Haunted by the Memory of Her Song: Fifty Years of ‘Rio Bravo’
by Leo GrinThe sun is sinking in the west
The cattle go down to the stream
The redwing settles in her nest
It’s time for a cowboy to dream….
Exquisitely crafted, but never ostentatious. Pleasantly mellow, but never lazy. Thematically rich, but never preachy. Respectful of tradition, but never stolid. Deeply compassionate, but never descending into schmaltz. Five decades ago, a group of men now long-dead (and, it must be said, one smokin’-hot woman, still-living) followed an aged veteran director into the Arizona desert to make a humble, heartfelt western based firmly on quintessentially American notions of courage, decency, and good humor. The result of their collaboration, Rio Bravo (1959), remains one of the great visceral pleasures of cinema.

Howard Hawks’ masterpiece stemmed from his disgust with the joyless anti-heroics of uptight, melodramatic westerns like Fred Zinnemann’s High Noon (1952) and Delmer Daves’ 3:10 to Yuma (1957) — dark “message movies” that seemed to revel in smugly depicting small-town Americans as cynics and cowards. The man behind such classics as Scarface (1932), Only Angels Have Wings (1939), To Have and Have Not (1944), Red River (1948), and Gentlemen Prefer Blondes (1953) was in his early sixties in 1958, his career winding down after decades of constant production. He had interned for Famous Players-Lasky way back in 1916, and directed his first features in the mid-1920s. Thirty years later he was old and tired, and his last film, Land of the Pharaohs (1955), had been a disheartening flop. Since then, the previously prolific director hadn’t helmed a picture in three years, an unheard-of period of self-exile for a man who had cranked out movies regularly for decades. But the brazen slap across the face that High Noon had given America’s western mythology had bothered him. “I made Rio Bravo,” he later told an interviewer, “because I didn’t like High Noon. Neither did Duke. I didn’t think a good town marshal was going to run around town like a chicken with his head cut off asking everyone to help. And who saves him? His Quaker wife. That isn’t my idea of a good western.”
In his now-famous 1971 Playboy interview, John Wayne recalled his own loathing for the film:
Everyone says High Noon was a great picture because [Dmitri] Tiomkin wrote some great music for it and because Gary Cooper and Grace Kelly were in it. In the picture, four guys come in to gun down the sheriff. He goes to church and asks for help and the guys go, “Oh well, oh gee.” And the women stand up and say, “You rats, you rats.” So Cooper goes out alone. It’s the most un-American thing I ever saw in my whole life. The last thing in the picture is ole Coop putting the United States marshal’s badge under his foot and stepping on it.
Some critics like to nitpick and remind us that Cooper doesn’t actually step on his discarded tin star, but Wayne’s then-twenty-year-old memory is plenty close enough for government work. The conclusion of High Noon (former President Bill Clinton’s favorite movie, natch) has marshal Will Kane casting his badge into the dirt with a sneer, his features oozing contempt for the yellow-bellied townsfolk he defended. “That was like belittling a medal of honor,” Wayne seethed privately to his friends. And even as he graciously did his pal Gary Cooper the favor of stepping up at the 1953 Academy Awards and accepting the Best Actor Oscar for High Noon on Cooper’s behalf, the Duke began thinking about how such a role should have been played, and how he might someday use his superstar clout to craft the same basic story according to his own sensibilities. A story where the town didn’t cringe and run, but instead backed the marshal with their guns and their lives against the black-souled gangsters arrayed against them. A story which would ennoble America, flaws and all, instead of soiling her with a revisionist history at odds with how the brave pioneers of the west really acted.
Hawks agreed and, reinvigorated by the prospect of the film, he commissioned a script from the talented pulp writer Leigh Brackett, with whom he had previously collaborated on The Big Sleep (1946). He was re-invoking cinematic first principles, determined to “go back and try to get a little of the spirit we used to make pictures with.” Instead of High Noon’s straitjacket of a script, featuring automatons in the service of a preordained ideological payoff, Hawks strove to create characters that threatened to derail the plot with unpredictable and shamelessly entertaining personalities. In the place of a grim, constipated marshal standing alone and without help, Hawks envisioned a good-natured hero whose bacon is saved at every turn by the intervention of his colorful assortment of friends, in between raucous bouts of drinking, smoking, showering, shaving, shooting, kissing and singing — not necessarily in that order.
A big part of Hollywood’s Golden-Age spirit stemmed from the excellent writing to be found in many movies from the 1930s and ’40s. The best of these had wonderfully witty dialogue, spoken by characters so vibrant and alive that they fairly leaped off the screen and into the audience’s hearts. It’s worth remembering that underneath the gunshots and barroom brawls of Bravo is the clever and mischievous mind that once gave audiences hilarious screwball comedies like Bringing Up Baby (1938), His Girl Friday (1940), and Monkey Business (1952). “We used to use comedy whenever we could,” Hawks remembered about his early years in Hollywood, “and then we got too serious about it. So, in Rio Bravo I imagine there are almost as many laughs as if we had started out to make a comedy.”
One of the things modern filmgoers often forget is that movies like Bravo once played on big screens to packed audiences, eliciting massive laughs from scenes that we now watch alone in our living rooms on DVD with scarcely a murmur. Hawks once explained his particular brand of humor thusly:
I like things like — I think it was in Rio Bravo — Wayne went over to a man and said, “So nobody ran in here?” Some man said, “Nobody ran in here.” And Wayne went like this and hit him right across here with a gun so blood was coming all over his face. And Dean Martin said, “Take it easy, Chance.” And Wayne turned and said, “I’m not going to hurt him.” The audience laughed so at that.

