REVIEW: ‘The Road’ Casts a Spell, Never Lets Go
by John NolteDo you ever wish you would die?
No. It would be foolish to ask for luxuries during times like these.
Times like these represent a post-apocalyptic world where, for reasons never explained, civilization and most of every living creature has been wiped out; a world where forests and cities and mountains have been replaced by a grey barren landscape littered with dead trees; a world where the earth itself seems to grow impatient with the sound of footsteps, often starting fires and creating earthquakes in order to rid itself of any intrusion; a world where the last remnants of man roam in cannibalistic gangs hunting for food.

At first glance this may not sound like the kind of cinematic experience you’re looking for during the holidays. Not with glib Victorian-era detectives and CGI’d Smurfs to choose from. But director John Hillcoat’s spellbinding, emotionally moving, and frequently terrifying adaptation of Cormac McCarthy’s Pulitzer Prize winning “The Road” is, at least in spirit, richly rewarding and therefore perfect for this time of year. This is the rare film about something that matters.
Man (Viggo Mortensen) and Boy (Kodi Smit-McPhee) push a shopping cart down an empty road framed by tall, bare trees swaying in a wind that makes an unholy sound. Both are filthy, exhausted, constantly threatened by cannibals, always hungry, and father and son. They head south towards the coast never knowing what’s around the corner. One day it could be marauders, the next a stash of non-perishable food. Why they’re headed in this direction doesn’t matter. What matters is what father teaches son along the way: “Keep the fire.”
That fire is our own humanity.
Man fully understands that Boy might very well lose his life on the road. But no matter how desperate things get Man will never let his son lose what makes him human. A revolver, a few rounds, and what it takes to press the barrel against the boy’s forehead will ensure that. A species of human might well survive this holocaust, a predatory species all too willing to feast on its own. But for Man that’s not enough. Humanity must survive or nothing means anything, and so at all costs he preserves this in his boy.
Mortensen delivers an Oscar-worthy performance as a decent, everyday man bearing the unspeakable sadness of losing his wife (Charlize Thereon) and charged with guarding the most precious and fragile part of his son, even if he must make the ultimate sacrifice to do so. As a young boy coming of age in Hell, 12 year-old Smit-McPhee is startlingly good using none of those child actor affectations that have been all the rage these last ten years. In her small but pivotal role, Theron’s excellent as a mother unable to deal with bringing a child into a world with no future other than deprivation. Two other supporting roles are memorably handled but I won’t name names and spoil the pleasant surprise I felt when they arrived.

Thanks to two remarkable lead performances and the measured, steady tone Hillcoat perfectly calibrates and never let’s get away from him, almost immediately you’re emotionally invested in the narrative and the plight of its characters. Most effective are heart-rending flashbacks involving the tragedy of Theron’s character. The sense of loss that hangs over every unremittingly bleak frame lingers long after the credits roll.
The spell Hillcoat casts from the opening scene to the last also lingers. And what a pleasure it is these days to be completely drawn into a film without ever once being awkwardly snapped out of it by some clumsy narrative misstep. The beautifully desolate locations and seamless CGI imagery are as crucial to that success as anything.
Most everything Hollywood produces these days seems to be overloaded with eye-popping imagery in the hopes we’ll forget how barren and empty the characters and story are. Part “Fires on the Plain,” part ”Bicycle Thief,” but all Cormac McCarthy, the despairing wastelands of “The Road” might be barren but the characters and the message they carry is anything but. While not for children, this bleak but affecting story of the hope found in a father’s abiding love and, most importantly, faith in his only son, is not only a beautifully produced reminder of what’s important this time of year, it’s also one of the best films of the year.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
74 Comments
Read the book, it is as haunting as most reviewers suggest.
I'm going to make a guess that the supporting characters are Robert Duvall and Guy Pearce. I haven't seen the film, but I'm not sure why that's a spoiler, since it is plainly stated on their promo materials.
Not my type of Christmas movie, but Iwill borrow it from the library, especially if Duvall is in it.
What are some examples of the child actor affectations you're talking about?
Think you John Hillcoat for not turning this classic story into a political statement…
Mr. Nolte:
Does the film seem to be influenced by Lone Wolf and Cub? It sure looks like it.
If you've never seen the Lone Wolf and Cub films, I highly recommend them.
Two words: "Dakota" and "Fanning."
An inspiring tale of survival, I look forward to seeing this immensely. John Hillcoat appears to have matched the novel's scope perfectly. The Proposition a collaboration with Nick Cave, which he directed as well is stunning as it is raw also. Hillcoat is definitely a maestro of his field. Great review thanks, John.
