The Stamp of Revolution — Again
by Michael MandavilleThe American Revolution was fired up in earnest with the Tax Stamp Act, imposed by the British Parliament on the American Colonies. This Act required that a Stamp be affixed to any paper or document such as bills, newspapers, correspondence, leases, bills of sale, etc. It was invasive, arbitrary and onerous.
The Federal and State governments are continuing this tradition of oppression with Stimulus Bills which our representatives neither understand nor read. Yet these bills are passed without any mind to the financial indentured servitude for future generations. I believe that this debt will be a ‘fiscal press gang’ against generations’ optimism, opportunity and Freedom.
The latest California budget fiasco is an opportunity in disguise. Sacramento has become a laughable reference for a political class which spends like a drunken sailor making a port of call after months at sea. I intend no insult against sailors. They can only spend what’s in their pocket – and they borrow from shipmates who know where to find them.
Sacramento’s Latest Budget Balancing Plan: Raid, pillage and burn the budgets of its Counties and Cities.
To maintain its reckless, gluttonous diet of a bureaucracy expanding faster than the guts of a hungry contestant in a hot dog eating contest (Joey Chestnut wolfed down 68 hot dogs and buns in 10 minutes at Nathan’s annual 4th of July contest), Sacramento has expanded employees, unions and ever-widening Chinese take-out menu of services that aren’t justified by the incoming revenues. Here is the effect of their plan:
- Several sources who have been briefed on the ongoing budget negotiations say that included in the pending deal are $2 billion in borrowing from local property tax revenues that would otherwise go to cities and counties and about $1 billion that would be taken outright from gasoline taxes that now go to local governments for street maintenance and repair. The effect of these actions, says local government lobbyist Anthony Gonsalves, would be dramatic. “They’re going to bankrupt the cities like they bankrupted the state. If this happens, there will be a minimum of 30 cities that are going to file for bankruptcy,” said Gonsalves, whose clients include the cities of Camarillo, Simi Valley and Thousand Oaks.
But here’s the good news. The States and Cities are going to fight back. Guess what my favorite sentence is in this excerpt?
- The anxiety of local government officials is so intense that over the weekend more than 500 supervisors, city council members and school board members gathered in the Sacramento summer heat to vent their anger, listen to calls for a constitutional convention to dramatically reform state government, and attempt to organize the beginnings of a revolution that would permanently change the relationship between state and local governments in California.
This isn’t a problem. It’s an opportunity. Are you listening? “I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore” is spreading. The Tea Party enthusiasm is crossing over from select groups (or what Janet ‘The Terrorists Came In from Canada’ Napolitano calls ‘right-wing extremists’) to the mainstream. They just don’t know that it’s called ’smaller government’ i.e., conservatism. Some prominent council members are calling for a Constitutional Convention to “to give cities, counties and local school districts greater control over their revenues.”
- “After a series of Saturday workshops, the local officials identified the top four areas they would like to see targeted for reform: protection of local revenue sources, term limits, lowering the voter-approval threshold for local revenue measures, and requiring future ballot initiatives to identify revenue sources to pay for their associated costs.”
Most are conservative principles of fiscal responsibility, not that I saw them observed much over the last decade in either Federal or State government. Nonetheless, this moment is a keen opportunity for conservatives to reassert the message that financial responsibility means safety, education, and the future.
The 10th Amendment of the Constitution says:
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
ACTION: This Amendment echoes on the local level. You can push your city to keep its revenues, property taxes and assert more local control. You can push your state to affirm the 10th Amendment. A number of states are doing so. Even symbolically, the reassertion of state sovereignty means that the state’s representatives on the federal, state and even city level are more accountable to the citizens who elected them.
PROBLEM: “Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work,” said Thomas Edison.
You’ll have to roll up your sleeves, quick screwing around with your iPod, turn off the TV and head down to the local City Hall to give voice to your anger. That’s what they did in the pubs, halls and town squares to stir the populace. An overwhelming debt is an oppression of the mind. One that saps our optimism for opportunity, destroying creative impulses that cannot be entertained because they are suborned to the practical servicing of debt and obligation.
Our voices, together as Citizen Soldiers, can set fires in people’s minds with a walk to City Hall. Revolution.







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
60 Comments
I'll be watching this closely along with Arizona and Texas's efforts to exempt themselves from any National Health Care plan, along with Montana's attempts to exempt themselves from any national firearms measures. How far people are willing to go preserve their liberty may make all the difference between keeping what we have left of our freedom and loosing it.