Howard Hawks is often cited for his unobtrusive nature, his lack of a palpable style compared to other great directors like John Ford and Alfred Hitchcock. But this is a gross underestimation of a man that contributed far more to his films than he is given credit for. Rather than use the camera for an assortment of clever movements designed to catch the Academy’s attention come Oscar-time, Hawks used a minimalist compositional palette that refused to pan, crane or dolly ostentatiously. The results are often startlingly unique. Under Hawks’ direction, the first four minutes of Rio Bravo became a near-pantomime without a single word of dialogue, an apparent homage to the silent movies he had cut his teeth on so long ago. The next time you watch Bravo pay close attention to the compositions, most of which are medium-wide shots, with the camera at chest level. There are virtually no close-ups in the picture, a gutsy decision at a time when technique was becoming far more elaborate in Hollywood fare. In hindsight, it was a bold choice that enhanced the languorous, easygoing byplay between the film’s charismatic stars. Director Michael Powell once said that Hawks “had a very deep understanding of people, what was inside people.” The relaxed purposefulness of Rio Bravo’s confident compositions allows a rare richness of character to shine through.
Characters are the most important elements of any Hawks movie. By 1958 he had concluded that “audiences were getting tired of plots….But if you keep them from knowing what the plot is you have a chance of holding their interest…It’s when a character believes in something that a situation happens, not because you write it to happen.” Hawks had an unparalleled flair for consciously using detail to expertly reveal character. All throughout the production of Rio Bravo, he would sit silently as the actors rehearsed their scenes, ever on the lookout for ways to organically grow their motivations cinematically, thereby creating deep wells of subtext without clubbing the audience over the head with a screaming, obvious M-E-S-S-A-G-E. Here’s Hawks describing just one example out of hundreds that he seized on to make the movie what it is:
In Rio Bravo, Dean Martin had a bit in which he was required to roll a cigarette. His fingers weren’t equal to it and Wayne kept passing him cigarettes. All of a sudden you realize that they are awfully good friends or he wouldn’t be doing it. That grew out of Martin’s asking me one day, “Well, if my fingers are shaky, how can I roll this thing?” So Wayne said, “Here, I’ll hand you one,” and suddenly we had something going.
Most crucially, it was director Hawks who crafted John Wayne’s character into a master not only of action but of reaction, in the process establishing an overriding feeling of camaraderie that makes the film endlessly rewatchable. “John Wayne represents more force, more power than anyone else on screen,” Hawks claimed, and yet by dint of directorial will the star of Rio Bravo becomes everyone else’s straight man. During the course of the plot the Duke gets socked by Dean Martin (twice!), is verbally out-dueled by the precocious Ricky Nelson, suffers the outrageous behavior of Walter Brennan, is relentlessly teased by the ever-flirtatious Angie Dickinson, and is continuously rescued by all of the above. “You give everybody else the fireworks,” Wayne grumbled to Hawks at one point, “but I have to carry the damn thing.”

And yet Hawks knew that, with a universe of talents at his disposal, Wayne’s secret weapon was always his generosity and humility as an actor, his penchant for binding himself and his ego to the needs of a picture. He was unparalleled in his ability to lend his potent movie-star glow to others in a scene, holding up the entire business like a grizzled, enduring Atlas. For Rio Bravo, the breakthrough came during one of Dean Martin’s many set-pieces, while Wayne was standing aside and watching glumly as Martin got to once again chew up the scenery with his performance. “What do I do while he’s playing all of these good scenes?” he finally asked Hawks in frustration.
“Well,” Hawks replied, “you look at him as a friend.”
Suddenly everything Hawks had been striving for, the entire emotional spectrum he was meticulously constructing, became clear. And throughout the finished Rio Bravo, you can go to any point and see the spectacular results of Wayne embracing Hawks’ perceptive direction. Watch, for instance, the scene after Walter Brennan’s character Stumpy has almost killed Dean Martin by carelessly shooting at him through the jailhouse door. Wayne stands by as Brennan, one of the all-time great scene-stealing character actors, goes through an entire blabbering monologue of words and emotions that covers denial, mortification, and finally a resigned acceptance of responsibility. It’s all great stuff, hugely entertaining — but look closely at Wayne. Not a word spoken, not a single word. And yet his pitch-perfect reactions to each of Brennan’s lines gives the scene its touching pathos and power.
Wayne spends virtually the entire film loaning his star power to others in this fashion, not acting so much as reacting, and using those reactions to give his co-stars a much brighter spotlight in which to shine. Indisputably, we have Howard Hawks to thank for that. The Duke was known to sometimes distrust and argue with lesser directors, but along with John Ford only Howard Hawks commanded his absolute respect. “Hawks I trust with my life,” he once declared, a sentiment amply proven by the fearless bigheartedness of his performance in Rio Bravo. Both star and director were so happy with the way their collaboration went (only their second time working together after Red River eleven years before) that they more or less remade the same plot twice more in later years, as El Dorado (1966) and Rio Lobo (1970). The relationship was a special one. Long after both Hawks and Wayne had died, Peter Bogdanovich (who knew both) recalled in an interview that “The last times I saw both Cary Grant and John Wayne, they both talked about Howard, about missing him.”
What they missed — the desideratum of Hawks’ personality and artistry — can be sensed within every frame of Rio Bravo. The film features old friends (Bravo marked the twenty-second and final time that John Wayne and Ward Bond — a delightful character actor and Wayne’s best friend — would appear together in a movie), old props (in Bravo, Wayne wears the same, now-rumpled hat he wore twenty years earlier in his breakout role in Stagecoach [1939]), and old music (”My Rifle, My Pony, and Me” was created by adding new lyrics to a theme previously used in Red River a decade earlier). Surrounding all of this are seemingly endless moments of pure character-driven pleasure. Wayne scooping up a sleeping Angie Dickinson like a kindly father and carrying her to her room. Ricky Nelson taking a nervous drag on his cigarette and a deep breath of courage before brashly heading out the door to kill or be killed. Dean Martin pouring a glass of booze back into the bottle, hands steady as steel, finally conquering his demons. Wayne kissing Brennan on the top of his head and getting his ass swatted by the business end of a broom in return. And above all, that marvelous singing interlude in the jail, a masterstroke that releases the audience’s built-up tension via a sustained sequence of pure fraternal joy.

