U2 & Me
by Matt PattersonI anticipated the new U2 album, “No Line on the Horizon,” with something approaching dread – the kind of dread only a longtime fan can muster.
I stuck with U2 virtually my whole life – from their sophomore album October (the first record I ever bought with my own money), through the ambient experiments of “The Unforgettable Fire,” to their earthy and earnest “Joshua Tree” phase, all the way through the avant-garde “Zooropa” wackiness. God help me, I even loved “Pop.”
Through it all, it had been easy for me to tune out the political pontificating for which the band was known, drowned out as at was by so much wonderful music. But by the time of 2004’s “How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb,” that ratio had begun to shift. The band’s musical output declined in both quantity and consistency, while at the same time Bono’s political activism went into overdrive.
The diminutive front man could be seen glad handling any world leader who would meet with him (which turned out to be quite a few). He toured Africa with the American Secretary of the Treasury; he appeared on the cover of Time magazine with the caption, “Can Bono Save the World?”
These were gag inducing spectacles, to be sure. Nonetheless, I maintained a grudging respect from the Man in Shades for two reasons. One, unlike a lot of celebutards who shoot their mouths off on subjects about which they know little or nothing, Bono was widely praised for his deep knowledge on issues of global poverty (however misguided his policy prescriptions may be). And two, he studiously avoided the knee jerk liberal tendency to demonize conservatives and Republicans. In fact, Bono showed admirable maturity in working with President George W. Bush, for whom he has publicly expressed gratitude for dramatically increasing United States largess for the fight against AIDS in Africa.
But then came the 2005 “Vertigo” tour, when for the first time in a U2 show that I had seen, the politics deeply and clumsily intruded on the music. ”One,” one of the most heart wrenching love songs ever written, was enlisted for yet another of Bono’s vague and interchangeable political side shows. ”Running to Stand Still,” about a heroin addicted couple in the Dublin slums, was head-scratchingly dedicated to American troops serving in Iraq.
Don’t get me wrong. I bow to no one in my admiration for our fighting men and women. That’s why Bono’s dedication was so infuriating: why that song? It made no sense. It seemed forced and insincere and, once again, took a classic and beautiful piece of music and fused it with the highly charged political zeitgeist.
That was distressing, but when Bono put a blindfold over his eyes and stumbled around the stage, feigning bound hands, I became livid. This rich, pampered rock star was pretending to be a tortured political prisoner, in implicit criticism of the nation that made him wealthy and famous. It made the bile rise in my throat.
The Vertigo tour was followed by lots more activism, but hardly any new music. Meanwhile more and more U2 songs were used in more and more political rallies and movie trailers, cheapening their legacy still further.
At last came rumblings of a new album, with sessions guided by Rick Rubin, the mastermind known for reviving the careers of Johnny Cash and Neil Diamond by stripping their music down to the bare bones. That sounds interesting, I thought. But then Rubin was out, with little or no explanation.
A November 2008 release date for the new album, titled No Line on the Horizon, was finally set – then pushed back to March 2009 because, it was announced, the band had written just too many good songs. Right, I thought. Then the first single, “Get On Your Boots,” was loosed upon the world, and promptly confirmed everyone’s worst fears – “Boots” is a dreadful mess, a halfhearted mash up of a dozen better things you’ve heard before. Then came the coup de grace: a listless performance of “Boots” at the Grammys, after which I was forced to conclude that U2’s days as a vital musical force were probably over.
Still, on March 2, the night before the new album went on sale in the U.S., I tuned in to catch U2 on The Late Show with David Letterman, where they were beginning a widely publicized string of residency performances. I expected that they would do “Boots,” but hoped against hope for something different, something better.
And got it.
The song they ripped through, “Breathe”, was new, powerful, and utterly unique. The performance was exhilarating. Could the album be worth a damn after all, I wondered? Could there be some life left in these boys?
It is. There is.
True, the critics have been divided on No Line. Some have complained that it is devoid of melody. Rubbish. It is filled with layers upon layers of gorgeous melody, just not the kind that beats you over the head. The melodies in No Line rather break like gentle waves over the ear and heart, set in motion by subtle yet complex rhythms that lull and churn.
