<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: George Bailey Wasn&#8217;t Born Here</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/mmcgruther/2009/01/13/up-on-the-big-screen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/mmcgruther/2009/01/13/up-on-the-big-screen/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:47:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sharise parviz</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/mmcgruther/2009/01/13/up-on-the-big-screen/comment-page-1/#comment-43521</link>
		<dc:creator>sharise parviz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7905#comment-43521</guid>
		<description>There is def. bias.  If you look at the Hollywood Reporter and Variety (industry mags)  you see how the left controls the industry.  As  &quot;An American Carol&quot; gets a small blurb and is bashed but then &quot;W&quot; or &quot;Milk&quot; gets great kuddos and huge write-ups. This is just one example.  Articles bashing the political right are also written up which has nothing to do with the industry ( and no need to be published in these mags.) And I guess it is just expected that every Hollywood artist who subscribes  holds these beliefs.

It is tiresome</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is def. bias.  If you look at the Hollywood Reporter and Variety (industry mags)  you see how the left controls the industry.  As  &#8220;An American Carol&#8221; gets a small blurb and is bashed but then &#8220;W&#8221; or &#8220;Milk&#8221; gets great kuddos and huge write-ups. This is just one example.  Articles bashing the political right are also written up which has nothing to do with the industry ( and no need to be published in these mags.) And I guess it is just expected that every Hollywood artist who subscribes  holds these beliefs.</p>
<p>It is tiresome</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael McGruther</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/mmcgruther/2009/01/13/up-on-the-big-screen/comment-page-1/#comment-39629</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael McGruther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7905#comment-39629</guid>
		<description>McCLAIN -- Do you not believe that we as conservatives can reach powerful positions in Hollywood? And more importantly make mega hit movies that break box office records year after year? I do. And when we are in charge I am merely suggesting that we can end their style of gameplay all together by changing the game on them. Of course we&#039;ll be thinking ten steps in front and behind them at the same time -- but they will be totally lost in an industry that puts a premium on class and character again. On dignity and the right to your own individual opinion.  Someone has to take the high road eventually and we can take it because we are Right and they know it. I trust the movie going public will know when that has happened in earnest too. Truth, Justice and The American Way will be back and it&#039;s going to be conservatives that do it. Because we&#039;re the only one&#039;s that can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCLAIN &#8212; Do you not believe that we as conservatives can reach powerful positions in Hollywood? And more importantly make mega hit movies that break box office records year after year? I do. And when we are in charge I am merely suggesting that we can end their style of gameplay all together by changing the game on them. Of course we&#8217;ll be thinking ten steps in front and behind them at the same time &#8212; but they will be totally lost in an industry that puts a premium on class and character again. On dignity and the right to your own individual opinion.  Someone has to take the high road eventually and we can take it because we are Right and they know it. I trust the movie going public will know when that has happened in earnest too. Truth, Justice and The American Way will be back and it&#8217;s going to be conservatives that do it. Because we&#8217;re the only one&#8217;s that can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoenix48</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/mmcgruther/2009/01/13/up-on-the-big-screen/comment-page-1/#comment-38293</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenix48</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7905#comment-38293</guid>
		<description>Great article Michael.  I&#039;m not in the biz (aging wannabe) but I spent a good deal of my childhood in and around Indiana Pa - and GEORGE BAILEY WAS BORN THERE.  They gave Jimmy a bronz statue shortly before he passed on.  The first thing to greet you before you walk into City Hall.

I luv Big Hollywood and am a true believer.  Capra and Wilder and Stevens have got grandchildren working in the shadows TODAY.  And Americans want to see those movies.

