The Most Conservative Show On Television
by Kurt SchlichterAmerica is facing a self-esteem crisis. There’s too damn much of it.
In a nation where failure is rewarded with bailouts, the successful are public enemy number one and society’s nannies spread the lie that everyone is a winner, a simple TV singing contest provides the loudest voice of bedrock conservative values like hard work and personal achievement. And that voice has an English accent.
For the three folks who don’t know because they have been living in a cavern next to Osama bin Laden since 2002, “American Idol” has wannabe crooners appear before a panel of four judges and warble some song for about sixty seconds. The viewers vote (by paying a buck to the phone company) on who stays in the contest and who gets tossed off, but before the voting the singers get feedback. This is when the fun begins.
Three of the judges are almost always positive. Randy Jackson, a producer who calls people “Dawg,” usually says something along the lines of “You really worked that out” or “Every week, you get up there and bring it.” Kara DioGuardi, a songwriter, mostly urges the singers “to show us who you are.” Paula Abdul, who looks astonishingly like she did back when she was making records in the 80’s, absolutely loves everything about everyone. Her critiques are rambling, often incoherent affirmations not only of the singers’ performance but their essential beings – “That was beautiful, moving, heartbreaking, and I can feel that your inner beauty shining through and look, there’s a squirrel and I have a hat. I love you.”
None of this could be considered criticism. It is mostly validation, criticism’s arch-nemesis and the bane of anyone actually trying to improve himself.
It’s the fourth judge, English expat Simon Cowell, who makes “Idol” so conservative and so refreshing. Because he just doesn’t care. And it’s glorious.
“That was bloody awful,” he will casually observe. Then the camera will pan to the 22-year old singer slash Hooters girl as her jaw drops in the face of an undeniable truth no one has ever dared tell her before.
“But singing is my dream,” she’ll protest.
“Get a new dream,” Simon will reply without a hint of emotion, “because your singing is a nightmare. Go home.” And they usually do – the audience tends to vote off those not making the Cowell cut.
There are still a few places left in American society where hard truth and unrelenting standards still intersect – courtrooms, basic training, match.com. But those are exceptions.
Schools ban competitive games, stop designating valedictorians and promote everyone with a pulse to protect the tender feelings of those who fail to achieve. Teachers whine endlessly about the tyranny of standardized tests and the oppression that is accountability. Auto companies mismanage themselves until their capitalized value is less than that of Arby’s while the wizards of Wall Street flush trillions on deals that would make P.T. Barnum blush, yet they all get checks from Uncle Sam. People do stupid things – like buy houses they couldn’t afford on twice their income or have eight kids with no husband – and end up with cash subsidies and sympathetic profiles for the geriatrics who still watch the CBS Evening News.
It’s clear many of these contestants have never been told the truth about their singing – that is, been criticized – in their life. It stuns them – someone has pointed out that they are less than perfect! They are flabbergasted. It’s like Simon has just lectured them in Swahili.
“Well,” they will stammer, “I think I did really well and I had fun out there.”
Only in a society where children’s’ self-esteem has been made the Holy Grail of the educational system could a 19-year old communications major from Maryland State with a love of show tunes presume to place her opinion about singing on the same scale with that of a 30-year record industry vet who could tile the floor of his mansion with the gold records he’s honchoed. And who lied to this young woman and told her that the amusement she derived from her activity is somehow relevant to evaluating the skill she displayed in executing it?
But you can see in the eyes of the smart ones that they are thinking about what Simon said. That’s good – criticism is the key to improvement. Validation is the key to staying lousy.
Simon, like all rebels, comes in for his share of grief. He is mocked for his huge ego, but he has a right to a healthy ego – Simon is tremendously successful music impresario. He earned it. The problem is the huge egos of people who have not.
Mostly, Simon is accused of taking pleasure in slashing the contestants down to size, but a closer look proves that is just not so. Simon is never happy when trashing a performance – there’s no smile, no hint of delight. If anything, he is irritated, offended that he and the audience were presented with a poorly arranged, lazily performed, overindulgent mess of a performance. The only time he is clearly happy, in fact, is when someone does well.
“That was brilliant,” he will say in exactly the same way he just told a lesser performer that she sounded like a broken woodchipper with a chest cold. But you can see the comer of his thin lips turn upwards in delight. Simon does not enjoy failure. He enjoys earned success.
