For Conservative Movie Lovers: James Cameron, Sigourney Weaver, and ‘Aliens’ Part 2
by Leo GrinScience fiction is a strange genre, liberally blending the past, present, and future into wonderful new forms. It takes a special mind to seamlessly achieve this mixture, to get an audience to truly believe that what they are seeing on the screen, fantastic as it is, is a living, breathing (and, in the case of Aliens, screaming) world. James Cameron is one part cerebral Vulcan scientist and one part wistful artistic hippie, with more than a bit of raging Scottish highlander sprinkled on top. It’s hard to imagine the movie ever coming into being without that curious makeup fueling its creation from first to last.

Cameron was the oldest child in a Canadian family of five. Born in 1954 and growing up near Niagara Falls, he was just in time to catch the tail end of the atom bomb/Sputnik hysteria and to spend his teen years watching Vietnam play out on the nightly news. “In my youth I was an absolutely rabid science fiction fan,” he says. “I read all the classics, all the old Ace paperback novels. I was really into people like Arthur C. Clarke, Robert Heinlein, Ray Bradbury, and Kurt Vonnegut. When I read science fiction I saw stuff in my head that I had never seen in films.” He also loved the films of underwater pioneer Jacques Cousteau: “I began to think of the deep ocean as outer space. This was an alien world I could actually reach.”
Dad was a quiet, thoughtful electrical engineer who gave his son a healthy interest in hard science. With his younger brother Mike playing Igor to his Dr. Frankenstein (Mike would himself become an engineer, and later developed some of the equipment his filmmaker brother used to explore the depths of the sea) Cameron regularly engaged in scientific experiments. One day saw them constructing a submersible “out of a mayonnaise jar, an erector set and a paint bucket,” complete with a live mouse as crew, and sending it to the bottom of a river on a rope (the little critter survived). Another time, they had the fire department chasing (and bystanders reporting as a UFO) a hot-air balloon constructed with dry-cleaning bags and lofted into the air by the heat generated by on-board candles.
Mother, on the other hand, was an earthy, passionate, artistic influence. A nurse who spent off hours indulging in serious painting and sketching, she also served in the Canadian Women’s Army Corps, revealing her to be a gun-toting tough customer underneath the feminine exterior, just like Sarah Connor in The Terminator and Ripley in Aliens. Under his mother’s tutelage Cameron became an excellent artist in his own right, winning many prizes in local contests.

But this skill created an inner war with his formidable scientific side, causing no small amount of angst as both disciplines vied for his soul. “There didn’t seem to be any reconciliation possible,” he said later of that time. “You were either in science or you were in the arts. But I was interested in both.” Little did he know then that his drawing, painting, and conceptual skills would be a key ingredient in first fantasizing about and then bringing into existence deeply imagined science-fiction stories like Aliens using the hard technologies of cinema.
Clarity came with his first viewing of a movie so overwhelming that after the lights went up he staggered out of the theater and threw up. “As soon as I saw 2001: A Space Odyssey, I knew I wanted to be a filmmaker,” Cameron remembers. “That movie hit me hard on a lot of different levels. Until I saw that film, nothing in my life had ever lived up to my imagination. . . I just couldn’t figure out how [Kubrick] did all that stuff. But I knew I just had to learn.”
When he was sixteen his Dad scored a job in Orange County, California, and their family moved from Canada down to the States. Soon Cameron was married and driving lunch trucks for the local school district, all the while studying special effects at the USC library and fantasizing about how to break into Hollywood. The impetus for making a serious go of it was the thunderous appearance of another science fiction classic. “I walked into Star Wars and just went ‘Wow!’” Cameron says. “Star Wars was what I had been seeing in my head all along. I saw that all the things I had been imagining could now be done.”

It wasn’t long before he and a couple friends began making their own ambitious 35mm sci-fi movie, Xenogenesis (1978), using seed money acquired from dentists looking to invest in films as a tax shelter. Cameron remembers those days as exhausting but heady. “It was no problem staying up all night, every night for as long as it took. It was that young perspective where you’re willing to sacrifice everything for what you feel is important.”