If there is a single criticism of Rio Bravo that grates above all others, it is the widely-held idea that the jailhouse duet between Martin and Nelson is a major artistic misstep, superfluous and corny. Nonsense. The memorable scene in question occurs almost two hours in. For much of the film, the audience has endured a mournful and threatening Spanish dirge called “El Degüello” (”a throat-slitting”), rumored to have been played by Santa Anna’s troops to the doomed defenders of the Alamo to weaken their resolve. It’s a song the villains play to signify “no quarter,” and as it begins to grate on the heroes’ nerves in Rio Bravo, we the audience worry right along with them. Then, deep in the movie, in a gripping emotional scene, Dean Martin with great agony renounces the bottle and regains his manhood. Finally, at long last, all four men are united in purpose, their doubts behind them. At that exact moment Hawks gives us a much-needed respite via the relaxed singing in the jailhouse. Coming on the heels of all that dramatic strain, it serves as a massive, cathartic release, a musical sunset after the long storms of the first two acts. It is male bonding on a par with the protagonists of Jaws (1975) comparing scars and warbling “Show Me the Way to Go Home.” It is the cementing of an oath-bound brotherhood between friends.
As Dean Martin and Ricky Nelson sing, we get lingering reaction shots of Brennan and Wayne appreciating the music — the first relaxed, genuine smiles we’ve seen for a long time. We listen as Dude and Colorado effortlessly merge their voices and complement each other, the beginnings of the teamwork that will become so important in the trials ahead. Stumpy asks Colorado to play something that he can sing along with, and Nelson obliges, bringing Brennan into the emotional core that has formed. This is one of the very few scenes without arguing or bickering of any kind — it’s a peek into the true feelings of a pseudo-family newly formed to confront a daunting menace. By the end of two songs, these disparate personalities have gained a much deeper sense of friendship and fidelity. We the audience have seen them at their most human — not as cardboard cutout plot points, but as people with longings and heartaches and dreams beyond the dusty and dangerous present. It’s the kind of scene that couldn’t possibly exist in a film like High Noon, with its relentless cynicism and sense of betrayal. And that, of course, is the point. “My Rifle, My Pony, and Me” has become a thematic mirror-image to the sinister “El Degüello,” and it’s no coincidence that, late in the picture, Hawks has the former tune playing on the barroom piano in the hotel, serving as as a subtle, triumphant reminder of which song — and which worldview and moral code — has won the day.

Strangely, Hawks’ potent cinematic iconography seems to be lost on many of Rio Bravo’s most ardent admirers. Director John Carpenter has called Hawks “the greatest American director,” and he not only made Rio Bravo’s plot the template for his Assault on Precinct 13 (1976), he also remade Hawks’ The Thing from Another World (1951) as The Thing (1982) starring Kurt Russell. Neo-noir director Quentin Tarantino also reveres Rio Bravo, to the point of using it to screen potential girlfriends — if she doesn’t like Bravo, she’s outta there. And yet while the films of Carpenter and Tarantino possess many shallow Hawksian trademarks — groups of men struggling in environments poised on the razor’s edge of danger, conversations so hectic and colorful they threaten to derail the plot — they seem to pay scant attention to the emotional resonance Hawks strove to achieve. Film critic Robin Wood, who wrote what is by far the single best book-length treatment of Hawks and his films, notes that, “Hawks is not really a modern artist…he is a survivor from the past, whose work has never been afflicted with this disease of self-consciousness. An artist like Hawks can only exist within a strong and vital tradition.” Too often, a “disease of self-consciousness” overwhelms the work of directors like Carpenter and Tarantino, as they mimic the techniques and plot elements of Hawks without capturing (or indeed, hardly seeming aware of) the “strong and vital tradition” that makes his best films worth remembering in the first place.
Modern film critics, on the other hand, often recognize Hawks’ heart and soul, but just as often they tend to dismiss them with jaded cynicism. The late Pauline Kael, long the High Priestess of The New Yorker’s film criticism department, once sniffed around the edges of Rio Bravo and approvingly declared it a “semi-satiric western pastiche…silly, but with zest; there are some fine action sequences, and the performers seem to be enjoying their roles.” Satiric was a favored adjective of Miss Kael’s whenever she felt the need to explain away the pesky traditional mores of a film she otherwise liked. She also judged The Right Stuff (1983) to be “often satiric,” and for films that celebrated conservative values too unambiguously to laugh off — think Dirty Harry (1971) — she’d pull out the critical napalm and call it fascist. Liberals struggling to justify their forbidden love for John Wayne westerns often adopt such views. In Rio Bravo’s case, the argument usually goes: It’s a cult film, man. A hip film. It’s satiric, dude. Knowingly silly. So determinedly un-cool as to be super-cool.
I beg to differ. Dr. Strangelove (1964) is satiric. Monty Python’s Life of Brian (1979) is satiric. This Is Spinal Tap (1984) is satiric.
Rio Bravo, in all of its particulars, is sincere.
A full half-century after its release, Howard Hawks’ masterwork still epitomizes the essential qualities that made Hollywood’s Golden Age glitter. It’s a nostalgic old man’s love song to the “spirit we used to make pictures with,” a movie that loves its characters — and through them its audience — with a sincerity that soothes like a shot of whiskey chased by a mouthful of warm apple pie. For fifty years now audiences have loved it back, with an ardor that is equally unabashed and unadorned. The song that haunts Rio Bravo is a elegiac melody celebrating humanity, friendship, honor, and tradition, all treasured parts of the deep, eternal river of memory that ever rolls through the God-fearing American soul.
By the memory of a song,
While the river Rio Bravo flows along….
FURTHER READING and VIEWING
Buy the two-disc special edition DVD of Rio Bravo at Amazon. Rio Bravo is also available on Blu-ray.
Add Rio Bravo to your Netflix queue.
Buy Howard Hawks, a clearly-written, thoughtful critical volume by noted cinéaste Robin Wood.
Buy Howard Hawks: Interviews, a meaty collection of conversations with the master director.
Buy Howard Hawks: The Grey Fox of Hollywood, the definitive biography by Todd McCarthy.
If you are ever down Arizona way, visit Old Tucson Studios, where the exteriors for Rio Bravo were shot.
View some great behind-the-scenes pictures from the set of Rio Bravo at Life magazine, The Dino Lounge, and Emulsion Compulsion.
“The Story Behind Rio Bravo: The Greatest Western Ever Made” by Kaleem Omar.