It is, alas, not a masterpiece. There is, after all, that pesky “Boots” right in the middle, as well as a few other ill advised turns that would have benefited the album tremendously with their absence. And as a lyricist, Bono is clearly flying without his muse, who is perhaps punishing him for neglecting her so.
But the highs are high indeed. The title track comes on like a shimmering freight train, the kind of thing that The Jesus & Mary Chain tried their entire career to pull of. ”Unknown Caller” is the strangest of creatures – like Devo doing a Christmas carol, complete with french horns and technophilic lyrics. It shouldn’t work at all, but it does, gloriously and giddily. And don’t let the unfortunate title of” I’ll Go Crazy if I Don’t Go Crazy Tonight” fool you – it’s classic and euphoric U2.
“Moment of Surrender” is the gem of the album and possibly their entire corpus, a lilting refrain suffused with deep melancholy and yet a strange and tender joy.
“No Line” is a flawed but surprising record. The mediocrity of the lyrics will likely bode ill for its long-term legs, but for right now it is by far the most interesting music by a major artist. Who would have thought U2 would be capable of that, after all this time?
Not me. It’s good to be wrong.







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
73 Comments
U2 could pass gas for 45 minutes and still sound better than most current rock poseurs. Their longevity is proof of their deep and abiding popularity. It seems only yesterday that 'Sunday, Bloody Sunday' was on the charts…
Bono's activism is for the most part well intended; he is in a struggle of sorts with Sir Bob Geldof for title of Most Important Man in Rock, and bith have impressive legacies. Remember, even a mediocre U2 recording is a significant moment in pop culture, and we await it with interest…
U2 could pass gas for 45 minutes and still sound better than most current rock poseurs. Their longevity is proof of their deep and abiding popularity. It seems only yesterday that 'Sunday, Bloody Sunday' was on the charts…
Bono's activism is for the most part well intended; he is in a struggle of sorts with Sir Bob Geldof for title of Most Important Man in Rock, and both have impressive legacies. Remember, even a mediocre U2 recording is a significant moment in pop culture, and we await it with interest…
I, too, love U2. Have always, and probably always will. I listened to the new album and was really discouraged. However, I Tivo'd Letterman and had my face punched by what is the best band certainly of my lifetime (in my opinion). These songs were distant to me on CD, but seeing and watching the crowd's reaction, I was sucked in and taken back by the power of this band.
he might have also said "dammit Jim, I'm a doctor not a music critic" as well…
When I was a college DJ in the early 80s I used to use their songs to make conservative political points when introducing the songs. I was always pleased how well it worked (based on student reactions). Bono would flip if he knew that "Sunday Bloody Sunday" and "Second" were used to support and justify Reagan's SDI.
I have been a U2 fan since I first heard "I Will Follow" in 1980. I have bought all their CDs and DVDs. I have always liked the new directions they've taken through the years, which I see as a sign of musical maturity. I have also appreciated that, though liberal, they (mostly) are devout Christians and that does inform their world view more positively than with most pop stars. Like Mr. Patterson, I've always grumbled, but stomached their misguided political activism because: a) it was overshadowed by the music, b) the lyrics were often ambigous enough that they can be interpreted in lots of different ways, and c) they were mature (if misguided) in their presentation of their poltitics. I agree that they've gotten more strident as they've gotten more successful, but I still have been able to stomach it, because underneath it all they always seemed to remember to laugh at themselves and their own pretensions.
Oh, and I agree. This is their weakest albumm By Far. I've listened to it twice and it's not grabbing me. It lacks the usual complexity and punch (even on the elgaic songs) that make them great. The lyrics seem weaker on first listen too.
we just don't see the political stridency everyone else is trumping; they have always been a Christian themed act and as such stress positive, not negative messages. You must look at a bunch of Irish kids with a different eye than you do Americans (particularly conservatives). Our free-wheeling independent exceptionalism is unheard of in Europe, so their viewpoints are always to the left of us…
I love U2 and the new record took a few listens, but now with every successive spin I enjoy it even more.
