On the Record, Off the QT and Not Very Hush-Hush
by John T. SimpsonDear Big Hollywood readers, it gives me great satisfaction to report to you that BH has been out on point not only on compelling film industry issues, which will never be covered in promo rags like Variety and the Hollywood Reporter (but then again, AMPAS and the studios aren’t buying us off), but on many controversial issues being played out in America and the greater world at large as well.
I know this to be true. Being a news junkie myself, I have found time after time as I was reading about a supposedly breaking subject, like ABC’s recent coverage of the targeted LGBT murders in Iraq, that it had already been on display for all to see in Big Hollywood posts for months.
Not to toot my own horn, but…well, okay, I’m tooting my own horn. And those of Andy Breitbart and John Nolte, who have given I, and so many other wonderful and insightful Hollywood right-wing fringe types, a magnificent bullhorn we otherwise would not have. We appear to be doing the dirty jobs our media just refuses to do. It’s a labor Hercules would completely sympathize with.
Here are some prime examples.
THE OBAMAMEDIA: The British press, the UK Telegraph in particular, are VERY unhappy with White House spokesman Robert Gibbs today. Seems Mr. Gibbs offended them beyond belief with this statement, in response to the British tabloids hammering the Obama Administration over the suppression of torture photos, a la the reviled BusHitler:
“Let’s just say if I wanted to look up, if I wanted to read a write-up of how Manchester United fared last night in the Champions League Cup, I’d might open up a British newspaper,” (Gibbs) continued. “If I was looking for something that bordered on truthful news, I’m not entirely sure it’d be the first pack of clips I’d pick up.”
The UK Telegraph found the irony of that statement delicious:
Can you imagine Gibbs making these remarks about The New York Times or The Washington Post, or NBC, ABC or CBS? This would never happen. The British press, especially the Telegraph, has been singled out because they frequently publish articles critical of the Obama administration and are not afraid to take on the status quo in Washington.
Increasingly, millions of Americans are turning to online UK news websites for cutting edge reports on American politics and U.S. foreign policy that the mainstream media refuses to cover in the States, especially if it is unflattering to the Obama White House.
Mates, you’re not telling Big Hollywood anything new. We reported that our Fourth Estate was now a Fourth Branch of Government a month ago. Of course, these UK complaints of Obamamedia malfeasance would hardly have been necessary were President Obama a Republican, which we here at BH also hypothesized in Alice In Wonderland fashion. Fact is, if Obama were a Michael Steele-like Republican POTUS, the US press would be all over him like white on rice. Can I say that?
Who’d a-thunk we and the British tabloids would ever be banding together and staging a revolt against the American government and its PRAVDA-like propaganda wing, the VSM? Strange days, indeed. I also find it incredibly ironic that, as President Obama goes out of his way to appease the Hilterite Islamist extremist regime in Iran, his administration lackeys, through pure idiocy, are marching us down the path to yet another war with the British. Not only that, just how bad is it when the British revolt against OUR tax policies? Sorry, but I’m with the Redcoats this time around.
OBAMA AND THE LEFT: On May 26th, US News and World Report opined on the dissatisfaction of the liberal wing of the Democratic Party with Obama’s Bush Lite policies. On May 24th, Gary LaMarche tried to quell the Leftie uprising against Obama with this HuffPo piece. However, if you read the comments, many Lefties aren’t biting. Sorry, Gary, the Kumbaya routine doesn’t work with tinfoils. Same at KOS, which is telling their readers to quit with the ‘Obama is a War Criminal’ crap.
Again, Big Hollywood beat all to the punch on May 23rd. We knew how much of a disappointment Obama was to the Left. It is, in fact, a complete train wreck of liberal politics, naive idealism and harsh realities. And we’re lovin’ it! Again, Big Hollywood is ahead of the curve.
OBAMA AND GAY RIGHTS: On May 23rd, the New York Times published Frank Rich’s OpEd ‘La Cage au Democrats’ in which he commiserated with gay rights advocates of how little support LGBTs were getting from the Obama White House. He closed it out with this stinging rebuke:
The gay civil rights movement has fewer obstacles in its path than did Dr. King’s Herculean mission to overthrow the singular legacy of slavery. That makes it all the more shameful that it has fewer courageous allies in Washington than King did. If “American Idol” can sing out for change on Fox in prime time, it ill becomes Obama, of all presidents, to remain mute in the White House.
