REVIEW: Cameron’s ‘Avatar’ Is a Big, Dull, America-Hating, PC Revenge Fantasy
by John NolteAbsent from the big screen for over a decade now, Oscar-winning director James Cameron returns armed with a reported half-billion dollars, a story he’s been desperate to tell for 15 years, and the very latest in cutting-edge visual technology. The result is “Avatar,” a sanctimonious thud of a movie so infested with one-dimensional characters and PC clichés that not a single plot turn – small or large – surprises. I call it the “liberal tell,” where the early and obvious politics of the film gives away the entire story before the second act begins, and “Avatar” might be the sorriest example of this yet. For all the time and money and technology that went into its making, the thing that matters most – character and story – are strictly Afterschool Special.
What a crushing disappointment from one of our most original and imaginative filmmakers.

Set in 2154, “Avatar” is a thinly disguised, heavy-handed and simplistic sci-fi fantasy/allegory critical of America from our founding straight through to the Iraq War. Sam Worthington is Jake Sully, a paraplegic Marine Corporal sent to the planet Pandora after the untimely death of his brother. In a plot-thread built up to promise much that never pays off, Sully has none of the training his brother benefitted by: years of schooling in the Avatar Program to prepare him to infiltrate the indigenous species of Pandora called the Na’vi, who are the only things between Earth’s RDA (Resources Development Administration) and a precious energy resource “ironically” called Unobtainium.
Because the air on Pandora is toxic to humans, the RDA developed the Avatar Program to create clone-like avatars from both Na’vi and human DNA (which is why they need the untrained Sully) that allow for a human to transfer their consciousness into the 10-foot native blue beings and safely explore the planet. The scientists want to use the program to study Pandora, the military wants to conquer it, and the RDA wants to strip mine it. At first Sully’s unconcerned with these dueling tensions and agendas. Once a marine always a marine, and when his commanding officer, the beefed up genocide-happy Col. Quaritch (Stephen Lang), asks him to infiltrate the Na’vi and do recon for a probable attack, Jake is more than ready. Hoo-rah.
But before you can say I’ve seen this movie a thousand times before, Jake enters his Na’vi avatar and in a tired action scene straight out of the “Jurassic Park” trilogy, gets lost in the dangerous Pandoran forest only to be rescued by something else he’d like to enter, the beautiful (if you go for ten-foot tall gaudy blue females) Neytiri (Zoe Saldana) – a walking cliché of the tough, earthy, compassionate, oh-so wise love interest who can somehow speak English … but in that halting way that’s so gosh darned endearing.
And so begins the real Cliché-A-Thon…
***SPOILERS COMING***
Does Neytiri just happen to be the Chief’s daughter? Check! At first, does the tribe not trust Sully and want to kill him on the spot before Neytiri intervenes with wise explanations as to why it’s their tribal custom to take in strangers as one of their own? Chuh-eck! Is Sully then immersed in the native culture and put through a series of tests to prove his worthiness beginning with the sort of clumsiness that brings hoots of derisive laughter from the male warriors but endears him to Neytiri? Double check! Does Sully eventually become one of their strongest warriors and on the day he’s to be initiated as a full member of the tribe—GOD this movie’s tedious.

There’s nothing wrong with a simple, boilerplate plot. They’re boilerplate for a reason. But within that well worn template complicated characters involved in complicated and surprising relationships are an absolute necessity, and this is where “Avatar” fails miserably.
Within 15 minutes, the “liberal tell” spoils every story beat of Sully’s character arc. He’s as dull a protagonist as you’ll ever see. Sigourney Weaver plays a gruff-talking, cigarette smoking scientist with … wait for it, wait for it … a heart of gold. Giovanni Ribisi’s sweaty weasel of a corporate executive never moves beyond that and Col. Quaritch is all ‘roid rage, no humanity and his Big Speech about the necessity of “a pre-emptive attack to fight terror with terror” was as surprising as Cameron‘s use of a military “shock and awe” campaign to level the Na’Vi’s precious “Home Tree” as a tacky metaphor for the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center.
