A Muslim’s Take on ‘Traitor’
by Michael van der GalienAs a devout and convinced Muslim, who hates Islamic extremism for the twisted and sick ideology it is, I thought ”Traitor” would be one movie I’d enjoy watching. Let me explain why.
Firstly, real people act in it, which is, as I explained in my post on “Kung Fu Panda,” a definite pro for me. Secondly, “Traitor” deals with an incredibly hotly debated subject; the war on terrorism. Thirdly, the main character is a Muslim American who helps fight extremist Muslims; it is a subject seldom explored in books or movies. It is a grand, novel and innovative idea, especially from my perspective.
And it was. The actors perform sublime. They draw you into the movie immediately and convince you that they are the characters rather than pretending to be them. The special effects are great and the movie was exciting; it keeps you off-balance. It is not until the very last moment that you understand the plan and the way in which it was executed.
But there is more to the movie than the superficial aspects described above. What made this movie so interesting – and from my perspective resulting in a mixed review nonetheless – are its major themes.
*Some Spoilers Coming*
Let’s start with the good stuff: The main character, Samir Horn (Don Cheadle), is depicted as a Muslim who worked for the FBI but fired after his colleagues complained about his devotion to his religion. He is “the reluctant fundamentalist” but more violent. Although that theme can hardly be called innovative, everything changes after those first 30 minutes. At that moment it becomes clear that the firing was a cover-up. Instead of being fired he became an undercover agent who had to infiltrate terrorist networks and prevent them from executing their plans.
The above was quite surprising because his project is depicted as just and as the act of a religious Muslim who, we find out later, considers extremists his secular and religious enemy, an opinion many Muslims, including myself, share. It has, however, seldom been made clear in movies or books.
That his fight is portrayed as ‘just’ is also surprising because Hollywood often produces rubbish about the war on terrorism portraying the good guys as the bad guys and vice versa. “Traitor” shows reality as it is and how it should be: a devout Muslim opposing extremism and even fighting it, and Americans as those who are protecting freedom against the enemy who wants to destroy all we hold dear.
There are certainly some minor points of criticism with regards to the first part of the film: for instance, at the very start of the movie, one sees the father of Samir teaching his son how to perform the ritual prayer. Ironically enough, the ‘devout Muslim’ performs the ritual prayer incorrectly. Instead of saying “as salaamu aleikum wa rahmatulaa” twice at the end he says “Allahu Akbar.” This is a frustrating mistake to make for a Muslim because both sentences have entirely different meanings. “Allah Akbar” means “God is Great” while “as salaamu aleikum wa rahmatulaa” means “may the peace and blessings of God be with you.” If the main character of a film is a devout Muslim, at least teach the actor how to perform our ritual prayer correctly.
The American government too is generally shown in a favorable light. An example: Samir’s superior cares deeply about him and does everything in his power to protect the undercover agent. Additionally, one of the two FBI agents, impressively enough the one who also happens to be a devout Christian , tries to understand terrorists and is open to a different interpretation than the most obvious one with regards to Samir’s actions. Agent Roy Clayton (Guy Pearce) is passionate about fighting terrorism, but he does not use “all means necessary.”
Clayton’s partner is an entirely different agent, the embodiment of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney’s approach to the war on terror Hollywood-style. This man is not open to reasonable arguments, all he wants to do is to capture or kill terrorists. If torture has to be applied, so be it. If innocent civilians have to die, who cares as long as they are Muslim?
Luckily, the partner plays only a minor role in the film, so the viewer is not really bothered by him.
As said, there is certainly room for criticism of “Traitor” but its main themes are refreshing, inspiring and of fundamental importance: the war on terrorism is a war between good and bad, between freedom and oppression.
Especially the message that you can be a devout Muslim yet a good American nonetheless, is inspiring. It has not been said often enough in the last couple of years that one can be both at the same time. Many pretend that in order to be a good American a Muslim has to ignore a large part of his religion. “Traitor” shows that this is not the case; you can be a devout Muslim, yet a supporter of America, of freedom, and of democracy nonetheless.
Unfortunately, the above changes radically in the last few minutes when Liberal Hollywood could not resist to once again portray the good side in the war on terrorism as the bad side.
Where Samir Horn is portrayed as a religious and devout Muslim fighting the good fight in the first 90 minutes of the movie, he ends up with absolutely nothing in the end. He tortures himself by reciting a famous verse in the Qur’an in which God says about those kill one innocent: “It would be as if he killed the whole of mankind” (5:32). Samir makes clear to agent Clayton that it may finally have been clear to all involved that he was acting in America’s interest, but he has lost his confidence in himself and in his moral authority. In short, the devout Muslim fighting extremists ends up a broken man.