I predicted long ago that California was a precursor to federal financial woes….too many initiatives (e.g., stem cell research) without any identified revenue source…people in California quickly caught on that they could pretty much vote themselves whatever they wanted…not realizing that eventually the bill would show up in their mailbox.
"Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one."
Thomas Paine
It's getting intolerable folks…
The only problem I see is that you have to pay taxes before you have any reason to resent them. What happens to California when taxpayers simply vote with their feet and only the beneficiaries of government largess are left behind? It's almost too ugly to contemplate. Bread and circuses, anyone?
A new Democrat National Comittee ad is BLAMING the Republican Party for it's inability to pass a healthcare bill. It paints the GOP as the PROBLEM, despite more than enough votes in both houses to PASS a BILL, even a BAD ONE!
"It is an affront to treat falsehood with complaisance. "
Thomas Paine
The Dems need to be held accountable and made to pay…
California experienced a net loss of residents in the latest year they have records. Of course that only counts legal residents…businesses are fleeing at an alarming rate also…
[...] reading here: The Stamp of Revolution — Again This entry is filed under America – Blogs, Big Hollywood. You can follow any responses to this [...]
Funny that the states with the lowest tax burden for it's citizen's and business's are seeing rapid population growth (and as a side benefit, added tax revenue) while the highest taxing states are getting ready to turn out the lights and lock the doors…………….Go figure.
"requiring future ballot initiatives to identify revenue sources to pay for their associated costs.”
Now there is a novel idea: what did the state voters do this last year but pass a multi billion (9.95 bill.)initiative for high speed rails. California voters pass multi billion dollar bond initiatives as if they do not have to pay them back. The representatives spend like you said and get voters to pass bond measures they do not want their signatures on. Always saying: children will die, schools will close, and we will have no police or fireman.
Works like a charm 90% of time.
The Free and Independent States joined the federal union for the net benefit of their citizens. If that union acts in a manner to the net detriment of their citizens, then those detrimental portions should be considered a violation of the contract that may be ignored.
Perhaps Kalifornia will break up into two or more smaller states, the sane one(s) and the liberal section(s). Lord knows I would not mind seeing Philadelphia excised from Pennsylvania before the cancer spreads further, let them stand on their own without my money. Hey, maybe we will get to those 57 states after all!
Awww, are they afraid that without all 60 of the Senate votes the Occupant in Chief will veto it?
Yes that's true, but isn't that what led to the civil war? It would seem that anyone who disagrees with the federal union, isn't actually allowed to disagree. Scary, isn't it?
It amazes me that Kalifornia is still limping along. When will it ever crash?!
BTW, I loved California, the old one — when Reagan was Governor.
It is time for a truly Righteous Revival!
The politicians shall Repent Religiously!
Prepare for the coming Republican Revolt!
Praise the words of the great Ronald Reagan!
Money Talks and B.S. Walks. Whether your Liberal or Conservative, Republican or Democrat Lack of Money Talks Louder Still. If Things get Any Worse the People Won't Be Walking to the Polls in 2010 & 2012 They'll be Running. Hopefully Over the Bodies of Their Former Representatives Including the Great O. I've Got My Sneakers On.
And what would happen if people said no?
In PA practically everywhere but large cities there are volunteer fire companies that work just fine, you could do the same for police as local governments hire who they want. There can be home schooling, people using garage space and empty buildings for "one room schoolhouses" etc, plus the internet gives access to many teaching tools and there are already many kids who are cyber-schooled. There will be more than enough education available at least for GED's, and it should go fast and easy without the liberal indoctrination materials.
Over time the feelings of community will grow stronger, as can still be found in small towns and as the pioneers knew it. If your neighbors are hungry, need clothes and/or shelter, the community will come together and provide as needed, as is now done locally and usually in response to disasters like fires. It will not be completely free, it shall be expected that you contribute back to the community. After all if you are not working than surely you can spend some time babysitting some kids or helping with a community fund raiser, for example. Perhaps you can even take in laundry and do other jobs, eventually for money. Likewise will medical care and other essential services be provided.
What will be lost is big sprawling cities, as they are revealed as malignant growths that those within them cannot sustain by themselves. Better to disperse into small tight-knit communities. Why, as people grow to know their neighbors and trust them more, knowing they are willing to support and defend each other, some truly amazing things will began to happen. Like carpooling, or one family with a large vehicle doing the shopping for several families. Miracles shall occur.
So next time they warn they have to spend ungodly sums or the sky will fall, tell them to let it drop. See what they say then.