Unfortunately the dentist money dried up long before principal photography was finished, so Cameron cut what little they had shot into a twelve-minute demo reel. Chock full of models, miniatures, and effects like laser blasts, explosions, and forced perspective cityscapes made out of cardboard, the end result wasn’t 2001 or Star Wars, but it was the beginnings of the style that audiences would later come to embrace in The Terminator and Aliens. “For a bunch of dumbshits who didn’t know what we were doing,” Cameron says, “it was pretty good.”
It was also enough of a résumé to finagle his way onto the effects crew of low-budget producer Roger Corman, where he soon was doing visual effects, set decoration, and art direction for such deathless masterpieces as Battle Beyond the Stars (1980 — Corman’s Star Wars) and Galaxy of Terror (1981 — Corman’s Alien). On the set of the latter film, Cameron first met a struggling actor (and, incidentally, the director of the cult music video “Fish Heads”) named Bill Paxton, and the two would become friendly, something for which lovers of Aliens will always be grateful.
The work was overwhelming and the pay minuscule, but Cameron stuck it out, took on every job he could (often to the chagrin of his less-ambitious co-workers) and began to catch the notice of other low-budget producers looking for people to help get their visions on-screen for pennies on the dollar. “I ran roughshod all over the place,” Cameron says.
It’s a culling process. Some people don’t want to deal with it, the fact that so much relies on personality and not logic. That it’s hype. That it’s the pitch. I knew you had to sell and you had to make your move. . . .
I got a lot of good experience from Roger. What I learned was just ‘Go for it.’ I learned that there was always a way to get it done and make it presentable. Roger’s kind of low-budget mentality teaches you that you can probably get by with a lot less than you think. With Roger, if push comes to shove and there’s a crunch, you can still shoot.

After contributing to the effects work on Escape from New York, he finally got a chance to direct with Piranha Part Two: The Spawning (1981). The experience was a disaster, resulting in the fledgling director’s firing a few weeks into the shoot as part of a nefarious plan by the film’s Italian producer to take over the reins himself. Depressed, disheartened, and broke, Cameron fell ill in Rome and spent a feverish night engulfed in a nightmare featuring a robotic monster rising menacingly out of flames. When he awoke, he hurriedly sketched the image before it melted away back into dreamland.
The Terminator had just stalked out of the war-torn future into our world, and the repercussions — both on sci-fi in general and on Cameron’s Aliens — would be incalculable.
Previous posts in the series “James Cameron, Sigourney Weaver, and Aliens”
FURTHER READING and VIEWING
Watch James Cameron’s early demo film Xenogenesis (1978). If you’re someone who’s ever attempted to make a film by yourself, counting on your own ingenuity and long months of work to substitute for a million-dollar budget, you’ll understand how impressive this short film remains even today. A bigger budget only gets you so far, and Aliens could never have been made without the sort of cheap, scrappy techniques demonstrated in this movie.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
42 Comments
- Terrific read…
Hope, the genesis of fantasy and science fiction appeal.
Too bad Cameron turned into a freak show himself.
Fascinating. What drive. I'm reminded of Bette Davis' line in All About Eve, except, of course, you have to substitute a couple of words for "woman" to make it gender-neutral:
"Funny business, a [man's] career – the things you drop on your way up the ladder so you can move faster. You forget you'll need them again when you get back to being a [human]."
That's a Cameron for you. It can't be bargained with. It can't be reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever.
Is "Aliens" at all conservative? This strikes me as another case of so few right leaning movies that we're forced to pick something slightly less obnoxious than average and adopt it as "conservative".
The movie is clearly anti-bizness – the bad guys aren't the aliens, it's the greedy yuppie executive. When Burke, the evil executive points to the giant company created terraforming machine with pride, Ripley gives him an eye rolling look of scorn, as if humans remaking and exploiting even an uninhabited planet is somehow dirty. An echo of Cameron's "AVATAR". It's even got the M-1 racial theme with the android standing in for the oppressed victim class minority. The rest is Heinlein boilerplate without the Heinlein politics. The one "conservative" notion is that the US will still exist as an independent national entity 100 years from now.
I was a big fan of Aliens when it came out, but have found it tedious to watch on DVD exactly for the reasons above. When the culture wasn't nearly as poisonous such themes were acceptable, but the movie has taken it's place as a precursor of the culture smog we all now have to breath every day.
I don't remember the author making any arguments in this piece or the first part that there is anything particularly conservative about Aliens. I know the piece is called "For Conservative Movie Lovers…" but I don't think that means these films are uniquely conservative. This is more about the people involved, the creative process, and the circumstances that led to the final result. All of the films in this series have been particularly creative, excellent films.