From a Christian perspective there are some incredibly powerful songs on here, frankly I could see myself singing a couple in church. I think a lot of music critics out there are looking at it from a similar perspective so their understanding is limited in that respect. Bono's & the guys' faith is very real and very evident on the record.
As for the political issues…they've always leaned left, but Bono a major centrist. He got a ton of flack (and still does) for even engaging in conversations with conservatives and the right; he realizes in order to help Africa he needs support from everyone. Helping save lives isn't a right vs. left issue.
On a personal note, I happened to meet Bono in an elevator in New York City a few years ago, and he was incredibly gracious, kind and humble.
"he is in a struggle of sorts with Sir Bob Geldof for title of Most Important Man in Rock"
Sir Bob would have done better to pay more attention to his pathetic junkie of a daughter than to try and save the world. Of course, he probably wouldn't have been knighted (gag) for doing THAT…
As for Bono and U2, I was never all that impressed by them. They're not bad at all (or at least they didn't used to be- that Grammy performance of "Boots" was absolutely ludicrous!). But without the hype-machine running in Warp-Drive, they're just another decent band that won the lottery and hit the Big Time.
In my youth (late 60's) I played rhythm guitar for a year in a professional band, and saw SO many other bands with REAL talent you wouldn't believe it. The garbage one sees nowadays is beneath contempt, and without the impressive light shows and huge pillars of smoke and shrieking tweeners, most bands wouldn't even qualify to play at a Bar Mitzvah, wedding, or high school prom.
Thanks for the Rick Rubin reminder, Matt (as well as the nod to his Neil Diamond work). As damn good as No Line on the Horizon is, can only imagine how much better he would have made it.
Give it a few more listens. I'd argue it is one of their most complex even. And the punch? Breathe…Magnificent?
Almost 2 years ago, a journalist from Africa, took apart the western media and BONO in all of 17 minutes @ "TED"
Not surprisingly, this talk was not widely reported in the media. "Saint Bono" and his "Make Poverty History" project were dismantled in a logical, reasoned presentation, from someone who actually LIVES THERE. You will never see this man on CNN, THE TODAY SHOW, etc. Why? Because HE TELLS THE TRUTH!!
BONO and his WORLD AID PALS, do MORE HARM than good.
Please Watch – http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/andrew_mwenda_...
Let me encourage you to listen to it with an excellent pair of headphones, or loud on a good stereo system!
It WILL grow on you, a very layered album,. the birds, the horns, etc.. seem to come alive.
I have been working through the movie that accompanies it (a different order of songs) but my grumbles have more to do with storytelling or camera angles, than the music. I agree BOOTS is NOT what it should have been and would have been better to be left off and released somewhere between albums like "the Saint's are Coming".
Lastly, Grammy impressions were identical to yours and I felt same thoughts, then Letterman performances redeemed the band so much. Look them up at youtube and see for self. The guys still have the fire, and like several of you I want that religious inspired message of hope to resonate in a world that grows darker week by week it seems. I know people have said this forever, but it can too often seem like "It's the end of the world as we know it" type of mentality that pervades our media. That is after all what got the change guy elected.. doom N gloom..
Good positive messages are needed, if we are always talking things down, doesn't it follow that it becomes self fulfilling prophecy?
I WILL follow! (the author of truth)
GoodonyaLads!
Don't hate 'em. Don't like 'em, either. They always sounded whiny and preachy to me. And I suspect that if they have indeed "gone back to their roots" it will only be long enough to earn sufficient cash to return to biting the hand that feeds them. I don't think Bono did anything particularly brave or honorable cozying up to George Bush. There was money to be had for one of his pet causes, and if he got it from the President, he wouldn't have to put his own money where his mouth is. He just took Deep Throat's advice—-follow the money. After pulling that obnoxious routine demonstrating how American soldiers torture and torment poor little terrorist murderers, the only way I would give money to Bono is if he would take off those stupid glasses, bleach his greasy black hair, and march into a Dublin pub to sing "God Save the Queen."
To be honest, you are grossly misrepresenting Bono here. The ONE Campaign is just as much about creating economic opportunity, education, helping stabilize transparent governments as it is providing some developmental aid. No one wants to pour money and aid into a hole. Andrew Mwenda (video actually seen here: http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/andrew_mwenda_... is correct, and I don't think Bono would disagree with him at all.
