn September of 2001, I found myself employed at a theater in Los Angeles playing the part of Ben Franklin in the musical “1776.” The show is about the signing of the Declaration of Independence: an entertaining history lesson that concludes with all the bells in Philadelphia ringing and the actors freezing in a tableau recreating the famous painting of the original signers. It stirs up feelings of patriotism in the hearts of all but the most America-hating of theater goers.
As luck would have it, the first week of the show’s run concluded on Sunday September 10th. The next morning, I slept in, then awoke to find an answering machine message from my wife, who’d driven off to a breakfast date. “Turn on the TV,” her breathless voice said. “New York City has been bombed.” I spent the rest of the day, like most of the country, glued to my set, unable to believe what I was seeing or hearing.
1776 was, as scheduled, dark that night, and the management cancelled the following night’s performance. America was in a state of shock. On Wednesday the 13th, we re-opened. The theater was packed but the reaction from the crowd was strangely muted. The laughs which usually accompanied the comic by-play between Franklin and John Adams were missing. But as the show concluded, the bells rang and the actors froze in the famous patriotic tableau, cheers and audible sobs erupted. People actually cried out, “God bless America.” The performers remained on stage after the curtain calls and asked for donations for the Firemen’s Relief Fund. In the five days following 9-11, in our smallish theater in Los Angeles, we raised just under twenty five thousand dollars. People were dying to do something… anything… to help. The president went on the tube and urged us to go about our lives as if nothing had happened; the people felt otherwise.
The patriotic fervor lasted for the best part of a year. Every ball game opened with “God Bless America.” It was a terrifying but in many ways exhilarating time. I’d lived through World War II and hadn’t been able to wait to join the army as soon as I turned 18. I’d loved my country then and I loved it still. But, as we all know, the euphoria didn’t last. Patriotic feelings waned and blame-America became fashionable again. “War Is Not the Answer” stickers bloomed on the bumpers of Saabs and Volvos, replacing the small American flags which had briefly flown from cars across the country.
In ‘08, Barrack Obama was famously elected president. Even though I’d supported McCain and dreaded what I feared Barrack might do, I felt a surge of elation when the networks announced he’d won. I really hadn’t thought the U.S. would go for an African-American for a decade or so. The elation didn’t last, as Obama kept one after another of his campaign promises. The millions of centrists and disgruntled conservatives who’d swallowed hard, joined the left and voted Democrat began to wonder about what they’d wrought. Rush Limbaugh’s ratings soared; so did those of Fox News.
And so did the ratings of Mark Levin. When my friend Larry Elder had been taken off the air suddenly some months ago, the innocent victim of the collapse of a bankrupt radio syndicate, he’d been replaced, here in L. A. by Mr. Levin. I’d heard of him, of course, hadn’t read his best-seller “Men In Black.” I tuned in, resentful at first on behalf of poor Larry but was soon hooked by Levin’s wit and erudition.
Nothing prepared me, though, for the brilliance of his new book, “Liberty and Tyranny.” The title is taken from a quote of Abraham Lincoln’s, which he features on the book’s back cover. What knocked me out though, was the sub-title: “A Conservative Manifesto.” I’d never heard the word used apart from Marx’s Communist Manifesto. (Well, there was the Uni-bomber.)
Levin’s book is the equivalent of a popular college course in conservatism. Strict adherence to the Founding Fathers’ words are necessary, in his view, to be able to call oneself an genuine conservative. He has withering scorn for neo-conservatives, whom he regards as wolves in sheep’s clothing. His word for the liberal is Statist, a term he uses over and over until it begins to sound like an ugly epithet. “The state will take care of me,” is the mantra of the leftist, as Levin describes him, but as a bronco once broken discovers, there’s a heavy price to be paid.
The book is divided into sections: In On Prudence and Progress, he begs conservatives to be wary of the sort of imprudent change the Statist insists upon. “For the Statist,” Levin writes, “liberty is not a blessing but the enemy. (The Statist) believes it is not possible to achieve Utopia if individuals are free to go their own way.” In On Faith And The Founding, he asserts that the founding fathers clearly believed in Natural Law as divined by God. In On The Constitution, he declares that the Constitution is not “a living, breathing document” that may be altered at will, but a set of immutable laws to be strictly adhered to.