Welcome to the ironic paradox of the "true believer" liberal who believes in community, that those in need should be taken care of regardless. The way to bring about their "liberal" utopia is, has been, and shall remain, less government, not more. Now you know why when they show the national election maps broken down by counties, all those many Republican red areas are where you can find small towns, or at the very least those who know how they feel. We know what works.
[...] Relies on Media Matters to Hunt for Truth About Conservatives Michael Mandaville, Big Hollywood: The Stamp of Revolution – Again Neoavatara: Failure You Can Believe In: Obama Stimulus II RedState: Whoops… Entitlement Programs [...]
[...] Nasty Chicago Tea Party-Basher Susan Roesgen Out at CNN Michael Mandaville, Big Hollywood: The Stamp of Revolution – Again WTF? | Obama: Anti-Tea Party Susan Roesgen out at CNN. The American Spectator: Health Care and the [...]
[...] To Say Absolutely NO, Dems Didn’t Really Mean “THAT” NO! Michael Mandaville, Big Hollywood: The Stamp of Revolution – Again Michelle Malkin: Dallas Tea Party activists outflank MoveOn at Obamacare protest and Waxman wants [...]
[...] money… and Exposed: A trial lawyers’ pay-off in Obamacare Michael Mandaville, Big Hollywood: The Stamp of Revolution – Again Charles Krauthammer, National Review Online: Why Obamacare Is Sinking – You can’t fake [...]
[...] an earful and Cap-and-Tax Watch: Protests across the country Michael Mandaville, Big Hollywood: The Stamp of Revolution – Again Hot Air: Baton Rouge Independence Day Tea Party, UDPATED – Big turnout, except for media Why Mommy [...]
Everytime my parents and my husband and I get on the subject, my mom just says, "Your grandfather believed that there needs to be a good Depression every so often to weed out the weak and the bad and reset things, and we haven't had one in a long, long time."
I'll respond CrisD,
If you do not grow GDP in this country there is no way out of what you described. Raise the cost of business they move or close. It is no different than our home finance. If you have more bills than you can pay you either need to bring in more income, refinance, or go bankrupt at the same time as you cut your expenses.
We have done just about all the refinancing this country can do. We are shooting ourselves in the foot by raising the cost of doing business in this country.
Unless business is allowed to thrive we will meet your forecast. How many poor people have written you out a paycheck?
[...] and and Gates: Sure, I’ll have a beer with Crowley and Obama Michael Mandaville, Big Hollywood: The Stamp of Revolution – Again Politico: Limbaugh Lashes Out – Rush Says Obama has ‘chip on…shoulder’ Lloyd [...]
The only FISCAL responsibility we have had since Obama was in office is when he paid for his and Joe's hamburgers…
Fed up with Obama? Check out this song at: http://www.myspace.com/rogerweber
You'll feel better.
Look at those RIGHT WING extremists, where is Janet Napolitano when you need her!
[...] ACORN outnumbered by Tea Party Patriots 10-1 on Long Island Michael Mandaville, Big Hollywood: The Stamp of Revolution – Again Politico: Limbaugh Lashes Out – Rush Says Obama has ‘chip on…shoulder’ George [...]
Dare to dream aye? I'd love to remove Chicago from Illinois. That liberal rat's nest costs the rest of Illinois dearly every year. Chicago could be a beautiful city if not for the ancient hippies in the Viagra Triangle……….I'm looking at you Bill Ayers!
I am not a financial person but I see a short term recovery b/c of the bank infusion and now a slow decline into a depression for 10 years (or more.) I am not knashing my teeth over this anymore I picture things as you describe above, kadaka.
The money won't be there and people will reorganize the best way that they can. Good could really come from dismantling the schools-I work in one part-time and it is a bad place in almost every way.
I will add only that I do not understand how anyone can proceed with a pre-crash (Fall 2008) attitude about finances and government. Things are very ominous.
Can you respond? I would appreciate your thoughts.
Christine
Vote and vote often!
What the left has done is pissed off the people that pay the freight, Carter gave us Reagan – Obama will give us “conservative?”
I knew that would get asked!
Civil War was two things, Southern states left and war was declared. While Texas "in theory" can leave the union, and Puerto Rico and certain territories that are not states can walk away, it is highly doubtful that will ever happen. When the battle comes it will be in the courts, with the 10th Amendment as the banner and fast-tracking straight to the US Supreme Court. And really, the Democrats do not want that to happen. Too much of their in-place agenda falls under usurpation of States' Rights and could get thrown out.
