Matt Damon’s Upcoming ‘Green Zone’ a Bush-Bash-Athon
by John Nolte
The lead for this story might be Matt Damon’s heartbroken disappointment over Obama’s inability to strip away our health care as the millionaire actor holds on to his, but the news about “Green Zone” — which hits theatres March 12th — is the more interesting part:
It’s hard to think of a movie that’d play better in the Obama White House screening room than Matt Damon’s new Iraq War thriller, “Green Zone,” in which the Oscar-winner adroitly portrays a soldier fighting to expose the Bush administration’s weapons of mass destruction deception. …
Damon … vouches that “the people who worked on ‘Green Zone’ come from all across the political spectrum.”
His character, Roy Miller, is based on real-life Army chief warrant officer, Richard (Monty) Gonzales, whose Mobile Exploitation Team was charged with finding the WMDs during the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
“Monty was a Republican – he’d voted for Bush,” Damon told us at Nobu 57 after the movie’s Cinema Society premiere. “He went to Iraq with the absolute conviction he was going to find the WMDs.”
Makes sense. After child-raping directors, Hollywood’s favorite hero is The Disillusioned Republican.
In the movie, Amy Ryan plays a reporter obviously modeled after Bush water-carrier Judy Miller. Greg Kinnear plays the oily Bush operative who leads her to believe an Iraqi general has confirmed the existence of WMDs. A chase commences to find the general.
Since Paul Greengrass is directing, think of “Green Zone” as Bush-bashing filmed with a shaky-cam set alternately on WhatInTheAlmightyHellIsGoingOn or ICan’tSeeShit.
The advertising for this $150 million piece of propaganda is desperate to make it look like “Bourne 4: Undermining An America Still At War,” which brings us to today’s survey question…
After more than a dozen-plus anti-Iraq/War on Terror films flopped something terrible, many of them starring the biggest names in the business, would a money-driven industry greenlight $150 million for yet another? Is that the behavior of a money-driven, profit seeking, bottom line industry?
Or is that the behavior of Leftist propagandists?
Okay, I lied, that’s a rhetorical question.
Email this to a friend | Print |
Share on Facebook
| Tweet this
| 
Follow Us on Twitter
Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
207 Comments
Let me be the first to not go.
Thanks for saving me money. I do not like Damon, but I am a fan of the Bourne series. I was ready to see Green Zone because I thought it was a Bourne like movie set in Iraq. Whew, that was a close call.
Wow. I've seen the preview no telling how many times (halfway paying attention each time) and I had no clue what it was about. I should have known it would be anti-Bush bullshit since Damon is nearly as delusional now as Alec Baldwin and Sean Penn. I guess when your boy is letting you down, when all else fails, you can always fall back on the "well…yeah….ehh…Bush sucks" card.
Damon is such a tool.
After convulsing from the politcal diatribe in Edge of Darkness, my brother in law (apolitical for the most part) says to me, "yeah, well there's nothing else that's coming out soon, except Green Zone, I think that looks good. I hope that's not too political." I had to break it to him that it was not Bourne 4 and that the entire point of the movie was to talk about how Bush never found WMD's in Iraq and how he tried to cover that fact up for as long as possible. Sounded like he was still going to see it though. I told him I'd pass. Hopefully, everyone else does too.
But I can't say I'm not waiting for the inevitable "this is for the troops" media blitz that Damon will put on in an attempt to Avatarize the movie. A soldier plays the good guy after all!
I believe that Saddam's WMD caches are buried somewhere in Matt Damon's backyard. That man think way ahead of Bush!
Why does Hollywood always protray us as the bad guys? Another movie for the left to fawn over while the theater stays empty.
"Damon … vouches that 'the people who worked on "Green Zone" come from all across the political spectrum.'”
In Matt Damon's world, that means a spectrum that stretches all the way from Progressive to Maoist.
Admittedly a little hyper-sensitive these days about anti-military sentiment in so many movies today, when I went to see a big screen showing of a 1939 classic I was unpleasantly surprised by this line in a movie I thought was safe:
"Back where I come from, we have men who are called heroes. Once a year, they take their fortitude out of mothballs and parade it down the main street of the city. And they have no more courage than you have. But! They have one thing that you haven't got! A medal!"
