Dreams – or Nightmares – From Obama’s Father?
by Ken BlackwellAnyone who wonders how Barack Obama seems to have come from nowhere to become our 44th President need only read his amazing book, Dreams from My Father. Or, better, you should listen to the audio version of the book, read by Barack Obama himself. This recorded book won a Grammy Award. The award is richly deserved.
Obama’s book is a classic of American literature. Those who think he did not write it, that perhaps, as some Internet zanies have alleged, that the radical Bill Ayers wrote it, are doing both Obama and themselves a disservice. Bill Ayers’ thoughts have all the leaden quality of most deadening Marxist screeds. Ayers’ writing you can’t pick up; Obama’s you can’t put down.
It’s deeply offensive to many to charge that Obama did not write his own book. It’s the same charge, incidentally, that was made against the first great black American writer: Frederick Douglass. Frederick’s powerful stage presence soon proved doubters wrong.
Obama’s book is witty, spirited, engaging. It draws you in. It commands not just your attention, but your respect and even your affection. One caution I should provide. Obama’s talented mimicry of the accents of his African relatives and a militant Chicago street hustler includes an occasional use of the F-word. He never uses this kind of language speaking in his own voice, but only when quoting others, I should point out.
Not only do I recommend this book to all Americans, and, especially, to all my conservative friends, but I respectfully recommend that President Obama re-read his own book.
That’s because it’s hard to believe that the worldly, winsome, wise man who wrote this book is pursuing policies that run completely counter to all the life experiences he relates so well.
Take Lolo, for example. Lolo was young Barack’s Indonesian stepfather. Lolo takes Barack and his mom home to Indonesia right after the bloody 1965 military coup. That coup may have claimed as many as half a million lives. Barack’s American mother was literally clueless about the dangers, the lethal violence, that haunted Indonesia-until she showed up in the country with her little boy.
Lolo tries to teach Barack that you need to be strong if you’re to be respected. Lolo keeps his head down. He avoids provoking a murderous response from the dictators of his country. We can all learn from Lolo.
We don’t want to live in the violent and lawless world that is Lolo’s post-coup Indonesia. But that world-like Thomas Hobbes’ “war of all against all”-is much closer to the global reality than is President Obama’s vague and hazy UN-inspired multilateralism.
A strong America is our best defense. President Obama speaks to dictators like the Iranian mullahs with exaggerated “respect.” He tries to sweet-talk tigers into drinking warm milk, just like Tabby cats. Obama makes you want to yell: LISTEN TO LOLO!
The most moving and powerful part of the Obama narrative, of course, is his relationship with his mostly-absent dad. The senior Barack Obama was a brilliant Kenyan foreign student. He graduated from Harvard. After the unfortunate breakup of his marriage to Barack Obama’s Kansas-born mom, the senior Obama went home to Africa. There, he began a swift rise to power, influence, money, and respect as an official of the post-independence Kenya government.
He visits young Barack back in the U.S. for ten wonderful days in 1971. Barack Obama’s re-telling of this visit is a heart-rending tale. When his dad speaks to the students in his Hawaiian prep school, young Barack is at first embarrassed, but soon joins in the acclaim for the amazing performance his dad puts on.
Returning to Kenya, however, the senior Obama is soon to be disappointed, bitterly so. As a Luo tribesman, he sees the massive favoritism and corruption of Jomo Kenyatta’s socialist government. Dr. Obama might have kept quiet, kept his head down, like Lolo, and survived, even thrived. He might have been content to hold his position as “window dressing,” a token Luo in a Kikiyu-dominated regime.
But Obama’s dad had a passion for justice. He spoke out, and paid the price. He was soon ousted from his government job. Not only did he lose his job, he lost his home, his government car, his friends. Even family members-that great haven in a heartless world-were afraid to be seen with him. Our hearts bleed when we read of the brilliant Dr. Obama’s descent into despair and alcoholism.
What a shattering thing it is for young Barack Obama to learn of his father’s fate. He had only ten days with his dad, but he lionized him from afar. With Kenyatta’s passing comes an easing of the edicts against Dr. Obama. Slowly, he is able to get back on the ladder of success. He is only on the third or fourth rung, however, when he is tragically killed in an auto accident.
What lessons do we draw from this sad, sad story? Has President Obama seriously considered the Kenyatta government in Kenya, a regime that arguably ruined his brilliant father’s life?
When you look at President Obama’s plan for government-run health care, when you see his moves to control banking and finance, to run major auto companies, to control all U.S. industry and energy through his Cap and Trade (and Tax) bill, what is this except the very kind of regime that Kenyatta represented?
Harambee! The word means “let’s all pull together.” It’s a Swahili word, or possibly Bantu, but it was taken up as the slogan of President Kenyatta’s movement. Many of us remember Jomo Kenyatta, the charismatic independence leader who brandished a fly whisk almost as a scepter of authority.
President Obama, the community organizer, also wants us all to pull together. He swatted that fly in the White House (”I killed that sucker!”) just as Jomo Kenyatta swatted those pesky critics–dissident politicians and journalists.
If you doubt Obama’s swatting prowess, just watch one of his carefully staged “Town Hall-style” meetings. Note the operative word: style. They look like Town Hall meetings. They sound like Town Hall meetings. But they are orchestrated shows with a cast of hundreds all recruited, prepped, and manipulated for the benefit of the prime time lap puppies.
Can we resist all this? Yes, we can. We can reject the path that Barack Obama has laid out before us. It is a path not of independence, but of ever greater dependence, a path that leads to loss–loss of liberty, loss of self-respect, loss of self-reliance.
Disraeli said it well in the nineteenth century: Bismarck made Germany great by making the Germans small. But America already is great. And we don’t want to be made small.