By the way, if people want to help develop economic opportunities, Kiva (http://www.kiva.org/) is a great way to help individuals in these countries with personal entrepreneurship by providing micro-loans.
To be honest, you are grossly misrepresenting Bono here. The ONE Campaign is just as much about creating economic opportunity, education, helping stabilize transparent governments as it is providing some developmental aid. No one wants to pour money and aid into a hole. Andrew Mwenda is correct, and I don't think Bono would disagree with him at all.
By the way, if people want to help develop economic opportunities, Kiva (http://www.kiva.org/) is a great way to help individuals in these countries with personal entrepreneurship by providing micro-loans.
Bah, meant to give you a thumbs up! Totally agree with you here.
I haven't liked U2's music since Auchtung Baby. But their stuff before that is like the soundtrack for my youth. So, I have mixed feelings. I think a lot of their activism is beneficial. Much however, is what lead to the giant trud episode of Southpark.
We did however, get to learn about "Sunday, Bloddy Sunday" in a terrorism class.
Sorry, try this link – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfobLjsj230
Back in the 80's I heard U2 describes as a "really socially concious" band. Soon after I heard Bono say the band was so successful "becuase our music is so extraordinary." I am always skeptical about performers who are so self important as to call themselves by a single name. Cher, Sting, Madonna, Bono, (The) Edge. Gimme a break. I also thought (remember,this was the 80's) that U2's "social conciousness" would be better spent keeping their social commentary confined to the "troubles" in Belfast. I resent when non-American performers feel so self-righteous as to crticize the US when their own countries aren't exactly Utopia's either. (Neil Young et.al.) I thought the MLK song, and the Billi Holiday song (yes I know the actual titles) were just an attempt to make money off of the American record buying public. I don't find anything "extraordinary" about the music or the guitar work. Just sayin'.
Just to clarify: Bono and The Edge's names are their nicknames from when they were kids growing up, and they just stuck. All the guys in the band had them at one point….they aren't stage names or anything, their family and friends actually use them face-to-face.
And good Lord, Bono loves America….certainly much more than other rock stars…a few quotes:
“Your America is where Neil Armstrong takes a walk on the moon. Your America gave Europe the Marshall Plan. Your America gave the world the Peace Corps."
“America is not just a country, it’s an idea, isn’t it? It’s a great and powerful idea. The idea that all men are created equal, that we are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights. That among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”
“America has so many great answers to offer. We can’t fix all the world’s problems, but the ones we can we must.”
I've loved U2 since the early 80's, but when asked if I'm a fan now, I feel the need to clarify that I love the U2 of that age, lest they assume I like the self-important crap they put out now. I'm all for political activism, but it seems to be more about Bono now than the causes he claims to serve. Achtung Baby was the last decent album they put out, only saved by songs like 'One' and 'Love is Blindness.' And I actually hated that album at first aside from 'One' – I had to spend a lot of time with it to appreciate it. I bought Atomic Bomb, but haven't even given it a full listen. I know from a ten second soundbite if I'm going to like a song, and everything there bored me.
I think there comes a point when a band has created all the music that they're meant to create, and I think that happened for them in the mid 90's. Larry Mullen still has my permission to retain the title of awesome, however.
this rock ribbed conservative agrees wholeheartedly. If we start bashing them, we won't have much more left to criticize. They are not nihilists, or licentious. As we pointed out earlier, you must use a different prism when you discuss European viewpoints. Take The Economist, for example. It is quite conservative for the UK. By our standards it would be left of center. So, to is U2…
Neither Bono nor Edge gave themselves their nicknames. Bono was shortened from Bono Vox, and Edge was nicknamed as such because of his sharp features. There was another local Dublin band that they were friends with (still are) called The Virgin Prunes (LOL) that had band members with nicknames like Guggi. The nicknames just stuck.
And I have to echo was ajamison said above – they have always been very vocal about their love and appreciation for America, no matter who is in the White House. They know where their bread and butter comes from, and they aren't going to forget anytime soon.
hallelujah, brother…
You are correct. It is more about Bono, than the causes he claims to serve.