It's based on the novel by Cormac McCarthy, which may or may not have been influenced by the Manga or the film that came out in the 80s. It's only similarity is the man and a boy and a cart, though. They are not assassins, They are trying to survive.
The two other things that struck me from the review were that they are always moving and that the father was willing to kill his own son under certain circumstances. I don't picture Cormac McCarthy as a Lone Wolf and Cub fan, but you never know.
Ill wait for the DVD. The current situation in the US is depressing enough without paying big ticket prices to experience more of it
"Hide and Seek": Worst child acting in the last ten years.
I was kinda looking for an excuse to see this movie. Nolte just gave me about five or six.
I'm there.
Ogami Ittoo and Diagoroo cast a very long shadow.
Or as "Red Eye's" Mike Baker called it… "The feel good movie of the year!".
DAMN!!! You beat me to it!!! I have the entire "Baby cart killer", "Shogun Assassin" series too freakin' cool!!!
I appreciate this review much more than the last review I read on this site. That review pigeon-holed this movie as just another godless and depressing offering from Hollywood. It seems like every movie that reflects on God's relationship to human suffering ends with God's rebuke for lacking faith and an overflowing of God's mercies. There is a twisted place in my heart that enjoys Cormack's "terrible" endings. We are so conditioned to expect justice. We never relate with the characters who die in vain. We never identify with those who scratch out pathetic lives, lived a few decades too long,
That being said, I haven't made time to catch this flick in the theater either. Christmas time just isn't the time to reflect on humanity and death.
[...] from: REVIEW: ‘The Road’ Casts a Spell, Never Lets Go This entry is filed under America – Blogs, Big Hollywood. You can follow any responses to this [...]
-Two words: "Dakota" and "Fanning."-
Bingo! Kid actors who act like sociology majors. One reason I prefer Unbreakable to The Sixth Sense. The kid actually acts like one.
Fires On The Plain is an interesting comparison. Although that movie must have had one of the least sympathetic characters of all time.
Anyway, thanks for the review. I'm really looking forward to seeing this.
But wait…isn't Viggo on the boycott list because he was in the Howard Zinn special?? Aiiee!! The conflict! (Actually, none for me, as "Precious" used up my depressing movie credits for the next year)
I gave it back for ya.
I agree. I'm not sure it made it in the movie, but the novel does include parts about religion. There's a part earlier in the book where the Man thinks about different forms of prayer, and later the narrator says "Whatever forms you spoke of you were right." There's even a part where someone says "the breath of God was his breath yet though it pass from man to man through all of time." So sure, you can interpret the setting as a godless wasteland, but there's a lot within the book that connects God with hope. And most importantly, the novel doesn't treat religion as a pointless exercise; there's a real place for God in this world and it's a big part of what helps these people survive.
Definitely cooler then Elvis! I still remember "The Green Hornet" on TV when I was a kid. Kato defined cool.
But wait! Try reading the book and see if you really want to squander even more money watching this depressing dreck. The book was horrid and please, please tell me why ANYONE would have received a Pulitzer for this… oh yeah… awards are always given to folks that don't deserve them. Hey! Are those Pulitzer guys from Oslo too? No mystery there then.
Seriously, the end of this story wasn't some noble passing of the torch. What it was can be described as just empty as No Country for Old Men. Yet another steaming pile of poo. Ruined world isn't normally holiday fare so hopefully this will tank quickly.
Save your money. If you NEED to be depressed (which this movie will provide aplenty) just continue to watch our government at work.
I read the book a few years ago, just a year after my first son came into this world. Unlike mothers, a father's 'bonding' if you will, is a evolving process. With the notion of "a father's love" still needing to be fully defined for me, the book opened the doors. My heart ached after almost every page.
I've been wanting to see this film, but I don't think it had a very wide release. Only one theater is showing it in Seattle. Kinda weird considering the hype leading up to it. Maybe they felt they couldn't make money on a depressing film during the holiday season in the middle of a recession.
Sh*t Desert Yote, I pressed thumbs down, instead of thumbs up ,sorry bro. That was the Tequilla's fault
I also have EVERYTHING Bruce Lee ever MADE!!! Personally, I think Bruce was cooler than Elvis!! And just 1 step ahead of "Superfoot Wallace"(my cousin)
Sometimes I feel like I'm beating a dead horse on this, but why are you recommending we go see a film, literally giving our money to a man like Viggo Mortensen, not to mention an industry, that has done everything in its power to destroy America as we know it.
