Hollywood Goes to Iran
by Mark TapsonInspired perhaps by President Obama’s “unclenched hand” approach to reaching out to “countries that don’t like us very much,” as his former opponent John McCain tepidly used to put it, an unofficial delegation from Hollywood’s Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (including current and former AMPAS presidents and Annette Bening, among others), has set out to visit Iran as part of a “cultural exchange.”

Bening, Iranian actress Fatemeh Motamed Aria and Alfre Woodard in Iran
Exactly what is being exchanged is unclear. Maybe Ms. Bening et al are lecturing President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the mullahs about “the shame they will see in their grandchildren’s eyes” over their denial of equal rights to gays in Iran. Ahmadinejad memorably told a howling audience at Columbia University in late 2007 that, “In Iran we don’t have homosexuals like in your country.” That’s because they are hanged there, which certainly marks the Mormon Church as lightweights when it comes to intolerance of gays. But for their part, Iranian cultural advisor Javad Shamaghdari laid out for the Hollywood representatives exactly what Iran wants in return: “We will believe Obama’s policy of change when we see change in Hollywood too.”
The change Shamaghdari wants is for Hollywood to stop insulting Iran and its Persian heritage in movies such as the rousing sword-and-sandal epic 300, the historical retelling of the famous last stand of a small but fearless Spartan force against waves of Persians, who are depicted as decadent, arrogant, and imperialistic – the same charges Islamists level haughtily at the U.S. today (apparently Iran isn’t happy with The Wrestler either, in which Mickey Rourke tears up an Iranian flag – one more reason Mickey should have won the Best Actor Oscar). Two years ago this same cultural minister Shamaghdari complained that, with 300, the U.S. had tried to “humiliate” Iran and “provoke war.” ”If Hollywood wants to correct its behavior towards Iranian people and Islamic culture then they have to officially apologize,” Shamaghdari stated this week, with more admirable bluntness than most of our own politicians are capable of today.
Since Hollywood today is well-known for its kneejerk anti-American, anti-war, pro-guilt output, I’m not sure how much more apologizing it can do for America, but in any case, I don’t recall that Iran ever apologized for storming the U.S. embassy in 1979 and holding Americans hostage for 444 days; for backing HAMAS; for providing insurgents in Iraq and the Taliban in Afghanistan with weapons to kill Americans and our allies; for forming, training, and supporting Hezbollah, which has killed more Americans than al Qaeda apart from 9/11; for threatening America and Israel with annihilation; for thumbing its nose at the UN and the international community in its blatant pursuit of nuclear weapons. But then, this is how the left’s highly touted “dialogue” with Islamists always seems to work – in one direction. The Islamists accuse and threaten, we apologize.
For an honor culture such as Shamaghdari’s, a mutually respectful discussion is out of the question; rather, it’s important that we be humiliated, that we grovel. There are no doubt many in Hollywood (perhaps even in the ill-advised AMPAS delegation) who would happily denounce America’s imperialistic aggression throughout the world and our grossly unfair insults toward Iran – just like the craven Columbia professors who scurried to Iran to apologize personally to Ahmadinejad after his appearance there. Of course, Iran would view such groveling as a sign of contemptible weakness, and rightly so.
We will believe Obama’s policy of change when we see change in Hollywood too. If anyone is unclear just how significant a role Hollywood plays not only in the world’s cultural landscape, but in the perception of what Americans stand for, this statement clarifies things. The world, including our Islamist enemies, looks to Hollywood as the barometer, or now the Obamarometer if I may, of America’s moral and political character and direction, and those of us who work here should maintain an awareness of that responsibility.
With that in mind, and in the newfound spirit of cultural exchange, I have a couple of suggestions. One, that we in Hollywood make more movies that are spirited, unapologetic defenses of honor and country like 300, whether or not it pleases such arrogant bullies overseas as Shamaghdari and his bosses. Two, that we send to Iran a new Hollywood delegation consisting of filmmakers that “don’t like America very much,” to paraphrase Senator McCain, for cultural re-education. That could include such luminaries as Ridley Scott, director of the exercises in moral equivalency Body of Lies and Kingdom of Heaven, and Brian De Palma, whose disgusting Redacted should earn him a grand reception in Teheran. I recommend that the delegation enjoy Iran’s hospitality for 444 days.
