Comments on: The Stoning Of Team Hollywood

By: Cyber Crime

Cyber Crime — Wed, 23 Mar 2011 02:38:53 +0000

You’re a very skilled blogger….

I’ve joined your rss feed and look forward to seeking more of your magnificent post. Also, I have shared your website in my social networks!…

By: Will ‘The Stoning Of Soraya M.’ Get An Oscar Nod? « N. Virginia, Richmond, VA and DC Metro Chapter

Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:00:02 +0000

[...] of ten candidates for Best Picture? Or, will the Academy bury it as a dirty reminder of their collective shame this past [...]

By: George Moneo

George Moneo — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:30:02 +0000

How about 50 years of injustices, murders, imprisonments and the like in Cuba? All we get from Hollywood are hagiographies of one of its executioners. This is not new behavior, by a long shot.

By: Hanson cuts to the chase « DaTechguy’s Blog

Hanson cuts to the chase « DaTechguy’s Blog — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:35:11 +0000

[...] It never ceases to amaze me how supposedly smart people are willing to believe the mullahs while there were unwilling to believe president Bush. I think as mentioned on Morning Joe today there are just too many people who don’t want to seem on the “Bush” side. They may not like the Mullahs but they hated republicans more. If you want a great example of the delusional state of these people Big Hollywood gave a history lesson this weekend on the Annette Bening Iran trip fiasco. [...]

By: Jimmy Arone

Jimmy Arone — Sun, 21 Jun 2009 04:58:34 +0000

A kick ass, swan song of an essay, John Simpson. Amazing work. I love your passion and your style. No question, I will share this with others.

I appreciate the numerous links as well. Quite a bit of work. You seem to have touched all the bases from the video of the young men who were recently hanged in the streets of Iran to one of my favorite films 'The King of Hearts'.

Solid piece of writing, lots to digest. Thank you for your contributions these past months. I wish you continued success in all you do.

Be well.

By: Mergatroid

Mergatroid — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 07:16:50 +0000

Prior to the war, Lindbergh did want the US to remain neutral. He came around somewhat after Pearl Harbor, flying combat missions (as a civilian) in the Pacific Theater.

Even today, there are still questions as to whether he was actuality a pro-Nazi sympathizer.

By: ScottMcC

ScottMcC — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 06:41:26 +0000

Good luck, Mr. Simpson!

By: ALLAMERICAN

ALLAMERICAN — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 06:28:57 +0000

Great Post Brother and so True.Keep them coming.

By: CD-R

CD-R — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 05:42:40 +0000

Most liberals are, by their nature, cowards. I'm sure many, if not most liberals sided with Charles Lindbergh and his desire to appease, or at least accommodate the Nazi's before and during WWII. Yes, there were anti-Nazi movies coming out of Hollywood, once the war was engaged, but the floodgates really opened (and they haven't yet closed), once it was "safe" and the Nazi's were defeated.

We still have anti-Nazi movies coming out today, for a war that ended almost 65 years ago (Why there are so few anti-Stalin movies out there – more people died under Communism in the 20th century than under any other system – is for another discussion).

Yes, we should discuss the Nazi's and Communists from the mid-20th century, but what about TODAY'S DICTATORS? Hollywood won't speak out because it's not safe yet (see: Dutch film maker Theo van Gogh). If this country survives under Obama, 30-40 years from now, "brave" liberals will be lining up to re-write history as to how they stood up to Islamic-Fascism. Remember when that time comes, it's all a lie! The time to be brave is NOW!

By: John T. Simpson

John T. Simpson — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 03:55:13 +0000

AUTHOR'S CLARIFICATION: I'm not holding AMPAS responsible for events in Iran. Nothing new under the sun there. But I do hold them accountable for being such willing tools for one of the worst dictatorships on the planet, and for being silent and willing bystanders through all that was going on at that time.

They were in Iran when SOS Clinton demanded Roxana's release. Ms. Clinton also requested the return of Iranian-American filmmaker Esha Momeni. She's not only an American. She's one of them! Crickets!

I've presented my evidence for the prosecution. I leave it for all of you to judge. You're the jury. Sure, anyone can put the puzzle pieces of reality together in any shape or fashion they like, especially these days. The question you all have to answer is, based on the evidence, do the pieces fit? Do I have a case? If not, toss your stones at me. I'll leave it to others to deflect if they so desire.

Discuss amongst yourselves. Over and out. EOM. And thanks again, John, Alex and Andy