On Federalism deals with states’ rights vs federal intervention. I learned something I hadn’t known here: in the nineteenth century, northern states had laws on their books which created legal obstacles to the deportation of escaped slaves back to the south. The federal Supreme Court sought to rule these laws unconstitutional. It also held, in Dred Scott in 1857, that no slave or descendant of a slave could be a U.S. citizen.
In On The Free Market, Levin quotes Abraham Lincoln: “Let not him who is houseless pull down the house of another; but let him labor diligently and build one for himself, thus by example assuring that his own shall be safe from violence when built.”
From On The Welfare State: “Barbara Wagner… was diagnosed with a recurrence of cancer. Her doctors recommended a specific drug… However, Barbara is a resident of Oregon… the state refused Barbara’s request for the drug, since it does not cover drugs that are meant to prolong the life of individuals with advanced cancer… But Oregon also has legalized assisted suicide and in an unsigned letter from the state, Barbara was informed that the health plan would pay to cover the costs of a doctor to help her kill herself.”
Enviro-Statism (global warming). Here, Levin quotes a list of calamities predicted in news reports which hilariously include: Antarctic ice growing, Antarctic ice melting, Atlantic Ocean less salty, Atlantic Ocean saltier, crocodile sex (?) and itchier poison ivy. This reminded me of a Harvard Lampoon send-up of how various publications would handle the end of the world. Washington Post headline: WORLD ENDS TOMORROW: Women, Minorities Hardest Hit.
Levin concludes his book with an epilogue: A Conservative manifesto. “So distant is America today from its founding principles,” he writes, “that it is difficult to precisely describe the nature of American government… If the bulk of the people reject the civil society for the Statist’s Utopia, preferring subjugation to citizenship, then the end is near…”
Like Tom Paine before him, Levin is a brilliant pamphleteer. Anyone who wants a thorough understanding of the difference between right and left in this country needs to read this book. A college credit should come with it.
Orson Bean’s new book, M@il For Mikey, is published by Barricade Books






Subscribe via RSS
69 Comments
Mark Levin is brilliant. If you haven't read his books, regardless of your party affiliations and beliefs, you must. His books are well written and well researched. MEN IN BLACK, in particular, was an eye-opener.
http://the100mostannoyingthings.blogspot.com/
"It stirs up feelings of patriotism in the hearts of all but the most America-hating of theater goers"
This implies that there are some theater patrons in L.A. that aren't America-haters… and I gotta say that this is pretty hard for me to believe.
Where are they and why are there, not men like Mark Levin leading the Political Conservative movement in America today. Articulate, studied and passionate men and women, who are not afraid to invoke the founding fathers. There are many out here in flyover country just waiting for one person to grab the reings and say follow me!
It’s encouraging the way the book is selling as well. I think that the American people are waking up, this is good news.
Great post. Thank you, Mr. Bean. Levin is indeed a national treasure, and if only the conservative lawmakers would live and lead by the advice and counsel he offers.
I would have only on quibble. September 11 was on a Tuesday, so September 10th was on a Monday, not a Sunday as stated here, and that kinda throws the timelines a little whacky. But otherwise, very enjoyable column, and very true sentiments expressed.
Where are they and why are there, not men like Mark Levin leading the Political Conservative movement in America today. Articulate, studied and passionate men and women, who are not afraid to invoke the founding fathers. There are many out here in flyover country just waiting for one person to grab the horns and say, follow me!
Orson Bean, you read my mind. I had the exact thought that Mark Levin is the "Thomas Paine of our time" before I came across your column. Glad to see you got this thought out there in the ether.
I just looked on Amazon and it is still number one. I'll be buying mine soon. It is exciting to see people taking time to read and learn why this country is great and how it got that way by relatively simple principles.
Most of the liberal books do not sell well and the ones that do are bought up in bulk by folks trying to skew the numbers. You can tell by what little used lib books get on Ebay compared to conservative authors.
Yeah, no one can accuse the guy of being shy!
I've heard nothing but great things about this book. I think I'll pick it up today.