One more suggestion. In 300, a Persian envoy comes to King Leonidas with a demand for submission. “Submission?” Leonidas ponders. “Well that’s a bit of a problem.” I recommend, for an appropriate American response to Iran’s demand for an apology, that we give the same answer as Leonidas: a good, swift kick right in the abyss.





165 Comments
I have no interest in Iranian dialogue.
Leonidas has the right idea.
"I don’t recall that Iran ever apologized for storming the U.S. embassy in 1979 and holding Americans hostage for 444 days…."
Perhaps if we apologized for Operation Ajax!
"…for backing HAMAS…."
Why should they? We back Israel.
Come to think of it, I don't recall there being any such thing as "Islam" back in Leonidas' day. What do we need to apoligize for, again?
wonder if we can offer to trade the hollywood delegation for the missing journalist girl?
Dear Iran: So sorry. Please accept these actors as our sincere apology.
No, really. Keep 'em. We've got plenty.
and the headscarves are strange. why not the full burkha?
How was Xerxes behavior shameful? He wanted to conquer Greece, a backwards, moral catastrophe of a nation, yet somehow his behavior is shameful? Your logic confounds me.
I hope Israel nukes Iran and the Middle-East, so people like you will not have anything left to complain about.
Tell the Hollyweird delegation to stay there and find out what it is like to live under a dictatorship for real.
And Hollyweird went there because…..? To experience true freedom of speech, dress, sexual orientation…? What?
Now that they are there, do you think we could convince the Ayatollahs to keep them? Probably not. They would be aghast at the sense of entitlement and lack of vocabulary. Their interpreters's heads would explode as well from an overdose of "like," "I mean," "you know," "I was, like…," "duh," and all the other terms of art employed by the Hollyweird uber-lib intelligentsia.
Gear bags of Andrea Anastasiou, Rachel Zoe and Melanie Whitmore all held up at Customs at Baghdad International…
Which is an astute sort of thing to point out, really. But I think that aharris was being a little bit tongue-in-cheek about the Persian Empire being "shameful".
I sometimes wonder if the "thing to do" about the middle east is to make a really big deal about their glorious, pre-Islamic past.
I certainly hope so.
I second the motion.
Don't waste time paying even the slightest attention to trolls like Rexter- I'm pretty sure he's posting from Gaza!
If he's not, then that's certainly where he should relocate (or perhaps to 1930's era Germany if a time machine is ever invented…).
LOL. Oh, the equivalency!!
It's amazing isn't it?
Now, please… I like Iranians. An Iranian surgeon took care of my baby sister and helped out our family… that was my first impression of Iran and it's favorable. My neighbors in California were Iranian, and really nice people. Persian… and from a secular tradition. Amazingly, in my very small, very rural, public school, our exchange students were all Iranian… that stopped when the Shah fell. And, the other Iranians I listed all left Iran either then or before… but I've got all sorts of warm fuzzy feelings for Iranian people… even those who are still in Iran having to deal with the idiots who rule that country… all those people who want to be modern, who remember when Iran was known for the high levels of education and numbers of doctors… all those people getting nose-jobs in defiance of calls to piety and those women pushing back, now, and wanting the sorts of freedoms their mothers and grandmothers had.
None of that negates the fact that their rulers are morons and that demanding apologies for movies like "300" is something only morons do, and a publicity stunt besides. It's chest thumping for the sake of it, to see if they can force the other side to back down.
HAMAS = Israel. Okay……
Nice try on the moral equivalence, Rexter.
You keep telling yourself Israel and the United States are the cause of this:
http://www.haber27.com/news_detail.php?id=23672;
http://www.interfax-religion.com/?act=news&di...