He once had a favorite hat, he had forgotten, flown 1st class at a cost of $1,700 to a gig.
I guess "Stetson" refuses to fly coach.
" . . . the kind of dread only a longtime fan can muster."
What a classic line.
I'm not a U2 listener, but I just had to say I know exactly what you meant with that nifty turn of phrase.
In the immortal words of Frank Zappa, “shut up and play your guitar.”
No, it's not "pleasant." Neither is Achtung Baby or Pop — an album so brilliant music critics still haven't caught up with it. The last two were indeed "pleasant" — safe, pretty, with a couple of wonderful songs, and absolutely without challenge. To hear them once was to know them completely.
You have a strong set of criteria for art that you like, and I can respect that. Personally I prefer something that's a little more difficult to get into, something that rewards repeated listening, with depths it takes a while to understand. No Line is that for me.
For me, Magnificent is up there with their five or ten best songs.
Living in the SF Bay Area during the 60's-80's and being involved in the music scene myself, I was blessed to be able to see tons of bands playing at the height of their careers. In early 1985 I saw U2 play at the Cow Palace. I'd always thought they were pretty good and had followed their career starting on college radio, but I was unprepared for their live show.
By the time they were finished with us, there was a quiet, peaceful hush over the crowd. There were people weeping as they left the venue. There was an aura–of dare I say it–"love" in that place. I've never experienced anything like that at a concert before or since. It was almost magical. And for any wiseguys out there–no, neither the people with me nor myself were drinking, smoking doobies, or suing illegal substances.
As far as Bono's obnoxiousness: that goes with the rock star territory. At least he's actually trying to do some good. Good for them that they keep plugging away and trying to reinvent themselves.
I understand the reward that comes with music that takes repeated listening to appreciate, but what about the ones that don't end up paying off? You end up paying a high price for that.
When you edit your replies, it messes up the links that you post. You have to repaste the link when you edit.
Just repaste it in a reply to this.
When you edit your replies, it messes up the links that you post. Just repaste the link when you edit.
I'm a boomer so maybe I'm outside of U2's demographic. As an ex touring rock musician I try to keep up and find a lot of good and compelling new stuff. But for the life of me I've never understood the adoration for U2. I find Bono's voice about as pleasing a nails on a blackboard. The political posturing is annoying but I could put that aside if I liked the music. I will say Edge is a good guitarist and Larry Mullen, Jr. is a smokin' drummer.
That's why I read The Telegraph (UK). Not exactly as right as The Washington Times, but for England, it ain't bad.
Maybe I'll give the album a listen after all… I've been a fan of theirs for so long, it's hard to just give them up.
Bono lost all credibility with this household when he wanted Western Governments (that is people's tax money) for what he thought important (and helping to stop malaria IS important) and then moved his residency out of Ireland so he would not have to pay the taxes. Taking other people's money and spending isn't noble. Where does he think governments get their money? If he wants all to contribute financially then he needs to pay his share as well, imao.
Music wise – his ridiculous performance at the 2002 Super Bowl with Stars & Stripes inside his jacket made me cringe. He is a great singer but the lyrics have become a joke.
It is, alas, not a masterpiece
EPIC understatement. I was looking forward to this album. I really like U2. I liked "All That You Can't Leave Behind" and "How To Dismantle An Atomic Bomb". The latter had to grow on me a bit, but I liked it at first even. But this album just sucks. It is completely uninspired. It lacks any of the 3 things that I consider crucial to be good music:
1) Emotionally touching
2) FUN!!
3) Having very pleasant sounds.
Most good music does not fulfill all 3 of these categories (1 and 2 are almost mutually exclusive), but it will at least fill one of them. This latest U2 CD did not accomplish any of these categories for me in the least.
Some of my friends who are hardcore U2 fans insist with a religious zealotry that this CD is great ("in it's own way", whatever that means). But in the words of Dr. McCoy: "He's dead Jim". Let this CD die so that they can actually dedicate some time and emotion to creating a good CD. I'm sure they still have it in them.