I'm not an expert on marketing movies, but isn't this a really stupid time to release this movie?
Yet another Damon/Greengrass shaky-cam movie that gives the middle finger to the United States? How utterly depressing.
Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain…
Matt Damon has been on my banned list since he made a movie version of Zinn's history of the U.S. from a Marxist perspective. His bitter mother brainwashed and radicalized him when he was a youngster. He is even banned from my television set. Damon is one of Hollywood's most radical. When will conservatives begin to back up their principles with their pocketbooks? It is fundamentally hypocritical to keep putting money in the bank accounts of these radical leftists who are using that money and wealth to seek the destruction of our Republic, while claiming to be a conservative! Back up your beliefs… with behavior, Americans!
What a surprise! NOT!
It is propaganda and they will keep peddling it until we all are assimilated. "Resistance is futile…"
Yes, why would anyone want to see a movie that reminds the world that we never found the WMD that George and Don and Dick said that were there , that reminds us of the tremendous cost of our "leaders"lying to us.
Am I the only one that thinks Matty looks slightly "r-word-ed?" He always appeared to be a little eggheaded, and it seems to be getting worse with age.
I doubt the average kid who goes to war because he is the bravest one in his neighborhood.
but I never took that line the way you did. I always thought it was a dig at people who relive the "glory days"
your comment may have been flippant, but it is interesting how people interpret things differently.
What can we expect from Damon – coming out of MA the small minded little man didn't have a chance. I wouldn't waste a dime on anything hollywierd puts out these days.
I seem to remember, both Clintons, Gore, Kerry, Kennedy, Edwards, etc., all saying they were there as well and saying Saddam needed to be taken out.
Are you practicing your liberal selective memory tricks again???
Google Iraq, yellowcake and canada and read about the huge amount of yellowcake Sadaam had … yes we knew about it before the war and if he wanted to startup his nuke weapons program he didn't need to buy anymore yellowcake …
I wonder if we'll hear about how "angry" vets are at this movie like we're hearing about with 'Hurt Locker?' For some reason, I suspect not…..
Maybe you should go ask the Iranians if Iraq ever had chemical weapons..oh, and are you still irate that Obama hasn't closed Gitmo as well?
Country AND Western!!!!
Of course they all said that and went for the war, you think they wanted to end up like Paul Wellstone?
It's getting harder to suspend disbelief, nowadays. That Progressive wussbag, Damon, an action hero? He'd be more believable wearing a sundress.
I always took the line to be a very American sentiment….
…that ordinary folks do extraordinary things in wartime, then go back to their ordinary lives…
…and only reluctantly, or at least, humbly, put the uniform back on on Veteran's Day for the town parade…
…the Wizard of Oz was telling the Scarecrow that all men are capable of "Courage", which is NOT the absence of fear, but, the decision to press on DESPITE one's fear.
Blithering Matt’s mom will really need to see this movie many times for it to make a buck
Oh no, Matt Damon's sad. He might have to change his facial expression.
not much here, really…
Just another revisionist Iraq war film NO ONE will go see. It is our belief that these are being made, despite the lack of interest, for political reasons alone. Their thinking is future generations will accept, wholeheartedly, the propaganda and lies purposely put in textbooks, TV, and film.
The fact that Iraq is ultimately a success story, that schools and brigdes will be named after George W Bush cannot be left unchallenged. Ergo the spate of bad, even unwatchable films.
One more thing: The 'Bourne' films are crap. Well made? The first one was ably directed by Doug Liman, and had a few good gags. Bad script, though. And the subsequent shakycam Greengrass sequels with a miscast Ivy League letterman posing as an operative is a hoot. You all should see what a real operator looks like…
It was obvious from the title this was going to be some sort of BS Leftwing rhetoric movie. Who knew it went that far?
The only way I'll see this movie is if GW shoots Damon in the head at the end then pees on his head. And I'm not even a Bush supporter.
Wow! What a total surprise – another anti-American, Bush-bashing movie.
“the people who worked on ‘Green Zone’ come from all across the political spectrum.”
Yes, they have liberals and former Republicans. It´s like this scene from The Blues Brothers …
Elwood: What kind of music do you usually have here?
Claire: Oh, we got both kinds. We got country *and* western.