Oh yeah, he went there…
In supporting roles, Michelle Rodriguez and Joel Moore bring a whole lot more to their underwritten roles than the film deserves — you’d like to spend more time with them — but it’s always back to the film’s dullest characters: the one-dimensional Na’vi. You would think that with 15 years and a half-billion dollars, Cameron could come up an alien species that doesn’t drip with every Indian and African sacred-cow cliché imaginable. These are creatures who worship the Great Mother Eywa, have a sacred relationship with the earth, shoot bow and arrows, ride horse-like animals, whoop it up in battle, and talk like this: “It has only happened five times since the time of the first songs of our ancestors.”
The Na’vi also apologize to animals after killing but before butchering them. So I guess that’s okay. Maybe if Quaritch had gotten on the loudspeaker and spoken a little mumbo-jumbo before dropping a daisy cutter on Home Tree all would be forgiven.
On top of that, the Na’vi are an awfully stupid species. After years of dealing with the “Sky People,” for some reason they still haven’t figured out that arrows are useless against giant military aircraft. And is it okay to mention how hard it is to keep track of who’s who, because the Na’vi, uhm … all look alike? Twice I was sure Sully’s avatar had been killed. Twice I was disappointed.
Cameron’s brainchild tribe is boringly perfect and insufferably noble … I wanted to wipe them out.

Visually “Avatar” doesn’t break any new ground. It looks like a big-budget animated film with a garish color palette right off a hippie’s tie dye shirt. Never for a moment did I believe the Na’vi or the world of Pandora was something organic or real. The fairly pointless use of 3-D certainly doesn’t help, but Steven Spielberg’s sixteen year-old dinosaurs are light years ahead of “Avatar” in the reality department.
The one thing Cameron has always done well is to create busy, energetic, brilliantly choreographed action scenes that allow the audience to follow what’s going on. That’s not a small thing because it’s becoming a lost art in Hollywood as more and more filmmakers lazily trade coherence for the artless shaky-cam and hyper edits. And while none of Cameron’s big battle set-pieces is ever able to overcome the “liberal tells” pre-ordained outcome and create a sense of suspense or peril, at least you don’t get lost in the precious wonder of it all.
Think of “Avatar” as “Death Wish 5” for leftists. A simplistic, revisionist revenge fantasy where if you freakin’ hate the bad guys (America), you’re able to forgive the by-the-numbers predictability of it all and still get off watching them get what they got coming.
And if Cameron is able to make a profit spending a half-billion dollars on a little liberal bloodlust, more power to him.
UPDATE: More on “Avatar” vs. “Jurassic Park” here.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
836 Comments
Bullshit. FOX produced it. DId you see it? Why must everything get politicized
Hilarious!
Hope Cameron loses his shirt on this.
Another Hollywood coincidence year : TWO animated films about baaaaaaaaaaaaad old military trying to take over a paradise planet …what are the odds?
"Liberals Hate America" is pretty much the entire point of this site.
I will not see it.
Isn't this just the same thing as Dances With Wolves? Some new idea…"thud"…is right.
No, no… It's "Hollywood hates America…" that's the point. And to back it up I offer in evidence this half-billion dollar propaganda machine.
Well, if libs didn't always $#!t on this country every five seconds, maybe we wouldn't say that!
Dances with Smurfs!
"Dances With Wolves" is a wonderful film. Sure it's touchy-feely and liberal, but it has heart and warmth and great characters. And it's not as PC as everyone remembers…
The Whites aren't portrayed as the only threat to the tribe. There's another INDIAN tribe out to exterminate Dunbar's friends, as well.
Presenting that reality — that there were INDIANS as ugly and predatory as the worst of the whites — is a very important statement in the film that its critics on our side don't give enough credit to.
Could you look into using Spoiler Alerts next time? Seriously.
Faux News produced it? Was Roger Ailes or Sean Hannity involved? Talk about politicizing everything.
The trailer gives it all away. Evil warriors attack peaceful species to get their minerals so that Rush Limbaugh and Dick Cheney can buy more polo ponies.
No wonder Cameron has been out of the business for so long. If this is his swan song, I'll just put Terminator in the BluRay and remember when the guy could tell a story and not preach to me.
Reverend Cameron, go jump in a pristine lake cleaned by the American DEQ and EPA.