I catch Levin's show every now and then, and I must say that his abrasive and rude approach to those who disagree is counter-productive. You catch more flies with honey than with vinegar, as they say.
Levin has a brilliant mind. I can only believe that if his approach was more… civil, he would be much more persuasive.
And that is the one thing Conservatism needs above all else these days- persuasiveness.
I too mourn for the post-9/11 patriotism that our country briefly showed.
While I enjoy Mark Levin's written work very much, and I hope to read Liberty and Tyranny soon, I simply cannot stomach the man's verbal tirades. I've listened to his show several times, but am inevitably turned off not by what he says (which is often right on the mark), but by how he says it.
We've tried persuasiveness, politeness, courtesy and all the rest of it.
Sadly, it has not worked, and has not brought any liberals over to our side, that I can see. Conservatives continue to be demonized, and shouted down, by the Left.
Sometimes you need to be polite, and sometimes you just need to tell the truth. Considering the dire straights the country is in at the moment, we might just have to shout back, and offend some people at this point.
Amen, Illinois may have one of the most corrupt governments of the states, but we people from the rest of the state (ie, not Chicago) are still decent and waiting for a leader we can really get behind. Perhaps the reason for the spread of statism is the lack of homegrown Americans, I mean small town, care about my neighbor and put my children and my family before myself. For some obscene reason, small town now means uneducated, backwards hicks rather than the epitome of America. There's a reason why we're called the heartland, you know.
[...] Mark Levin: The Thomas Paine of our Time Category: Womens Health | Tags: book, country, entertainment, men-in-black, movies, people, [...]
Mr. Bean, my favorite non-funny moments on Dennis Miller is when you're on.
I am working my way through the book. What struck me is that it isn't his radio outrage, but rather a very scholarly work.
I concur that Mark is an abrasive host; I limit my time listening to his show because I don't need the stress.
In this, the comparison to Paine is apt–by all accounts he had a pretty wide abrasive streak.
But we must bear in mind that Mark is yelling "fire" in a crowded, BURNING theater. His knowledge and grasp of the Constitution and the intent of the Founders is unparallelled.
We have plenty of personable, persuasive voices in the movement—Limbaugh, Hannity, and many of the writers here at Big Hollywood. Mark Levin provides us all with compelling arguments and ammunition.
Mark Levin on radio comes across as a right wing bomb thrower yet his publications have an entirely different tone. His last tome 'Men In Black' is a scholarly dissertation on the verities of our legal system and is required reading for budding constitutional scholars. Mr Bean and others posting today are indeed correct; this individual brings some serious intellectual heft to both politics and the law.
Highly recommended here…
Much as I admire Mr. Bean's take on things, his recommendations and his way with words (not to mention the stones to work with a political flake like Charlie Sheen) this article hit me wrong from the opening. Having now checked my calendar, it's apparent why: September 11th was a Tuesday, not a Monday.
Does this make the story any less compelling? Not hardly. Just a reality check for me and others who spent fourteen hours watching Peter Jennings and may have thought they were losing a marble or two.
I just finished reading the book and it is brilliant…if I knew as much a Mark Levin does with regard to Liberty's founding principles while witnessing our country abandon these fine principles by taking a hideous path towards tyranny I'd be screaming louder than he does.
Someone has to break the fried zombies out of their TV Land trance; how can sensible people compete with the Industry of Agitprop which keeps eyeballs glued to Jon Stewart's anal cavity?
To the low profilers (Big Hollywood excluded of course) hiding in Hollywood too fearful to stand up to your industry's despicable agitprop I say this…evil wins when good people do nothing and because you were more concerned about your own wallets Kingdom Hollywood is wining their war upon Liberty with every idiotic agitprop junk produced.
I love how Mark expresses himself – it took me a little time to adjust but I have looked at why I like it, and why some don't.
First, Mark is yelling fire – and he is absolutely right. Short of inciting violence this is exactly the sentiment needed. Any rational person should be outraged at what is taking place. Outraged!
Second, Mark is not going to convince leftist drones by logic or any other means. They are believers, and Mark knows it, so he just mocks them which is exactly what is needed. Besides, isn't that what the entire left does with regard to the right? Why the double standard? Maher, Stewart – all of them, are dripping with contempt for anything and anyone with the slightest conservative leanings, and this is just accepted by everyone, yet Levin's "tone" is called into question..