That said, I don't think it's fair to call Aliens anti-business. The corporation is bad, but there is nothing uniquely conservative about massive corporations, especially the ones that are in bed with government. I would wait until Grin actually makes an argument that Aliens is conservative before you start your counter-argument.
the article chronicles his science/geek upbringing…
But does not address the megalomanical sociopath he has become. And THAT is no small distinction. His work has always been a potpourri of inspired techie stuff, leftist politics, thievery- and insultingly bad writing.
'Avatar' is badly written, for one.
His best stuff ('Terminator, 'Aliens') is either derivative (sequels) or outright stolen- for which he has been sued, settled- and acknowledged his 'guilt'. But he was shameless even there. He relunctantly gave the great Harlan
Ellison credit on the title crawl of 'Terminator'- but it WAS court ordered.
He never really admitted what everyone knew- that he flat out stole the man's intellectual property and then was forced to 'fess up'. 'Avatar' has been rightly called 'Dances With Smurfs', which it, well, IS. Only difference is Costner's eponymous work is far superior.
Last we heard the Smurfs were ok with being called 'Nav' i'…
Aliens is a good scary movie. Another Cameron movie that I like is Titanic.
How did I miss the obvious cultural milestone that is Fish Heads?
"But does not address the megalomanical sociopath he has become. And THAT is no small distinction. His work has always been a potpourri of inspired techie stuff, leftist politics, thievery- and insultingly bad writing."
Well, this is only Part 2…
Listen, we know all that stuff. This series is about Aliens and the creative process that led to its creation. Is it impossible to read a piece about a left-wing megalomaniac with destructive politics and just enjoy the insight into one of the most enjoyable films of all time? I for one am not going to let the ginormous b*ner that is James Cameron diminish my enjoyment of Aliens and the creative process that went into its development.
On the DVD making of extras for Aliens Cameron talks about how Sigourney Weaver was all upset about the guns in the movie. But as she was trained on them and had a chance to wield them, the flamethrower, especially and she started to like it and he said "Another Liberal bites the dust."
I completely agree with you, OriginalK.
I posted this comment in the first thread, but I think it was past the statute of limitations, so…
Hope I'm not stealing your thunder from future blog posts on this movie, Leo, but it was very interesting to be reading A Bridge Too Far one day (classic war history about Operation Market Garden) and come across the names Hicks, Hudson, Dietrich, Crowe, Frost, Apone, Gorman, and the clincher, Wierzbowski.
Cameron persevered in the Hollywood jungle. I'll bet he's one in a hundred to survive.
Perhaps as a metaphor picture Hollywood success as an oasis surrounded by hundreds of miles of desert, littered with the bones of many who attempted the journey…
if you have paid any attention to the posts we've done on Cameron…
You'd know that we separate enjoyment of his work from the cretinous bevavior he displays. Told folk to see the 'Avatar' re-release because of the sheer visceral thrill. Think 'Terminator' to be one of the great 'B' films of all time.
'Aliens' was overrated, in our opinion. But he is a thief; keep that in mind when you analyze his work…
I have a friend who is a movie nut claiming that Cameron stole the basic premise of The Terminator from Harlan Ellison. I think I saw his original story in The Outer Limits.
I'm not really sure who the "we" is that you're talking about, but ok. I'm just saying this is Part 2, it's a little early to be pointing out that Grin hasn't mentioned Cameron's "shortcomings" so to speak. Just because he is a giant douche doesn't mean that every post about him and his films needs to point this out.
Yup, Hollywood is where great fresh talent goes to starve to death,
while fearful mediocrities (agents, producers, studio execs, etc) shun the risk of saying Yes to new talent/ideas — any new talent/ideas that have not been already approved by any of the other CYA gravy train gate-keepers (that peer approval makes it safe to say Yes to new talent/ideas, not how obvious good they are) …
At least now the internet (You Tube et al) and other technology advances (digital everything) enables creative people to present their product to the public, demonstrating that many people will really appreciate this fresh new offering, if only they are given a chance to check it out (by-passing the prohibtion of the blind/cowardly gate keepers in the biz).