Almost 2 years ago, a journalist from Africa, took apart the western media and BONO in all of 17 minutes @ "TED"
Not surprisingly, this talk was not widely reported in the media. "Saint Bono" and his "Make Poverty History" project were dismantled in a logical, reasoned presentation, from someone who actually LIVES THERE. You will never see this man on CNN, THE TODAY SHOW, etc. Why? Because HE TELLS THE TRUTH!!
BONO and his WORLD AID PALS, do MORE HARM than good.
Please Watch – http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/andrew_mwenda_...
He still lives in Ireland, not sure what you are going on about.
And that 02 Super Bowl performance was legendary. He was showing solidarity with our country after we were still reeling from the 9/11 attacks. How on earth is that cringe-worthy?
Living in Ireland is one thing. Legal or not, setting up a tax shelter in the Netherlands to avoid paying taxes like the average Irish citizen a whole other.
As a capitalist-minded person, I say do what you want to keep most of what you earn, but pulling something like this isn't too far off from having an offshore Cayman Islands account, an entrepreneurial practice libs that comprise a large portion of the U2 fan-base mock and abhor.
Bono would not disagree with him? He heckled Andrew from the audience!!
He later said "listening to Mwenda talk, was like listening to an African Margaret Thatcher."
I suggest you google "Bono Andrew Mwenda" and then still see if you come to the conclusion that I am "…grossly misrepresenting Bono here."
Everything after Pop was too safe. This one tries to break that trend, but comes off a little boring and uninspired. I fear U2's best album days are behind them. Zooropa was the high water mark. When I listen to it now, it STILL sounds ahead of its time. Brave, avant garde, enjoyable, emotional… Zooropa may be one of the most under-appreciated albums of all time. NLOTH has a few nice moments (title track, breathe, magnificent) but that's about it. Same can be said for ATYCLB & HTDAB. But they still put on a good show.
As for the other "great" bands out there: Radiohead, Wilco, & – yes – Phish.
U2 was great when they first entered the music scene. But then like many successful artists, Bono had to open his big mouth and bore us to tears with his politics and then suddenly his music became second-rate. I stopped buying their music long ago.
http://the100mostannoyingthings.blogspot.com/
I have to agree with Ben Hur, I remember when U2's first album came out and MTV played the hell out of the video that was glorifying the Soviet Army. I did a little deeper and discovered they supported the IRA and denounced most of the countries they were making money from. I labled them hypocrites and moved on to better more hoonest music and I never looked back at them.
"U2 could pass gas for 45 minutes"
So, basically every album they've made so far?
Thanks for having my back on this one, because it is most definitely NOT "politically correct" to admit that one doesn't love U2 & Bono!
As a (former) professional musician I was just trying to be completely objective; and while they're certainly not bad at all compared to most other bands nowadays, they really are nothing special- and IMO hardly deserve status as "superstars" by any stretch of the imagination.
Once again, that's just MY opinion.
U2 was one of the few acts I would still schlep down to the Beast Buy to plunk down my Hamilton to blind (deaf?) buy their latest on the day it came out. When the album leaked a couple weeks early, I decided to try before I bought and I am so glad I didn't waste a farthing for this turgid bore of an album.
Background: I've been a fan of theirs since 1980 when a high school pal had a t-shirt for their "Boy" album. My band covered "I Will Follow" at our annual Big 80s show last year. I have all their albums except for "Poop" (as I call it), which was such half-baked mess due to their having to push it out the door in time for the already-planned tour. (I gave that to my girlfriend with whom our first real date was a Zoo TV concert in 1992.)
I thought "All That You Can't Leave Behind" was the sound of a band with nothing to prove casually rebounding from their self-inflicted irony overload and delivering a solid album. I call "How To Dismantle An Atomic Bomb" a "Wonderbra album" because what was up front – the sublime "Vertigo" – was just a tease because what came after was a flat experience that sounded like the Edge scrolling thru his guitar effect presets of classic tones.
Where "No Bars on the Verizon" (heh) flops is that the laziness and distractedness of the lyrics are only compounded by the lackluster music. Larry is playing the same beats; the best lick in the title track is the one Edge nicked from "The Fly"; every song is a slow to mid-tempo dirge except "Get On Your Boots" which serves as a midpoint wake-up nudge more than an exciting and memorable song.