“Rio Bravo Still Popular and Hip at 50″ by Allen Barra at The Wall Street Journal.
“Rio Bravo“ by Jim Monaco at The Dean Martin Collector’s Club.
“Rio Bravo Turns 50″ by Phil Nugent at The Screengrab.
“The Duke and Democracy: On John Wayne” by Charles Taylor at Dissent magazine.
“The Great American Movie: Rio Bravo“ Charles Taylor (again), this time at Salon.





Subscribe via RSS
90 Comments
I watch Rio Bravo with my beloved grandchildren. It is their favorite Wayne movie. My eight-year old grand-daughter does a respectable Walter Brennan imitation, complete with pointing finger and frumpy face. Her show-stopper is:
"But, what I wanna know is, WHY ARE YOU ALWAYS PICKIN' ON DUDE!?"
I will read your article aloud to them. Thank you.
Rio Bravo is almost impossible to skip past when it is playing on television. Every scene is immensely enjoyable and the subtext of friendship and duty generate such good will that it draws you in. There are a lot of lines everyone quotes from this one, including "THAT will be the day." But my favorite is when Ward Bond says, "A bum-legged old man and a drunk. That's all you got?" Chance answers laconically, "That's WHAT I got." As tough minded as Chance may be, people are more to him than a balance sheet of outward qualities and faults. Wayne conveys as much in that one sentence as in a dozen mushy Frank Capra speeches about the little guy. (My review, here http://www.davidforsmark.com/4558/rio-bravo)
Also, wonder what modern 12 steppers think when Dean Martin is given "only beer" to keep him from strong drink! Great, great movie, one that even its fans underrate. Thanks for a terrrific article.
One caveat, I think that Chance is not exactly fatherly when he carries Feathers off to bed. Tender, yes, fatherly, no.
Rio Bravo. I’ll remember that name and plan to check it out. You’ve convinced me. What I don’t get is why so many Americans are ashamed of their cowboy film culture, when millions around the world would rather watch an old Western than an environmental cartoon extolling the benefits of recycling. This. Is. Maddening.
WOW – I think youve just helped me understand Sam Raimi's attempt at a western ("The Quick and the Dead") Have never been a fan of Clint Eastwood's version of westerns.
*Bookmarking*
Check out The Outlaw Josey Wales before you totally dis Eastwood's westerns.
Not dissing them…just prefer Wayne as cowboy rather than Eastwood…but Ill watch it…havent done so in a while…
Being a native New Mexican, I have an abiding love of things here, (such as the Rio Bravo). I usually stop and watch things with those items in it.
I watch Rio Bravo, and her sister films, El Dorado and Rio Lobo, (and yes, they are almost the same thing, so what?), every time they're on. Every time.
It's a buddy picture. its how my friends and I relate. We all call each other names on occasion, but don't cross us, you'll get a handful of trouble. Just like those guys.
I never noticed the minimalist no closeup approach before. And when I was younger, I didn't understand the song business. I get them both now, and "My Rifle, My Pony, and Me" makes perfect sense; If you're working all alone on a stray cow roundup, (or stray criminals), don't you need friends? And the camera work does make everyone play on the same plane.
"Rio Bravo" was made when I was born. Its aging better than me.
Rio Bravo is indeed a wonderful movie. From the perspective of the townspeople, let's not count out Rio Lobo. Not as star studded, but also a great movie. It may not have been made as a direct response to High Noon, but again the town folk around Col. McNally step up when called upon. They even tell us why.
Also, as a cranky side kick, Jack Elam is nearly a match for Walter Brennan. I just love Phillips' (Elam) little streak of mean. Oh, and Jennifer O'Neil is a _serious_ hottie as Shasta.
The Outlaw Josey Wales is one of the greatest western movies ever made. Glad somebody else has an appreciation for a classic.
I have never seen this movie but will now. Thanks for the great review.
Also, I HATE high noon; never understood why it was/is so popular.
To me, Unforgiven is among the top Westerns every made.
Great movie and a must if you haven’t seen it, true Americana. Also I agree up-thread El Dorado and Rio Lobo great companions. Other Wayne movies around the same time, The Sons of Katie Elder, Big Jake, and True Grit all worth your time IMHO.
Right you are BPT. That would be our wussie liberals that don’t like a real western, you know the metrosexual thing and all. Done right people would come out in droves, Hollywood.
I loved both films. Rio Bravo as a straightforward Western, and High Noon as something else entirely. I know that High Noon was originally conceived as an allegory for the world's silence during the Holocaust, and that by the time it was filmed it was supposed to be an allegory for McCarthyism. Nevertheless, as great art sometimes does, it transcended its time. By the time I saw it for the first time in the 90's, I took it to be a simple critique of cowardice and blind pacifism as well as an ode to a lonely hero doing what must be done regardless of the lack of public support. Now with the war on terror all kinds of different comparisons immediately come to mind. In the end, it doesn't matter. We ended up with two great movies instead of one. Nothing to complain about.
Hang’em High, Josey Wales, High Plains Drifter, Pale Horse, Unforgiven, and all his earlier Westerns, with Sergio Leone great movies all. Eastwood IMHO was right in there with Wayne with the western genre.
Just some trivial footnotes about townsfolk going up against the outlaws coming in to raid the bank or whatever – the update of 3:10 to Yuma was totally ruined for me when the baddies rode in to town, shot the marshal and essentially bribed the other townsfolk into going along with them. What would have been more likely to happen was what happened in Northfield, Minnesota when the James gang came to town. Or when Civil War era outlaw J.P. Waldrip came to Fredericksburg, Texas…
Rio Bravo is my absolute favorite Western. An amazing movie, and this was a wonderful tribute to it. Thanks for the great read.
actually, the Leone movies have nothing to do with the American West, they are almost set in a parallel universe (and the first Man with No Name is based on a Kurosawa movie) but The Good the Bad and the Ugly is a masterpiece, nonetheless. Josey Wales, however, is a distinctly American movie with a liberatarian Don't Tread on Me sensiblity and voluntary community.