We can treat President Obama and his father’s legacy with respect. We can pray for him and his beautiful family, even as we firmly tell him: “Mr. President-it is for the sake of your family and ours that we must say no.






Subscribe via RSS
125 Comments
[...] Big Hollywood: ‘The Smile’: A Perfect Presidential Nickname Ken Blackwell, Big Hollywood: Dreams – or Nightmares – From Obama’s Father? The Conservative Mama: Are Liberals in Denial, or Just Plain Suicidal? Peoples Press Collective: [...]
I don't know whether he wrote his own book or not, and frankly don't care. I did say no in 2008. His policies are terrible, they are badly hurting this country and I will work hard to try and defeat him in 2012
Thank you for your insightful, fair-minded but ultimately revelatory commentary. Mr. Obama may not be an open book, but that doesn't mean we should stop at the cover.
The Audacity of Arrogance.
It is a shame that Obama forgot his father's life. Then again, it's only about Obama and his future. Not the lessons of the past or what he is doing to the greatest Country in World history. (other than Israel of course)…
"Giving kudos to the undeserving is a form of idolatry" Talmud
It is passing strange that a man should write a paean of praise to the father he barely knew, while dissing the granma who made him the man he is!
That, however, is typical of Barry-boy–he loves what he can't have and discards those who've helped him!
The next four years will reveal the pathology of this deeply-damaged psyche!
Thank you for such a well written and thought out piece. It's interesting how people will interpret circumstances differently. I can't pretend to understand why Obama thinks his policies are the answer– though I do believe his relationships with Ayers and Wright had a lot to do with forming his political ideals. What we see as the problem he sees as the solution, even though his life experiences should point him in another direction.
Great blog Ken! I too ready Obama's book years ago and had so much hope for his future. But, I was quickly disappointed to learn that he was just another socialist once he came into office. You would think that his life experience would have taken him another way.
I join with you Ken, to respectfully say no to President Obama's misguided policies. Socialism has never worked. Capitalism–for all its many faults–is the best system yet devised.
One might almost see Dr. Obama's complete and utter screwjob by the Kenyatta government as being karmic retribution for abandoning his wife and son.
[...] Obama’s Cold-Blooded Fly Swat, Movie About Incident in the Works Ken Blackwell, Big Hollywood: Dreams – or Nightmares – From Obama’s Father? New York Times: What Has 132 Rooms and Flies? (The White House) Politics and Such: Obama Crushes [...]
"It’s deeply offensive to many to charge that Obama did not write his own book. It’s the same charge, incidentally, that was made against the first great black American writer: Frederick Douglass."
Why does everything, everything, have to come down to race?
There are good reasons to suspect that Obama did not write the book. The style is completely different from that of his later book, "The Audacity of Hope." Obama initially was unable to write the book at all, missing the deadline; his agent then got him a deal with another publisher (and a new deadline). Only then did he finally turn in a manuscript. Did he get a burst of inspiration, or did he hire someone to write for him once he realized he was unable to do it?
Obama would hardly be the first person to make use of a ghostwriter. Are we supposed to believe he's too honest, ethical, and upright to do it?
An empty suit hiring a ghostwriter sounds about right to me.
[...] More related reading: ExposeObama.com: Obama Closes Doors on Openness Frugal Café Blog Zone: Suspicious: WH Says “Obama’s Rhetoric Shouldn’t Be Taken Literally” Concerning Promise That Americans Can Keep Their Private Health Insurance GayPatriot: Obama’s Problem with the Unexpected and If Arlen Specter Had Voted Against the “Stimulus”… Ken Blackwell, Big Hollywood: Dreams – or Nightmares – From Obama’s Father? [...]
[...] fit and The Colin Powell endorsement: Triumph of hope over reality Ken Blackwell, Big Hollywood: Dreams – or Nightmares – From Obama’s Father? GayPatriot: Obama & Palin: Blank Slates on Which “Journalists” Project Their Biases Greg [...]
[...] President Pantywaist Clinging G & G: Just Too Awesome to Fail Ken Blackwell, Big Hollywood: Dreams – or Nightmares – From Obama’s Father? GayPatriot: Obama’s Problem with the Unexpected San Francisco Chronicle, SFGate: State cuts tax [...]
Who says he forgot it? He just took a different lesson from it than we would have, that´s all.
Who says he forgot it? He just took a different lesson from it than we would have, that´s all. Whatever it was.
Plagiarism is rampant in politics. JFK took credit for Sorensen's work; Martin Luther King plagiarized both his Master's thesis and Doctorate with the help of his wife; Vice President Biden took the life story of a James Callaghan speech and incorporated that into his own life story and more recently Obama lifted lines from Duval Patrick (Hope and Change) and the line "we are the change we have been waiting for" from Thomas Banyacya. There dozens of other examples.
There is no evidence of literary skill from Obama's early years. The fragments that have surfaced have revealed a pedestrian literary talent at best. The analysis by Jack Cashill of Dreams is very compelling. Obama' sentence structure, anecdotes, metaphors, etc are extremely similar to Ayers. Ayers is a professional writer and worked together with Obama for years with the Annenberg and Woods Foundations. Michelle Obama's brief law career intersected with Bernadine Dohrn, Bill Ayers fellow terrorist.
Interesting take.
I've heard parts of the book but I could not stomach reading it. Barry is a very dangerous man. He is a tool of the far left and loves it for a myriad of reasons.
Writing a book about yourself when you have done little of note says volumes about the man. Hubris, vainglorious, self-deluded.
A one termer we can all hope just disappears.
Dr Obama Sr? BO Sr never completed his Phd. If you are going to make a cheesy mistake like that, what does it say about the rest of your piece?
