Comments on: America in Danger: Important Courtroom Battles

By: garment sales worldwide

garment sales worldwide — Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:50:07 +0000

Great website…

[...]we like to honor many other internet sites on the web, even if they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Under are some webpages worth checking out[...]……

By: gbm

gbm — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:28:10 +0000

The Civilian court system is not in the chain of command.

By: Mrs. H

Mrs. H — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 07:58:19 +0000

Well Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!!!
This is a WAR, not a crime scene.
And Habeus is a US citizen's right in a civilian situation.
I have been seriously concerned about this exact issue, since the idiot decision was made.
CSI on a battlefield??? Or how about a line-up to identify a perp? This is a WAR not a crime scene.
Plan B: the Commander in Chief becomes the Prosecutor of record, requiring his personal presence at the battle site. Members of the Civilian Court System arrange their own transport, and investigations. They have a budget, let them investigate. The DC Prosecutor's office can handle it…
Once more with feeling :WE SUPPORT OUR TROOPS,
Let the legal eagles go to hell, I mean war, and deal.

By: AtheistCon

AtheistCon — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:53:00 +0000

Ah, ok. Gotcha.

By: Kix_A

Kix_A — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:22:47 +0000

I am fed up with politicians and the courts aiding and abetting the enemies of this country for their own purposes. Between their contempt for our military and their contempt for our intelligence agents they are doing more to destroy this country than all the mujaheddin in the world. I say it's time "we the people" start holding them accountable.

By: Daniel

Daniel — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:20:28 +0000

Its already started…………………………….the door has been opened for anyone since 1/20/09. But now its a revolving door. And shit flows in and out of it.

By: Sanmon

Sanmon — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 06:42:32 +0000

Interesting Appeals Brief regarding evidence gathering and holding of detainees. Placing our Armed Service members in harms ways to do police work is nothing they should be tasked with. I guess if this is fully implemented then we would have to kill all combatants or just let them go.

Osama bin Laden has always said the US will lose this war in the US courts. He has studied us well.

"This case raises the question of whether courts thousands of
miles away should constrain U.S. and allied forces in ways that
will impair the effectiveness of and increase the considerable
dangers to SOF personnel who regularly confront al-Qaeda, the
Taliban and other terrorist groups in combat."

By: tahDeetz

tahDeetz — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 06:02:59 +0000

I'm goin' with all the above.

Please God Go with Our Military.

By: U2Dave

U2Dave — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 03:40:01 +0000

Is the constitution required reading any more, for any of the branches of government !?!?

I think it is pretty clear, Civilian courts have some how injected themselves into an area in which they have no authority. We have military courts for military matters because the area in which the two courts operate are well night and day. They military has kept us pretty damn safe for over 200 years thank you very much.

Aid and comfort for our enemies is still called Treason and it's a capital crime.

Perhaps we should let the judges ride along on one of these snatch and grabs and then they can procure all the witness statements and evidence that they require in civilian courts. .

By: SilenceDogood59

SilenceDogood59 — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:52:42 +0000

Know your Country, know your Government, know the difference: http://oath-keepers.blogspot.com/