Most critics are just rubber-stamping 5-star/A+ reviews for this thing like they automatically award the latest loaves pinched by Bruce Springsteen, Bob Dylan, or any act that bashed Dubya. Fans who can't cope with the idea that their beloved band could fail are happy-talking, too. But for those still able to see whether the monarch dressed for the day or not, "No Bars" is the sound of a band that should decide whether they want to save the world or save their musical reputations.
The new album's got some great sounds, and outside of Radiohead, U2's the only other band that is really trying to create sounds that have not been heard before and that can only come from these particular individuals, in both bands. Both have bugged me far more outside of their music than in it, and that's a good thing, because the only reason I listened and still listen is because of the music.
As a U2 fanatic, I really wish I was enjoying this new album as much as some people are, but I'm just completely underwhelmed by it, which is a new experience for me..
A lot of it is derivative of U2's earlier work. While Larry and Adam are playing very strong, this isn't Edge or Bono at their best. And while there are interesting hooks, the songs don't settle down enough to let any one hook grow. It's not (ultimately) as much of an overt retread as Atomic Bomb was of All That You Can't Leave Behind, but it's not all that innovative, and I think it trades away good songwriting for superficial experimentation.
"Magnificent" is a great song, as is "Moment of Surrender," but every U2 album has at least one or two great songs. That's simply not the standard they've set for themselves.
I used to love U2, but the downfall came for me way back in the 80s when at a concert in Ireland Bonehead yelled, f**k the revolution! After that I noticed his activism and the more he became active the more I lost interest in their music. He was too over the top and it was obvious that he cared more about his activism than the music. And I couldn't get past it. I really don't need to know the personal pet projects of the bands I follow or the celebrities in Hollywood. When will they figure out that their fans encompass more than one group? Yeah, Bush gave in to Bonehead's demands that we put up the funds to fight AIDS in Africa. I had to ask, why? We didn't start it there, did we? There are homeless, AIDS, and starving people in this country. Why are we supposed to save the world? When will the other countries on this planet take responsibility for themselves? I don't agree that he has deep knowledge of any of the topics. Throwing a tantrum and bullying the leaders of countries into forgiving the debt of these countries was wrong. I understand his skewed logic in saying that if the nations of the world forgive the debt that the people will benefit, but he was wrong. The people will never see a dime of any of that money because the people that the nations of the world keep putting into power are not righteous people and they never will be. Doing the same thing over and over expecting a different outcome is a sign of insanity. The US needs to stay out of the business of other countries and let them take care of their own problems. We have problems here that need to be addressed. If Bonehead needs a cause, maybe he should start with his own country. He should go back there and make amends. He turned his back on his own people because it became too hard for the pampered rock star when people quit listening to him because they realized he was a pretender. Then he comes here and disses our country, the one that made him famous and contributed to his fat wallet and head. I'll never waste money on another U2 album as long as I live. There are better bands out there than U2. And their members stick to what's important: the music.
Brilliant summary, there, particularly of the last three albums. I agree that POP was undercooked, but I still think it's a stronger albume than No Line, and it's certainly more interesting: "Discotheque" is just as dense as "Get On Your Boots" but not cluttered, clumsy, and embarassing.
But, yeah, I think All That You Can't Leave Behind was their third high watermark, if not an uncontestable masterpiece like Achtung Baby. Atomic Bomb was a retread, and No Line is certainly a different album that Atomic Bomb, but hardly an improvement.
Thank you. One comment I left out (but have noted elsewhere) is that as awful as "Poop" was, it at least had some verve to it. "No Bars" is just sleepwalking banality. There isn't a single moment as stirring as the modulation at the end of "Walk On" that slingshots the song into the outro.
The Rolling Stones fizzled out in the mid-Eighties as their comfy lifestyles sedated them into irrelevance, but U2's decline has been more distressing, partially because they were the "Great Band" for my Gen X cohort, but also as recently as 2002 they still had some juice in them. While some may resent Saint Bono globetrotting Third World hellholes with his $150 D&G shades on, that's not what's behind my disappointment in this album; it's lameness is.