I read the Audacity of Socialism — err, I mean Hope. Everything you needed to know about him is in the book.
There's been many instances where I've said something from that book, and someone says, "no way — where did you get that?"
I respond, "In his book."
Good entry, Mr. Blackwell. By the way, I voted for you, and helped with the GOP campaign in 2006.
Mr. Blackwell-
Respectfully, have you even looked into the reasons why it is alleged that Bill Ayers "wrote", or at least heavily edited, this supposed memoir?
The "internet zany" you refer to has a name. Jack Cashill. He also has a website. He also has some very specific and carefully documented rationale behind his allegations.
You do yourself a disservice by dismissing Cashill's work without (apparently) even fairly considering his arguments. Don't let your race get in the way of your own objectivity. Frederick Douglass was quite a long time ago.
I obviously read a different edition. The release that read was an adolescent, racist, hate-filled screed from an admitted fascist. And it was also the one where Obama went back and apologized to his mother, in the new preface, for making her sound completely irrelevant in his life, too.
Just saying.
Mr. Blackwell,
I met you at a GOP dinner in Ohio when you were running for governor. I had generally lost hope in most Republicans, however your words and prayer were very inspiring and it was refreshing to hear them. In your words I heard "real hope" as well as a true love for your state and America. It is a shame that you are not Ohio's governor, we really need you.
Now I hear some Ohio lawyers are courting Alec Baldwin to run for governor of Ohio, what a joke. I hope these arrogant people do bring him here and that you run against him because you will be a shoe-in. All voters have to hear is Baldwin's crazed "little pig" rant against his 12 year old daughter and he's sunk.
Regarding Obama, I may on your advice read it. However it will be a borrow from the library as I will not give one cent to this "empty suit" or his publishers.
You are certainly right that we dismiss Obama´s rhetorical and literary gift at our peril. He may not be as good as some claim but who in politics is really better?
As for what drives Obama, let´s not draw simplistic conclusions. The same life experience that makes some people wise turns others into sociopaths. Has he really ever been at the receiving end of thuggery (for want of a better word) himself or has he just observed it froma distance? And why would he draw the conclusion you want him to and not the opposite one? Obama left Indonesia when he was 9 or 10. Who knows what he remembers? What are one´s true feelings for an absent father?
You know who probably has the most accurate analysis? Whatever Russian intelligence service deals with that kind of thing.
Anyway, always great to have you here, Mr. Blackwell!
The case for William Ayers as ghostwriter for Obama is compelling and thoroughly researched and documented. See Jack Cashill's articles on http://www.AmericanThinker.com for yourself. Again, its not uncommon for busy figures to have ghostwriters do their (auto)biographies. But the real point of determining if it was Ayers or not ( a point simply denied by Blackwell, not refuted) is to underscore the depth of the lie told by Obama regarding his apparently fairly close relationship with unrepentant domestic terrorist William Ayers and his wife Bernadine Dohrn, 2 people who are not in jail today only because a prosecutor was overzealous rather than any idea they were innocent of the charges against them.
Barack Obama is a cheap socialist suit inside a tailored centrist one.
So what if he can write or speak convincingly? He can't govern, period. He can, however, ruin things. Why are you building him up, or promoting the delusion that he'll give a single African damn about what you have to say?
This is the man (K. Blackwell) who should be running the RNC. I lived in OH for 10 years and saw what a good publice servant and conservative KB is. Steele is OK -just OK- but KB would've been better.
another proof to the theory that one cannot predict what someone will do by what that person says, but can accurately estimate what that person will do by what that person has done.
Jed, I agree and could not have said it any better!!!
I don't know whether he wrote his own book or not, and frankly don't care. I did say no in 2008. His policies are terrible, they are badly hurting this country and I will work hard to try and defeat him in 2012
Anyone who drank the Colin Powell Kool-aid should read this – http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/07/college...
Well, judging from the content of this article as an introduction to his thought and beliefs, I'm going to have to say "No".
"After the unfortunate breakup of his marriage to Barack Obama’s Kansas-born mom, the senior Obama went home to Africa."
"unfortunate breakup of his marriage" = bigamy
Mr. Blackwell is quite the wordsmith. Reminds me more than a little of Bill Clinton.
Interesting read, but in my opinion what Obama's ramming down the throat of this country is impeachable… marxism. What made this man the cold, calculating, nauseatingly radical leader of the 'free' world should be studied.. as we proceed to fight him on every single socialist policy he is inflicting on us.
"You would think that his life experience would have taken him another way."
Is it possible that the book does not fairly and accurately reflect his "life experience". That it is, in fact, just a story constructed around some elements of truth?
I second this.
During his campaign I asked liberals what this man had done to be qualified to lead this country, I got crickets, then I had to remind myself that he did indeed author 2 books……….about himself……
*cough*egomaniac*cough*……
Interestingly, you got a "+6" before your comment was deleted by the administrator. Must have been highly offensive.
Mr. Breitbart, if you ever read this, could you maybe review your site's editorial policy in favor of basic freedom of expression?
I've heard some extended excerpts from the audio book and they left me unimpressed. Perhaps I would feel differently if I was able to glean any authenticity from the man but he strikes me as phony on every level.
"That’s because it’s hard to believe that the worldly, winsome, wise man who wrote this book is pursuing policies that run completely counter to all the life experiences he relates so well."
This is the key problem with Obama – there is a fundamental disconnect between his experiences and his worldview. By the time he wrote Dreams, he had already formulated a worldview that went unexamined and unquestioned when he got to writing. It's all just stuff that happened and he evidently didn't learn all that much from his own experiences. Which means either a) he's not much of an intellect, or b) he's a bullshit artist. Or some of both.
Besides, I get enough Obama as it is – I don't need to spend my valuable down time with him too.