Who made it a law that expression of anger and frustration is inappropriate? Those on the right who believe there is a fair and civil debate going on in this country are delusional. Those who believe that a fair and civil debate is even possible, or would have any effect are also delusional.
Mr. Bean, I must thank you for this review. Everyone should buy a copy of this book. I am 26 year old that recently graduated with a BA and MA, however, I was limited in American history and the principles of our founding fathers. I listened to Mr. Levin's show since he began locally here in NYC on WABC. I was hooked from the beginning. Not only is his show entertaining, but it was also like taking a American history course with a wonderful professor. I listen intently and absorb all he says and research it later. That is the mark of a great thinker and teacher.
I took the gumption to call Mr. Levin one day, last year on Feb.20 and we had a lengthy conversation on the air of my father's experience as a political prisoner in Cuba and the totalitarian regime there. Cuba was one of the richest nation's in the world. However, it was all smashed by the "great speaker" and "men of change" Fidel Castro and Che Guevara. I warned the audience that the language of Obama, was the same language used by these dictators. The drones followed them, thus we have Cuba as a third world nation, and one of the axis of evil. However, the left admires these men as some kind of heroes.
America's public education system is full of leftist professors and teachers that despise this country. I recommend all people young and old to pick up a copy of this book, read it and buy more copies for you friends, neighbors, and famiy members. The book is a national treasure.
Thank you Mr. Levin and Mr. Bean!
To Tell the Truth (oops, sorry) I think it's a fantastic sign that Mr. Levin's book is topping the charts, and so dominantly at that. It gives me hope that our country isn't inhabited completely by Mr. Bevis (ugh, did it again) and Butthead. I still think the next four years are going to be like a Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman episode, though (OK, three strikes. I'm out). LOL!
I am going to buy this book this week. Levin is on the march and there can be no doubt his clarion call is being heard. The book is HUGE! A bigger seller than Hannity's last one and that of Coulter. The thing is this: Many so called liberals don't even know what they voted for. When you start pushing their buttons they admit it. This ignorace is frightening but it can be remedied. Bring up bailouts, the huge leap in our debt. They freeze and stare, unsure. They realize that they have been living so long in their own selfishness that suddenly the future and tomorrow becomes bigger, as it always should.
Great book… just finished it.
With regard to the sale of liberal books, look at all of the school and public libraries that obligingly buy every Obama, Clinton and Kennedy fluff and you will see the majority of their sales. Try to find a copy of Levin or Marcus Latrell's "Lone Survivor" in a public library – low probability event.
Amen, Lola. Liberals are so uninformed that I sometimes am embarrassed for them. They read nothing of the opposing viewpoint.
You can get it from his site on the internet for free and no commercials! http://www.marklevin.com
[...] has been in the news lately, for suggesting in an editorial that Conservatives like Rush Limbaugh Mark Levin: The Thomas Paine of our Time – bighollywood.breitbart.com 04/06/2009 In September of 2001, I found myself employed at a theater [...]
I'm actually writing a paper on "Liberty and Tyranny" for my College Prep English class. I'm sure my lib teacher will love it.
Andrew Breitbart is soooo lucky! He has Orson Bean as a father-in-law.
Thank you, Mr. Bean and Andrew, for showing us in fly-over country that patriotic conservatives still exist in Hollywood. We've got your back, guys!
Attaboy! Kudos for getting smart before you get old. I wish I would have wised up before my 30th.
Not reading the book is a prereq to being a book critic. Otherwise, anyone could do it….
Not for nothin, but it's worth noting (in the Deathless Irony column) that the line "World Ends – Women and Minorities Hardest Hit" was first used as a crack at the final headline of the San Francisco Chronicle (in the '50s) by none other than Mort Sahl.
Mort Sahl.
[...] Levin: The Thomas Paine of our Time Mark Levin: The Thomas Paine of our Time I have to agree with this. Levin is a modern day Thomas Paine. I listen to him when I can on 77 [...]
I just bought the book at my campus bookstore. Really weird, though. This is the second conservative bestseller I got for 30% off. I was going to wait a while, until I had saved up more cash, but a I had a wonderful conversation today with a friend that prompted me buy it ASAP.