If there’s one thing we (liberal Muslims) do not need right now, it is for others to tell us that our fight is not worth fighting. We need encouragement , not discouragement. We are fighting the good fight and standing up for what we believe in. We are doing everything in our power to prevent the hatred disguising itself as religion from taking over our communities, our mosques, our families, our cities and our countries. We know, and we need to know, that it is the extremists who are the villains and that is us who are the good guys.
Samir is a hero in every sense of the word; he is a secular American hero and a true Muslim hero; we need more of those. The film should have had a happy end for that would have sent a positive and inspiring message, instead of giving everyone the impression that the war on terrorism is not truly worth fighting.
Worse, according to “Traitor” we are no better than Osama Bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahiri and other extremists if we decide to take them on. If someone would say this to your face, you would laugh at him. But for some reason, Hollywood considers it perfectly OK to put this idiotic message in one of its top productions. It defies reason.
Samir made mistakes in the movie, but this does not make him a bad guy. Even good guys make mistakes in the real world. We should learn from those mistakes but they should not cause us to lose our confidence in ourselves and our goals. The mistakes made by proponents in the war on terrorism – say Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib – were grave, but what differs us from the real bad guys is that these acts are mistakes for us while they are normal for the enemy. The enemy does not beat itself up after seeing evidence of a prisoner being tortured; it happily publishes videos of the (innocent) person being tortured and eventually murdered on the Net. The enemy is proud of it. We are not – and that’s what makes us different.
Perhaps some big shot in Hollywood will read this pos, and do something with it. I know it’s easy for these people to dismiss everything conservatives say, but I’m also a Muslim which should make it harder to ignore me considering liberals’ adoration for minorities. If Hollywood wants to make a positive difference in this world, it should use “Traitor’s” themes for a good cause: to encourage rather than discourage, and to build rather than destroy.







Subscribe via RSS
28 Comments
Thank you, Michael. Well thought out and interesting blog.
My 19 year old son’s best friend (since kindergarten) is a Muslim. We are Christian (Specifically, LDS–I consider myself a Christian, but I’ve heard a lot on websites that I’m not. However, back to my topic) I don’t remember the two of them ever having an argument over religion. After 9-11 my son had his friend’s back. And more often than standing up against Muslim bigots, my son’s friend stood up for him in dealing with anti-Mormon bigots. (They have, however, argued over girls, parents, and other things boys argue about.)
I have personal experience that people who hold opposite religious views can be good friends, supportive and loyal to each other.
It has been my experience that many Muslims are just as upset (or more so) at the hijacking of their faith.
Imagine if during WW2, Hollywood cranked out war movies reeking with this kind of moral relativism, with self-righteous filmmakers contriving to erase distinctions between good guys and bad guys.
FDR would have herded up the entire industry and imprisoned them in a camp. Till it was safe to let them out again.
Michael, with all due respect where are all these muslims who hate the extremist?
Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think all muslims are fanatics, but in the years since 9/11 I’ve yet to see a giant groundswell of muslims coming out to publicly speak against the extremist.
The silence is deafening.
Excellent post, certainly one of the best I’ve read here.
Michael, I also agree with Opus. Organizations such as CAIR have had a much louder voice in the US than any moderate, liberal Muslim group. I also would love to hear from those of you, on a regular drumbeat basis, who despise what the seemingly majority of radical islamists stand for and why. I don’t have much faith in a Faithless Hollywood to show the truth about Muslims such as yourself who don’t live by the fanatical, hateful rantings of the jihadis. Your voice is a refreshing look at what many of us hope is true. Just don’t count on the Faithless in Hollywood to hear you.
“It is not until the very last moment that you understand the plan and the way in which it was executed.”
Really? I saw it coming a mile away. This movie was a turd.
Film opinions aside, I too have to ask where are all of these devout muslims who hate extremism you spoke of? I’d like to hear or read what they have to say but I think it’s wishful thinking on your part.
Here’s another thumbs up for the comment from OPUS. The silence of moderate American Muslims is deafening. Or is the media just not reporting it?
Michael, your words are refreshing. Please tell us that you have a community of friends who are as willing as you are to be vocal.