And right now, White House lawyers are buisily working on arguments to allow Obama to bypass the Senate's treaty ratification responsibilities to he can ratify a new arms treaty with Russia all by himself. How's that for a Constitutional Law Scholar?
Dreams of His Father, indeed …
Well said, Mr. Blackwell. Owing to Obama's egregious inconsistencies I don't know who can, with any certainty, say what the president believes.
Were I inclined to give President Obama the benefit of the doubt, I would say that he has some ideas characteristic of any American, but that he fell into some unfortunate intellectual company, with the result that he now views America and the world through a soft-left, quasi-socialist, welfare-statist lens.
Yet his dizzying array of evasions, reversals, and revisions of his ideas make any finite conclusion on his philosophy impossible. He denounces G.W. Bush's policies of fighting terrorism, them embraces [some of] them. He praises capitalism and free enterprise, then undermines them. This list is long and growing.
The question still remains: who is Barack Obama? We might know by now, if only the media vetted him half as well as they did Sarah Palin!
Unfortunately, it doesn't matter whether Obama is a hard leftist, a soft socialist, or a welfare statist, as all of those positions are ideologically evil and the only difference between a welfare state and a totalitarian one is time.
You know what? It's "deeply offensive to many" to suggest that Michael Jackson was an unrepentant pedophile.
The truth sometimes burns like a cleansing fire.
<"…We can pray for him and his beautiful family, even as we firmly tell him: “Mr. President-it is for the sake of your family and ours that we must say no.">
Mr. Blackwell, I believe you should be suggesting we pray for each other and America. This President has put the unborn, the sanctity of marriage, and our country's future in jeopardy in the blink of an eye; so if you don't mind my prayers will be for my fellow citizens who have to find a way to stand against his onslaught.
Pretty cowardly that the comment by "Earl_Dumarest" was deleted, and pretty funny considering it racked up a quick +6.
I tried reading Obama's autobiography but found it to be a snooze. One internet pundit described it as the "most bought and least read" book in America; I'd say that's about right.
I have to agree with most of the consensus here, BHO as an author was not impressive in my opinion. His writing seemed to be more of an excuse for his future actions rather than a telling of his past to give the reader more insight.
"Don't let your race get in the way of your own objectivity."
Too late!
Don't know why people persist to put this crisis in the context of socialism vs. capitalism.
The problem is with the CORRUPTION!!!!! And obviously Obama is using the failures (corruption) of our leadership to perpetrate this “let’s all pull together” BS. It's not let's all pull together. It's let the most productive Americans finance the least productive Americans.
And what happens when we productive Americans decide that we don't want to pull together anymore? Well then we are all going to be less productive. So who finances that?
That being said thank you for your analysis.
I know! I lived in Cincy for a while when he was mayor.
Very nice place to be at the time.
I tried to read it, I really did, but with every sentence I felt a nagging twinge in my brain. He may be a gifted writer and eloquent beyond belief, but I just can't do it. I look at him and I see just another Chicago Machine politician lieing through his teeth as a means to an end,
It's sad to say, but I believe almost nothing at all about Obamas childhood and early years. To much of it sounds fabricated. I honestly think he's pulling a Raymond Burr on us!
Politicians of his type all start out the same. With grandiose dreams of changing the way things are done in politics. It always ends the same. A complete disaster for the average citizen!
Did he use a teleprompter to write his book. Who was writing that?
Capitalism, like democracy, is the worst system available except for all the others.
I don't believe there is one real thing about Barack Obama. That includes his authorship of his books and his parentage.
Why would the grandparents allow someone like Frank Marshall Davis, who was known as bisexual and a seducer of children to "mentor" the young Barack? Why would they even leave the teenager alone in the same room with him? They wanted Barack to connect with him somehow.
Don't judge KB so quickly O_T. The Clinton comparison is waaay wide of the mark.
[...] Dreams – or Nightmares – From Obama’s Father? by Ken Blackwell [...]
[...] the rest here: Dreams – or Nightmares – From Obama’s Father? This entry is filed under America – Blogs, Big Hollywood. You can follow any responses to this [...]
Whether Ayers wrote or assisted in writing Obama's book or not, the political alliance between those two was there in plain sight for anyone to see.
For instance: http://chronicle.uchicago.edu/971106/justice.shtm...
It doesn't really matter whether or not he wrote the book. The book was written for one purpose: to assuage Americans into thinking the unknown Obama was somebody he wasn't. It's the only game a leftist can play if he wants to get elected. Once he won, the book no more mattered than his campaign pledges mattered. If you're looking for meaningful insights into the character of Obama look at what church he attended for 20 years or from whose friend's livingroom he launched his political career, not a self-serving book (which he may or may have not written).
I'm judging strictly by the content of this one piece. The Clinton comparison is strictly limited to his manipulation of the truth through the use of carefully chosen and misleading language.
How is that "wide of the mark"?
Don't you realize that Obama says what he needs to at the moment to get himself ahead. That goes for his book too. He's a con man. And he's selling this country out.
con man is the perfect description
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/06/breakthrou...
Jack Cashill isn't the only one who has come to the conclusion Obama didn't write "Dreams."
I thought that this is a rather fawning piece and not very deep. If you feel like you need more than just the two self-serving Obama "autobiographies" (what chutzpah!), read this: http://colony14.net/id41.html or the new book when it comes out: http://colony14.net
Barry, we hardly know ye.
Sorry… not buying it. People who know this stuff know that a lousy writer cannot become a brilliant writer. He couldn't write his way out of a wet paper bag in a downpour.
I am with Jack all the way on this one.