I'd also like to mention Leigh Brackett, the screenwriter of Rio Bravo. She also wrote the script for Howard Hawks' The Big Sleep (Hawks was, before he met her, under the impression she was a man). She also wrote a great deal of science-fiction as one of the first female authors in the genre (many of her readers were under the impression she was male, too). Her best known SF is her series of stories about the interplanetary outlaw Eric John Stark, a character influenced by equal measures by Tarzan and Conan. Some of these have been reprinted by Paizo Publishing under the Planet Stories imprint and are well worth checking out.
Exactly, love both films for what they are. High Noon is allegorical, Wayne and Hawks were right to say it would likely not happen that way in the West, however, it is a stirring film about standing up even if you must stand up alone. It applies more to this world, every day.
That's probably the best movie review I've ever read, and the fact that I loved that director and every single actor in the movie has nothing to do with it.
Rio Bravo is greatness. El Dorado is very good, but not in RB's league. Rio Lobo was a mistake, the director in decline.
I agree completely. Unforgiven may have the Oscars, but The Outlaw Josey Wales is the superior movie in my opinion.
What I loved most about Howard Hawks was his versatility. The man could do anything.
I sent this one to my dad. His John Wayne collection is the sort where you have to have the list of what he has in order to shop for new movies to add to his collection every year. I'm sure he'll enjoy reading about a new way to watch an old favorite … not that he likely needs an excuse to pop in a Wayne flick.
What's next on your plate, Leo? 3000 words about that 'Three's Company' episode where Roper's niece has the hots for Jack?
This is a little much for Rio Bravo, no? Rio Bravo is to film what a Whopper without cheese is to cuisine. Scratch that 'Three's Company' thing. Your next probing, insightful article should be a review of the Whopper. I bet Quentin Tarantino likes Whoppers.
Lets stay sane here folks and not mention John Wayne in the same breath as Clint Eastwood.
The townspeople in the west were mostly all ready fighters from the trip west with Indians and a hard trip. Many were veterans of the civil war. High Noon was more a comment on the fact that most of current towns were so separate with neighbors not even knowing each other and standing together as they have done in the past. Any student of the old west realize that the Westerns as we saw them in the 30's thru the start of the supposed real westerns a real line between good and evil with good winning all the time. usually alone at the start but sometimes with help.
Very nicely done, Leo. Always fun to go back to "old Hollywood" and sometimes wish more of these articles appeared more often. I do envy those watching Rio Bravo and … Josey Wales for the first time, as it will be such a treat for them.
This is one of the first movies I bought on dvd when I bought my dvd player. I have always loved this movie. Last time I watched it I found myself mesmerized by Wayne's reactions as you pointed out. All I could think of was "Damn, he's good." I admit I have watched this with my eye on the Duke, but next time I will appreciate Hawkes' skill. Thanks for a great review.
You do not believe that John Wayne deserves to be mentioned in the same breath as Clint Eastwood?
That was a fascinating, truly fascinating piece, which I enjoyed immensely.
Beautifully written essay on — dare I say it? — I dare! I dare! — an UNDERRATED classic! Yes this loving and lovingly worded tribute shows ephatically how a great many of the pearls offered up in Hawks' enduring masterpiece have so far been UNDER-appreciated.
I wouldn't have thought it possible, but there you have it.
Pardon the pun Leo but SOMEBODY has to make it: Bravo, sir! There. Now I'll get on with my day.
See…? THAT's why I said prefer Wayne over Eastwood…CE is fabulous in what he does…I saw Unforgiven when it first came out and loved it. I like WESTERNS. But John Wayne came *before* Eastwood, and will always be #1 to me.
The excerpt from the song caught my eye on this article: and I have to tell you, that is one of THE best movies ever made, for a variety of reasons—everything about it and ALL of its stars is just exquisite.
And I not only appreciated the duet between Dean (I LOVE DEAN!) and Ricky Nelson, I often wish they had recorded an album of duets. I even buy into Nelson's acting—dittos to everything you said, and then some. My grandmother and I watched this a hundred times together, often just to get to the song since we couldn't buy it anywhere. This movie will also, forever, tie me to my grandparents who are both gone now—we loved watching this classic together. I'm so glad you gave it some deserved attention>
Mr. Grin – thank YOU for these unknown insights into one of my favorite films. (That hat was from 'Stagecoach'? Dang, I didn't know that.) You've done something I didn't think possible – made me appreciate 'Rio Bravo' even more than I already did. Thanks.
I think there was too much mercury in somebody's salmon!
My two cents about 'High Noon'. Leftist propaganda. Men of that era were predominantly Civil War vets, meaning they knew how to kill and risk being killed, to shoot, to act together as a group, etc. So the idea of 3 measly hoods terrorizing an entire town is laughable. The only thing those townsmen would have said to Cooper was to tell him to quit blocking the barrel of their rifle as they aimed at those three lowlifes.
Secondly, that a townspeople of the old West would have worried about 'what people would think' is even more laughable. The West wasn't for wussies. If you moved out there, you moved into a scary situation – Indians, heat, dust, starvation, etc. So only the courageous took that gamble. People of the old west were primarily courageous, individualists, loners, tough people, etc. Nope – 3 hoods terrorizing that type of people? No way. Like Ford and Hawkes said – it wasn't the real West.
I have watched this movie more times than I can count. There are several moments I wish had been done differently (Dickenson's unnerved commentary after the gunfight comes up short of the necessary emotion of such a moment), but overall it's one of the finest Western's I've seen. The touches of humor (and singing) manage to weave their way through the story without distracting from it. The result is a movie that you can enjoy on several levels, whether you're a child or an adult.
Very nice article, Leo.
Since the days of Owen Wister, westerns have been (at least in part) a sort of American mythology. Americans who are ashamed of the cowboy movies are generally ashamed of the myth.
There is an essay by the critic Robert Warshow titled, "Movie Chronicle: The Westerner" that discusses this in greater detail. See Warshow's anthology The Immediate Experience
Check out the treatment of the the Northfield Minnesota raid in "The Long Riders" for further details.