Where society seeks to avoid at all costs “stigmatizing” people by telling the truth about them, Simon swims upstream against this feel-good nonsense like some kind of truth-telling salmon. Like so much of society, many of the contestants show up believing they are somehow entitled to validation. In the past, this misconception would have been dispelled by parents and teachers. Now it’s up to Simon.
The American people are hungry for the kind of conservative values like hard work, discipline and healthy competition that “Idol” rewards. The show is a huge hit and Simon is its (pardon the expression) heart. At the risk of inflating his ego further, Simon Cowell is clearly the most important British contribution to Anglo-American civilization since the Magna Carta.







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
637 Comments
“That was beautiful, moving, heartbreaking, and I can feel that your inner beauty shining through and look, there’s a squirrel and I have a hat. I love you.”
Omigod. I can't stop laughing
I knew there was a reason I've never subjected myself to a single episode of this show
Other than its utter idiocy, I mean. And my hatred of that muppet-looking Limey.
Cowell is doing these kids a favor by bringing them down to earth.
The music business is rough and cruel. There are people who'd chew a 19 or 20 year old to pieces (and thy've done it to 40 and 50 year old veterans as well) just to show that they are in charge. Think of how many talented musicians and singers who became drunks and drug addicts; spent time in therapy; or weren't ever heard from again after a couple of years trying to sustain a career.
Cowell's comments may not be to one's liking, but the 19 year old engineering student who is a borderline singer will thank him for his candid and truthful assessments. Instead of just another borderline singer, we may get a darn good engineer instead.
Analogies, can be found for many things. It is a powerful way to make a point.
But it only comes on every four years.
Absolutely right. I like Cowell, his honesty and unashamed criticism is there for everyone to make use of. Simon wants to save people from delusion in a world where everyone else is afraid to hurt feelings, and Simon has seen too many broken lives. If I had to sit through thousands of bad auditions I would want to act like Cowell myself in fighting the culture of self-esteem too.
And ironically Simon makes the show. People want to hear what HE has to say. We know Abdul will blather on emotionally. Does she take sympathy medication? Half-a-hit of X with a martini?
Kara DioGuardi may be a great songwriter but I always have the nagging feeling that she doesn't know what she is talking about. Randy Jackson seems to care only about pitch, and as a judge of the Judge I would say to Randy, "Look Dawg, your slang is becoming silly. You seem one-dimentional, try using less slang and your judging will improve"
It is a testament to Cowell and his honesty that when he likes something, people are inspired and proud.
That said, American Idol, like every other reality show, has a fatal flaw; it's in their interest to present bad or negative scenes. This has the effect of encouraging this type of behavior. Thus when Idol presents the insufferably bad singers and the mediocre but obnoxious wannabees, it lowers itself along with them.
One last thing off topic. As talented as the final contestants are on Idol, the other day I was listening to an old Sade album and it occurred to me that she, and other famous singers, are in a completely different league than even the best of American Idol.
I think the whole thing is staged, after all people aren't let randomly on the stage, they audition and surely Cowell hears that audition either in person or on tape.
That doesn't mean you're not correct about the appeal of the show, though.
I know tons of young people, being single at my advanced age means I either have young friends or none, and I don't see any more tendency to narcissism in them than any other group. I do think your criticisms of the institutions that reward narcissism are correct.
I have a different take on why people like seeing the narcissists on the show dressed down. Somehow, the elite fraction of the baby boomer generation, unlike previous or subsequent generations, has consisted almost entirely of people with narcissistic personality disorder. That's why our institutions reward narcissists, and it's why we get brutalized by narcissists in the media day in and day out. We see people like Garofalo throw hate in the face of everyone and get away with it like she's some sort of princess. And we just want to see people like that kicked in the teeth, for effing once. Just for once, you know? A beatdown on the people who try to kill us with a death of a thousand cuts just because they can. The people born without empathy and with massive self-concepts.
Every once in a while on Fear Factor (yes I used to watch that) they'd put someone with a wild case of NPD on the show and the host would just tear them to pieces and I loved every second of it.
It's just so nice to see the bad guy lose once in a while.
I'm sure it's all quite deliberate on Cowell's part, and I'm sure he keeps a stream of narcissists coming through and beats them down for the rest of us. Does anyone NOT hate them? They are the cancer eating the West.