Well judgingthe man by the content of this single piece (which I myself feel is a bit too sympathetic to Firefly) would be akin to judging Reagan by a single speech he gave when he was a democrat and president of the Actors' union. This essay does define the type of public servant, and man that I watched for 10 yrs. And the Clinton comparison is way off the mark because KB has written a favorable review of a book he enjoyed. Clinton used language to deliberately decieve. I love \”The Godfather\” novel. And I'm Italian/Amer., it doesn't mean I'm sympathetic to LCN or that Mario Puzo was. But opinions vary and you are certainly entitled to yours.
— On Tue, 7/7/09, IntenseDebate Notifications <notifications@intensedebatemail.com> wrote:
Many nice points…David Axelrod "handled" Duval Patrick, before serving up Obama. Sames speeches, same tag lines, and, watch and see….same bankrupt results.
The teleprompter wrote it
Say, who is that guy in a suit grabing a photo op with the "King of Stoop"? whaat……………..? Who? Nah, you're kidding right? Dad? Really? Allrighttttty then…
Only Stanley Kurtz of NRO was willing to do the legwork on that story. Everybody else was in Wasilla.
Shhesh, One only has to read the man's life-history to know he is carrying a barge load of extra luggage. He spelled it all out in his book, but the lemming lberals lined up en masse to drink their koolaid anyway. The true believers thrashed about, spoke in tongues, praised the messiah, and voted. And here the lemming libs disdain Christianity when all the time they have been worshipping their own God.
Liberals get all "out-of-control" when I note the many subtle simularities to a wacko, self absorbed, narcissist, vegetarian, that was a devout National Socialist from a little town called Braunau, in Austria…he spoke German, not Austrian….hmmmm…..LOTS 'O BAGGAGE….
Liberals get all "out-of-control" when I note the many subtle simularities to a wacko, self absorbed, narcissist vegetarian, that was a devout National Socialist from a little town called Braunau, in Austria…he spoke German, not Austrian….hmmmm…..LOTS 'O BAGGAGE….
Liberals get all "out-of-control" when I note the many subtle simularities to a wacko, self absorbed, narcissist vegetarian, that was a devout National Socialist from a little town called Braunau, Austria…he spoke German, not Austrian….hmmmm…..LOTS 'O BAGGAGE….
I don't think Ayers or some other person wrote the book without Obama, but I do not think that Obama wrote that book all by himself. We have heard his speeches, we have heard him mess up with teleprompters. He has a gift for speech, this doe snot always translate to a gift for written word. Regardless, the contents of the books are terrifying and should have spelled his doom as a candidate.
I think Barry deserves all the respect Dems afforded President Bush. (Note to self: Ignore future Blackwell drivel posted here)
Blackwell had my ear, but then he played the race card and I stopped reading. John Cashill has done a bangup job of making the case that Ayers wrote or co-wrote "Dreams"–it's a fascinating case of detective work, using a copy-editor's eye, and an English teacher's nose for classroom plagarism.
Great to see you here, Mr. Blackwell. Please run for office again.
Update: I see now that this is actually your second post here, not your first. Well, the sentiment still stands.
Why can't we read Obama's college writings? If he is such an inspired writer — let us enjoy all of his work — is there something to hide? Perhaps a discovery of his writing style not matching "his" book style.
From what experience did all the maritime references come? Perhaps Ayers merchant marine experience?
Good peice, Ken,
I hope and pray that in three and one half years that Barack and his family return to Chigago and that he finds something useful to do with his remaining years.
Double ditto Jed!
Yep and I third that. Egomaniacal doesn't even come close.
I don't think he is as boring as I think he is deceitful–by omission.
He played it very close to the chest his whole (short) career. Most of what he said in the campaign can be interpreted a number of ways. His voting record in the Senate is terrifyingly blank. Where are his academic writings?
I will reiterate that I could not stomach reading his nonsense.
Your analogy is pretty strained: this piece was published yesterday, it's not an archive from the '50s. Blackwell wrote it and he can stand by it or retract it. Book report or not, I feel it reveals him to be less than objective on issues specific to race. He may not even be fully aware of this himself.
Frederick Douglass? God in Heaven. That reads like something Al Sharpton would have come up with. In other words, anyone who thinks Obama didn't write "Dreams" without the help of a white man is obviously a racist.
I would love to read Mr. Blackwell's thoughtful rebuttal of the points Cashill makes regarding the authorship of "Dreams". Dismissing him as an "internet loony" and by implication a racist is simply not scholarly or objective in thought.
It's Jack Cashill, but otherwise, yeah. Ditto on the race card.
The "most bought and least read book in America"?
You mean, "Dreams From My Father" has actually replaced the Bible?
That sounds about right…
Wouldn't read this book if someone gave it to me to read. I know everything I need to know about Barry Soetoro and his fascist thinking just by getting up every day and going to work seeing my tax dollars being confiscated from me to fund things like "universal access to abortion"….this creep didn't even have the balls to get one of our brainless legislators in either of our legislative bodies but rather signed an "excecutive order" to provide funding to kill babies for people that don't even live in our country. Sweet dreams Barry.
Perhaps I missed it, but reading through the article and comments I did not notice any reference to support for Raila Odinga or how the many felt being slaughtered in the streets…
I saw that coming; I should have specified "current book".
The comment was about the love 'em and leave 'em style of Obama's biological father, humorously portrayed as a "player". Real horrible racism with no relation to reality…
Vegetarian? I'm pretty sure I saw Obama ordering a cheeseburger just a couple of weeks ago on the evening news.
Other than that, well, sure…
Read Rahm Emanuels book "the plan" that one will scare you too. Don't buy it though, see if it's at the library, don't waste money supporting that joker.
Interestingly, as editor of the Harvard Law Review Obama published nothing of his own work in it.
