Comments on: What’s Not To Like: Gillibrand

By: texacalirose

texacalirose — Sun, 25 Jan 2009 21:42:03 +0000

El Gordo – January 25th, 2009 at 10:55 am
Texacalirose,

you´re the bee´s knees.

Muchisimas gracias, mijo. Oro en paz; fierro en guerra.

By: thiaCyn

thiaCyn — Sat, 24 Jan 2009 08:19:04 +0000

As for throwin it out there, this pasty is NO conservative! Not doing research on these bureaucratic politicians has and is going to do this country an extreme left socialist code pink attitude and you all know what those hags are about! Nutzzzzzzzzz! I don’t live to far from Bezerkley, see all sorts of squirrels in cages. Do your research then come back to us when you have more! Have a great weekend guys and gals!

By: texacalirose

texacalirose — Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:52:31 +0000

Quiz time again! Who said this? And ~~‘feminuts’~~ 'texismellirose.' Heh. That’s quality humor. Is ~~Lola~~ Angie drinking and typing again? And who said this? [Angie], I find it interesting that the posters on this site with the biggest swinging dicks are all women. Angry, smirky, condescending women. Not sure why. Maybe it’s just a coincidence. Me? I blame ~~Ann Coulter.~~ Hillary Clinton.

By: Ken in Irvine

Ken in Irvine — Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:24:05 +0000

Angie: Except the sense that believes in women’s reproductive rights, of course, right?

Palin opposes pregnancy?

By: texacalirose

texacalirose — Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:18:23 +0000

Andrew Price:

Thx. It’s been a bit of a snark fest this evening. The trolls and even those who purport to engage in civilized discussions from the other point of view (you know the ones, the oily, the unctuous) are filled with the audacity of hoping that we are all as inept as John McCain. The fight is on.

By: texacalirose

texacalirose — Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:12:50 +0000

Quiz time for Vangie again!

Guess which 2008 presidential candidate said this:

[The candidate] said Thursday he’ll bypass the federal public financing system in the general election, abandoning an earlier commitment to take the money if his Republican rival did as well.

Associated Press

Thursday, June 19, 2008 (NOT 1984 or 1987, by golly).

Clue: It wasn’t the Republican candidate.

Hint: It was the same guy whose acolytes now extol his integrity, admonishing anyone who doubts his oaths and exposes his dissembling to believe the unbelievable.

In the words of his guru-ness, Gary Graham: FTS!

By: Angie

Angie — Sat, 24 Jan 2009 04:48:05 +0000

Raven, it was 1987, not 1984. Got it?

Oh, and it ain’t comin’ back; the Dems aren’t pushing it, contrary to your Fearful Leader Rash Limbo’s fever dreams.

And comparing the American Left to totalitarianism shows both your historical ignorance and paranoia.

And Texismellyrose? When Obama reminded everybody that he won, it’s because HE DID.

Deal with it.

By: raven

raven — Sat, 24 Jan 2009 04:33:47 +0000

We are talking about the idea of the Fairness Doctrine , or its censorious equivalent, embodied by the term, based on the former policy, properly vanquished in 1984 by Ronald Reagan (but which lives on in the fevered dreams of the Left). Follow the bouncing ball of context, Angie. So, yes, it is a term to describe a mode of suppression, a brand name so to speak, and yes, it has been ruined for use by the Left, thanks to conservative flogging over the past year. We’ve done something right, anyway. We can tell this by your sneering dismissal of it as a “faux issue” – nothing could offer better proof of your anger that we vitiated your lovely wording. Too bad — “Fairness Doctrine” had such an Orwellian ripeness, no? (And why are you calling it an “issue”, Angie — don’t you know it’s a policy!) No matter. The Left will come up with a new “term” — for the same idea, and ultimately, policy. That is what the Left does. No new ideas, just new names. “Hope” for dependence, “change” for the reanimated corpses of failed ideas.

Yes, no doubt Nixon’s list tips the scales aainst the dissent-crushing wheels of the Leftist totalitarian states throughout the 20th century. Good work.

By: texacalirose

texacalirose — Sat, 24 Jan 2009 04:29:50 +0000

Raven:

Thanks for taking the heat off me for a while. I was getting scared. Ms. Bowie skipped right over my comments and got her Nixon-Derangement-Syndrome on. I dodged that one. I wonder if anyone is going to explain to him/her/it the relationship between the terms “issue,” “term,” and “policy.”

And speaking of “stomping on dissent,” guess who said this:

“I won,” he said, according to aides who were briefed on the meeting [with US senators]. “I will trump you on that.”

Clue: It wasn’t Schumer and it wasn’t his former colleague who had her husband’s enemies’ FBI files on her desk, either.

By: Angie

Angie — Sat, 24 Jan 2009 03:58:49 +0000

Raven, you really don’t know your policies, do you?

The “Fairness Doctrine ‘ isn’t a “term” that “conservatives have ruined” for anybody–it was an FCC policy.

You do know the difference between a “term” and a “policy”, don’t you, Raven?

And it’s your side, Raven–not ours–that has historically tried to “stomp on” dissent.

You do keep abreast of political history, don’t you, Raven? You have heard of Nixon and his “enemies list”, haven’t you, Raven?

Raven? Raven?