Idol is a total money machine. Everything that's done is another cash nipple in the cow – smart marketing and refreshingly, unabashed capitalism with all it's flaws. If you look at it, each week people tune in to watch another potential collapse by Paula, or Simon and his snark, but you can't criticize the formula. It's been king of the hill for 8 years, and while showing signs of aging, the producers will continue to milk this cow, until it rolls over and dies in the field.
I agree that Simon's critique is the most direct and powerful of the judges. Just wish he would be a bit more diplomatic in the phrasing of some of his criticisms. I also don't believe he takes pleasure in a negative review.
Simon is the man. I have seen him interviewed (I think on O'Reilly) and he basically reflected what was in this column. I specifically remember him saying it would be more cruel for him to not be honest with the contestants.
I haven't watched a season of Idol in a while, but I appreciated Cowell. Like I used to tell my husband when he would comment on how harsh Cowell was: better that he cuts them down now than give them false hope and let go on to be destroyed later. And yes honest criticism, even when presented harshly is better than no ciritcism or false validation. I taught inner city for two years at the junior high level and ran into plenty of kids who felt real good about themselves but couldn't identify a noun.
You actually hate someone you've never watched?
Anyone that thinks AI is a singing competition is deluded. It's all a ratings competition and if you have been to the auditions, you will realize that. Many, shall we say, adequate, competent, and decent singers are passed over in order that AI may present the dolts and morons who attempt to wail a tune only to have Cowell humiliate them in front of 20 million people. Great ploy to keep a dumb American public tuning in each week and voting for their "favorites." I'll give Cowell this: he's a genius at never underestimating the gullibility of the public.
I have never seen the show, which is odd, because I really like music. As much as I am a fan of the truth, my idea of a fun time is not seeing people humiliated for the purpose of ratings. I am not going to pay a dollar to vote, either.
Egad. While I agree that liberals are anti-competition, I can't see American Idol as conservative in any way. The show is lowest common denominator. It's cops without the beat down. It's a celebration of unwarranted self-esteem, of the uber-diva, and of the triumph of corporate hype over substance.
I've been watching since the Sanjaya mess, where the producers got bit in the bum with that fiasco. This show is a money making marketing balloon. In this day of age of heavily overdubbed electronic editing, most everyone can sound good on an album but live (not lip-synch) they sound like a howling beagle. (See David Archuleta performance).
The most successful Idol didn't even win the competition.
Without Simon Cowell, AI would not be worth watching. He makes that show, and he's the only reason I've bothered to watch it. The real verdict on a performance isn't in until Simon has spoken, and he obviously takes more pleasure in a good performance than in excoriating a poor one.
It reminds me of the ONE term I volunteered in college to edit poetry and short fiction submissions for the campus lit journal. I kept waiting for something good to come in, but the only pieces submitted that quarter were complete crap–submitted by people who could barely write. I was the only judge who seemed to think so, however. I didn't bother volunteering for that the following term–nor did I bother picking up any future copies of the lit journal.
I haven't watched Idol beyond the audition shows the last couple of seasons, but I have to agree with this posting in a big way. Sometimes Simon makes me feel uncomfortable, but he knows what's good and he knows what sells, and he can be constructive in his criticism where it's merited. Even if he likes the performer, their voice and presentation, if he doesn't like the song, he's pretty forceful in letting people know. Take a look at this for an example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVU4IkzMNIo
He doesn't do it to be cruel, he just doesn't beat around the bush, preferring direct honesty to false praise of something that just isn't good enough.
“For the three folks who don’t know because they have been living in a cavern next to Osama bin Laden since 2002…”
Present. Not even 1 show! *Raises hand with pride*
I've suspected for quite some time, that “American Idol” and other similar TeeVee shows, including, all so-called “reality shows”, “Disease/Disaster movies of the week”, “We’re all going to die now, just give it a few more weeks Huumans” News/Special Reports, and the wide world of professional wrestling, (well maybe not wrestling, that IS real, just ask my Dad), is Hollyweirds attempt to simply package the age old product of “Panem et Circenses” or “Bread and Circuses” to the unwashed masses for a generation of viewers.
Luckily, I have not fallen into that morass of mind numbing, dumb downing and the superficial attempts at making me look at these slow motion car wrecks by those special media powers.