Moreover, just about anything the government has done for a very long time comes through that peephole blown up into a freeway tunnel known as the Interstate Commerce Clause. What happens when it gets properly decided that if money is not being exchanged over state lines then it does not apply? Imagine what happens if, say, Oklahoma decides they would rather have their own in-state Medicare program without federal money? Then insists the federal government stops deducting that money from the paychecks of Oklahoma residents? You get care in Oklahoma, state takes care of it. Outside the state, the patient is responsible for the bill however Oklahoma will (legal fine print, at their discretion) reimburse the amount. No state money crossing state lines, not interstate commerce, sure looks like the federal government can go pound sand.
Which federal politicians, predominantly liberals but even many conservatives, want to see that happen? They will try to "convince" the states to take what is offered, they will try to force it outside of the courts. And ultimately, they would rather let "small things" slide then risk so damn much getting tossed aside at will by the states. A leash can only continue to restrain a dog if the dog does nothing that continually weakens it. And caution must be used in how you "persuade" the dog to leave the leash alone, as all bets are off when the dog determines it has had enough and stops to take issue with the one holding the other end.
Good one, Michael. Today Sarah Palin again called the Supreme Leader's mega debt "immoral."
I love the smell of revolution in the morning!
Have you been reading the provisions in the bill that explicitly state "no judicial review"/ I think things are more dire than you make it out to be. The healthcare bill is more than just about healthcare, there are clauses for national ID cards and linking people's bank accounts. Much like Al Qaeda in the 1990s, the U.S. government has declared war on the American people and they have failed to notice yet. Another 9/11 is brewing, but it will be a domestic version, and it very well may be state-initiated.
Have you been reading the provisions in the bills that explicitly state "no judicial review"? I think things are more dire than you make it out to be. The healthcare bill is more than just about healthcare, there are clauses for national ID cards and linking people's bank accounts. Much like Al Qaeda in the 1990s, the U.S. government has declared war on the American people and they have failed to notice yet. Another 9/11 is brewing, but it will be a domestic version, and it very well may be state-initiated.
If you haven't read a summary of the healthcare bill, for Heaven's sake, READ IT: http://lifewithmonkeys.typepad.com/my_weblog/2009...
This bill makes the British look like pikers. It is nothing short of fascism. I kid you not – National ID cards, your bank accounts linked to the government, a Health Czar – enough of this shit! Secede yesterday and be done with it, people of any red state who cares to have an ounce of freedom left for their kids to enjoy!
LoL. You've got that right Brother.
loc n load – gunny
No, I think that they're afraid of having to take full responsibility for it. They want Republicans to vote for it so, if it turns out to be bad, at least the Dems can say "Hey, the GOP voted for it too! There's no reason not to re-elect us, the Republicans are no better!"
Have you been reading the provisions in the bills that explicitly state "no judicial review"? I think things are more dire than you make them out to be. The healthcare bill is more than just about healthcare, there are clauses for National ID cards and linking people's bank accounts. Much like Al Qaeda in the 1990s, the U.S. government has declared war on the American people and they have failed to notice. Another 9/11 is brewing, but it will be a domestic version, and very well may be state-initiated.
[...] an earful and Cap-and-Tax Watch: Protests across the country Michael Mandaville, Big Hollywood: The Stamp of Revolution – Again Hot Air: Baton Rouge Independence Day Tea Party, UDPATED – Big turnout, except for media Another [...]
Actually, it was slavery that led to the civil war. It was the south's refusal to stop the practice of owning and selling other human beings.
[...] Doug Powers, Michelle Malkin: Why I tea party like it’s 2099 Michael Mandaville, Big Hollywood: The Stamp of Revolution – Again Hot Air: Baton Rouge Independence Day Tea Party, UDPATED – Big turnout, except for media Another [...]
Have you been to Texas lately? Oh we can and will do what we want, don't doubt us! There's a reason Texas leads the nation in jobs, lifestyle, etc…we have had and always will have a can-do attitude and we don't wait for someone to fix our problems. We are mad as hell in Texas, keep your eye on us.
No state money crossing state lines, not interstate commerce, sure looks like the federal government can go pound sand.
With as many multi state companies that are involved in the medical industry, that statement may be very difficult. The Oklahoma Medical system would be required to use vendors who are completely in state.
Slavery was at the core, but states rights was the banner.
Nancy & company need a scape goat to blame for their own failures. The GOP and Conservatives in general are an easy target.
Keep in mind that there is only one absolute in this world, Politicians LIE.
Under a rock somewhere.