It's true. Cameron did in fact plagiarize huge portions of Ellison's story from "Outer Limits". Later Cameron was ordered to give Ellison credit for "inspiring" the original idea for home video releases. From imdb.com: Harlan Ellison (The Outer Limits teleplays "Soldier" and "Demon with a Glass Hand") originally uncredited. Link here: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088247/fullcredits#w...
There was an interesting article – somewhere – on how low budget – or "unestablished" – movie makers can still be sucessful and forget Hollywood – make deals with the cable companies…
point taken…
'we' means there are several here who input the site. So, enjoy your Cameron fest.
What? No Drake, Vasquez, Ferro, or Spunkmeyer? I love that it has Wierzbowski even.
No way!
Another aspect of "Aliens" that makes it remarkable is that it's a timeless film.
You don't look at it and think, "Ugh! Those costumes! What were they thinking?"
Every character is fleshed out. Every military weapon is realistic. You COULD go "iffy" on Burke's and Ripley's hairstyles….if you wanted to, but have you seen some of humanity today?
The only issue that could jar you from realizing that the 1986 special effects aren't up to standard is when Ferro flies over the compound. IF…you wanted to compare SPFX with other sci-fi films.
"Aliens" is a seamless movie. You can't help but like everyone (not all at the same time, either), the James Horner score keeps up with the frantic pacing, and your heart is pounding most of the movie. Oh, one recommendation: YouTube the clip, "How It Should Have Ended – Aliens." Funny stuff!
I'm not that big a fan of Aliens…no that I didn't like it, or the Terminator, it is just that I don't hold them up as something great. They were just another movie, IMO.
However, there are some Cameron movies that I have enjoyed more than a few times, The Abyss is one of my favorites, and was actually the first DVD I bought when I started getting DVD's.
I've enjoyed Titanic as well. Again, it isn't a great movie that completely blew me away…but I enjoyed it.
I haven't seen Avatar…and I really don't have any desire too.
I can't recall any other Cameron movies off the top of my head.
Too bad the guy is such a crazy. It does make it hard sometimes to divorce the man from his movies.
As several other commenters have mentioned,Aliens just doesn't hold up for me.I loved it when it came out,LOVED it.Watching it now though it is filled with flaws.It doesn't help that Cameron is now an outspoken left winger,or at least that I an now aware of it.Terminator 2 holds up better(to me it was the LAST Terminator movie).Abyss was pretty good,though it still has some cringe worthy politics in it.
Though the film may have the anti-corporation thing, the film does seem to have respect for its military characters and their actions. Please allow me to explain, though be warned THERE ARE SPOILERS AHEAD:
The Marines:
1. Hicks: He is always portrayed as the sensible one of the group who helps lead the survivors with Ripley. Throughout the film Ripley shows respect for him and soem affection grwos between them. In addition he saves Ripley and Newt a couple of times.
2. Hudson: while he is a constant chest thumper who turns intp a cry-baby, he eventually reddems himself. First it is Hudson who saves Newt from the parasite in the medical lab, and it is he who lags behind covering the rest of the team in the retreat when the Aliens attack control room. It is when he has done this that he is killed. In the end he goes down on his feet and not his knees.
3. Vasquez: While she is a chest thumper, her abilities as a soldier never come to question. She never shows any cowardice and also dies covering the team's escape throught the air ducts.
To Be COntinued
This is a continuation of my previos Post with Spoilers
4. Gorman: While Gorman's inexperience costs the lives of soldiers in the first battle, he begins to redeem himself by fighting alongside the surviors in the control room and he dies while trying to heroically save Vasquez, who clearly could not stand him. He also uses the grenade to both spare Vasquez and himself from the death by Aliens and take a few down with him.
5. executive Officer Bishop: Is constantly honorable, volunteering to go outside colony to get the drop ship and rescues Ripley and Newt with the dropship.
6. Drake: A bit of a chest thumper who handles himself well in battle and also dies while covering the rest of the team to the mobile carrier.
7. Apone: It is shown that he is clearly respected by the rest of his troops, is clear headed and does not act cowardly or antogonistcly at any point.
The third part of my post with SPOILERS BELOW
8. Even Dietrich is seen as trying to take care of Newt temporarily and the parasite victim (true she is the medic, but she is shown taking her job seriously).
Therefore the Marines are portrayed honorably for while they start off as "chest thumpers" a number of them act honorably and heroically thorught out the film, thus gaining both sympathy and RESPECT from the audience. And if I saw correctly, I beleive that i saw some american flags on the some of the uniforms.