“Oh look, *giggle*, Simon's really going to let him/her have it now,” but don’t look at the congress, the Senate or the state of our country and culture, as it degrades into the pit of “the cult of personality” people.
Give me any episode of “Future Weapons” or “Things that go Boom”, any time kids.
Not Over.
I have never seen the show but do like your description of how this is done. I do agree, American children have been told they are great at everything. Jeez, get over it, it is a tough world out there.
I always liked Simon. I was sort of the odd man out in grade school, and high school, and in college most people like him just because he's the only one who's not obviously insane, but I've always liked him. I mean, I agree, this man has money riding on the winner of this contest. He has a reputation to uphold as well as a producer. If anyone has a right to be "cruel" and "mean" to these people, it's him.
I agree totally with the article. "Idol" is the only "reality show"I have ever watched and probably will be the only one I ever will. I'm not musically inclined and hate most of the songs the contestants sing. The exception was last year when David Cook sang "The First Time Ever I Saw Your Face". But I do like the fact that you can't use political correctness to figure out who's staying and who's going. Last week, Lil Rounds didn't make the cut. Because she was the only African-American left in the competition and one of the only two women, I was sure she'd stay even though she'd chosen perfectly terrible songs to sing (she has a great voice, is very engaging and likable and probably would be a great performer with some help and advice). This year, however, has (IMHO) a paucity of talent. Simon's favorites are a horsy sixteen year old with a good voice but no stage presence and a very attractive man who wears heavy makeup and a girl's haircut who has a good voice and great stage presence. In PC world, the girl would win because a guy won last year.
But why, oh why do we need someone with a British accent to convince us that our restaurants are awful, our hairstyling salons dreadful, and our parenting skills nightmarish? It's as if it's still hard-wired into our national psyche that the British Voice is the voice of our forefathers and authority.
Perez Hilton can try to scold us, but it just comes across as shrill and bitchy. Oh, wait . . .
Yep, that pretty much cracked me up too. lol..Described Paula to a T.
IMO there is just too much coddling anymore. Kids NEED to know what rejection and losing means in order to feel exhilerated at winning something, there can't be just a neutral everything. Maybe this is just more indoctrination into accepting socialism, everyone's an equal. Sorry but real life isn't like that and these namby pamby teachers and parents better wake the HELLo up.
this is indeed an odd case. 'American Idol' accelerates the narcissism being peddled just about everywhere- 'we are all stars'- which isn't just patent nonsense it has dangerous underpinnnings. The disaffection of those who lose can manifest itself in very negative ways. When you watch, say, a football game you may see a great play but you will not say 'I could have made that if only given a break'… it is the instant celebrity thing (and the subsequent nebulous quality of same) that feeds on people.
That being said, Mr Cowell, as most UK expats do, exhibits the free will concepts of success and failure and revels in his fortune without apology- so there's that…
Okay, this a complete non-sequitor, but…this has been my morning. At around 10am, the military, in their infinite wisdom, decided to take pictures of an AF 1 back up plane buzzing the Statue of Liberty in a mock rescue with jets flanking it. Oops, they forgot to tell anyone! People were panicking and buildings were evacuated. Ya' know? We that work around Ground Zero are a tiny bit sensitive to seeing planes flying low near us…
I think the comparison was brilliant! From a few outtakes, I garnered AI ,however, is so transparent, narcissistic, trite and overwhelmingly stupid that I stayed in my cave. I would rather watch I Love Lucy reruns over and over than ever watch AI and I don't really care for I Love Lucy that much….
Perhaps also because they speak better English and more eloquently as well, as in "dreadful" (I'm hearing a Brit accent). Better than hearing, "That sucked dude"
Is it possible to love a show and never watch it? If so, I love American Idol. I never watch it because, as a musician, poor performances are literally torture for me. Absolute agony (So, if you put me in Gitmo and want my debit card PIN, you now know what to do). However, I love to watch the YouTube videos of the breakout exceptional performances. Paul Potts literally brought tears to my eyes.
I mostly watch on youtube also cuz there you can pick and choose.
Which ones you want to watch that is.
Yep, I always get sucked into anything that has a well modulated, refined English speaker doing the talking.
Haven't heard about that yet Bev, I'll bet that was completely unnerving to say the least. I guess we here at BH got the scoop on the media, I'll let you know if I hear about it here in AZ.