Ouch! Dead Bullseye, Frank! Sorry to tell you, Mr. Rich, but you’re only splitting Big Hollywood’s arrow. BH contributor Charlie Winecoff covered this issue in-depth at Big Hollywood way back on March 19th in his ‘Love, War and Gay Marriage’ OpEd. He saw what was coming based on Obama’s own statements, positions and even associations with gay-haters like Farrakhan. On May 8th, we illustrated how even Ronald Reagan was a better friend to gays than Obama probably ever will be.
Double Ouch! Sorry, Frank. You guys at the Times have to keep pace better than that, or you just might find yourselves relegated to dinosaur status. Wait a minute…Oh, never mind.
LGBT MURDERS IN IRAQ: Yet another issue that is beginning to inflame American gay advocates, who are fast becoming infuriated at the brutal and systematic extermination of LGBTs in Iraq on our dime, sanctioned by both Supreme Leader Ali al-Sistani in his fatwa of death against Iraqi LGBTs and by the Iraqi government itself. Not only are LGBTs being slated for execution by al-Maliki’s government, the Interior Ministry police are raiding gay parties, hunting gays online, and either arresting them or killing them on the spot. Shiite gay death squads are now common in Baghdad.
News outlets such as ABC are finally beginning to cover this issue in-depth. Gay rights advocate Michael Petrelis of the Petrelis Files blog has long been on point on this issue, holding demonstrations and raising money for Iraqi gays. Though encouraged by the media attention this horrific plight of gays in Iraq is finally getting, he could not be more outraged by the willful ignorance of this issue by the White House, the State Department and his Congressional representative, none other than House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
Though Mr. Petrelis was not entirely enamored of my Reagan/Obama piece on gay rights here at Big Hollywood (he called me a right wing blowhard on his blog), he does credit BH for addressing the issue as he wished so many others in the gay community and politics would, and praises our calling it for what it is: a gay holocaust. What else do you call a targeted extermination program?
That said, the Reagan piece was not the first BH OpEd to address the burgeoning problem of targeted gay murders in Iraq. That was highlighted in my very first piece for Big Hollywood, entitled ‘One Critic’s Review of Mr. Ganis Goes to Tehran’ way back on March 9th. It was, in fact, Team Oscar’s trip to gay-butchering Iran at that time, not five days after the gay-infomercial Oscars, that sent me into fireball mode and led me directly to BH in the first place.
Not only did that piece describe the longstanding gay holocaust in Iran, a de facto genocide of Iranian LGBTs, it exposed for all the world to see what a human rights sham AMPAS and so-called Hollywood gay rights champs like Sean Penn and Dustin Lance Black really are. Team Oscar member Annette Bening went so far as to praise women’s rights in Iran (an oxymoron if ever there was one), even as fellow American Roxana Saberi was being held hostage as a political pawn right across town in Evin prison. Need more be said?
Again, Big Hollywood was way ahead of the curve.
Speaking of which, the targeted killings of Iraqi LGBTs poses a very curious question. If Prop 8 opponents are so infuriated and outraged at the perceived abysmal gay rights situation in California, as these Tweeting celebrities at afterellen.com seem to be, and in which model/actress Adrianne Curry sarcastically retorted, “treating gays like they aren’t human is wonderful!” then where is the outrage over the hunting, torturing and extermination of gays in Iran and Iraq?
Where is the fury over gay men in Iraq having their anuses glued shut, and being forced to drink diarrhea cocktails that induce horrible suffering before death? Sounds like way less than human treatment to me, Adrianne. Where, oh where, is the outrage?
Just goes to show. Hollywood celebrities may not be gays rights advocates, but they play them on TV. And where else, but for a few lone gay blogs like the Petrelis Files, will you find this pressing issue covered in as much depth as here at Big Hollywood? Hmm. Curious.
TEAM OSCAR IN IRAN: Who else was covering Team Oscar in Iran like Big Hollywood? No one in the entertainment industry I could find. A few outraged conservatives, that’s about it. And it looked like AMPAS shut down all PR coverage of Team Oscar after the punking episode (a story lead I broke to Drudge and Nikki Finke, hee hee!), I had to get all my scoops from the Tehran Times and the Middle East press! This, for the most historic mission in Academy history! How sad is that?
Do any of you remember their grand Red Carpet heroes’ welcome at LAX? Me neither. Hell, they were so quiet about the trip, I though the Iranians were holding them hostage! I thought maybe they had taken me up on my offer to trade the Nine Stooges for Roxana Saberi. No such luck.
And show me anyone else in the media or entertainment rags who was pointing out that Iran’s film industry, which Academy prez Sid Ganis is still praising, spits out the worst anti-Semitic propaganda since Goebbels’ Reichministry. They’re marketing and exporting child martrdom cartoons like Hollywood does SpongeBob! Doing a bang-up business too, if you’ll pardon the pun.