…just transplanted to "Matt´s Liberal Bunker"
Yes, that evil genius Bush again, or was Cheney in charge of taking down aircraft.
You're cuckoo for coco puffs…..
Let me guess, you're a truther too…..
The guy's about 4'9" — like Tom Cruise, he's more action figure than action hero.
And the intellgence services of virtually every country – including those that opposed the war.
I have just one thing to add:
"Maaaaaaaaaaattt Daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaamon. MATT DAAAAAMON!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
…And Obummer just renewed the terrible, horrible, fascist, Cheney-inspired "Patriot Act"…
…and the LameStream Media and the Lying Socialist Left just swallows it all like good little squishes…
…Useful Idiots are Useful Idiots are Useful Idiots…. hahaha
you guys are both right…
The Bourne stuff drives us batty; Damon always looked like he left his 'Hahvard' sweater somewhere.
The cut and paste job of filmmaking was competent- but that's it. Anybody who ever has plied that line of work thought the series a joke; Dan Craig's 007 was far better- not to mention more realistic- than this half-fairy loser…
What is even harder for me to believe is that he is staring in the re-make of True Grit. There is hollywood for you, Who do you get in the remake of John Waynes greatest movie? Lets get Matt Damen. There is a movie i will not be seeing also
"…WMD that George and Don and Dick said that were there,"
Don't forget to include Bill Clinton, the U.N., Jacques Chirac, Wesley Clark, Howard Dean, John Rockefeller, John Kerry, Sandy Berger, . . .
Matt "Sarah Deranged" Damon has jumped the shark – only one less relevant is his girlfriend Ben Affleck…
Econey, Please get your lies straight. The 500 munitions discovered throughout Iraq since 2003 and discussed in a National Ground Intelligence Center report meet the criteria of weapons of mass destruction, the center's commander reported on 6/29/2006.
"These are chemical weapons as defined under the Chemical Weapons Convention, and yes … they do constitute weapons of mass destruction," Army Col. John Chu told the House Armed Services Committee.
The Chemical Weapons Convention is an arms control agreement which outlaws the production, stockpiling and use of chemical weapons. It was signed in 1993 and entered into force in 1997.
The munitions found contain sarin and mustard gases, Army Lt. Gen. Michael D. Maples, director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, said. Sarin attacks the neurological system and is potentially lethal.
"Mustard is a blister agent (that) actually produces burning of any area (where) an individual may come in contact with the agent," he said. It also is potentially fatal if it gets into a person's lungs.
The munitions addressed in the report were produced in the 1980s, Maples said. Badly corroded, they could not currently be used as originally intended, Chu added.
While that's reassuring, the agent remaining in the weapons would be very valuable to terrorists and insurgents, Maples said. "We're talking chemical agents here that could be packaged in a different format and have a great effect," he said, referencing the sarin-gas attack on a Japanese subway in the mid-1990s.
This is true even considering any degradation of the chemical agents that may have occurred, Chu said. It's not known exactly how sarin breaks down, but no matter how degraded the agent is, it's still toxic.
"Regardless of (how much material in the weapon is actually chemical agent), any remaining agent is toxic," he said. "Anything above zero (percent agent) would prove to be toxic, and if you were exposed to it long enough, lethal."
Though about 500 chemical weapons – the exact number has not been released publicly – have been found, Maples said he doesn't believe Iraq is a "WMD-free zone." So, yes there were WMDs, just not as much nor the type that Saddam wanted everyone to believe. Hell, even Saddam's own generals believed he had more then we found.
you know econey, i know your just saying these things just to get a rise out of us, and like the last time when you said President Bush lied about Saddam having WMD's. Chemical weapons are considered WMD's, Saddam used chemical weapons on the Kurds. Therefor he had WMD's. Plus like i said before if you tell me that you are coming to search my house for something and give me 2 months notice you are coming to do it. When you search my house you are not going to find anything.
LMAO, oh thanks. i had not heard this one before. You really think President Bush had Wellstone wacked?? oh thats a good one. lol thanks just when i was begginning to think you really believed the stuff you posted on here , you redeem yourself by letting us all know its a joke
Matt Damon always reminds me of the type of bullying frat boy who always talked and acted tough because he was always hanging with a bunch of his equally obnoxious frat brothers. It's still the same but now we call his frat "Hollywood."