Terrific article! One thing I take issue with:
"Teachers whine endlessly about the tyranny of standardized tests and the oppression that is accountability."
I'm all for accountability, the problem is schools are sometimes victims of geography. My son attends a public school where 90% of the students speak English as a second language. Holding everything else constant, what school will do better on these tests, my son's school or one where 90%+ speak English as their first language?
life is a fight and we do no favors to our children when we fail to teach them basic survival skills. honesty trumps idealism every time.
Karaoka without the alcohol
Gosh Miles,
Your love of the little people is soooo inspiring.
I agree that A.I. is entertaining because Simon Cowell gives aspiring "singers' what they need most; a good swift kick of reality. Randy is the perpetual nice guy, although his attempts to be hip ("dawg" or "bring it"), and Kara and Paula's nonsensical ramblings ("you're SO relevant!") are distractions, but it's Simon who says the things most of us would like to say to the likes of Tatiana (snicker) or Sanjaya.
The little people?
I have to admit to watching only 1 or 2 episodes of Idol. It is Simon that makes the show. At first I thought he was being unnecessarily nasty but it occurred to me that if some of these would-be singers had the chance to audition before a producer (like a Phil Spector before his troubles) the singer would probably get the same cold objective opinion that Simon gives.
With all this "self esteem" nonsense – coddling young children from the realities of life and competition – I went to a baseball game yesterday where no scores are kept – there are no "outs" – only times at bat – this is doing the child no favor and as Kurt wrote – takes life eventually – or Simon – to throw the cold water of reality on…
English expat Simon Cowell, who makes “Idol” so conservative and so refreshing. Because he just doesn’t care. And it’s glorious.
He does care to give the unvarnished true, while others avoid it.
agreed. We are still the Colonies, after all… if you want to come across as well educated and erudite a Brit demeanor doesn't hurt. With the third world-ization of our culture perhaps more folk now are relating to what seems like voices of sanity. Not that everyone in the UK is sane- it's just the comfort of the smooth delivery…
For these kids, it shouldn't be a shock when Simon critiques them with dead-on accuracy. (As an aside, I am always amazed at how they keep their composure. I would be a weeping mess, but I cry at the drop of a hat.)
With such harsh criticism when singers are "off" and terrible, isn't it so much sweeter when Simon calls a performance "brilliant"? You know you've EARNED that kudo.
For these kids, it shouldn't be a shock when Simon critiques them with dead-on accuracy. (As an aside, I am always amazed at how they keep their composure. I would be a weeping mess, but I cry at the drop of a hat.)
With such harsh criticism when singers are "off" and terrible, isn't it so much sweeter when Simon calls a performance "brilliant"? You know you've EARNED that kudo.
I don't know if this quote is your's, Kurt…
"Criticism is the key to improvement. Validation is the key to staying lousy."
…but its made my list of favorites.
I disagree. Isn't the Idol winner ultimately decided by popular vote, not the judges' decision? So ultimately it's a popularity contest, not based on true merit at all. How does that make for a "conservative" show? The Idol wannabees are seeking the most shallow of goals–fame and fortune without years of hard work first. Not saying Cowell isn't correct in his criticisms, but the whole show is shallow. These are not professional singers who've worked at their craft for years. (for that go find the doc in theaters called "Every Little Step" about "A Chorus Line" and you can see how REAL auditions work)
[...] Simon Cowell has a huge fan … somewhere: quote of the day Posted at April 27, 2009 via BIG HOLLYWOOD [...]
I don't care if American Idol is conservative, liberal, or down the middle. I still loathe this show.
For the very reason you've stated, I abhor watching "American Idol:" no one told those kids they didn't have any talent. My husband has to drag me to the TiVo to watch snippets of "AI" here and there, and when he does, I relish every second the camera stays on Simon: that man undeniably knows what he's talking about!!