Yes, this is a site devoted to movies. But aren't there tons of good movies out there that don't star a person (Mortensen) who is as radical-left as they come, who campaigned for Dennis Kucinich, called for George Bush's impeachment and attended every ANSWER anti-war rally that he could? Couldn't your time and money be better spent?
Skip this one, read the book if you want, and send the $12.50 to Marco Rubio or someone who will use it to help our country, not destroy it.
WOW! A REAL MOVIE from Hollyweird! Go figure. No political statements like Camermoron's Avatar.
http://noliberalspin.blogtownhall.com/2009/12/29/...
The Anti Liberal Zone
Too bad you feel that way, Viggo is a tremendous actor. History of Violence and Eastern Promises are two of the finest thrillers of this past decade.
Actually, the child actors in both City of God and Slumdog Millionaire were tremendous (and yes, the two films were quite similar)
Didn't read the book but saw the movie the first weekend it was released and I am still thinking about it.
It is was acting, movies and great writing were meant to be. I hope to see Viggo receive credit for his superb acting.
It was a grey winter day when I saw this movie, cold and rainy.
When I left the theater, it seemed like a miracle when my car started.
When I got home, flicked the light swith and the lights came on, it felt like a miracle.
That is what this movie does. It takes you to a place so well imagined that it makes you appreciate our FUNCTIONAL world and not take it all for granted.
Go see this movie.
I think this is a trap that conservatives can fall into. Movies are the product of a combined effort by a huge number of people. If you boycott a film because of one person, you end up boycotting everyone involved. In this case, that would even include Robert Duvall, who is reportedly conservative.
Refusing to see a movie because the message itself is offensive makes sense, but not solely because of one actor's outside behavior. If you do that, you end up missing some truely good work, and it leads to conservatives being even more divorced from the culture than we are now.
I agree that he's an excellent actor, with a great presence. One of the few actors working today who can truly convey manliness. But I don't think that talent outweighs his ludicrous politics, about which he is quite outspoken. I could overlook his far-left politics if he wasn't so blatant about them, but as long as he insists on using his fame as a platform from which to shove them down my throat, I will choose to not hand him my money.
I get your first point, Nick, and I think that could reasoning would apply to a film in which a politically offensive performer or director was part of a larger ensemble (LoTR) or was in a secondary role. But in this instance, Mortensen IS the cast. Yes, Duvall shows up for a bit, and I know the kid plays just as large a role, but the movie will be remembered for Mortensen's performance, and by paying money to go see it, you're contributing to his success, and to his having that much of a larger presence and impact in our culture.
As for your second point, yes, I'll miss out on some entertainment, maybe even some "art." But there's enough quality art and entertainment out there to fill hundreds of lifetimes. I've read the book, I know the story, I'm not missing out on the culural impact. I don't need to fork over good money to enrich this idiot's lifestyle and clout. If you're that worried about missing out on something, at least wait for it to come out on DVD and rent it, or watch it on TV some day.
i have seen the film twice.
i recommend it to anyone who wants a simple story with characters that matter. no fluff.
while i am here i shall let all know that UP IN THE AIR is a turd. it should be retitled UPINTHEAIR, the GEORGE CLOONEY STORY..
happy new year
So, the only politics that are allowed to be expressed out loud are only the ones that Andrew Breitbart approves of? Conservatives sure like to dish it out, but they ball up like little infants when they get pushback.
Either way, it's your loss.
So in other words, only people whose politics line up exactly with yours are allowed to have cultural impact?
Of course, DVD sales and cable reruns also result in actors getting residuals, so I'd imagine you will demand that stores pull films from the shelves of "politically disapproved" actors?
Well said, Nick. For a number of reasons, I don't particularly buy into the eliminationist rhetoric of movement conservatives. However, it makes no sense to avoid culture because it doesn't line up 100% with one's political beliefs.
"only people whose politics line up exactly with yours are allowed to have cultural impact?"
No, of course not, and that's nothing like what I said, and you know it. I simply refuse to – and don't think other conservatives should either – voluntarily hand my money to people like Mortensen. I'm not saying their movies shouldn't be made or sold, I just have zero interest in paying to see them. There's enough other culture out there that to waste time or money on Mortensen is just that, a waste.
But you have obviously chosen to twist what I said and put words in my mouth to fit your agenda.
The majority of comments on this post are an obvious refution of your point. Most conservatives are quite open to opposing viewpoints, and to supporting performers who may espouse those viewpoints.