Of course Rio Bravo wasn't a film (insert snootiy faux-sophisticated grad school attitude), it was a movie. Not pretentious "art" (i.e. suitable only to make academics and wanna-be's feel important and superior to the peasants that "don't get it")
But then, the worst Whopper I've ever had was superior food to the over priced minuscule portions and screwy flavor combinations of Nouveau Cuisine.
And the best wine in the world doesn't compare to a mediocre beer.
So fine, I assume your tastes probably don't match mine, but those are opinions. We don't have to agree, but don't give yourself airs that your opinions are somehow arbiters of quality and sophistication. Outside of Hollywood, the shrinking NY Times readership, and grad schools, the attitude makes you look silly and self important, not sophisticated.
The ironic thing for me was that the biggest, meanest gang o' bank robbers in the Wild west were taken out by a group of Minnesota townies. Not the Pinkertons, or the US marshals, or the Texas Rangers or any other semi-organized law enforcement body. Just ordinary citizens. There's a moral in that somewhere, I am sure.
Personally, I love Rio Bravo. It's just so darn fun to watch that it's almost impossible to dislike. But I have to say High Noon is getting an unfair bad rap here. The truth is, Rio Bravo was made 7 years after High Noon, and no one really made a comparison of the films beforehand. It was only afterwards that Wayne and Hawks made those comments comparing the two. I think a weird part of the criticism of High Noon is that it's somehow inaccurate in its portrayal of the old West. Well, heck, is Rio Bravo supposed to be an *accurate* portrayal? They have a singing cowboy scene and a scene where they toss dynamite at bad guys and shoot it out of the air! High Noon is not bound to its anti-McCarthyist theme whatsoever–it never makes reference to any sort of persecution by politicians or freedom of conscience or anything like that, and it could just as easily be seen as a right-wing film where Frank Miller is a communist coming to take over the town and the people are allowing it to happen. The great thing about Westerns is that they are a genre which can be used to address all sorts of issues and situations, from the lynch-mob mentality of The Ox-bow Incident, to the social structures and prejudices of Stagecoach, to the ideas of civilization, democracy, and the rule of law in The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance, to the dangers of obsession and racism in The Searchers, to the honor and defense of less privileged in Magnificent Seven, to the passing of the West and coming of modernity in Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid and The Wild Bunch. The Western is a genre which is really about a mythical world and time period which never really existed but which allows filmmakers to present rip-roarin' adventures and explore various concepts and ideas in a grand and instantly recognizable style. The Western is important to the American psyche, because it created and ideal of freedom and individualism that we long to exemplify; but many of the greatest Westerns are also critical of this ideal, and display the flaws and non-historicity of the myth. It is important to have these, and that's why the Western is great–because it is really a national conversation about our ideals as a country.
High Noon shows that we must have faith in the laws and rules of civilization if we want it to survive. Gary Cooper gives one the great film performances as a man who refuses to back down, even in the face of almost certain death. He will not forsake his duty, and when Lon Chaney, Jr suggests the life of a sheriff is pointless, Cooper refuses to listen to him. In many senses, Kane is a traditional Western hero like Shane in that he is cut off from the society he must defend. While the film is critical of the townspeople, it is still highly supportive of the individualistic hero who must fight alone against impossible odds. Force is still seen as being the only answer against violent criminals, and the Quaker sensibilities of his wife are shown to be useless and ultimately must be throw aside. Because of all this, and because of its superb, groundbreaking techniques of editing and sense of real time, I think High Noon is the greatest Western ever made. If you don't agree, that's perfectly fine, I just think it's being attacked for the wrong reasons.
Oh, and for the record, Eisenhower and George W. Bush both rated it as their favorite film as well.
Leo has nailed it. Rio Bravo is a great, great film; on so many levels. I have the DVD at home and watch it all the time.
There is another great song in "Rio Grande" that the boys sing in one of the cavalry tents, but I can't remember the name of it!!!
My all time favorite Clint Eastwood western. Both of these guys are great and I'm not going to choose between them. Either one is far superior to the bozo's trying to be heroic these days…
Isn't your posting name the name of Thor's hammer? Just curious…
Damn, Leo, Skip is right; one of the best, insightful artistic reviews I've ever read. I also disagree with the ding on "High Noon", which a different allagory, and one of the best message allegorys ever made. Actually, the Noon message was duty in the face of evil, and as much anti-McCarthy as anti-Nazi and anti-communist. The throwing the badge and Cain's disgust, I understand, was to show he didn't do it for them, despised their corruption and does not seek power from them. The Bravo message, which you nailed with why the song is there, is the Band of Brothers, together in moral lfe/death harmony despite their oddities, to do the right thing, their duty, despite the Deguello threat. These Westerns are not about our Western States; they are about western civilization and human ideals.
[...] Another fellow blogger put an intriguing blog post on Haunted by the Memory of Her Song: Fifty Years of â [...]
Thanks for the head's-up on the Robin Wood book, I'll definitely hunt it down.
"dangers of obsession and racism in The Searchers"
It's too late to respond to this but come on…, racism?
"Oh, and for the record, Eisenhower and George W. Bush both rated it as their favorite film as well."
For the record, what's your source on that?
I really liked comic books as a kid, too. I got a kick out of a handicapped man being the mythological Norse God of Thunder. And since I so enjoy hammering the trolls around here, it just fit naturally…
The Empire Strikes Back gives a writing credit to Leigh Brackett, but George Lucas claims he tossed her script and wrote it himself from scratch, with Lawrence Kasdan's help. I have a hard time believing that. Unaware of that connection, I walked out of Rio Bravo after first seeing it thinking it reminded me of The Empire Strikes Back. They have the same basic idea – the question of duty and friendship.
I love how this film is a summation of roughly every genre Hawks ever worked in. A western that startts as a musical, plays with a screwball comedy.
Oh, and Angie Dickinson was smoking hot. Although I've seen it said she got better looking with age.
Thank you for this article.
The Outlaw Josey Wales is a masterpiece.
"You gonna pull those pistols, or whistle dixie?"