He has written nothing before or since "Dreams" that shows anything remotely resembling the style or talent of that authorship, including his other book.
But, according to Mr. Blackwell, to suggest Obama needed help to produce the book makes you at best an "internet loony" and at worst a racist.
Any time a comment is deleted I always wonder why. Couldn't the site post reason?
Like – This comment deleted because of vulgar language
or
this comment deleted because of ad hominem attack on another poster
or
Maybe as seems the case according to what the posters who read it are saying – there are certain opinions we may not hold or voice. I can even accept that so long as I know the opinions I may not hold. Racism, I understand, but does it apply to whites, too. Can I say anything negative about white men, most anything negative about white women. Can I call Grits (of which I am one) a redneck, honky, white trash, trailer park trash (as Carville called Paula Jones), cracker (as blacks call whites all the time) but no disparaging remark about minorities. Can I say Palin's fourteen year old was impregnanted by a baseball player but must not mention the presidents daughters except to extol their praises. Tell us, Andrew what we can and cannot say.
Obama is a man of many layers and facets. We have not seen his SATs so don't know if he was affirmative actioned into college or not. His wife was, as she openly states (as was Sotomayor, as she, too, openly said), was the president? Without the SATs, we'll never know. He transferred to Columbia in his second year of college. What were his grades the first two years? We know Gore's and Bush's grades; why not President Obamas? Everyone claimed Bush was dumb. His IQ was divulged. What's Obama's IQ? To get into Harvard he had to pass the Lsats. What were his scores? How'd he do in Harvard. We know Bush's and Gore's grades at Yale and Bush's grades in the Harvard Business School; why not Obama's at Harvard. He obviously passed the IL bar since he taught in IL, so that's in his favor. How hard is it to pass the IL bar? Is it as corrupt as everything else in the state?
President Obama seems to have an unhealthy attachment to the father who deserted him and his mother. I am no pshrink, but I suspect this is not all that rare — abandoned children searching for the love that was denied them makes for powerful novels. Obviously he employed a lot of father figures, among them the Marxist who mentored him in HI – forget his name. Marshall? – Ayers (a known terrorist who but for a technicality would be in the slammer for murder), Reverend Wright (an admitted Afro-Centrist). I don't think we need to worry about this man turning America into Euro Socialism or USSR Communism; I think we need to worry about him turning America into African Marxism. This seems to be his focus. Not a transfer of wealth from the Haves to the Have Nots or from those with Ability to those with Need but rather the Oppressor to the Oppressed. This is straight out of Kenya, Zimbabwe, South Africa, etc., and could explain his dissing Europe while playing cozy with Russia (no colonies in Africa but Russkies were very helpful to Africans in throwing off the yoke of European colonialism) and Saudi, Turkey, Iran and turning away from Israel.
I thought the same thing. Posted a comment similar to yours, which disappeared after about a minute.
This is censorship. Shame on you, Andrew.
<edit>
And now oddly, my original comment is back (see below). But only after several hours in the dead letter office, and only after I posted the above accusation of censorship.
I can't tell whether this site is being run by an actual human or whether there's just a really bad automated filter. In either case it's getting annoying.
Why would you ever twist the truth so baldly to lionize a piece of garbage like Obama, Sr. You refer to him as "brilliant" (twice) a claim that has no basis at all, and afford him the unearned honorific of "doctor", while doing everything you can to paint him as a tragic victim of circumstance.
In fact, he was lowlife. He was a polygamist who abandoned his first family to take up with Obama's mother while here in America, and when he got the degree he came for, he dropped her and her son like hot potatos to return to Kenya. He spent his life pursuing the evil and failed ideology of communism and attempting to impose it and the attendant suffering it causes on his countrymen. He died by his own hand because he was a drunken loser, not some tragic hero. What a bunch of crap.
Here's where I have a problem with that: censorship of thought should be antithetical to the purpose of this site. Filtering for vulgar language is fine with me, as is editing for abusive, gratuitously insulting language. Both of those things disrupt the healthy exchange of dialogue.
But censoring someone for calling Obama's father a "player"?
Come on, Andrew. You know better than that.
While I'm waiting for my comment to be screened by the site thought police, let me just say that Michael Steele is "Carleton" from the "Fresh Prince".
<edit>
Interesting. Just a test of the emergency censorship system. How is that remark less offensive than calling Obama's dad a "player"?
Definitely, this article by Mr. Blackwell is very disappointing.
Regrettably it's not a well thought out piece. Obama's father was a communist and not some great fighter against socialism. He also left his family behind once he got a chance to go to Harvard. Mr. Blackwell ignores these facts for some reason and sees the need to praise Obama Sr.
I found the piece disheartening and disappointing from someone I voted for for governor.
From the Wikipedia article on Kenyatta:
"He is credited with leading Kenya to independence and setting up the country as a relatively prosperous capitalist state. He pursued a moderate pro-Western, anti-Communist economic philosophy and foreign policy."
Either Wikipedia or Blackwell are wrong.
In addition to Ayers and Wright, he was also influenced by Marx while "opening his mind" at Harvard. And, what did Marx write? The Communist Manifesto. Water it down and call it Marxism but that's positively communism. THAT's where Obama is taking this country. Maybe we won't see it during his stint in office but he's certainly solidifying the ground for future communists.
While I too was not enthralled by this blog post, Terrahawk. It's the type of article to present to the kool-aid chuggers. If you come out of the gate hitting hard against Obama, they shut down. Like this socialist movement, we need to let it ooze over them before bringing down the sickle.
A few blogs back, Andrew Price & I were kidding about Al Sharpton being a "playah" and it didn't get deleted. Must be various people watching the board with differing perspectives on what's "acceptable."