[...] The Most Conservative Show On Television by Kurt Schlichter [...]
on a vaguely related note, can anyone explain the phenomenon that is Taylor Swift to me? if she had been on Idol, Simon could have told her she sucked and the rest of us would have been spared her pathetic cooing, not to mention her even worse song writing! really, what is the deal? you put her in a junior high talent contest at a medium size school and, at best, she finishes a distance third behind a good ventriloquist… and his sarcastic dummy.
she writes her own songs? oh, no s**t? gee, i never could have guessed that puerile drivel didn't come from the self-absorbed mind of today's teenager. i suppose we should be thankful that at least she's not butchering the work of decent writers with her not-even-mediocre voice and crappy guitar playing.
never in my entire music-listening life, have i changed radio stations so often just to prevent another one of her auditory assaults from becoming lodged in my head. and now that she's such a big cross-over hit- SHE'S F***ED UP ABOUT EVERY STATION ON THE DIAL!!!! AAAARRRGGHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
My mother & I have had the worst go-rounds about Simon Cowell. Personally, I love him because he's so blunt. Of course, if I was on a stage in front of him, I would absolutely break down in tears before he even said a word but I already know I have no talent. But that's the point, I haven't been told I can succeed at everything, I've been told that I suck at quite a few things actually. And then I've gone on to find other things that I am good at.
I would much rather be on the receiving end of a harsh criticism than be petted and pampered while still doing badly. I like non-PC people if only for the novelty of non-conformity and I think that's why Simon is so popular. To hear someone say 'you were horrible and my ears are bleeding' is so novel that people are drawn to it because that's what they are thinking but too afraid to say.
According to CNBC, it turns out, they were using Air Foce One to get a photo of the plane passing by the Statue of Liberty — hello, ever heard of photoshop?
And best of all, whoever was in charge specifically ordered that the media not be informed — they thought it would be a security risk.
Nice.
If you're looking for an alternative to American Idol (I may be the only person in America who's never sat through an entire episode), try THE UNIT. The acting is much better and you don't have to listen to Paula and Randy ramble.
I have never seen this show, either, and I have no wish to. Listening and watching this amateur hour would bore me to death. It IS "utter idiocy."
The point of standardized tests is to make sure that all of our schools are producing the same quality of future citizens. If some students start out at a disadvantage, we need their schools to work harder to get those students caught up to where they need to be. What we don't need to do is lower the standards to make sure everyone passes and feels good about themselves.
Simon says what many of us think, but have a difficult time expressing because of the languid, politically correct slog swamp of a time we live in. I find satisfaction when my impression of a performance matches his inclination. Cowell is admired for the blunt-force truth of his words, and that is why people value his opinion over that of the other three panelists.
I like Randy, the girls are okay, but Simon is the man. His evaluation of the contestants is typically fair and honest. There is some meat to his judgments.
Last year was the first year I watched Idol, and it's been hit and miss this year. My time is taken now coz I have become so consumed with following the career of last year's runner-up, David Archuleta. What an incredible voice and what a fabulous human being! I'm wowed, to say the least. Oh, btw, David said that he liked Simon coz he always gave you good advice as to what you could work on.
Good point about Simon Cowell.
So, for those keeping track, the tally now stands at: NASCAR, Nashville, VeggieTales, the sundry 'talents' of Blue Collar TV and now American Idol. Is there a slice from the WORTHLESS side of the pop-cultural pie "conservatives" DON'T want to lay claim to?
Dodgeball, anyone?
http://fathersforlife.org/education/self_esteem.h...
There's nothing wrong with competition although that and the idea of self-discipline scares hell out of the 'politics of feeling' folks.
I have never, nor will I ever watch one of these shows, as they are verboten in my household. I have seen a trailer or two from some channel the girlfriend is watching and I did not make it out of the room in time. Maybe they have their place but, like some have posted above, the self-esteem affirmation fest just nauseates me. Perhaps I have had to forceably sit through too much Kareoke(sp?). *yuck*…… I am a little off these last few weeks so, maybe that is why I can not understand the Conservative connection.
Only on a website as stupid as this, with a commenter as obtuse as you could one actually find praise for a show in which young people pin their entire life's dreams in winning a competition for the minimally talented.
If there is any lesson to be learned from "American Idol" it's that American pop culture has been severely dumbed down over the past generation and does not demand much in the form of skill or raw ability.
No, all you need to do is run the gauntlet of standing before a few judges, and your fortune is sealed.
Once again, "Big Hollywood" proves to be a big joke.
Every successful drama or entertainment must have an antagonist. Without Simon, IDOL wouldn't have lasted longer than "Rockstar.
The fact that you would think American Idol rewards "conservative values like hard work, discipline and healthy competition" shows how much your benchmarks for said values have been lowered by the validation culture you pan.