Cameron …what happened? You had a gun toting Mama who was artistic and obviously "conservative" in many respects. When & where did you get brain washed in the political arena? I don't think your Mama is happy with your Socialistic leanings.
Yes, they are shown as basically decent and heroic. In the sense that conservatism wants to protect society and its instituions and values, that can be seen as conservative. On the other hand, the movie uses the Vietnam war – as seen on TV and in movies by people who weren´t there – as a template:
1. Soldiers drafted from the bottom layer of society,
2. their best weapons unusable or ineffective,
3. commanded by overconfident, inexperienced officers,
4. fighting in an environment that hides the enemy and takes away their technological advantage,
5. being ultimately tools of corporations and commercial interests.
While not entirely divorced from reality – all of these things happened at various times and places in history – it is a clichéd and biased view of Americans at war, esp. coming from a Canadian.
Cameron´s sympathy for these guys is based on the socialist view of class, not respect for the military. They are the exploited. In "The Abyss" they are replaced by the crew if the rig, and the Navy SEALS are anonymous and ineffective drones led by a psychopath. It is just a short step from Michael Biehn character in "The Abyss" to the American SS of "Avatar".
I´m not so much worried about having a large corporation as baddie because large corporations often oppose free enterprise and free markets. But Cameron isn´t concerned about that. He is victim of the "race, class and gender" obsession that captures his generation. It just didn´t become that obvious prior to "Titanic". He probably doesn´t realize it himself.
Doesn´t prove a thing. First, Cameron was wrong about that. Weaver said some fairly silly things recently.
And people change. Cameron probably doesn´t see himself as a card-carrying liberal – it would clash with his view of himself as a total individualist – but that is what he is now. When doesn´t he fit the mold?
Shooting guns? That is not inherently conservative. Defending the 2nd amendment and the rest of the constitution is.
True, but in terms of pure filmmaking (shooting, pacing, editing, soundwork) Cameron is brilliant. If he simply "translated" ideas from literature and other movies into great entertainment, I´d forgive him. The writing only became bad (or the badness became obvious) as his movies became more self-important, first with Titanic, then with Avatar.
I can´t think of a more up to date analogy now, but in rock terms, Avatar is to Aliens as Pink Floyd´s "The Wall" is to "Meddle". Good sales cannot cover up the misanthropy and narcissism, the overblown production und ultimately meaningless "message".
Some have put cameron in the solipsistic gulag, while others rehabilitate him.
Political views often flip-flop over generations. Rebellion.
Not only did Cameron steal it, he boasted of stealing it! The reason that Harlan Ellison won the court case so easily was that he had witnesses to Cameron boasting at a party how he had stolen the story. This tells you something important about Cameron's (lack of) character.
A true genius through and through.
I recently watched the two Outer Limits episode and it's obvious where the initial idea for Terminator came from. Cameron = Hack.
interesting take…
We would posit 'Avatar' as closer to 'The Division Bell' than 'The Wall'- but your point is well taken. Cameron would be a first rate Production Designer for a good director. He does shoot action well, so he could handle the second unit. But considering his stuff lights up the box office that'll never happen.
What amazes us is HOW popular 'Aliens' is. That one is a head scratcher. It has some good moments, but it is another post feminist tract and the military stuff in it which is SO popular is so badly done. We could go on, but why belabor the point? Cameron's stuff appeals to the geeky fanboy- some of which is in all of us, true- but for the most part his stuff just ain't that good…
Cameron = Hack? No, Cameron = Thief. We can't call him a hack because he has done plenty of good work on his own. It's just that no amount of talent excuses theft.
From what I've read, I think it was all a game to him, stealing for the fun of it; to get away with something and to rip someone off. And that's worse than stealing because you cannot afford to pay.
Watching his first film on the above two links, specifically the second clip, I almost expected the girl to bust through the wall with the walker and calmly say to the tank robot: "Get away from him, you b***ch!"
Interesting side note about Al Matthews (the actor who played Apone): he was the first black Marine in the 1st Marine Division in Vietnam, to be meritoriously promoted to the rank of sergeant.
One of my favorite sci-fi/action films. Really enjoy this series of columns, keep 'em coming!
You must be logged in to post a comment.