This is the enemy of democracy slipping through the shrubs away from the front gate. It comes in quietly and subtly. Thanks to the lapdog media, the enemy is also hidden well through cover of darkness – information flow is cut off with propaganda.
You, and Wikipedia, are spot on. Obama, Sr. was a communist, intent on imposing that ideology on his already destitute and suffering countrymen. Like his son, he was a statist who abhorred capitalism, liberty, etc. I really can't believe Blackwell wrote this dreck. Set aside the silly "brilliant"/"doctor" issues, what would lead Blackwell to try and lionize this lowlife. The guy was an adulterous/polygamous, communist, alcoholic who abandoned his son. Why would Blackwell waste his breath on him?
Now this is a comment that deserves to be consored – unlike the earlier on ehtat actually was censored! The difference is pretty obvious.
I really couldn't care less about Obama's "daddy issues". The only thing that matters to me is that his policies are destroying this country.
I really have minimal knowledge of Mr Blackwell except that the general Conservatice opinion of him was positive and more favorable than M. Steele for RNC Chair. After reading this erroneous piece on Obama Sr. and Jr. by Ken Blackwell I have to say he is very discredited in my view…this revisionist piece of racist garbage needs to be refuted!
Oh, puh-leese…
as the media portrayed Bush as our enemy, the media portrayed Obama as a god to be worshipped. Sorry, but I am not buying it.
Thanks for your response….Old_Tom.
I loved Martin Luther King Jr…he left us with a profound philosophy that we ALL need to judge people by the content of their character and not the color of their skin.
So to Mr Blackwell, it is my 1st amendment right to respectfully question a President (any candidate/elected official) on any aspect of his character/official decisions — regardless of one's race, religion, gender, sexual preference, affiliations, etc. I lived in downtown Chicago in the 90s through recently. I was and have always been a news junkie and had a front row seat to Chicago politics, debates, speeches, interviews, journalistic pieces (especially those before 2008–after 2008, the news was slanted, past information was "lost" ) AS A RESULT, I do very much question the "transparency and integrity" of Mr Obama….I did eeven when he was elected to State Senate and never showed up or too often when he bothered to travel to Springfield — he voted present)
If that makes me a racist — then maybe the issuer of that label should look in the mirror. Enough is enough.
This is not the city of Chicago…there is A LOT a stake — our very existence. We have every right to be confident of the character of our leader (I didn't hear too many objections to the way past Presidents have been questioned). This leader continually contradicts himself, re-writes history, espouses fuzzy math, quotes statistics that are not substantive, offers questionable remarks about himself — they all add up to loss of credibility — when CAN you believe Mr Obama on matters that cannot be double checked. I was always told — you don't have to memorize the truth…or read it from your handler's written words.
Every other candidate gets vetted beyond comprehension — especially when the left leaning press is not in their fan club….look how far they went with Palin. Maybe a few dozen or so of those Alaska bound lawyers could have made a stop in Chicago, New York, Boston, Kenya, etc.
Until Mr Obama starts living up to his self-proclaimed label of "the most transparent President" there are millions of citizens — with more every day — starting to shout, :The Emperor has no clothes."
That Mr Blackwell, is my first admendment right — to speak up when I question the truth. Mr Obama COULD set the record straight very easily and chooses to be an Opaque leader….that will only work for so long and the polls are starting to reflect that sentiment. His books beyond the style of the writing have unreal exaggerations — ie passages related to the astronauts for one — Mr Obama could easily set the record straight — now that Mr Blackwell, would be a great story.
That's the baffling thing. I thought Blackwell did a good job as Secretary of State especially when the courts kept changing the rules in the run up to the 2004 election. His campaign for governor was pretty tepid but not all of that was his fault. This article though is junk and is strewn with all sorts of errors and one implication of racism. I expected better of Mr. Blackwell.
Valid point..
Further, in Chicago, while Pres Obama was running for State Senate and later — US senate….he was introduced by the press as having been as a guest lecturer. Not a constitutional professor as is now being promoted by the media and Mr Obama. UofC used to list him as an Adjunct (guest lecturer).
I don't believe you make headway by making erroneous statements. Obama Sr. was not a capitalist and did not oppose Kenyatta due to the latter's socialism. Kenyatta was considered to be a capitalist and anti-communist (see wikipedia). Mr. Blackwell's statements in this matter are troubling because of how completely out of line they are with the facts. Now if Mr. Blackwell had wanted to reason along the same lines in his article but leave out Obama's father, fine. But making all sorts of errors to back up your point is not a good thing regardless of your goal.
For whatever it is worth — Mr Obama told another fib today (re-wrote his own personal story) while in Russia…Apparently, he is quoted as saying, "“I don’t know if anybody else will meet their future wife or husband in class like I did, but I’m sure that you’re all going to have wonderful careers” (There is a You Tube Video of him saying this while talking to students in Moscow)
The truth: He didn't meet her "in class," but at a Chicago law firm in 1989…..Michelle was his acting supervisor when he asked her out……Michelle's words on Paula Deen prior to 2008 election.
What is going on????
Humph, Ken Blackwell shouldn't be writing this at all then. I'm going to have to run on my standing rule moving forward, no exceptions. Nothing Obummer writes is truth and anything praising Obummer is obviously kool-aid induced. In this case, Assuming these things regarding Obummer does not in fact make me a donkey, just safer. Thanks for the correction, T. Maybe you need a blog entry to counter Blackwell.
He has one good point then, he seems like a good family man. Hopefully he'll be a private citizen SOON. Jan, 2013 can't come soon enough.
So if you where given a copy of 'Mein Kampf' and was there to listen to the writer orate to the crowds in 1926, would your opinion of the man be as tame as when you read the presidents book?