Rio Bravo is a masterpiece. One of those films you can watch over and over again. I have the DVD and will get the Bu-Rey when it's available. A recent Western that I found to be quite good was "Open Range" starring Robert Duvall and Kevin Costner. Costner also directed, though it's hard to believe the same man who directed Dances With Wolves directed Open Range. Duvall was his usual brilliant self and Costner was quite good as well. It has a some similarities to Rio Bravo, particularly in the last half. The final confrontation of the film is just outstanding.
Open Range is very good too.
And Costner is very good in it.
Ok, let me say right off that this is superb. You've touched on exactly the things someone should when describing the following:
1. Anything to do with Hawks
2. Anything to do with Wayne
3. Anything to do with classic Hollywood
4. Why High Noon is overrated.
Plus a whole lot more that I won't bore folks with, since they've read it in the original piece.
And I gotta say, that when I logged in to "the central office" and saw what was cued up here at BH, I couldn't help but notice the tags on this piece. Of course, since it wasn't published yet, I couldn't read the article. Title? Ok, Rio Bravo? Fantastic, I thought. One of my favorite films by one of my favorite directors written by one of my favorite writers and starring some of my favorite actors.
But then I started looking more closely at the tags.
Whoa! Strangelove, Ward Bond, Bringing up Baby, Michael Powell, The Thing from Another World, Dirty Harry, Pauline Kael, The Right Stuff, Jaws, etc. etc. etc. I said to myself, "Holy Todd AO!, this guy has, in his tags, mentioned a huge chunk of my love for Hollywood."
Perusing the those alone was thoroughly enjoyable reading! And the article did not disappoint.
Well Done and Bravo, Rio Bravo!
Let's talk future scripts over coffee, man! You are exactly what we need in this fight. Tell me you've got some scripts of your own going. Tell me this, please.
Actually, she passed away before completing it and Larry Kasdan was on board to doctor it and made major changes. However, elements from Leigh's version were retained in the final film from what I understand. I've heard Lucas say things in the past that were very close to being untruths. I'm not sure why this is. If reality is bending or George is having selective memories. Either way, it's worrying.
Wayne, Hawks and Bracket made another under rated comedic adventure about tough professionals and their friendships in 1962 with Hatari. The film contains the most amazing animal footage ever filmed, and probably would not be allowed to be made today, filming the live capturing of a wild rhino, for instance. It was also a particularly dangerous film for the actors to make. A really terrific movie, often overlookedby Wayne fans because it's not a western.
One of my favorites scenes from Rio Bravo is when Angie throws the pot thru the window and Ricky tosses the rifle to the Duke and draws his gun.
Actually, High Noon wasn't Cooper's only "one good against many evil" role. He also did it well in "The Westerner", taking on Walter Brennan (Judge Roy Bean) and his gang, though if I recall correctly, he used his brains more than his guns in that one. And another good "one against many" was "Shane" with Alan Ladd. Of course, all of the Alan Ladd height stories I've heard about that one (him standing on boxes, trenches dug for taller people to walk alongside him) make it slightly harder to watch without an inappropriate smile in some places.
"Well, heck, is Rio Bravo supposed to be an *accurate* portrayal? They have a singing cowboy scene"
To be fair, I'm sure real cowboys sang. Where did country music come from, anyway?
"'dangers of obsession and racism in The Searchers'
It's too late to respond to this but come on…, racism?"
Granted, Wayne had more than enough justification to slaughter the gang of redskins he was chasing. But do you think he'd have wanted to kill the girl if she had been raped by white outlaws? To miss Wayne's racism in that movie is to miss a quite heavy-handed character device.
"The throwing the badge and Cain's disgust, I understand, was to show he didn't do it for them, despised their corruption and does not seek power from them."
Also, it must be remembered that he was leaving anyway. It's not like he quit after the townspeople refused to help him. But he was happier to quit when he learned what cowards they were.
THough I haven't liked Cameron's Titanic or anything post outside of his documentaries, he also used to be an absolute genius at fleshing out whole characters with a few details in just a few seconds… Vasquez in Aliens, the whole crew of Deep Core in the Abyss….
Roger that.
High Noon is a different kind of greatness. Marshal Kane does what he does because he knows it is right – not popular, not out of obligation, not for reward or accolades, and at the likely cost of his own life and marriage, simply because the bad men must not be permitted to ruin the town.
High Noon does not deserve to be dissed. Even by the Great Duke.
Thank you, thank you, thank you for the article. I have the Ultimate Edition DVD, with the small comic book reproduction and assorted extras, its like comfort food for me. On Saturday morning I'll put it in the DVD and am transported by Howard Hawk's and The Duke's greatness. It is truly an entertainment joy! You have described better than I ever could.
I've loved Rio Bravo since I was a child, it is one of few movies I never seem to grow tired of. I place it up there with Magnificent Seven. Also I'm in the minority on the duet was always one of my favorite parts.
Yes, also Will just married Grace Kelly; hmm, choices, choices, sex with Grace Kelly vs pondscum town; decisions, decisions—duty done, play to begin! Actually, I think Cooper and Kelly did flung a fling after the movie.
I've watched it, ("High Noon"), and I didn't get it either, at first. When you look at it through the lens of the times it was made in, not as a "Western", it makes a sort of sense. I also have "Outland" the sci-fi cover version of "High Noon" with Sean Connery. The characters become even more believable in that context; the whiny "miner" villagers, the exploitative Manager (read corrupt Indian Agent), etc.
I've watched it, ("High Noon"), and I didn't get it either, at first. When you look at it through the lens of the times it was made in, not as a "Western", it makes a sort of sense. I also have "Outland" the sci-fi cover version of "High Noon" with Sean Connery. The characters become even more believable in that context; the whiny "miner" villagers, the exploitative Manager (read corrupt Indian Agent), etc.
George is selective.
I remember a Cinefantastique article where Lucas was all heated up about making NINE "Star Wars" movies…
The center three, "Star Wars", and no, no revisionist interpretation will sway me; MY first 'words on a drum' never had "A New Hope" ANYWHERE on it…"Empire Strikes Back", and "Return of the Jedi". Then three set POST "Return of the Jedi", then the three prequels, "The Phantom Menace" et.al.
"Han Shot First". The problem in a nutshell.
I've go it. Nah nah nah nah naaahhhh nah!