Pete: go back to watching Deal or no Deal with your hack imitation of Brad Pitt on the couch in TRUE ROMANCE. (&#039;don&#039;t condecscend to me&#039;)

everybody else: Forget Pete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article Michael.  I&#8217;m not in the biz (aging wannabe) but I spent a good deal of my childhood in and around Indiana Pa &#8211; and GEORGE BAILEY WAS BORN THERE.  They gave Jimmy a bronz statue shortly before he passed on.  The first thing to greet you before you walk into City Hall.</p>
<p>I luv Big Hollywood and am a true believer.  Capra and Wilder and Stevens have got grandchildren working in the shadows TODAY.  And Americans want to see those movies.</p>
<p>Pete: go back to watching Deal or no Deal with your hack imitation of Brad Pitt on the couch in TRUE ROMANCE. (&#8217;don&#8217;t condecscend to me&#8217;)</p>
<p>everybody else: Forget Pete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krebstar</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/mmcgruther/2009/01/13/up-on-the-big-screen/comment-page-1/#comment-37829</link>
		<dc:creator>Krebstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7905#comment-37829</guid>
		<description>Michael,
I enjoyed the article and the ensuing discussion. I like the point that Mrs. Biggles made and that you answered.

Unlike most other posters I am not interested in the political. I simply believe that man trying to govern himself, despite the purest of intention, is doomed to failure. It&#039;s just what we are.

But I do have deeply held beliefs and convictions. I rarely see them mirrored in popular entertainment. I am not interested in blatant, religious messages, or the like. Most movies today are like waking up in a hotel room. There are fixtures and decor that mimic home, but it&#039;s not home. Once in a while they can be enjoyable to visit, but most people wouldn&#039;t choose to live there. And many of the movies of late are badly decorated, filthy, foreign environments that are impossible to get comfortable in.

My goofy screen name is a homage to a virtually unknown kids show that was on more than a decade ago. Based on the guest stars on that show I can only guess how the creators would identify themselves in the &#039;Conservative V. Liberal&#039; bloodbath. Regardless, in creating a surrealistic depiction of growing up they made a place that felt like home to me.

That&#039;s what I want from SOME movies (especially those that outwardly would not seem to be a political statement). I want to come in, feel at home, be entertained and not kicked in the back of the head by some unnecessary jab at the simple things that I think are good and moral.

If it wasn&#039;t for history proving otherwise, sometimes it&#039;s hard to believe that a vast majority of people used to honor the same things.

Oh and note to the bomb throwers: Yes, I&#039;d like to see more intact families and honorable authority figures, etc. Despite what you might be thinking, that is in no way welded to a desire to see segregated drinking fountains, subjugated women or mistreated people of foreign descent. Just thought I&#039;d get that out of the way for y&#039;all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,<br />
I enjoyed the article and the ensuing discussion. I like the point that Mrs. Biggles made and that you answered.</p>
<p>Unlike most other posters I am not interested in the political. I simply believe that man trying to govern himself, despite the purest of intention, is doomed to failure. It&#8217;s just what we are.</p>
<p>But I do have deeply held beliefs and convictions. I rarely see them mirrored in popular entertainment. I am not interested in blatant, religious messages, or the like. Most movies today are like waking up in a hotel room. There are fixtures and decor that mimic home, but it&#8217;s not home. Once in a while they can be enjoyable to visit, but most people wouldn&#8217;t choose to live there. And many of the movies of late are badly decorated, filthy, foreign environments that are impossible to get comfortable in.</p>
<p>My goofy screen name is a homage to a virtually unknown kids show that was on more than a decade ago. Based on the guest stars on that show I can only guess how the creators would identify themselves in the &#8216;Conservative V. Liberal&#8217; bloodbath. Regardless, in creating a surrealistic depiction of growing up they made a place that felt like home to me.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what I want from SOME movies (especially those that outwardly would not seem to be a political statement). I want to come in, feel at home, be entertained and not kicked in the back of the head by some unnecessary jab at the simple things that I think are good and moral.</p>
<p>If it wasn&#8217;t for history proving otherwise, sometimes it&#8217;s hard to believe that a vast majority of people used to honor the same things.</p>
<p>Oh and note to the bomb throwers: Yes, I&#8217;d like to see more intact families and honorable authority figures, etc. Despite what you might be thinking, that is in no way welded to a desire to see segregated drinking fountains, subjugated women or mistreated people of foreign descent. Just thought I&#8217;d get that out of the way for y&#8217;all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael McGruther</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/mmcgruther/2009/01/13/up-on-the-big-screen/comment-page-1/#comment-37565</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael McGruther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7905#comment-37565</guid>
		<description>MRS BIGGLES -- those themes you wish for will be in films once there are more conservatives working in the business and free to produce that kind of material -- like FIREPROOF. When liberals attempt to make family entertainment it&#039;s always fake feeling and ultimately done with sarcasm under the surface. We need public demand for product that does not tear down the family. I agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MRS BIGGLES &#8212; those themes you wish for will be in films once there are more conservatives working in the business and free to produce that kind of material &#8212; like FIREPROOF. When liberals attempt to make family entertainment it&#8217;s always fake feeling and ultimately done with sarcasm under the surface. We need public demand for product that does not tear down the family. I agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oLD gUY</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/mmcgruther/2009/01/13/up-on-the-big-screen/comment-page-1/#comment-37305</link>
		<dc:creator>oLD gUY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7905#comment-37305</guid>
		<description>&quot;Pro-Bush movies….bwhaahahahhahahahaaaa….seriously, are you guys kidding?&quot;

