[...] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[...]……

I enjoyed reading your article, by the way I sell Ensure Plus…

[...]we like to honor many other internet sites on the web, even if they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Under are some webpages worth checking out[...]……

[...]although websites we backlink to below are considerably not related to ours, we feel they are actually worth a go through, so have a look[...]……

[...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]……

[...]below you’ll find the link to some sites that we think you should visit[...]……

Again, it ain't gonna happen… But what a beatdown that would be.

Gingrich would pummel him, though his candidacy's a pipedream.

Finally, we live in a world where bad things happen. We ought not to unjustly condemn people who do make mistakes and fall into single parent families, regardless of whether it's through divorce or through a death. We, as a society (not speaking legally here), should still help as much as we can.

But we should never make exceptions into the rule. That single parent families form does not mean we ought to seek them ought and increase their numbers. So, too, even if a gay couple adopts a child, that does not mean we should increase the number of children in gay couple families. These are settling for something worse than the ideal, and pretending that the fact that we settled for it makes it the ideal. We ought to strive as much as possible to aim for the best.

It therefore follows that marriage is only given benefits because of the potential of children. Homosexual marriages produce no natural children. As such, there is no reason for gov't to promote or sanction gay marriage.

Furthermore, males and females are different. This fundamental difference is lost on most liberals. The reality is, you simply cannot replace a man with a woman and pretend that the woman can be a father. Nor can you replace a woman with a man and pretend the man will be a mother.

Healthy children need both fathers and mothers. It doesn't take just two *PEOPLE*; it takes a male and a female.

The net result, the gov't ought to encourage nuclear families only. The gov't ought to discourage single parent families from forming, and it ought to discourage homosexual couples from adopting.

However, this is not the same thing as saying the gov't should tell people who they can and cannot sleep with (except insofar as children may be produced). As a result, I would be against laws that restricted homosexual acts (although I believe they're immoral), because there's no reason for the gov't to be involved there. There *ARE* reasons for the gov't to ensure a lower crime rate, etc. that occurs naturally with the supremacy of a nuclear family over any other type of family structure.