Are you saying the reason the character Ethan Edwards spent 5 years tracking Chief Scar, together with Martin Pawley (who was part Indian) was to kill his niece because he believed in his racial superiority?
To link Ethan's actions to racism is to overly simplify the characters motivations and dismiss a complex cultural history.
Murder, kidnapping, rape from Indians inflicted on the Whites were shown or alluded to throughout the film. Ethan thought to kill Debbie only after years of searching for her when he learned she was Scar's wife. This was not because she was raped, I believe that fate was implied at the very beginning of the attack .
Remember near the end of the film Ethan had the opportunity to kill Debbie, only then could he see she had survived her experiences and as Martin tried unsuccessfully to explain to him, Debbie was still Debbie. Upon seeing Debbie was not destroyed by her years of captivity Ethan lovingly lifted her in his arms and took her home.
I think Ethan was a character shaped by his conflicts with the Indians. Cultural hatred for the Comanche for what they did to his family I think would be a more apt description, not racism.
I've seen Rio Lobo three or four times on lazy Saturday mornings, but you make me want to watch it again a little more intently. Clicking over to Netflix now.
"Are you saying the reason the character Ethan Edwards spent 5 years tracking Chief Scar, together with Martin Pawley (who was part Indian) was to kill his niece because he believed in his racial superiority?"
No. What I'm saying is once he realized she had been defiled and adopted a sort of Stockholm Syndrome, he wanted to kill her. That's not to say all "honor killings" are motivated by racial superiority, but I think this one was. Can you imagine him stopping to think about killing her if she had been captured by a white gang? I can't.
I don't mean to be reductive. Wayne's character was a complex in the mold of angry loner anti-hero. Probably had PTSD. Was representative of the Old West, and felt more comfortable on the trail than settled at home. Hated buffalo. But that he had a hatred for the redskin that would absolutely be considered racist today is so obvious to me that I feel a little silly for having to argue it. You may argue that it's more a matter of the sort of hatred Irishman have for the British, but I doubt it.
"Cultural hatred for the Comanche for what they did to his family"
You smash together two seperate ideas here. If Wayne was just out to revenge his family, the same as if she was kidnapped by regular old white outlaws, that would be one thing. And no one's saying revenge isn't a big part, the moajority even, of his motivation. But to throw in "cultural hatred" changes matters. "Cultural hatred" is a pretty good synonym for racism, actually.
His immediate emotional reaction was to want to kill her. Something primal came before his natural sense of filial love and damsel-protection.
Great article, Leo!
A great tribute to an even greater movie. Well done and Bravo!
My Dad and I would watch this together every time it came on television in the 1960's and 1970's. Now, I cannot watch it without thinking of him. And I watch it every chance I get.
My source is the "Inside High Noon" 50-minute documentary which is included on the 2-Disc Ultimate Collector's Edition of High Noon. It actually includes an interview with Bill Clinton about the movie, which is a little weird.
And I agree with Tublecane–Ethan Edwards was a complex character, but his racism is so obvious it shouldn't need this much explanation.
My source is the "Inside High Noon" 50-minute documentary which is included on the 2-Disc Ultimate Collector's Edition of High Noon. It actually includes an interview with Bill Clinton about the movie, which is a little weird.
And I agree with Tublecane–Ethan Edwards was a complex character, but his racism is so obvious it shouldn't need this much explanation.
Cameron hasn't come out with anything except documentaries since Titanic. He's been spending all his time getting ready for Avatar, which is due out this December.
Typical right-wing stereotyping. I'm as liberal as they come and I love westerns. In fact, RIO BRAVO is one of my three favorite films, period. To quote another classic oater: when ya say that, SMILE.
Interesting, thanks for the source.
>And I agree with Tublecane
I know, he was agreeing with you and I still disagree with you both
>>"Cultural hatred" is a pretty good synonym for racism, actually. Not at all, is hatred for the Taliban culture racist? Yes, Ethan was a man full of hatred, if you recall the saga began from a Comanche murder raid. The Comanche were his enemy, that does not make him racist, . After 5 years of searching for his niece he thinks to kill her in the final days of the search when he learns she has “married” Chef Scar. Scar murdered their family not to mention Martin’s mother years earlier, Debbie, to Ethan, is now a fully assimilated Comanche, his enemy- that does not make him racist. Even when Ethan has the chance to kill Debbie he doesn’t even draw his pistol, he lifts her and says “lets go home Debbie”. It took me a while to understand were you are coming from. Your taking your view of inherent western racism and applying it to this character which is unfortunate, anyway thanks for the discourse
>angry loner
yes because his family was murdered
>anti-hero
we are talking about The Searchers right?
[...] Bravo was never one of my favorite westerns but, but after reading Haunted by the Memory of Her Song: Fifty Years of ‘Rio Bravo’, I may have to see it again. Here is how it begins: Exquisitely crafted, but never ostentatious. [...]
[...] counts. You might also check out The Hyphen, as read by the great John Wayne. Yes, I said “great.” And I meant it. Category: Guardians Of Freedom ♦ [...]
Re: In response to Amazon's remote deletion of 1984 and Animal Farm
Hi there,
Saw you'd written about the Amazon / 1984 flap, and I thought you might be
interested in the petition we launched yesterday:
http://defectivebydesign.org/amazon1984
We have over 1400 signatures already, and signers include Lawrence Lessig,
Clay Shirky, Cory Doctorow and other notable authors, librarians, and
scholars.
The petition opens:
"We believe in a way of life based on the free exchange of ideas, in which
books have and will continue to play a central role. Devices like Amazon's
are trying to determine how people will interact with books, but Amazon's
use of DRM to control and monitor users and their books constitutes a clear
threat to the free exchange of ideas."
Please have a look, and if you support the cause or think it would be
interesting to your readers, a blog post would be great!
Thanks,
-Holmes Wilson
Free Software Foundation
The Duke would have fit in nicely in: SNAKEBIT, TEXAS http://www.snakebit-texas.com Too bad the Duke and westerns have seen their last sunset. Daniel Sterling Sample cinedog@netzero.net
You must be logged in to post a comment.