But as below, you're completely twisting my words. Nowhere did I say that entertainers, or anyone else, is not allowed to express their opinion. What I am saying is that if they choose to do so, they should be prepared for those who disagree with them to "vote with their wallet," so to speak.
Please stop ranting long enough to actually read what I'm writing.
So, in other words, because Mortensen does not share your politics, he should be made to suffer financially or professionally? You can't base the totality of one's life around only exposing yourself to points of view that you agree with.
Again, History of Violence and Eastern Promises are two of the finest thrillers of the decade, but you won't see them because Mortensen was against the Iraq War (a war that wasn't mentioned ONCE in either film)?
Again, I never said anything like that.
And you contradict yourself between your first point and your second. By your own admission, the Iraq War or any of Mortensen's leftist rants aren't mentioned in his films. So by viewing them, I wouldn't be exposing myself to them (or avoiding them by not seeing his movies).
The only reason I'm exposed to his politics is because he makes a point of espousing his views in public, in the media, using his prestige as an actor to further his political beliefs, beliefs which happen to run almost totally opposite to mine. His fame as an actor gives him a platform in the media that normal citizens don't have. By avoiding his films, all I'm doing is refusing to give him money and prestige to further his political aims.
I'm done here. All you're doing is twisting whatever I write, or flat out making up something completely new to fit your point.
When I go to a movie, I am essentially buying a product, and it is the quality of the product that matters, not the politics of the people on the assembly line. Refusing to a see a film that stars a liberal actor makes about as much sense as not seeing a film simply because the second assistant to the wardrobe director voted for Lyndon LaRouche.
When I read this book a year ago I was somewhat surprised that there were no chapters in the book. It was just a continuous novel. i can also remember hoping that this wouldn't be how the US would be like after an Obama administration. I would like to see the movie, but as others mentioned, it is in very limited release.
I disagree (obviously).
Your comparison is invalid. Mortensen is the star of this movie. He is the public face of the film. He is not some nameless assembly line worker (or second assistant to the wardrobe director). I don't know, and I don't care what their politics are, and neither does anyone else.
But Mortensen, as a successful actor, can influence a lot of people due to the podium the media gives him and his ilk, particularly when they are espousing the "correct" political viewpoint. That makes him very different from an assembly line worker or second assistant to the wardrobe director. People listen when he talks, and he has shown that he is more than willing to use that podium, which of course is his right. But, therefore, by paying money to go see his movie, I am making it that much more possible for him to reach a greater audience off the screen.
This review is just the nudge I think I needed to go see this proclaimed "bleak" movie. Bleak or not, it sounds good to me!
have yet to hear one good reason to be depressed for two plus hours. Maybe cable MUCH later…
Thanks to BH & Mr. Nolte for this review! I almost agree with you Chaz regarding paying into Mortensen's pocket however Charlie McCarthy is not your typical post modern writer. I've read a number of his books, The Orchard Keeper, All the Pretty Horses, The Stone Mason, etc., and know a bit about him, he was a contemporary of my father and a close friend of my father's brother of whom he modeled a character in one of his early novels…..I
…. knew his 2nd wife who had a successful bar called Annie's in the old city of K-ville….heard a lot of stories about McCarthy while sittng on the barstools there. McCarthy was born in RI but moved to E.TN @ the age of 4 where his father was a lawyer for Mr. Roosevelt's TVA. McCarthy was raised on the Southside of Knoxville TN…same area in which I was born & raised. South Knoxville is a very non-PC & produces a lot of idiosyncratic individualist like McC, the area butts up against the Great Smoky Mtns which explains his love for this area. I'd recommend reading the book before seeing The Road, McCarthy is a bit of a nihilist but IMO is a very good to great writer….what I remember most about this book is that it depicts a post nuclear WW and McCarthy with his roots in TN, TVA, the Smokey Mountains & it's history as a refuge as well as the travel to the coast reflect extremely well these areas of which I have intimate knowledge….he's good at pulling the actual locations into his stories…anyway thats my .02. Tis story
Yeah I read this book right after it came out and found it interesting mostly because of the area, ETN to Coastal SC that McCarthy dis a good job of detailing in a way that was immediately recognizable for anyone that knows the areas and Mccarthy….see my comments above.
Well, if his politics are so distracting that you can't enjoy his films, then by all means don't pay to see one. But you're only cheating yourself if you condemn the art simply because the artist is a liberal. Kirk Douglas, Humphrey Bogart, Tom Hanks, Denzel Washington, Harrison Ford. That's a lot of really good films to toss into the dumpster.