THAT’S A WRAP! As a contributor I will do my best, as many other fine folks here at BH are doing, to keep you all up to date on the goings-on in Hollywood and elsewhere, that you just won’t see covered in all too many other so-called media outlets. Considering how many pressing subjects the Obamamedia is dodging to keep Dear Leader spotlessly clean, that won’t be hard to do. The real problem will be deciding on which subjects the media isn’t covering to choose from.
As a BH fan and reader, I look very much forward to reading more of the great Greg G. spilling his guts, Charlie Winecoff’s unique perspectives on the issues of our day, John Nolte’s insightful and unbiased reviews of Hollywood films and TV shows past, present and future (as well as his calling the biased reviewers out for their politically-motivated hit pieces), interviews with outstanding Hollywood filmmakers you just won’t see in HR and Variety, and many other great contributors like Robert Davi, Bert Prelutsky, Andy Breitbart too numerous to mention here.
You want the real Hollywood scoop? You know where to come! Peace, all. I hope






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
26 Comments
what is occurring is no accident, indeed that the conservative Americans would find comfort in the UK Telegraph is not surprising. In the UK, the media has been politicized for some time, it is just recently that US publications have started choosing sides.
Not just editorially, mind you- were talking full blown propaganda/puff pieces meant to shape, not reflect- reality.
Newsweek is a blatant example of the 'new' Obama friendly media. And so it goes…
We just hope the truth, the straight telling of the facts- does not become the latest casualty.
[...] News Sources wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptDear Big Hollywood readers, it gives me great satisfaction to report to you that BH has been out on point not only on compelling film industry issues, which will never be covered in promo rags like Variety and the Hollywood Reporter (but then again, AMPAS and the studios aren’t buying us off), but on many controversial issues being played out in America and the greater world at large as well. I know this to be true. Being a news junkie myself, I have found time after time as I was readin [...]
[...] On the Record, Off the QT and Not Very Hush-Hush Dear Big Hollywood readers, it gives me great satisfaction to report to you that BH has been out on point not only on compelling film industry issues, which will never be covered in promo rags like Variety and the Hollywood Reporter (but then again, AMPAS and the studios aren’t buying us off), but on many controversial issues being played out in America and the greater world at large as well. I know this to be true. Being a news junkie myself, I have found time after time as I was readin Original post by On the Record, Off the QT and Not Very Hush-Hush [...]
A recurring theme that will playout over the Obama presidency will be his idealism, lack of depth, and propensity to talk himself into a hole. He's big on talk, small on ideas and action. The left is frustrated because he promised and promoted the idealist's dream yet delivered some startling reality. He's presently in Egypt speaking to muslims. They expect action based on his rhetoric. Unlike the United States where the American left accept their bloviating politicians as par for the course, Obama needs to find a new course with the middle east. They are more skeptical and less gullible than we Americans. He can talk himself and the United States into worse difficulties if he tries to play the Arab world the way he's played us. He needs a new A game.
It is clear that no matter how important the cause, if it in anyway conflicts with Obama's programs, the mainstream media will soft-pedal the cause and hope for change later. The gay holocaust is in its full horrible bloom, but the gay community gets no respect in the press because Obama is making nice-nice with the people who are committing the atrocities. It is good to know that Big Hollywood has played some part in waking up the mainstream and perhaps getting them to overcome their horror at the idea of diverging from Obama in order to stop the horror of a mass gay murder.
You know it is funny but if you listen to gay liberal activists it is the Christians that are out to destroy them and they will defend any Musilim that might be criticized by us. In reality if the Muslim extremeists had their way they would all be hung.
I read that there have been 4000 men a year hung in Iran on charges of Sodomy. You don't see it reported however here in the states. I guess if Muslims emigrate to this country and start voting Republican then we can hear tell of what is going on in Iran,
[...] View original post here:Â On the Record, Off the QT and Not Very Hush-Hush [...]
So what's the 'circulation' of Big Hollywood, anyway? What' the # of hits a day, etc.? Just curious.
If anyone wants to support Iraqi gays, support is desperately needed and will be put to good use both inside Iraq itself and to support the exiled movement. The group Iraqi LGBT needs £10,000 a month in order to keep its safe houses and other support for beleaguered LGBT inside Iraq going.