I assume everyone knows about the Tea Parties? Well, I recently learned from El Rushbo that nationwide tea parties will be taking place on tax day. So I looked it up and low an behold there is one within my campus town. I was so excited I had to tell someone. My friend just looked at me like I was crazy and said, "But you're not protesting against the English, you're protesting against your own government." I patiently explained that at the time, the british government was our government. So she switched tactics. "So you're gonna pollute the water to prove a point." Of course, cause environment concerns have everything to do with tax hikes and spendings. My answer… "It's tea. If it makes you happy, I'll use an organic tea bag."
the dates in the first two paragraphs of this review are wrong — september 11, 2001 was a tuesday. Sunday of that week was the 9th, etc. I realize this doesn't have anything to do with the broader points that follow, but the very specificity with which it opens makes the error very distracting to me.
I've just read the book and recommend it to any thinking American. I can only hope every member of Congress, at least the titular republicans, received a copy and are studying it. My only regret is that my blood pressure kept rising the many times Mr Levin reminded me of the destructive idiocy of the left and its leadership. God save us all. I look forward to his next title.
[...] UPDATE: Orson Bean reviews the book here. [...]
Has anyone noticed that book stores staffed and run by wishy-washy liberal types (Barnes and Noble etc) will immediately put conservative themed books on the 30% discount shelf as soon as they're released, as if they're trying to make a snide point about their disapproval of certain viewpoints? Here in New York they've done it with every conservative book released over the past few years. Ann Coulter's books go straight into the discount bin and I noticed that Levin's did too. Call me paranoid but I look around at the staff at Barnes and Noble and they do look like the types that would do that.
I bought an Ann Coulter book last year at one of their branches and the girl at the cashier made a point of slamming my change on the counter instead of putting it into my hand. She refused to say "thank you" or "have a nice day," wouldn't look at me and barked "NEXT."
The year before, I went in to order "The Capitalist Manifesto" by Andrew Bernstein. The guy at the customer service desk visibly winced and narrowed his eyes when I told him the title. He then paused for a while as if to say "oh, you're serious. You really want me to order that for you."
Is it too much to ask for these self-righteous lefties to just respect the fact that not everyone shares their world view?
Levin's abrasiveness is exactly why I enjoy listening to him. I can't take that approach 24/7, but sometimes, when it seems the whole country has gone crazy, it's nice to hear a guy willing to get on the radio and scream "HAVE YOU ALL LOST YOUR MIND!?!"
Excellent post, but just one small, niggling detail: your days of the week are incorrect. September 11, 2001 was a Tuesday.
People have told me about him for years and I just recently started tuning in. His wit and common sense are refreshing. Definitely will check out his new book.
Mark Levin is fantastic and this should be another home run book by him.
Newflash patriot act = tyranny Levin doesn't always love liberty just when its convenent to his point of view but his show is great. Lmao Keith overbite and countdown to no ratings.
Classic take on lefty critics. When "The Bell Curve" first came out, The New Republic chided National Reveiw for not immediately panning the book. National Review shot back with "generally, before we critique a book, we prefer to read it, unlike the editors of The New Republic.
Look at what a supposedly respectable book reviewer from the New York Times had to say.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/12/books/review/In...
"If Levin’s stately neo-federalist tone isn’t your cup of tea, a glossary at the Web site ­Mark Levin Fan (marklevinfan.com) offers a crib sheet of his views. “Philosophy of the stupid” = liberalism. “RuPaul” = Ron Paul. “The spiteful troll” = Al Franken. “New York Slimes” = . . . um, can I use a lifeline?"
Clever, yet completely useless. It is hard to review if you can't take the effort to read past the dust jacket.
Well, they don't see any advantage in reading the opposition — why would they risk shattering their illusions?
Yes.
Ken in Irvine, I couldn't agree with you more! I love listening to him because he speaks his mind and he knows what he's talking about. Name one other place where you hear someone let his feelings out on the radio. Lots of people complain about how Mark hangs up on people but when they are calling to rip on him, they are a worthless call anyway. So he cuts them off, interrupts them a few times and then gives them a half second to respond and says, GET OFF THE PHONE YOU BIG DOPE! LOL It makes me laugh every time! LOL
Yeah, go to his website and download his podcasts.