Thanks for proving our point.  Has Bush done nothing good, nothing worthwhile?  Your hatred burns so bright its blinding you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Pro-Bush movies….bwhaahahahhahahahaaaa….seriously, are you guys kidding?&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks for proving our point.  Has Bush done nothing good, nothing worthwhile?  Your hatred burns so bright its blinding you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McClain</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/mmcgruther/2009/01/13/up-on-the-big-screen/comment-page-1/#comment-37297</link>
		<dc:creator>John McClain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7905#comment-37297</guid>
		<description>Michael,
&lt;em&gt;Now we have to come together and start to get along. Please.&lt;/em&gt;

Liberals don&#039;t want to get along.  As long as they agree with what you are saying, they believe in free speech.  If they don&#039;t believe in what you are saying, you can&#039;t say it to them or anyone else.  That is their definition of free speech. They want to remove conservatism anywhere they see it and have socialism as the system we live by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,<br />
<em>Now we have to come together and start to get along. Please.</em></p>
<p>Liberals don&#8217;t want to get along.  As long as they agree with what you are saying, they believe in free speech.  If they don&#8217;t believe in what you are saying, you can&#8217;t say it to them or anyone else.  That is their definition of free speech. They want to remove conservatism anywhere they see it and have socialism as the system we live by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erasmus</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/mmcgruther/2009/01/13/up-on-the-big-screen/comment-page-1/#comment-37017</link>
		<dc:creator>Erasmus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7905#comment-37017</guid>
		<description>Pro-Bush movies....bwhaahahahhahahahaaaa....seriously, are you guys kidding? 

As for World Trade Center not including invective against Muslims, considering the movie was told from the point of view of two firefighters buried in the rubble, when exactly did the screenplay have time to get around to inserting some geopolitics?

By the way, correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but Paul Greengrass&#039; superb United 93 was nominated for several major Academy Awards, and that movie hardly sanitized anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pro-Bush movies&#8230;.bwhaahahahhahahahaaaa&#8230;.seriously, are you guys kidding? </p>
<p>As for World Trade Center not including invective against Muslims, considering the movie was told from the point of view of two firefighters buried in the rubble, when exactly did the screenplay have time to get around to inserting some geopolitics?</p>
<p>By the way, correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but Paul Greengrass&#8217; superb United 93 was nominated for several major Academy Awards, and that movie hardly sanitized anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cryptofascist</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/mmcgruther/2009/01/13/up-on-the-big-screen/comment-page-1/#comment-37005</link>
		<dc:creator>Cryptofascist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7905#comment-37005</guid>
		<description>One person, one vote.  Unless you are George Soros/Acorn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One person, one vote.  Unless you are George Soros/Acorn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Weldon</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/mmcgruther/2009/01/13/up-on-the-big-screen/comment-page-1/#comment-36885</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Weldon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7905#comment-36885</guid>
		<description>Frankly, I think if we aim for political neutrality in Hollywood we&#039;ll achieve nothing.

But if we aim for political domination of Hollywood we MIGHT achieve political neutrality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, I think if we aim for political neutrality in Hollywood we&#8217;ll achieve nothing.</p>
<p>But if we aim for political domination of Hollywood we MIGHT achieve political neutrality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