Well said! "Can we resist all this? Yes, we can. We can reject the path that Barack Obama has laid out before us. It is a path not of independence, but of ever greater dependence, a path that leads to loss–loss of liberty, loss of self-respect, loss of self-reliance."
This is a pathetic piece. Poor, sad Obama – now being compared to Fredrick Douglas. Give it a rest.
His father was a polygamist, in other words, he was married to 3 women at the same time. But Obama doesn't really go in to "all that." He was also a sad drunk who is not the honorable man this author tries to make out.
I would suggest you, Ken Blackwell, re-read both of Obama's books. You'll understand how the America-hating Obama teamed up with Ayers to flush his experiential toilet.
And M COlins is right on: American Thinker ran a couple of pieces that would lead any "thinker" to conclude that Ayers wrote O's book.
Please, step away from the Kool-Aid before you pick up your pen.
I think at times it's the computer grabbing the post because of key words. The last two times it happened to me, I was making a reference to Cheney. But I used his first name, and both times it was held up by the system.
But there are other times when our posts disappear and never come back. Not sure what to make of that.
I can just see it now. At least once Ann Coulter gets hold of the story. Imagine if Chris Matthews was interviewing her:
"Now Ann, you're claiming the President didn't write his own autobiography?!"
"No Chris, I'm *not* saying that! What I'm *saying*, is…"
"Okay then, are you *implying* the President didn't write his own autobiography?"
"Not neces*sar*ily. (And you always do this to me!) What I'm saying is, I think it *is* somewhat odd that the claim of his being a literary genius unparallelled in modern times, rests solely on his uncanny ability to write exactly like William Ayers, and like no other writer, including himself, apparently. Don't you find that odd, Chris? I mean, it certainly *is* a talent, to be sure, but is that kind of talent really something to be *proud* of? For someone who's such a literary genius, it makes me just a *little* bit curious to know what *his* writing style looks like, yet we've never *seen* it, not one piece of writing from him that would actually *demonstrate* that to anyone."
"There, you just implied the President didn't write his own autobiography! Really, Ann…"
"Listen, Chris, let's limit the discussion to what I *actually* say, okay, rather than what I *didn't* say. Let's start *there* All right?
"Now, what I *said* was [gets interrupted again] — no, I *didn't* say Bill Ayers *ghost-wrote* the book that Obama is claiming *he* wrote all by himself, which would of course be *fraud*. (Actually, you don't tend to call it "ghost-writing" unless the real writer is actually acknowledged, so whatever this is, Chris, it certainly *isn't* "ghost-writing".) So no, Chris. I'm *not* saying *that*.
"What I'm *saying* is, that Barack O*ba*ma, literary genius that he is, was evidently so in love with the literary style of a man he allegedly never *met* until 1995 – which, incidentally, was the year his book came *out* – a book he says he spent the previous five *years* writing, that he chose to write that book in some other man's *literary style*… and, quite *competently* I might add, because it's *not ea–sy* to write a book entirely from scratch in someone else's literary *sty–le*… their style is kind of like their fingerprint, y'know? It's not as easy as you might think. And yet I'm saying, he pulled it off… which therefore *makes* him a literary genius, though I doubt it's the *kind* of literary genius everyone on the left is *claiming* he is. But yes, a literary genius nonetheless.
"So I wonder, since he's so good at copying other writers' literary styles, when *will* he deign to write a Shakespeare sonnet to impress his royal subjects, or maybe a short story in the style of Mark Twain, or – if his literary genius is confined to the non-fiction genre, perhaps a dispatch from his recent trip to the Kremlin in the style of Edward R. Murrow? Or is his genius only able to capture the style of William Ayers? *I* happen to think that's an *excellent* question, by the way, *I* think that's the question you really *should* be asking, instead of attacking *me* all the time… yes, the more I think about it, the more I realize the world needs to see *more* of this man's literary genius."
If it's offensive to some that Obama didn't write the book, ————————— GOOD!
'Cause he didn't write the thing. When Ayers wants to, he can write compellingly. It's Obama that's a flat-out bore.
Right now, outside of his boringly repetitive and endless riffs off of MLK, Obama has nothing to offer.
And he's written nothing previously that's remotely close to that book, and since then, he's written again, NOTHING like that book.
That book came out of nowhere, just like his political career, and if it's bothersome to some to conclude that he didn't write the book, ——————— well T.S. baby.
Ken Blackwell, {who I otherwise like} didn't even bother seriously examining the VAST WEIGHT of evidence that leads one to conclude Obama didn't write the book.
He didn't even bother going through the evidence, because if he had, he wouldn't have bothered with this bizarre and weirdly misplaced paeon to Obama's creepy book about his creepy father.
That book was the book of a radical, and there's not a damn thing decent to be said about it.
[...] and If Arlen Specter Had Voted Against the “Stimulus”… Ken Blackwell, Big Hollywood: Dreams – or Nightmares – From Obama’s Father? Frugal Café Blog Zone: Obama Revises His Promise on Bills Being Available Online for Public [...]
[...] photographs of Barack Obama’s mother (warning: Sexually Explicit) Ken Blackwell, Big Hollywood: Dreams – or Nightmares – From Obama’s Father? Michelle Malkin: The more he talks about nationalizing health care and spending more money… and [...]
"I recommend this book to all Americans, and, especially, to all my conservative friends…"
I have finally read this book – a first edition – cover to cover. I wish more people had read this book in 2008. If they had, this man would never had been elected President. I never knew President Obama had such a disdain for the white race and would work tirelessly to fight against it. Associating with Marxists, Communists, Revolutionaries? Yes – I wish everyone in this country would have read this book.
No one can say that President Obama lied about his agenda – it was all there in black & white in 1995. We just failed to see it.
You must be logged in to post a comment.