You sir, are a political hack. The movie rocks and you will eat crow big time you idiot. Talk about being biased…you make me ill. James Camaeron is KING OF THE WORLD.
The amount of hype Avatar is generating ("This movie is SOOO groundbreaking and IMPORTANT James Cameron spent $500 mil and took 15 years to make it!!! OMG DON'T MISS IT!!!!") was the "tell" for me – this movie's gunna stink on ice. Nolte's review confirmed what I already suspected.
I'll pass.
Don't see it then. Go watch O'Reilly & Beck instead.
verything must be politicized. Art is an arena of power that the right has ceded to the left for too long. I've little doubt had this film depicted vicious muslim terrorists getting what they deserved after a terrorist attack you or your ilk would have the same reaction to it as we have to this. Not my money.
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by ChuckTryon and johnnyA99, Big Tweeting. Big Tweeting said: BigHollywood: REVIEW: Cameron’s ‘Avatar’ Is a Big, Dull, America-Hatin.. http://bit.ly/4vdeyc #BigTweet [...]
Oh right, I forgot the Hollywood bit for a moment there. I stand corrected.
I still plan to see the film; being a techno-geek I'm more interested in effects technology than the story of these types of films anyway.
wow that's original.
Did Cameron use his own money, or somebody elses?
There is no way he'll earn back what he spent on it. Think of all the independent films that could have been made with what Cameron wasted.
The only thing these pinkos understand is losing money – let's make this the biggest loser!!!
I can't wait to see this movie. Your review is irrelevant and biased. Have you seen the other reviews from bonafide film critics? Yes, you & perhaps a few of your right wing friends will not like it but other then that it looks like Cameron has a huge hit on his hands.
"Why must everything get politicized"
Ask the filmmakers and actors who use every movie and acceptance speech to wag their fingers at America and sanctimoniously preach the leftist gospel.
This looks like a 21st century Smurf movie. I wouldn't watch it even if they paid me.
Marxism leads to bad art, due to its inherently didactic nature. As has been said, the trailer disclosed the familiar liberal plot. I would only suggest that liberals would like to think of themselves as the creatures, vanquishing their moral inferiors, the conservatives. Total Recall worked the a very similar theme, but the plot was more interesting until the cheezy ending.
It's a download…
He purposefully made a shitty movie just to screw Rupert Mudock.
I wish I could make a movie about the Hollywood hating America crowd. I'd call it " And Then Their Were None". Forgive me Agatha Christie.
I should trust some pinko-commie self serving film critic aka "Bonefide" as to how I should spend my money and time? Not this American.
Sounds like every reason I haven't seen a Hollywood movie since the late nineties all rolled into one giant, CGI, crap fest. I'm admittedly interested in the new 3D tech, but I can wait until a real movie maker does something unique with it.
Exactly!!! And If the "moral of the story" isn't to your liking – you can always watch something else. Let the rest of us enjoy this.
Why must everything get politicized?Hmmm….let's see. Maybe because liberal sycophants such as cameron insist on spewing garbage that literally drips with leftist drivel every chance they get. There, answered your question for you.
He just said it wasn't a good movie. What else do you want from a review? John Nolte has reviewed plenty of liberal films that he enjoyed. Check out his "Che" review. If you think this review was about politics you obviously don't have a very good reading comprehension.
Thanks for the warning John, not that I'd give 1 dollar to this dolt anyway
I pictured Smurfs as well. Although the Smurf cartoons are probably much better than this leftwing dreck.
I suppose District 9 was simply a sci-fi movie about aliens and had nothing to do with apartheid right? No such thing as symbolism in movies, right?
So, can we presume you went in expecting America to be criticized and e voila!
Geeze, do we ever have movies we just walk into that we haven't already ahead of time decided are rants against America? If there were no America and you were British you'd be grumbling it was a movie against the grand things the Empire has done to bring civilization to the backwaters of the world. The story line of civilization meets and eats native culture is forever, it's an archetype.
The guy wanted to make the movie when Bill Clinton was President, ya know, before the dark times, before Bin Laden before we kicked Saddam's butt. Get a grip, sometimes a story is JUST A STORY.
Get some conservative hydrocortisone for the oversensitivity and stop sounding like a whiney liberal.