A glorified Karaoke contest doesn't strike me as a conservative showcase of innovation, creativity, drive and success. Rather, it's a celebration of parasitic self aggrandizement. A true conservative American Idol would have artists with real talent – you know, those who can actually write their own music. It wouldn't be a bunch of parrots who can carry a tune begging for a record deal in which someone else writes all their material.
Sorry, Kurt, but your attempt at being a hard-nosed, achievement-culture conservative doesn't wash with me. Try getting a new hobby, because your writing is bloody awful.
When I was in middle school, highschool, and even in college, I was the best, not cuz of the gradation listed in this article, but cuz I really was the best.
The first time, other than the judgments of my family, that I was worried about the criticism of others was when I was in the Marine Corps, but that fear, and that judgment I had recieved in the Marine Corps were the most valuable lessons I had ever learned.
Conservative? Nope.
Watch "Hell's Kitchen".
Same limey sass, better competition, and true conservative priciples of solid rewards for solid performance. A true meritocracy, with harsh reality and plenty of criticism for failure.
Kurt Vonnegut Jr., in one of his many wonderful novels, had a comment on our current situation and did it over 40 years ago. In this novel he had a character tell of a dancer and his partner who were so good, graceful, strong, etc., that the judges penalized him by making him wear weights on arms, legs, shoulders to 'level the playing ground' as it were to those who's self-esteem would otherwise suffer by watching his performances. Of course, the great dancer just tried harder and harder and was eventually killed for being unwilling to comply with the standards of the greater good. A great mind and quite prescient. Wtg, Kurt.
Simon teaches. His insights have taught me to tell more clearly and cleanly WHY I enjoy some singers and find others uninteresting, insipid or otherwise disappointing.
Friends don't let friends sing off key on TV !
i have no need to actually witness something before putting forth my opinion. This is what leads to all ______ are ______.
whites are racists
blacks are on welfare
christians are homopobes
pick what ever you want.
Photoshop..that's what we were talking about at lunch today. And, exactly what security risk is with in an empty AF 1 [except for those of us on the ground)? Mayor Bloomberg is not happy that he was not warned about it. But the upside, is we got to test our disaster preparedness and saw a few holes. Always look for the silver lining…
"There are still a few places left in American society where hard truth and unrelenting standards still intersect – courtrooms"
Dude. Clearly your wife has not divorced you yet. For me and many other guys, though you are legally innocent, a family judge takes your children, eighteen years of income, your house and personal property.
Good article. Yo got the rest of it right.
I think you missed the entire point of Kurt's article correlating conservatism with AI Yeah. The point is that AI is all about capitalism and self responsibility. In other words, you work hard enough and it pays off.
Well why even come here then Joe? Seriously, if you're bothered that much by BH then PLEASE stay away. Go back to PuffHO or Daily Kos. Why? Kos we don't like your type.
You're nothing but a HO Troll.
BTW, I disagree that American Idol is by any means "The Most Conservative Show on Television" and I'm also relatively sure Simon isn't a Tory but the underlying theme of this article is good. I think conservativism is also recognizing conservative principles (no one owes you) in places that we wouldn't expect (including American Idol) and the liberals would have a heart-attack to think of as representing a conservative value.
But seriously? American Idol vs. 24? Come ON!
The author is dead on. Especially in the audition rounds, Simon is telling people something their adoring parents, friends, and music teachers should have told them years ago. He is probably saving them from years of heartache that they might otherwise have spent fruitlessly seeking a music career. Once the show is narrowed down to the top 12, he is completely honest with each performer, and he's not afraid to admit when someone he previously downgraded turns in a surprisingly good performance.
Same here, Huc. Once upon a galaxy, long, long, well, ya know….I became quite the audiophile. $12,000.00 (Japan prices) in Amp/Pre-Amp, Tuner, DBX, Reel to Reel….not including 2 sets of speakers. Faithful reproduction was an absolute must. After hearing a few songs butchered at a bar, I swore off all of this type stuff. No exaggeration, -I am being nice- it makes me physically ill.
But…………..vinyl is coming back!!!!!