I was speaking of their comments before the war actually, during the 90's. Al Gore gave probably one of the most brilliant speeches ever as to why Saddam needed to be taken out.
Neither Matt Damon, the director of this piece of crap or Richard (Monty) Gonzales are very bright and seem to be unable to connect the dots too well. The WMD's were most likely there at one time, but, as soon as the U.S. telegraphed the intention to attack, Saddam and his fanatics moved them to Syria on the 80+ specially configured trucks spotted by the CIA moving across the Iraq-Syria border shortly before the start of the invasion. This is well documented and we have witness testimony and photographic evidence to support that high probability. Also, Israeli intelligence determined that part of the shipment was used to speed the startup of the Syrian Reactor they destroyed last year. In the Iraq WMD post invasion search, the remnants were found so the intention was very clear. I guess if you have BDS you can't see those points because of your mental disease.
No, I want to be the first who doesn't go, Larry!
Liberals celebrities are just parasites like Matt Damon.
I can already imagine the obligatory 4-star Ebert review.
What else should we expect of a devotee of Howard Zinn?
Why anyone pays attention to this boob's opinions is beyond me. He has twinkies for brains.Damon was only believeable, to me, in "The Talented Mr. Ripley'.
Geez……. he is not convincing (to me) as a grown-up…especially when he sports facial hair.
You beat me to it Kristine, and thanks for the specifics. But to re-cap for the trolls: We DID find WMD in Iraq. What we did not find was STOCKPILES of WMD (likely due to being trucked out to Syria prior to the invasion).
Thanks for the visual.
If by "Matt Damon's backyard" you mean Damon's rectum, then you're right.
I guess it's ok for conservatives to be rude on this site, but when a liberal gets snarky the censors cry foul.
People at the extreme ends of the IQ scale are virtually identical at first glance. I think it's because of the inside-out sweaters and bad haircuts.
Beat me to it. I remember a Vietnamese waiter at local restaurant in Los Feliz had just seen Team America and was telling all his tables "Matttt Dammmoonnnn." This wasn't a quirky guy, he just found the movie so funny.
"Damon told us at Nobu 57". That's "us" in the sense of "them". Not quite the creature of the masses.
This has hit written all over it. Why it could make twice as much as "In the Valley of Elah" or even eight times as much as "Redacted."
On a more serious note, my buddy said that he wants Don't Ask/ Don't Tell to be eliminated because that it the ONLY way you will ever get Hollywood to make an Iraq/Afghanistan movie made with a sympathetic and sane main character.
"Damon told us at Nobu 57"
Nobu 57 is one of the most expensive restaurants in NYC…d-bag elitist limousine liberals
I looked up "douchebag" in the dictionary and all it had for the definition was a picture of Matt Damon from his 'Good Will Hunting' days
Just say NO. Its easy, keep your money in your pocket, boycott the theaters, and turn of that TV. Easy really, just say NO.
You are going to tell me that after seven plus years in Iraq and Afghanistan, there is no act of heroism, on behalf of our soldiers, that could have been made in to a movie? Nothing? Is that what the libs want us to believe? Nothing to see here, just move along…..the last decent war movie I saw was Once We Were Soldiers…
Buckwheat & Famous Dr. – I wasn't being flippant, and my observation was based on my admitted hypersensitivity, but the line resonated with me and when I looked it up in the script I thought it *could* be viewed as a shot at the WW One vets. I heard the word "heroes" in modern day sneer quotes ("men who are called heroes") and derision about their parades. Add the pronouncement that "they have no more courage than you" about men who faced trench warfare and poison gas could be viewed as derogatory, I think.
Now that you've got me thinking about if further, though, could not the whole movie be seen as an argument against American intervention overseas? Could it be a depiction of the folly of fighting other peoples' battles, and of being manipulated through fear exaggerated and exploited by the man behind the curtain? As was said in a slightly earlier scene – "…if I ever go looking for my heart's desire again, I won't look any further than my own backyard."
Well, there is a bright side: $150 million lost on this dog is $150 million less for campaign contributions.
i wish i had written that
one could ask the Kurds too, Remember them?
I was just commenting the other day how vague the trailer looked for that film. Now I understand that it was intentionally so. Hollywood really does understand that the public does NOT want to spend their money on more Bush-bashing, anti-military drivel, so they tried to hide the truth of what it was.