OMG
If you are going to take it down that fine, the small farmer down the street selling his produce right in front of his house is engaging in interstate commerce. Everything becomes interstate commerce. Heck, one can argue farting is engaging in international commerce, farts to global warming to crop losses to the guy in Bangladesh paying more for a bag of rice. Now put a price tag on the effects of a burrito, add in the premium for hot sauce.
Point Of Sale should be the logical determinant. The multi-state company may be engaging in interstate commerce, but the money is provided by the state to the location in the state where the goods and/or services are provided so the state is not engaging in interstate commerce. If pressed and facing loss of business, I am sure the multi-state companies can spin-off separate in-state entities isolated from the main company, such is already done for tax purposes, and anything further down than those two layers of transactions gets too ridiculous to legally contemplate very quickly.
Like the National ID cards they were pressing for after 9/11 and the Republicans got hammered for it? In the UK they are trying to get them as well, the big backers being the Labour (big government) Party. You know, the ones going down in flames right now? Good amount of outcry about those cards, and the recent "expense scandal" sealed their fate. The preview of how that will go over here can be seen over there, except we are more wolf than sheep, and will beat the liberals with the same sticks they used against the Republicans if they dare to try it.
I would have to know more about "no judicial review," but I do know one thing. The liberals are saying nothing against the trial lawyers. If it deals with patients complaining about their lack of care who need someone to "valiantly defend their rights," woe to those liberal politicians who stand between lawyers and their meal tickets
Like the National ID cards they were pressing for after 9/11 and the Republicans got hammered for it? In the UK they are trying to get them as well, the big backers being the Labour (big government) Party. You know, the ones going down in flames right now? Good amount of outcry about those cards, and the recent "expense scandal" sealed their fate. The preview of how that will go over here can be seen over there, except we are more wolf than sheep, and will beat the liberals with the same sticks they used against the Republicans if they dare to try it.
I would have to know more about "no judicial review," but I do know one thing. The liberals are saying nothing against the trial lawyers. If it deals with patients complaining about their lack of care who need someone to "valiantly defend their rights," woe to those liberal politicians who stand between lawyers and their meal tickets
Like the National ID cards they were pressing for after 9/11 and the Republicans got hammered for it? In the UK they are trying to get them as well, the big backers being the Labour (big government) Party. You know, the ones going down in flames right now? Good amount of outcry about those cards, and the recent "expense scandal" sealed their fate. The preview of how that will go over here can be seen over there, except we are more wolf than sheep, and will beat the liberals with the same sticks they used against the Republicans if they dare to try it.
I would have to know more about "no judicial review," but I do know one thing. The liberals are saying nothing against the trial lawyers. If it deals with patients complaining about their lack of care who need someone to "valiantly defend their rights," woe to those liberal politicians who stand between lawyers and their meal tickets
Like the National ID cards they were pressing for after 9/11 and the Republicans got hammered for it? In the UK they are trying to get them as well, the big backers being the Labour (big government) Party. You know, the ones going down in flames right now? Good amount of outcry about those cards, and the recent "expense scandal" sealed their fate. The preview of how that will go over here can be seen over there, except we are more wolf than sheep, and will beat the liberals with the same sticks they used against the Republicans if they dare to try it.
I would have to know more about "no judicial review," but I do know one thing. The liberals are saying nothing against the trial lawyers. If it deals with patients complaining about their lack of care who need someone to "valiantly defend their rights," woe to those liberal politicians who stand between lawyers and their meal tickets
Like the National ID cards they were pressing for after 9/11 and the Republicans got hammered for it? In the UK they are trying to get them as well, the big backers being the Labour (big government) Party. You know, the ones going down in flames right now? Good amount of outcry about those cards, and the recent "expense scandal" sealed their fate. The preview of how that will go over here can be seen over there, except we are more wolf than sheep, and will beat the liberals with the same sticks they used against the Republicans if they dare to try it.
I would have to know more about "no judicial review," but I do know one thing. The liberals are saying nothing against the trial lawyers. If it deals with patients complaining about their lack of care who need someone to "valiantly defend their rights," woe to those liberal politicians who stand between lawyers and their meal tickets
Everything becomes interstate commerce.
That is my point exactly. That is the way that the feds want it.
one can argue farting is engaging in international commerce, farts to global warming
Please leave AlGore out of this one. LOL.
gets too ridiculous to legally contemplate very quickly.
Just the way that the Feds want it.
[...] Relies on Media Matters to Hunt for Truth About Conservatives Michael Mandaville, Big Hollywood: The Stamp of Revolution – Again Neoavatara: Failure You Can Believe In: Obama Stimulus II RedState: Whoops… Entitlement Programs [...]
You must be logged in to post a comment.