As a long time fan I'm torn after reading this. I recall borrowing 'Under a Blood Red Sky" and "Boy" back in 87 or so after hearing Joshua Tree (the wife and I dated while listening to the 'Joshua Tree'). I recall liking all the tracks. I like to be grabbed by a song….
Perhaps I'll download some of the tracks Matt lists and give them a whirl.
Joshua Tree. Their best. Period. (IMHO)
A grown man pays tribute to innocent victims of terrorists by showing the lining of his jacket??? Whoa – way to go; so out of touch with reality that your way to show solidarity with victims is to be self-indulgent during a half-time show at the Super Bowl. Legendary? Seriously?
I think I beginning to understand how Obama got elected.
Living in Ireland and sneaking your earnings out the treasury are two separate things, while whining that Western Governments (i.e. other people in Ireland's confiscated income) "do not give enough" – friends and the family in Ireland are very hot about this issue; "that is what I am going on about."
There are so many misguided and false accusations in your comment, I don't even know where to begin…so I'm not going to try.
First off, Obama has nothing to do with this (and for the record, I didn't vote for him)…irrelevant to the conversation. Especially since the show took place 7 years ago.
The Super Bowl performance (seen here on youtube: http://bit.ly/2lCt9u ) was probably the most un-self-indulgent halftime show I've seen. They list the names of the innocent behind them, quote Scripture…..I don't think that's very out of touch with reality. In fact, you're the only person I've heard in the 7 years since that show took place that is concerned about it; or for that matter, livid about it in the first place.
Secondly, Bono and The ONE Campaign is not solely about dumping money into Africa, as I've tried to explain here. He and the organization realize and incorporate promoting stable & transparent governments, education and entrepreneurship & free trade. My fellow conservatives like to (apparently) create this straw man image that Bono is a bleeding heart socialist hypocrite, and I don't know what else to say other than it simply isn't true.
Don't assume to know my personal politics, because frankly you have no idea. Your feigned indignation is hilarious though. Learn how to have an intelligent, thoughtful discussion with those who don't agree with you 100% and perhaps we might actually bring others into the conservative fold, rather than scare them away.
I'm done here.
First off, aj, in my comment "I think [am] beginning to understand how Obama got elected." Was referring to the complete and utter lack of anyone to do research before spouting off on a subject: "he still lives in Ireland…" YES BUT HE HAS OBFUSCATED PAYING FULL TAXES IN IRELAND.
So a grown man prances about at half-time and showing us the lining of his jacket, in front of a screen of dead people, is the new definition of, and/or is the epitome of "non-self-indulgent?" Hmm. That's really high bar on your part. Did BONO load the names in himself of was his only connection to the people behind so to just SING IN FRONT OF THEM? Did BONO choose the specific SCRIPTURE, or did he just SING IN FRONT OF THEM? Well, you were not at the Super Bowl Party I was at one everyone just pretty much were just amazed at what a complete self-indulgent jerk BONO was at the half-time.
Secondly, don't EVER mention "My fellow conservatives" {too much like "My FELLOW TRAVELERS" again in the front of a REAL conservative, aj, much less "The ONE Campaign." You have been suckered.
Recommeneded websites…
[...]Here are some of the sites we recommend for our visitors[...]……
Superb website…
[...]always a big fan of linking to bloggers that I love but don’t get a lot of link love from[...]……
Superb website…
[...]always a big fan of linking to bloggers that I love but don’t get a lot of link love from[...]……
Links…
[...]Sites of interest we have a link to[...]……
Visitor recommendations…
[...]one of our visitors recently recommended the following website[...]……
Read was interesting, stay in touch……
[...]please visit the sites we follow, including this one, as it represents our picks from the web[...]……
Check this out…
[...] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[...]……
Superb website…
[...]always a big fan of linking to bloggers that I love but don’t get a lot of link love from[...]……
Check this out…
[...] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[...]……
Visitor recommendations…
[...]one of our visitors recently recommended the following website[...]……
herbal remedies Thanks formerly statesman for intercourse this online. I favourite every bit of it….
Thanks formerly statesman for intercourse this online. I favourite every bit of it….
You must be logged in to post a comment.