Matt Damon who???
Never go to any movie he is in. Eastwood should rot in hell for working with that scum.
Or, the movie could be seen as a call for America to destroy the growing totalitarianism that was overshadowing Europe and Asia and threatening Freedom everywhere…
…Dorothy, not insignificantly, was from Liberty, Kansas and the "Wizard" was an unapproachable 'Dictator of the Emerald City'…
…and Scarecrow sings, " With the things I'd be thinkin' I could be another Lincoln…", and, of course, he does end up helping to free the "slaves" of the Wicked Witch by 'liquidating' her… ; )
A little known fact is that Wellstone had his body donated to public safety. He's now a speed-bump by the Lake of the Isles in Minneapolis., and just as annoying.
Wait a minute! Is George Bush still in office?
Didn't they find 500+++ tons of Yellowcake Uranium (from Niger-the country that Joe Wilson said never provided any uranium) in Iraq? & it was quietly shipped to Canada for use in their reactors?
Yes, like Harpo at the end of Animal Crackers, the Marsh Arabs all gassed themselves.
econey: "Yes, why would anyone want to see a movie that reminds the world that we never found the WMD that George and Don and Dick said that were there , that reminds us of the tremendous cost of our "leaders"lying to us."
Everyone, all together now- OIF wasn't about WMD. It was about REGIME CHANGE:
Lying leaders confirm?
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0302/06/lk...
CLINTON: But Saddam Hussein, for 12 years, has defied the will of the United Nations and we contained him effectively, but I think it's fair to say that after what happened on September the 11th the will of the international community has stiffened, as represented by this last U.N. resolution which said, clearly, that the penalty for noncompliance is no longer sanctions. It can be your removal from office.
So, I — my position all along has been one Senator Dole and I took here together on your show that we ought to let the U.N. do its work and I still believe that. But I think the fact that Colin Powell demonstrated persuasively that they're moving the weapons, or the weapon stocks in this case, which — and it would be easier to move the much smaller quantities of anthrax or aphrotoxin (ph) or they may have a little smallpox. But we're pretty sure they've got a botulism (ph) and the chemical agents, VX and ricin.
KING: Does it look inevitable to you? I mean…
CLINTON: It's not inevitable. It still would be much better if this could be done without violence. But the man needs to get rid of his chemical and biological weapon stocks and…
KING: Did you see information when you were president that led you to think he was doing this?
CLINTON: Sure.
——–
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0307/22/lk...
DOLE: Mine's the same. I think these are terrible people, and they inflicted punishment and death and everything they could think of, humiliation on Iraqis for I don't know how many years. And this, I think it's going to put the focus back where it should be.
We're at war with Iraq and next big target is Saddam Hussein. And the Iraqi people, as the president indicated, will start to understand that we're there. We are liberators. We are not trying to occupy Iraq. But it's going to take a while. And this demonstrates again — you just — I want to pat the military on the back. These men and women are doing a great job………
….CLINTON: I think the main thing I want to say to you is, people can quarrel with whether we should have more troops in Afghanistan or internationalize Iraq or whatever, but it is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks…… of biological and chemical weapons. We might have destroyed them in '98. We tried to, but we sure as heck didn't know it because we never got to go back in there.
But hey, the Left thinks Bill Clinton is a bigger liar than the right does. So maybe we should listen straight from the horses mouth: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/01/24/60minut...
" Piro says Saddam told him he himself gave the orders to use chemical weapons against the Kurds in the North. When shown the graphic pictures of the aftermath, Piro says Saddam reacted by saying, 'Necessary.'
In fact, Piro says Saddam intended to produce weapons of mass destruction again, some day. 'The folks that he needed to reconstitute his program are still there,' Piro says.
'And that was his intention?' Pelley asks.
'Yes,' Piro says.
'What weapons of mass destruction did he intend to pursue again once he had the opportunity?' Pelley asks.
'He wanted to pursue all of WMD. So he wanted to reconstitute his entire WMD program,' says Piro.
'Chemical, biological, even nuclear,' Pelley asks.
'Yes,' Piro says. "
—-
But then, the similarly secular, authoritative, statist Left has in recent years revealed much about not only how sympathetic but also like-minded they are with the likes of Saddam.