Brilliant!
It was a reference (I'm assuming). Do you know what a reference is?
The trolls are out. Fanboys are a genuine threat to America.
Nice touch. How about being civil? Your vulgarity is a sign of lack of command of the language.
Have a nice holiday.
This movie appears to be long on special effects and CGI, and a little short on story; "All hat and no saddle," perhaps!
BTW, don't desecrate the name
Are you that naive?
YES! Exaclty! Why must everything get politicized??? We agree!
I'd assume that was sarcasm, if not for the foul language. Ever heard of allegory? Symbolism? It used to be taught in high school English classes, and for all I know, it still is. Get off the internet and read your textbook. Learn something.
I doubt I'll see this movie, but I hope it makes billions and billions so Fox can keep the train rolling. Every time a liberal sees this movie, they are enriching Fox. That's just awesomeness.
There sure are a lot of people rushing to defend a movie they haven't seen.
All i know are the previews, some articles and reviews. That's all you guys have to go on as well.
I hpoe it lives up to the hype, but the overabundant product placement is already tiresome.
I am normally a scifi geek. mix it with fantasy, Oh Heaven
but there was something that kept me from getting all hot for this film
Maybe the fact that it was the greatest movie of all time two years ago.
at any rate I lost all interest at "Ubobtanium" oh man really? it was stupid in "The Core" too.
LOL this piece of crap actually has fanboys? Wow.
When the first ads and promos started to come out for "Avatar" I had a strong feeling this was as Cartman named it "Dances With Smurfs". I decided not to pass final judgement on whether to spend time and money seeing it until Mr. Nolte's review. Given Mr. Nolte's verdict, I am taking a pass and refusing to support another piece of anti-US or really in this movie anti-Western Civ piece of crap.
Definitely right ont he trolls, they arebeing herded over here by someone.
"Why must everything get politicized?"
Funny you ask this site that question but you don't ask Hollywood that insists on politicizing all their movies.
In other words, 'shut up and enjoy your propaganda, citizen.'
Yes. thank you — my apologies.
you know, I feel I've seen this movie before… Fern Gully I believe it was called… that one had more entertainment value in the synopsis than I can bet this one has altogether and it was a bleeding-heart indoctrination film by Disney
No, that person was right — i should've included a spoiler warning — been a while since I wrote one fo these and just plain forgot…
Wow, one fairly harsh review of a Hollywood sacred cow and the lefty crap weasels storm the walls. Too bad you clowns couldn’t focus all that rage onto humanities true enemies like Islamo-facism.
I'm still going to see it despite your review. I think you went in looking for things to not like and harped on those a bit much. The "cliche" of the female being the chiefs daughter is a very real homage to the very real Pocahantas. James Cameron has always struck me as Hollywood Right not Hollywood Left but for the most part he has been Hollywood Neutral.
If you want to see an aweful Hollywood Left film go rent The Day the Earth Stood Still remake. I can't imagine Avatar being farther left than that film.
"Can't you just fuckin enjoy a movie without injecting politics into everything?"
Cameron has been interviewed where he said he deliberately injected politics into the movie. Complain to him. If you want Republicans to stop complaining about politics in movies, stop making movies where everyone even vaguely right wing is more evil than a chorusline of Hitlers.
Why do you think this movie is getting all kinds of praise from big liberal movie critics?
There is a reason the South Park guys made a fun of Avatar weeks before Avatar was released. Because it's nothing but cliches.
In the off chance that Norman doesn't get your sarcasm, allow me to clarify: Fox News and 20th Century Fox are completely separate entities within News Corporation. Unless I'm mistaken, Rupert Murdoch does not enforce an ideological litmus test on the products his subsidiaries make, so there's no reason to expect his entertainment subsidiaries to reflect the same world view as Fox News.
I could almost feel the spittle splatter across the computer screen.
he should have made Aquaman instead.
