Also glad I'm standing upwind from your odor of personal sanctity.

You're obviously too ideologically pure to pollute your vote by actually making a difference.
My vote for Bush in 2000 and 2008 made the difference of having a grown-up in the White House while we faced the worst threat to our public safety since the War of 1812. You may have noticed that we had no further terrorist attacks after 9/11.

Thanks a pant-load for your small part in giving us President Hopey-Change.

Let me repeat, for the third time, some basic scientific facts:

1. All the cells of a human body have a unique DNA code that each and ever one share.
2. A embryo has a different DNA code than the cells of the mother's body. It is, therefor, biologically not part of the body.
3. The purpose of a fertilized egg, implanted into the uterus wall is to grow and mature into a human being. And left without outside intervention, will develop into a human, which is not the case with foodstuff, sperm or eggs.

Also, once again, you set up a strawman in your little aside about the ability to contribute to the cells. Food must be processed and eaten, this is a conscious effort to include it as part of the body. It's natural state, if left alone, is to do nothing. A fetus' natural state, if left alone is to be BORN.

That said it doesn't matter to you. You've never responded to the Constitutional arguments at the core of this outside of reciting platitudes, while we've been citing Court cases and the Constitution itself. You've never responded to the scientific points with any scientific counterpoints, even the glaringly obvious one that anyone with even a marginal knowledge of human anatomy would know to throw back at my points about DNA defining what it part of the body.

All you're doing is repeating your point, louder and more hostility, hoping we'll go away and concede you the field. You're intellectually bankrupt in this discussion, incapable of making a coherent point, depending on platitudes. You are arguing from a negative point, merely saying that "well what you're saying doesn't count." You've not even broached a suggestion of what you consider viability to be outside of the arbitrary and scientifically unfounded "first trimester" line, and your lack of knowledge of Constitutional Law and Biology is obvious for all to see here.

You feel differently, and I am not going to convince you otherwise, anymore than any amount of legalisms is going to convince me that a mindless collection of cells deserves full rights as a human being.

I have compromised enough with the Republican Party, and accepted "compassionate (i.e. big government) conservatism", McCain Feingold, and TARP I, to name