That killed my Matt Damon fan club also.
The people who worked on 'Green Zone' come from all across the progressive liberal spectrum- ludites, utopians, environmentalists, ecologists,social democrats, socialist, marxists, leninists, trotskyites, communists, politicians, and bankers. He almost got it right.
Washington Post 10/7/04
President Bush gives a statement to reporters on the findings issued yesterday by the Iraq Survey Group led by Charles A. Duelfer. Here is a transcript of Bush’s comments.
BUSH: The chief weapons inspector, Charles Duelfer, has now issued a comprehensive report that confirms the earlier conclusion of David Kay that Iraq did not have the weapons that our intelligence believed were there.
From his mouth to God's ears, hey guys?
Again chemical weapons are WMD's, chemical weapons were used by Saddam on Iran and Kurds. The fact that we did not find them does not take away from the fact that before we went to war every intelligence agency in the world including France and Russia believed he had them and was working on nuclear weapons. Heck even his on military leaders believed they had them. President Bush did not lie, he just believed what every other leader in the world believed.
Whenever I ask my warmongering friends what the US got out of the Iraq war, aside from thousands killed and many more thousands crippled for life, I get a blank stare and then they either say "go to hell" or just turn away and leave.
Do you think he will try to plug the movie on Hannity's show?
Thank God Mr. Damon had no say on "Saving Private Ryan". We would been told how America was the enemy and that the Nazis were "Just Misunderstood".
Source? A Source for my kingdom!
Save your breath, this dolt is convinced Bush was evil and lied about the WMD. No amount of reason will penetrate a cranium as dense as the one econey is sporting.
Matt Damon may be in for a surprise. Even many of the people who disliked Bush are beginning to look at him fondly in comparison to Obama. I hope the movie is a gigantic failure and will have to be shown on networks that no one watches like MSNBC and CNN.
Same reason their best scripts are coming from comic books. It's easy.
while i actually agree with you on this one, isn't the whole WMD thing sort of a sunk cost? It happened, it's done, we move on. It would show a lot more creativity to write a movie about a solution than a mistake.
Rock AND Roll!
If I've said it once, I've said it a million times –
"I have one rule in life: I don't see Matt Damon films."
If they keep pissing their money away making movies we don't pay to see – how can that be bad? The picture you chose from Team America was perfect – whenever I see Matt Damon these days, that's exactly what I hear in my mind – his one line from Team America which sums him up so well – "Matt Daaaaamon".
Matt Damon is a good actor and a terribly student of politics and of history. His talents belong on stage or theater or on the screen. However, I will not see his film or most of the new films. Scant fare for someone who thinks.
I hope the film bombs. America still values the military: duty, honor, country, and all the rest of patriotism.
Hollywood needs to go to Russia and make films or perhaps Saudi or Iran and make films for local consumption there. But not here.
Thanks for the update on Matt D. The proverb works: The apples do not fall far from the tree.
I heartily recommend that reader consult the book of General Sada, Hussain's air commander in chief. He readily admits Saddam had WOD. The word has not gotten out because, if so, the Bush and Dick Cheney bashing would be dashed on the rocks.
Rude? This??
Liberals are the ones who spew profanity, and cry foul: "Racist!" not to mention the oh, so depraved "Tea bagger."
All we say is that someone's a parasite or a moron. Hardly rude or profane, by any stretch of the imagination.
Oh, and our "mean" comments are based on fact – not emotion.
"Redacted" only profited ten bucks?
Yowza!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25546334/
Wait, wait, wait – you have "warmongering" friends?
I'm from a military family, and in all my forty years, I've met maybe one "warmonger" – and that was all the way back in high school.
Paul Wellstone! Ooooooh, the Grand Champion of tinfoil-hat conspiracy theories! You win the Golden Wingnut!
Little Matt Damon is the enemy. America knows. I wouldnt pay to see his crappy movies. I thought Bourne was true crap as well. Another little closet pretty boy with a platform, nothing more.
The article also mentioned that he's doing a remake of "True Grit"! As I posted in the comments there, I just don't think he's up to playing the part of the spunky young girl out for revenge.
Why don't they do something better with their money, like flush it down the toilet?
You must be logged in to post a comment.