I love how people are rushing to defend this movie, but give no reason why they "love this incredible movie". And note the fact that all the liberals that came to the forum to defend it, resorted to childish name calling to defend their opinion, instead of recognizing that we can all disagree about a movie. Look the fact is, Cameron is gonna lose his shirt on this movie. No movie hyped this much and that cost this much is going to make back a significant amount of money to justify the cost. And anyone with half a brain saw the trailer and went "It's Dances With Wolves in space" (this is not a good thing when you're trying to get people to see your expensive movie). The alien people looked like your typical "insert Native American cliche here" . I'll admit that the CG looks amazing, but I'm not going to spend ten dollars to see a movie that preaches at me about how evil America is. I'll wait to pay a buck at a red box, seeing how Red box is killing Hollywood anyway.
I think I'm going to pop in Aliens and watch a film when Cameron was still a good director.
And PS
About spoiler warnings, no movie with this many paint by the numbers plot points can ever be spoiled, all you need to to is watch a few movies over the last ten years…
South Park called it "Dances with Smurfs"
I wonder if über Hollywood lefties ever contemplate the fact they're able to churn out their allegorical garbage year in and year out because of that "evil" military they all disdain keeps them safe. Or why "The Hangover" grossed $277million and Michael Moore's latest made an abysmal $18million. To listen to them, the wise and powerful Hollywood elite, this country needs to think more like Michigan Fats and to tear down capitalism…but without taking away their overpaid salaries though..can't have that.
…ten foot tall blue trolls that talk like Indians?
I understand what your saying in your piece, John. I, too, was excited about this movie; all the hype, the promise of revolutionary film making, and a visual gem. Only, in reality, to be disappointed by the injection of someone's personal politics is the new status quo in Hollywood. $500 Million to push this is a huge undertaking, it's just a shame we are cartoonishly portrayed as the monsters…again. However, I've sat through liberally sappy films before and I'll do it again. I, for one, can look past the propaganda but it kills the re-watchability (is that a word?) of any movie. Sadly, the last epic blockbuster which showed American as a force to be reckoned with was Independence Day. Can someone make us the good guys again?
It's true – in Hollywood, "Imagination has gone out of style."
I delivered that sentence recently in a mid-level screenwriting class at UCLA, and everyone agreed with me – even the instructor. And no one seemed to think it was any kind of bad news. In fact, all of the students except a couple (me included) admitted they don't have much imagination and have real difficulty coming up with story lines and characters . . . and yet, they wanted to write movies.
Yes none of the peer reviewed liberal critics at the official government endorsed papers minded the massive liberal bias in the film, why should you!
"gets lost in the dangerous Pandoran forest only to be rescued by something else he’d like to enter" …. Great line….made me laugh…
"Presenting that reality — that there were INDIANS as ugly and predatory as the worst of the whites — is a very important statement in the film that its critics on our side don't give enough credit to."
I enjoyed this film for many reasons, especially since it was not COMPLETELY as one sided as one might think.
Oh come on, Cameron admitted he deliberately injected lefty politics into it and made the movie into an out and out critique of the Iraq War. You can't do that and then get pissy when people call you on it. Well I guess you can't, you're a lefty.
[...] Nolte is less than enthused about Cameron’s latest flick: “Avatar” is a thinly disguised, heavy-handed and simplistic [...]
Wow the guy that has seen the movie doesnt like it for a multiutude of reasons, political injection *by the creator not the reviewer* mediocre special effects, uninteresting story, and wooden characters.
The ones that havent seen it are calling him names and going berserk, why I am not exactly sure, is this a movie or a religion?
I agree with Blackhawk12151, who let the trolls out of the zoo today?
Mr. Nolte I agree with the person above. This is a plug and chug plot we've seen a million times. Its like spoiling the ending of a Charlie Brown Christmas special.
the trailers pretty much give away the whole movie.
Didn't his "King of the world" sink to a frozen watery death?
The Na’vi also apologize to animals after killing but before butchering them. So I guess that’s okay. Maybe if Quaritch had gotten on the loudspeaker and spoken a little mumbo-jumbo before dropping a daisy cutter on Home Tree all would be forgiven.
Mr. Nolte – you owe me a keyboard, sir. That was truly funny. I may see this for the CGI – with some serious earplugs perhaps.
I would really watch an acutal smurf movie.. but only if the cat Azrial gets to eat a few of them.