Tax-deductible donations can be made at http://rainbowfund.org
The right in the US is both the right and the left. Because the left is now obsessed with only a handful of prearranged topics – gay marriage, universal healthcare, taxing of the wealthy, the end to the Iraq war (which don't tell them is over and won), Christian hatred and oh yeah Bush hatred, they are missing in any discussion of human rights or anything substantial in the world that veers from that script. On the right their are pro-gay marriage libertarians and anti-gay marriage evangelicals (and many other people). On the right there is support for Democracy in the middle east and those who believe other peoples' business is not our business. There are a myriad of points of view on drug legalization. The right and center are the only people concerned about our burgeoning deficit (a point of view that made the right view Bush less favorably). So of course the right is better at dealing with the human condition, we believe people have the God given ability to succeed and deserve to be free, not prisoner to the liberal plan du jour.
At least a million views a week.
So what is that vis a vis Townhall, Huffingtonpost, Drudge, Daily Beast etc. Surprisingly hard to google site 'ratings.'
In the body of this article, the writer pointed out that the media have become a branch (unelected) of government. I've been saying for a long time that we have three branches of gov. set out in the Constitution (Exec. , Legislative and Judiciary) but have evolved (devolved) three additional branches: bureaucracy, media (Propaganda) and Education (brainwashing). These last three are firmly and strongly in the hands of the Left and have been since the forties (bureaucracy). Media became entirely part of the Democratic Party in the late sixties and once the flower brats got into grad school, they took over education (seventies and eighties). Walter Williams likes to give the analogy about "cooking frogs" – and that's what's happened here. We frogs were cooked so slowly we didn't even realize the heat was being turned up. Now the Social Democrats have the House, Senate, most of the Judiciary, Bureaucracy, Media and Education. In my opinion, we have an African style, neo-Marxist in the White House and the real fight will be between the Social Democrats and the Marxist — the question being will they sign on to his policies even when they obviously will destroy the prosperity of the 50 percent of us paying the bills? That question goes unanswered at this time.
So far as not mentioning Iraq, Iran except in glowing terms, I suspect the propaganda media get their marching orders from the party bosses and right now the party bosses are dedicated to isolating Israel so that Obama can claim he brought peace to the Middle East. Hell, we could have had peace in the Middle East in 1967 if we'd have joined the Arabs in attacking Israel. Peace in the Middle East was always within America's scope so long as America was willing to allow the Muslims to destroy Israel. Gays, Lesbians, Bisexuals and Tansgenders will just have to get used to being under the bus with Grandma and Reverend Wright for the time being. Look at the Demographics. How many GLBT are there? About as many as there are Jews. Not enough for their votes to make a difference for the second term.
"You know it is funny but if you listen to gay liberal activists it is the Christians that are out to destroy them and they will defend any Musilim that might be criticized by us. In reality if the Muslim extremeists had their way they would all be hung."
There's a reason Lenin coined the term "Useful Idiots". GLBT believe what the propaganda media tell them and the PM are not telling them about what's going on in Iraq, Iran and other Muslim countries.
"In reality if the Muslim extremeists had their way they would all be hung."
Just a minor quibble, but the term is, "hanged." For example, "If the Muslim extremists had their way, all LGBT's would be hanged, while if gays had their way, they would all be well-hung."
"Surprisingly hard to google site 'ratings.'"
That is not an accident, nor is it an oversight.
BH is the best blog to appear in years, just as Breitbart is the best news aggregator ever. Coincidence? I think not.
Check Alexa… i'll wager they're all on the listing.
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/bighollywood.breitb...
Bureaucracy, media and education. In other words, Miniplenty, Minitrue and Miniluv.
Reminds of that line from BLAZING SADDLES: "They said you was hung!" "And they was right!"
Harumph!
Ouch.. I just missed this line until now on the third rereading…
"On May 8th, we illustrated how even Ronald Reagan was a better friend to gays than Obama probably ever will be."
John, I think you just made some liberals heads 'splode!
Erm, the Telegraph is not a tabloid. It's a respectable broadsheet, and has a larger circulation than The Times.
It also was the paper which broke the MP-expenses scandal, which has already cost the Speaker his job and bids fair to topple Gordon Brown.
I’ve actually seen several items that we discuss on Big Hollywood make it into to the ether. I’m not sure if there is a nexus with BH, but one never knows. I know I personally find it cathartic to vent with fellow travelers, and the occasional sword crossing with some of the liberal troll’s is good for the soul as well. Lets keep raising Hell BH.
Hey B, I stand corrected. Perhaps I thought the Telegraph more of a tabloid because of all the rank Lefties I've done battle with there in the past. But they've been very impressive lately, no doubt. They hopped right on the Free Roxana Bandwagon when our press was dodging the subject, and called Obama "the rabbit in North Korea's headlight." Priceless!
THANK YOU Andrew & John for providing this venue – like talk radio I have gravitated to it like a parched guy in the desert finding an oasis
You must be logged in to post a comment.