excellent review and commentary! however, I do disagree w/your statement that “In short, the devout Muslim fighting extremists ends up a broken man.” I didn’t see Samir as being broken or even as weak; I saw him as highly conflicted and following the strength of his conscience, moral compass, faith, whatever you may call it – I could tell instantly from his expression (Cheadle really is a top-drawer actor) when the announcement was made that 8 had been killed in the consulate bombing that Samir was NOT disappointed that “so few” had died, but heartsick that there had been ANY casualties (he had expected the 6 bodies based on their plan, but not the 2 innocent people who died). it had NEVER been his intention to kill, especially innocent people. when Samir refused Clayton’s “invitation” at the end to participate in other operations, I saw that refusal as a mark of remarkable moral strength and courage, to walk away from a cause he obviously believed passionately in, in order to salvage his own humanity, as he’d not yet become desensitized to killing and still held sacred all human life; Samir was simply not willing to enter into a position where he’d be repeatedly required to “sacrifice a few pawns to win the game,” choosing instead to focus on jihad in the context of self-purification. in the end, I admired the character of Samir, I admire the justice which Cheadle did to the role, and I admire you for such an articulate and well thought-out post…
kind rgds,
Tanya
So where’s the rest of you? You describe yourself as “As a devout and convinced Muslim, who hates Islamic extremism for the twisted and sick ideology it is”. Great…it’s the first I’ve heard of you and your brethren other than Hirsan Ali. Where are the blogs, protest marches, associations and political action committees where you can express your views? I don’t see them. Also, you label terrorists as extremist. I have heard that they have ‘hijacked’ the religion. From whom? Muhammed? What are they doing that he didn’t do. Isn’t your prophet, as the author and perfecter of your faith, also the ultimate expression of pure Islam? What are the terrorists doing that he didn’t? Do you even know how your religion started and was spread?
Why the censorship, guys???
Excellent review. I’ve seen Traitor, which was also excellent.
However…
THIS is a base calumny:
“…embodiment of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney’s approach to the war on terror Hollywood-style…”
Neither Bush nor Cheney feel that way at all — except in the eyes of their detractors.
As one example, Bush could have set up a pro-American dictatorship in Iraq in 2003, and to hell with the Muslims who would have had to live under it. He was highly encouraged to do so by lots of “respectable” people.
Instead, he spent many American lives, 100s of Billions of American dollars, and most of his own political capital setting up an Iraqi democracy.
No good deed goes unpunished.
I don’t honestly think Muslims can be Americans, much less good Americans.
It’s simple: Islam demands Sharia, including polygamy, which is incompatible with EVERYTHING America stands for. You can no more be a FLDS member, a Klan member, a Nazi, or a Muslim and be an American. They are mutually exclusive and incompatible.
Like it or not, Osama IS a true Muslim, and accurately reflects the attitudes, mores, beliefs, and behaviors of Muslims. [An attitude shared by the way by former 1993 WTC bombing Prosecutor and NRO contributor Andrew McCarthy, who only came to that belief gradually as he prosecuted the Blind Sheik's people.]
Muslims believe in all sorts of things that Americans find incompatible with their core beliefs. I would urge all Muslims in the US to simply LEAVE for places like Saudi Arabia where they can live with Sharia and other Muslim institutions (such as polygamy, beheading, killing adulterers and apostates, gays, female genital mutilation, etc) to their spiritual satisfaction.
As an American I am frankly sick of the calls to implement Sharia in the US by Muslims, constantly, and find these things repulsive. A better solution would be for Muslims to simply return to Muslim lands, and stop trying to use terror/force/intimidation to impose a repulsive and alien belief on Americans.
The movie does not work because both Osama and Samir believe in the same thing: Sharia, and merely differ over trifles. Sharia is still Sharia no matter how much weeping is done.
There are people from all over the world from many different cultures who have converted to islam and from them there is silence.
There are muslims all over the world, in countless countries, under the influence of a myriad of different cultures, who’ve lived away from the middle east for generations, from them we get silence.
I don’t understand a pride that would make someone protest the portrayal of muslims as terrorists in movies or on tv, but not protest the muslims who are terrorists in real life.
The wide negative view many have of islam, especially in the U.S., wouldn’t exsist if moderate, peaceful muslims would visably,vocally stand up against the fanatics.
Madelyn – if you can refute the argument, do so otherwise why bother? Personal insults are a poor cover for ignorance. Dennis, “not terribly well stated”? As if! Perfectly well stated. Muhammed “Was regarded as having had the most holy life”? How could he not since he was the creator of the religion, not just a practitioner. His understanding of the faith he invented therefore was not subject to misinterpretation or misunderstanding. Muhammed practiced true evangelism of his religion for about 10 years and gathered a dozen or so converts, then took up the sword with unprovoked attacks that were convert or die. Trying to hide his ownership of slaves behind “tradition” or suggesting that he was merely a man of his times does injustice to the hard truths of the man, the religion and the movement he unleashed on the world
I don’t know if liberal muslims are a large enough group to make a difference in the war against muslim terror (a greater threat to them than infidels, ironically) or not, but I wish you the best either way.
If you want to have more conservative friends, make some noise in opposing groups like CAIR, who claim to represent you. I suspect and hope many many muslims are opposed to CAIR, but it’s hard to tell, probably largely because our media never met a victims group it didn’t love and grant instant moral authority to.
A shame that this movie copped out to multi-cultural cowardice in the end, though, it sounds like a good premise.
I thought Traitor was the best movie of the year. Too bad it didn’t get more attention. Don Cheadle is a wonderful actor.
You must be logged in to post a comment.