PS to the leftoid trolls swarming this post, Nolte pointed out that the problem isn't so much that this is lefty propaganda, its that its Incredibly badly done lefty propaganda. He and a few of the commentators even give examples of other hard core lefty movies that they enjoy.
Heck one of my favorite movies is Hero and that is quite literally Communist Chinese propaganda.
What a predictable load of propaganda. Its about as subtle as the agitprop movies from the USSR's Mosfilm or the Nazi crap produced by UFA. Stephen Lang and Giovanni Ribisi should be nominated for the worst pieces of overacting ever but, I guess, they just delivered what Cameron wanted. And what he wanted was a film packed with srock characters and cliches, It is so heavy handed that only the brain dead would fall for it and actually think that, apart from the technology, this shameless piece of BS was anything but a a laundry list of Cameron's political causes and agendas. However, you can bet it will get rapturous reviews from the usual suspects who would probably have thought Jud Suss was a masterpiece.
No surprises.I am sad we can't have any politics free safe zones anymore.
I do appreciate your integrity on the matter, but in my personal opinion, a spoiler alert would be redundant to anyone who has seen the trailers.
Meh… I wasn't sure about this movie to begin with… It looked kinda lame… and though I'm all about visual effects and the like… but I like for it to come with a plot and decent dialogue…
Someone must've linked to this article on the Smurfs fan site.
I found the plotline of Titanic to be similarly predictable, and full of liberal "tells"–what a useful new concept, "tells."
Remember Titanic–hot babe has to marry evil capitalist that likes to slap her around. Enter noble, poor Irish immigrant from steerage who not only doesn't slap her, but boinks her ahead of the evil capitalist, and then saves her life. Oh, and did I mention his tragic artistic talent? And the fact that he's Irish? O'Sully?
Cameron must read this site and is sending over his minions.
Sounds just like Tom Cruise's "Samurai" but set in the future.
You're right of course, but I'm thinking "I Love Lucy" reviews don't come with Spoiler Warnings either. Predictability is as predictability does. You were fair about the review I think. You said a boilerplate is just that. The real art of a story is how you tell that same ol' story. I'm guessing that the special effects were used to cloak the fact they didn't bother filling in any of the blanks in their "Let's Tell a Story! Guide for Beginners" format.
It's ironic that the the groundbreaking technology that went into making this movie is the only real highlight of it, and yet, the movie's story is about how bad technology is. Damn those evil corporations for making the tools that let us create "Dances With Smurfs"!
If you're so dumb that you can't predict the entire movie just from watching the trailer, you might want to do the rest of us a favor and go lay down on some train tracks. Remove your retarded ass from the gene pool.
VERY good analogy. and that movie sucked to.
Unobtanium – the AP reviewer called that a wry name. I think I agree with John – idiotic name. It's cute perhaps for a school play or telling the guys, or even a slight dig when you've got everything else truly going for it. Otherwise, it is just a wink – look we did not even bother coming up with anything creative, just shell out the money and get indoctrinated already.
Second that.
I'd be willing to ignore the political aspect of the film it wasn't a total cliche' parade, as Mr. Nolte describes. If you're going to tell me America stinks, you gotta at least be creative about it if you want my ten bucks.
Dances With Wolves for certain….even 'The Paradise Syndrome' with an amnesiac Kirk who gets loved up with the chief's daughter and becomes the tribe's pet project. Cameron is too busy preaching to create anymore….
Hmmm. "I'm as conservative as Genghis Khan…" Somehow I doubt you are conservative. But I'm as liberal as Mao Zedong, Pol Pot, Stalin, and King Nebuchadnezzar combined and I was able to understand that Nolte said this was a shit movie even without the America hating.
One I read a short synopsis of this, I knew it was a Dances With Wolves rip-off….
People like you are exactly why movies suck now. "I don't care if the story is cliche, retarded, and pointless – I'm going to see it for the EFFECTS!"
I was just watching the USA network and they showed a commercial on the theme of all of the actors on their network come from different backgrounds but they are all characters. One actor says he is Jewish, one female actor says she is Indian/British/American and so forth. One character stated, "I am a Democrat." I waited for the end of the commercial and not one said they were a republican. I am not surprised. I just thought you would like to know about it.
You must be logged in to post a comment.