No–Top Chef or Chopped is the better analogy: real chefs who've held real jobs in their field. Hell's Kitchen has had some wildly unqualified cooks–and I differentiate them from chefs as I'd differentiate a house painter from a fine artist–who were clearly hired for tv drama effect. But I agree that it's more realistic as the public doesn't vote, only the guy who's going to give the job. In any case, still super entertaining.
One day I was watching Idol and realized why I liked Simon so much. He reminds me of my husband. Speaks his mind, intelligent as can be and has a beautiful smile. My husband and I watch Idol but there are times we mute the tv while other other 3 judges are talking. My 4 year old speaks more coherent sentences than some of those judges. I won't even comment on the selfish ME generation. I have had enough of that talk for the day.
"There are people who'd chew a 19 or 20 year old to pieces (and thy've done it to 40 and 50 year old veterans as well) just to show that they are in charge."
What, like *cough* Simon?
I've also never seen an episode of this show. So according to the article, does that mean that Osama Bin Laden is somewhere in my house??
Why Can't he? Liberals hate Rush Limbaugh and have never listened to him!
A latecomer to "Idol," I watched the final shows of last year's contest, aware of the popularity of the show and wanting to learn more about the reasons for its success. I concluded that its popularity was due in large part to the authenticity of the judges, especially Simon Cowell, finding that if there was a hint of doubt about the honest and essential role Cowell and the other judges played the show would fail. The judges were ruthless in their assessments, and the contestants, even those who felt the brunt, ultimately respected the objective judgments. Merit reigns supreme here, a wonderful antidote to the non-meritorious judgments determining who makes it the everyday, affirmative action, world. Indeed, "Idol" is a conservative show in this regard.
This essay is the first I've read that gets to the heart of what's going on here. Thanks.
Good article. It's true, the man cuts to the chase. Tells people what they're better off hearing most of the time too.
I am not a fan of Idol, but have watched it from time to time. Occasionally some truly talented performers make it to the top 3. Overall, I do not think the contestants are all that talented. But, that said, I don't think some huge pop stars today are very talented – except at behaving like whores. Simon is the only judge who truly offers constructive feedback – and I trust his perspective more because he knows what will sell. And that is ALL American Idol is about. It's like the whole Susan Boyle phenomenon. Yes, I thought the video was sweet. And yes, Susan Boyle can carry a tune, which is more than a lot of people competing on these shows can say. But she is no more talented than half of the women in my church choir. I do a lot of community theatre and know several women who are attractive and have ten times the voice. Nothing against Susan Boyle. But I promise you, if she doesn't not agree to the packaging that Simon wants to do for her, she will never be a big star, because it's not just about the voice when you're talking about show business.
I would dearly LOVE to see Obama 'Simonized'. I can think of no other person more deserving of it.
One wonders if Simon lends a hand in this:
"who stays in the contest and who gets tossed off."
Ya wanker.
Interesting that most of the commenters who "hate" American Idol say they never watch it. I rarely do but I think it is the best of Reality TV (Oxymoron?), for the simple reason that the contestants actually know how to do something that requires talent and hard work. OK, not all of them. This show tries to encourage greatness, name another TV show that does that.
Simon tortures with a grin. Must be a liberal.
…"There's a squirrel and I have a hat." That was truly a Paula type comment.
I think you missed the entire point of Yeah's comment SgtTank. The point is that AI is NOT all about capitalism and self responsibility. In other words, you steal other people's work because you aren't creative enough to make your own, and it pays off.
One thing the author of this article should have mentioned about Simon Cowell is that he gets the loudest applause. When Ryan Seacrest introduces the judges, Simon's applause is THE loudest. You'll also notice that Randy Jackson always boos Simon as well. It could be just in fun, or could it be that Randy is jealous? For me, what make AI the show to watch is the funny things that happen between Simon and Paula and Ryan and Simon's little feud. They will both do a little snipe at each other every once in a while and it appears to be taken in good grace.
Simon sighing at Susan Boyle was pure joy for me. Plus, I only watch AI for Simon's opinion because it matches mine. I'm brilliant that way.
You’re a very skilled blogger….
I’ve joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your fantastic post. Also, I’ve shared your site in my social networks!…
Great Site……
[...]check this out as this contains important information about[...]…
Our Trackback…
[...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]……
Check this out…
[...] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[...]……
Online Article……
[...]The information mentioned in the article are some of the best available [...]……
Websites worth visiting…
[...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]……
You must be logged in to post a comment.