Comments on: Television’s Lame Attack on Guns

By: Roger

Roger — Sat, 26 Nov 2011 01:14:03 +0000

Is this really the best you can do? I expected more insults, more something.
This is boring 3rd grade stuff like a liberal would use.

How predictable.

Is this cutting into that chuckle time you like?
"My chuckle is that Iran is going to slip one through our admittedly very porous southern border and then detonate this in a US city…"
"

By: euzkadiCO

euzkadiCO — Sat, 26 Nov 2011 01:11:07 +0000

troll team jeepwonder / thankfulforMarx / 331769

By: JoeFromSJersey

JoeFromSJersey — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:55:21 +0000

Did you see the 20/20 "special". It turned my stomach. There was so much misinformation, half-truth, and a handful of just outright lies in it that it staggers the mind. I especially loved the entire segment on how you were more likely to shoot someone you care about than actually shoot an intruder. It's just enraging to see the pure propaganda our supposed media puts out these days.

By: Louisraritan

Louisraritan — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:16:33 +0000

As a vet…I cringe anytime I see a post about violence towards a public official for political purposes. I took an oath to protect and defend the constitution and the President of the United States. Brady is a hero in my book and I can understand the need to keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill. Its a very complicated issue. Whats next? Registries for gun owners and the mentally ill? Should I dissregard my first ammendment protection of free speach in TV blogs because big bro might be listening in? We are headed towards some interesting times my friend.

By: LawHawkSF

LawHawkSF — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:52:07 +0000

That makes sense, and I tend to agree about the show getting spooky and shady. Well, let's give them a little more time to see where it's going. Thanks.

By: Louisraritan

Louisraritan — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:46:51 +0000

Ok, I think early will inherit management of rayborns estate…..The direction of the show is getting kind of spooky and shady. There is way too much rogue vigilanteism going on. The shows hero's run the risk of crossing too many lines and becoming the corruption they fight. You really can't take David Early's character out of the show…..he is the behind the scenes guy and Crews confidante. At some point….maybe from the FBI…they will try to get to Crews through Early.

By: jeepwonder

jeepwonder — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:43:09 +0000

I wonder if that has anything to do with DC's desperation to have some of the strictest gun control laws on the books?

By: jeepwonder

jeepwonder — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:43:09 +0000

I wonder if that has anything to do with DC's desperation to have some of the strictest gun control laws on the books?

By: jeepwonder

jeepwonder — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:37:57 +0000

Well, he did volunteer (there wasn't a draft in place) to serve the president.
And Reagan wasn't at fault, it was a crazy. So, it would seem more appropriate for Mrs. Brady to go after mentally challenged being out of hospitals, or running low on medication.

BTW, has she been active against Jody Foster for giving the assasin a motive?

By: kadaka

kadaka — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:50:54 +0000

Ah, but personal tragedies provide the PR fuel for the gun banners. It's all about what's acceptable to the public. People are killed and maimed by cars, but banning cars is ludicrous, we need cars. Drunk drivers kill, but it's silly to ban booze so just go after the irresponsible use. A person is shot, and this isn't the frontier days, we have police, you can ban guns. If the victims and those left behind would soundly blame the attackers and refuse to be gun banner PR fodder because they know guns are needed by responsible public citizens, there'd be a lot less grease for the wheels of their un-American campaign.