So let's switch the game entirely on them. Don't call it "Conservative" or "Liberal" anymore.
I'm an "Individualist". They are "Statists".
It'll take the idjits at least two decades to figure out what him 'em.
I like it…… and let's start calling the trolls "little weenies"
My advice ……. For all its worth …..
Approach the paper by including the liberal arguments and then answer them with the conservative argument. If you word it carefully enough you will be able to praise the book without allowing the teacher to scold you for looking at one side.
Jason,
It is their loss. If tables were reversed we would charge double for the liberal books to make sure no one bought them. They want to give you a dscount for the books you like so that they can feel superior good for them. They can be superior and you can be rich. That's a trade I'll take any day.
If true, maybe Orson Bean has progressed in his life to greater wisdom. As for you though…Maybe you could try arguing against the points made rather than going straight for a lame and ineffective ad hominem attack?
… apparently you missed the joke.
Yes Mitch because the Tonight Show always has been a serious hard hitting news driven kind of show and their hads never been any joking around on that show…….. Oh Wait ……………………..
Yes Mitch because the Tonight Show always has been a serious hard hitting news driven kind of show and there has never been any joking around on that show…….. Oh Wait ……………………..
http://www.freerepublic.com%2Ffocus%2Ff-news%2F1720425%2... target=”_blank”>http://www.ask.com/bar?q=michael+savage+donate+to...” target=”_blank”>http://www.freerepublic.com%2Ffocus%2Ff-news%2F1720425%2Fposts
I belive the following is the reason Levin is agaisnt this Savage guy…… you make the call…..
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1720425/...
I belive the following is the reason Levin is agaisnt this Savage guy…… you make the call…..
It's only an ad hominem argument if the person's character has nothing to do with the discussion, but in this case it does. And no, his comments were not a joke as some other responders have written (and who surely did not see the show), the context of his discussion made that clear. It simply proved that he was (and still is) one of those people who will stand up and repeat any opinions that reinforce his own. You want me respond to Levin's book? I haven't read it and will therefor not venture an opinion on it like so many others are willing to do.
Jason,
At least you haven't been kicked out of Barnes and Noble, yet. Imagine them kicking out a 42 yr old grandma, with a baby with her, and you can picture me. They didn't like me rearranging their shelves for some odd reason. Of course, it might have been what I said afterward………………………………………..
So many good books to read, so little time.
Fair enough but like I said above 'The Savage' is often TOO tightly wound for me to listen to on a consistent basis; At that other site somebody put it best: When he's right he RIGHT but when he's wrong he's sometime SHOCKINGLY wrong.
I have to chuckle at some of the folks here talking about Mark Levin's radio show as being abrasive and difficult to listen to, yet his radio ratings are soaring. Personally, I find Mark outrageously entertaining.
But, he is a man of many sides. He is deeply intellectual and brings this to bear in his writing- I am on chapter 4, and I am ingesting this book like a precious tonic. It isn't just the context, but the almost poetic, tick-tock rhythm of the prose that makes it all flow together. So far, it is proving to be a once-in-a-generation book about Conservatism. Love it.
If there was one man who you would want on your side against the left, it would be ML.
According to Webster's dictionary:
ad hominem
1 : appealing to feelings or prejudices rather than intellect 2 :marked by or being an attack on an opponent's character rather than by an answer to the contentions made
You bring up an obscure reference that, if true, was ancient history. And your quote — assuming it was in proper context — gives no credit to where a person may have demonstrated a progression in personal growth and wisdom with the corresponding progression in their years.
And you're not familiar enough with the subject of the post to "venture and opinion."
Nice try. Please play again sometime.
I do apologize for my blanket statement regarding liberals. I sincerely was referring to a number of my own friends and relatives, who continue to rely on one-sided media.
And: yes, I honestly do try to be informed all all sides of an issue. Thank you for your comment.
Oh, I'm in CT. And I'm starting to find other kids on campus wanting to go. I think you might be pleasantly surprised on how many people will show up.
You must be logged in to post a comment.