You're a MORON. IN hollywood, the number of successful actors who are openly supportive of America can be counted on one's hands. Yet the number of insane lefties, who constantly get sloppy wet Lewinskys from the press, when ever they open their yaps and turds drop out spewing their politics are legion. Go away troll, pull yer head outa yer 4th point of contact and breathe some fresh. Last I checked, the Obamanuts haven't yet outlawed the 1st Amendment, and we are still allowed to express our opinions- even if lefty trolls get their panties in a wad.
This is more than a political statement, it is prophecy.
Hollywood has been predicting the end of the world for years, with increasing frequency lately. I think, in their subconscious, that Hollywood knows that they are on the vangaurd of destruction of Western Civilization. That unconscious realization comes out in films such as these
Horrid? I'll give you it was depressing, but also an amazing story of love and sacrifice. You can say it wasn't to your liking but to trash it because it didn't end with rainbows and unicorns is childish.
The reality is why miss a solid movie over the politics of an actor? What's the point? I'd much prefer not seeing Avatar or other lib movies instead and send that message. Viggo gets his money either way.
Read the book after reading some super reviews, but found it to be hard going with the repetitive nature of the reality of staying alive while constantly looking for food and shelter. The ending was quit abrupt, also. I'm afraid to see the movie — it all seems too REAL to me what with the state of the world right now. Scary real…..
Interesting.
Last I heard, Denzel was a Republican. See links below:
http://www.nationalblackrepublicans.com/index.cfm...
http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/showthread.php?t=18...
The book was very good but be prepared to be depressed, there is very little in this movie in the way of happiness.
lol..I hate to burst your bubble but the first reviewer was right also.
Seeing a movie with Viggo in it would be like buying a Dixie Chicks album. I'm NOT going to contribute to their enrichment. If they want money then they can just rely on the pacifists of the world to shell it out because it's not going to come from my wallet. Flock 'em all I say.
It does have that "feel good" relationship between father and son but IMO, that's about it.
Things will never be as bad as they are in this movie, unless the thugs in d.c. run out of money.
Well you're entitled to your opinion but it really doesn't matter what you think about me and my beliefs. And NO, I don't compromise them. For anything, not when I know for a fact that something goes against them.
I think you meant Cormac McCarthy not Charlie.
I'm with you 110% Chaz. I don't compromise my beliefs for ANYTHING.
So now it's about compromising beliefs? You're talking foolishly. I'm as conservative as they come and find your comment beyond misguided. It is certianly your right to not spend your money on something, but to make yourself out to be some martyr…
Not seeing a liberal message movie, like say Avatar, makes sense. This doesn't. I'm curious what kind of life you live since you don't compromise.
You can't drink coke because they signed onto some global warming thing, can't drink Pepsi because the logo looks Obamaish. Can't use Macs, iPods or iPhones because Apple supports gay rights. Can't watch NBC because of it's green week. Can't use GE products because of its support of cap n trade. Better make sure your doc isn't a member of the AMA. The list goes on. I mean how committed are you to this line of thought?
Best prose I've read in a long time. Thoughtful plot about man's struggle to reach 'something"…in this case, the "coast" which he hoped would provide salvation for the boy. I'd have a bullet for my son, too, rather than see him tortured and torn apart by savages. While Leftists probably see "The Road" as the result of nuclear devastation, it never occurred to me the destruction was caused by a nuclear device (or a million). I thought from the get-go, it was a species destroying event ala the comet that took out the dinosaurs but that man can survive whereas the dinosaurs didn't (except, as some believe, as birds). The boy also represents life eternal. I haven't seen the film. Those who say it's too much of a downer to see at Christmas are right. I would have seen it at Thanksgiving, but it wasn't released in my 2 million + metro area until a week before Christmas. Viggo is one of the useful idiots, and wouldn't have been my choice for "the man" — I'd have used Downey, but then I'd use Downey in every film – but Duvall and Pearce in the film cancels him out.
Huh? Conservatives roll up. Gadzooks. Liberals and Leftists will tolerate no dissent whatsoever and if anyone disagrees with them end up with ad hominem attacks. Read the Huff Post sometime.
Probably right unless the actor is Sean Penn or George C. Looney, both of whom are smirking, sniveling idiot.
Nice try. Of course, boycotts don't work when they're directed at Lefty loons, only at Conservatives.
Love the name annie. I used it once myself in an article years ago.
Watched country of Old men, still staring at the TV. What Fugg man. This isn't even a good "B" movie.
Who ever edited this suc* big time.
"The beautifully desolate locations…"
Yup. Shot in my hometown Pittsburgh. It's kind of a shithole.
You must be logged in to post a comment.